Physicists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and SUNY Stony Brook recently concluded that two black holes maintained their total surface area after merging. While this research was a welcome confirmation of the theory of general relativity, it failed to address a crucial matter: What were its racial implications?
That’s a lacuna that an astronomy course at Cornell University aims to prevent. “Black Holes: Race and the Cosmos” poses the question, “Is there a connection between the cosmos and the idea of racial blackness?”
Anyone familiar with academia’s racial monomania knows the answer: Of course, there is. Though “conventional wisdom,” according to the course description, holds that the “‘black’ in black holes has nothing to do with race,” astronomy professor Nicholas Battaglia and comparative-literature professor Parisa Vaziri know better.
Battaglia and Vaziri draw on theorists such as Emory University English professor Michelle Wright, whose book, “The Physics of Blackness,” invokes “Newton’s laws of motion and gravity” and “theoretical particle physics” to “subvert racist assumptions about blackness.” The course also studies music by Sun Ra and Outkast to “conjure blackness through cosmological themes.”
Many scientists, reading about Cornell’s course, might wonder: Is this a hoax?
There’s precedent, after all. In 1996, New York University physicist Alan Sokal published a paper, “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity,” in one of high theory’s holiest of shrines: the journal Social Text. Sokal drew on efforts among comparative-literature and American-studies professors to deploy scientific concepts toward a postmodern end: showing science to be a mere power play designed to silence “dissident or marginalized communities.”
Sokal cited such postmodern giants as Andrew Ross and Luce Irigaray on topics like “oppositional discourses in post-quantum science” and “gender encoding in fluid mechanics,” proposing a new theory of quantum gravity that could serve as the basis for a “postmodern and liberatory science.”
Sokal’s paper was, however, a prank. Clouded in Theorese, it obscured its own scientific illiteracy and so was accepted for publication—a mistake which should have triggered an academic reckoning. Instead, postmodern theory continued to fester, particularly in humanities and social-science departments.
In 2017, it happened again. Three academics submitted theory-drenched fake articles to various cultural-studies and social-science journals. Four were published, and three accepted, before the hoax was exposed.
“The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct,” published in the journal Cogent Social Sciences, argued for understanding the penis not as “an anatomical organ, but as a social construct isomorphic to performative toxic masculinity” (with climate change identified as one of its most damaging threats).
Another analyzed “the rape culture of dog parks.”
The humanities and much of the social sciences have been beyond parody for a long time. What’s different about “Black Holes: Race and the Cosmos” is its co-listing in an actual science department. The course fulfills Cornell’s science-distribution requirement, touching as it does on such concepts as the electromagnetic spectrum.
Astronomy departments have been on the forefront of campus identity politics — and so has Cornell. Cornell’s astronomy department won’t even allow prospective graduate students to submit the physics GRE test [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gre.asp] since female, black and Hispanic students score lower on average.
Meanwhile, Cornell’s engineering department accepts female undergraduates at over two and a half times the rate of male students, even though the average male math SAT score is significantly higher than the average female score.
Today’s academic charlatans mistake rhetoric for knowledge and words for things. This sleight of hand is particularly prevalent in matters relating to race. Hunter College professor Philip Ewell argues that the concept of tonal and harmonic hierarchies in music theory is a stand-in for pernicious racial hierarchies. Black business school students at USC protested in 2020 that hearing a professor use the Mandarin phrase for “that” — “nèi ge” — constituted racial harassment, since the Mandarin expression can sound like the N-word. The professor was sent on leave.
For decades, science has stood guard against the racial hysteria and postmodernism besetting the rest of the academy. Bit by bit, it is succumbing.
Heather Mac Donald is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal, from which this column was adapted.
Speaking in Atlanta Tuesday, Kamala Harris urged leftist ‘volunteers’ to go knocking on people’s doors and harass them into getting vaccinated, giving advice on what to say if they express resistance.
.
.
…..Corporal Adolf and an enemy French soldier both hear a wounded soldier moaning
Margi is the one who translated this Hitler poem, based on a true incident when Hitler and an enemy French soldier both simultaneously heard a wounded soldier groaning in no-man’s land (between the front lines) and both came out of mercy to see what they could do.
She read aloud this poem at the “No More Wars for Israel” conference in southern California in October 2007, and asked listeners to guess who the author was of “In a thicket of the forest at Artois.”
The “No More Wars for Israel” conference in southern California was a big event which we helped save when venue after venue canceled on us at the last second under Khazar pressure.
The poem is found here, 2/3rds down:
“Hitler’s moving WWI poem, composed in French Flanders, in the Artois forest, in the spring of 1916”
.https://johndenugent.com/a-spiritual-moment-for-corporal-hitler/
No one guessed after her reading it aloud that the poet was the supposedly merciless warlord Adolf Hitler. 😉
….that it was he who wrote of
“these sacred moments
when you see yourself
in the other man.”
….and not just SEE yourself in him or her, but know, sense, feel that we are one.
It is one big cosmic soup, all connected, and we are glowing nodes within it.
.
.
.
Qualche volta allora, 30 anni fa, ho superato il limite, fingendo più interesse per la donna di quanto fosse reale per fare sesso e dopo ho provato vergogna.Ho giurato di non andare mai a letto con nessuna donna a cui non fossi veramente interessato,cioè per una relazione seria e a lungo termine, e ho mantenuto quella promessa.
Una ragazza che si è completamente innamorata di me (anch’io l’amavo, ma non ero “INNAMORATO” di lei).
Cosa vuol dire l’Amavo,ma non ero innamorata di lei??:)
Comunque siamo qui per imparare anche dalle “relazioni” di breve durata.
Non è facile comprendere il vero amore..ma una cosa la so,siamo noi a gestire questa cosa.
E ci comportiamo esattamente come i buchi neri quando controlliamo la relazione e non cadiamo in qualche illusione o paura.
(Buco Nero vuol dire grande “vuoto”).
L’uomo si accorge di questa cosa e perde la testa, bè secondo me perde tutto,compresa la sua forza e né esce “rinnovato”.
Ma ci sono poche donne che conoscono davvero questa particolare condizione del loro essere:rendere un rapporto “Sacro” come un Tempio e mantenere viva quella “fiamma”.
Solo allora l’uomo non ti abbandona e non ti tradisce e sarà sempre attirato da quel rapporto “misterioso” 😉
E sono più che certa che Margi la pensa come me 🙂
Per questo credo che gli uomini vivano male tutti i rapporti e diventano matti.
Percepisco la loro “tristezza” 🙁
Vivono un tempio vuoto di “mistero” di luce e di appagamento spirituale.
La Donna è un tempio a 20anni…
(Di solito è iniziata a 12).
Ma anche a 30,40,50,60 ecc…
Per questo il mondo si dona ai culti satanici.
Ricorda che il tempio di una Donna è l’acerrimo nemico di quella Bestia maledetta…e lui lo sa bene!!
https://photos.app.goo.gl/TmUdvqfR29jtCZQV8
Questo è un particolare dipinto di Andrea D’Oggiono…allievo di Leonardo 😉
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Dcd9ZiFuPNU4drWS6
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou sayst,
“Beauty is truth, truth beauty”, – that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.
John Keats 🙂
Truth is beauty…. That is profound.
La Verità è conoscenza,insieme alla Bellezza!
Oggi invece viviamo tutto l’opposto 🙁
Intrappolati nel Mondo creato dalla nostra Mente.
Una “Macchina” spietata che rende ciechi i nostri occhi e ci stordisce con le sue “illusioni”.
E siamo noi che continuiamo ad alimentarla,a darle potere!
Questo piace agli Ebrei materialisti e satanici.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/UBbSAM3rikngcEMK8
Rifletto spesso su questa “affermazione”.
Ora capisco cosa intendeva 🙂