A massive comet around 10,000 BC that may have hit Greenland triggered a climate catastrophe and a decimation of the Solutreans in North America. THIS is how the “Red Man” took over our land, not by victory in equal contest.
In my experience, and in that of my father, a two-war Marine combat veteran, one-on-one the white man is the best fighter on earth. He is brave, systematic, and he makes and then follows a plan.
And we White Americans proved that in hand-to-hand combat against the ferocious Japanese (1941-45), the Red Chinese (1950-53), and the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong (1964-75), all of whom are of the same racial stock as the Siberians who invaded Solutrean North America around 10,000 BC. Those East Asians were highly disciplined, patriotic for their cause, and brave — but not our equal, not physically or psychologically.
My theory has always been that before the race war, something wiped out 90% of the Solutreans, and that is the only reason why the “red man” prevailed — a massive numerical superiority.
And we had no huge technological advantage over the “Indians” back in 10,000 BC — no horses, no gunpowder, no rifles or cannons. It was all man-to-man, spear against spear, knife against knife, rock against rock.
Famous scenes from the 1964 British film “Zulu” (with Michael Caine): White Northern Europeans with iron discipline, pride, good training, and modern weaponry wipe out hordes of fierce natives:
“Zulus, sir, thousands of them”
A stupid VIP twit tries actively to demoralize the soldiers, and the British sergeant did not sock the treasonous VIP in the mouth as he deserved:
Memorable and inspiring scene: the British follow their orders and training exactly, delivering volley after volley of accurate fire into the Zulus:
I decided 15 years ago that my movement would be the Eternal Solutreans. Why?
1) to emphasize that we Whites will not give up America, for it is OURS. (And by recapturing our country, still a superpower, we can change the whole white world.)
2) to showcase our innovations, bravery and skill, for “we will have to innovate our way out of this mess.”
3) If the jews really want a race war, we will reluctantly comply with their wish, and we will win over them as Eternal Solutreans, with no fear of death because we are immortal souls.
A comrade and repeat generous donor commented:
I disagree that the Solutreans residing in what is today the United States were killed by a natural event. I believe they were murdered by the Asiatics who came down from the north (Indians), and the reason they could not resist this attack was that they had lived in peace for hundreds of years and had forgotten their war skills.
I replied:
An understandable theory in view of conditions now, but unlike now, there was no welfare state back then, nor obesity, processed white sugar, vaccines, tv, chemtrails, low-testosterone, leftwing websites, or any other medium selling the notion of “white guilt,” or pacifism, not back in 11,000 BC.
And war skills were the same as hunting skills in those old Solutrean days. And this has continued to be true for millennia. The army rifles used in the American Revolution were single-shot hunting rifles. The Pennsylvania (or Kentucky) long rifle, developed by the German-American Mennonites in Pennsylvania, and which had true rifling, a spiral etched into the metal of the barrel, forcing the bullet to spin — could accurately shoot either a deer or a human at 200 yards.
Returning to Solutrean times, long before firearms, what we had was spears, knives, and axes, and they were were used for both hunting and war.
It was either kill and eat, or fail to kill and starve in the Old Stone Age.
Zia loves her father, the successful clan chieftain named Beyorg
A whining misfit wants Zia to share her food with him, but she replies:
After the misfit kills a man, he must now deal with the chieftain. Criminals are either executed or expelled to die alone.
.
In the NEW Stone Age, agriculture came in, a huge change which led to a peasant class, to rulers and their soldiers, the only ones armed henceforth.
The New Stone Age, or Neolithic, was actually the beginning of what we call feudalism: masses of unarmed peasants growing food in the fields and ruled by a warlord who had armed, professional soldiers and hunters and took much of their crop in return for offering protection and rule.
The king/warrior class (a caste called “kshatriyas” in Sanskrit in Indo-Aryan India) continued to eat meat, and they became bigger and stronger than the peasants, who grew only grains and had only low-protein bread to seat.
Nutritional deficiencies actually began in the New Stone Age, as we can see from examining the skeletons and teeth of the peasants three and four thousand years ago; their average height declined by five inches, compared to the Old Stone Age, which was the hunter-gatherer period of meat, roots, and herbs.
Also the New Stone Age masses over time lost more and more freedom, being disarmed serfs or even outright slaves (who were “property” that could be killed — or sold).
And remember that the animals whom the Ice Age Solutreans hunted were enormous — much bigger and far more dangerous than the predators found in the forests today in North America.
This bear (called the short-faced bear, because its muzzle was relatively short compared to bears today) stood up to six feet high at the shoulder or 12 feet when standing up. And, pound for pound, even modern bears are three times stronger than humans. Their survival is based largely on their strength. (This is also true of apes. A 50-lb. chimpanzee is as strong as a 150-pound man.)
But beyond all this, the Younger Dryas comet-impact event is now a virtual certainty:
The Younger Dryas Impact Debate – Is It Settled Yet?
Further, the Taurid meteor belt is seen as resulting from a comet that exploded 10,000 years ago:
Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurids):
Comet Encke and the Taurid complex are believed to be remnants of a disrupted 40-km-class comet from about 10,000 years ago,[6][7] breaking into several pieces and releasing material [….]”
……The Younger Dryas Impact Debate – Is It Settled Yet?
I read this article carefully and find it convincing. Also, the opposition to it seems to be from minions of the NWO.
I remember well when the Big Jews turned against the Solutrean theory — when in January 2010 they interviewed ME! The Discovery Channel and Channel 4 in Britain (which carries high-quality, historical and cultural programs) HAD produced TWO documentaries supporting the Solutrean reality — that Whites were here first, and that, at a much later date, invading Siberindians (“red men”) from Asia ruthlessly killed all the male Solutreans off — that is, those who had survived the Younger Dryas event.
The first Discovery Channel documentary supporting the Solutrean Reality was “Homicide at Kennewick” (1998) and the second, seven years later, was “Ice Age Columbus” (2005).
The goings-on depicted in “Homicide at Kennewick” and committed by the jew-ruled regime filled me with rage, showing scumbag president Bill Clinton ordering federal forces to send a helicopter to dump tons of gravel directly onto the archeological site of Kennewick Man! (Oh, see, this was to “protect the site against erosion.”)
No, it was to kowtow to the Indians, and their jew masters in media and academia, who feared the implications of the skeleton and skull clearly coming from the murder in 7,000 BC of a white man. That he was white was something which anthropologist Jim Chatters saw immediately.
Bootlicker Clinton understood that this white man’s bones in Washington State (near the US west coast) proved the existence of the Solutreans all over what is now the USA and that the Siberindians brutally KILLED them as they killed this white brother of ours. (Btw, illegal alien President Barack Obama ordered the bones be given to the local Indians for burial.)
URL on YouTube: .https://youtu.be/rmiD62V5Wk0?si=vHbu4HzQ1iaJ3jO4
Kennewick Man, who had many broken bones already, was shot from behind with an Indian-style arrow, which lodged in his pelvis, became infected (as we can see from the pelvis), and this infection killed him after three weeks.
Just as this Chicago negro just murdered this young white man. SICKENING!
The documentary “Homicide in Kennewick” shone a merciless light on efforts by today’s Indians and the Demoncrat Party to destroy this skeleton!
Why? Because the whole “gravy train” (panoply of state benefits) of Indian casinos, reservations, medical centers, welfare, food stamps, medical care, etc. ALL depend on the myth of the poor Indians, the supposed “native Americans” (what Canada calls “the First Nations”), and how oppressed they are and the poor victims of the cruel white man.
Look at this: while 98% white Ontonagon County has NO hospital any more (as of April 20 [hmmmm], 2024) and not one medical doctor, in the county just south and west of here, Gogebic County, the Indian reservation (“of Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians”) on US Route 45 in Watersmeet has not only a casino to provide revenue but also a spiffy medical and dental center (which at least is open to all races, and I and Margi often went there. Btw, many of the Indians in the casino — not all — are unfriendly to white people.)
The Indian casino
This is one of many Indian casinos in this state.
Across the street is the medical and dental center: .https://dsgw.com/projects/lac-vieux-desert-health-center/
Almost every staff member here is white, btw, and they are very friendly and also professional.
In reality, Indians were not victims but the perpetrators of rape, torture, and genocide on the WHITE native Americans!
This article below is a classic of political correctness, and, I suspect, outright bribery of the Danish scientific team that says it tested Kennewick Man’s DNA and said he was indeed an Amerindian. Note this confession by a jew, Lawrence Straus (https://historylink.org/File/5664)
Lawrence G. Straus, an expert in early European culture who rebutted suggestions that early inhabitants of the Americas came from that culture, said:
“Instead of trying to forge a mutual interest with Native Americans in discovering who these ancestors of us all were [what a blind and politically correct assertion that any of any race could be “the ancestor of us ALL”], we throw it in their faces that they are not the original Americans after all, when that is the one thing they have in their culture to hang on to in the face of the overwhelming dominance of ours.” (Downey, 60).
This Swedish libtard, Martin Rundkvist (and proud of it) also did a fake debunking of the “Solutrean hypothesis.”
Rundkvist starts out this way:
I’ve blogged before about the woebegone Solutrean hypothesis, and I’m happy to say that it is now dead.
“Dead”? No, but you ARE trying to murder it.
Readers objected on factual grounds to his smug and dismissive conclusions:
Actually I had one skilled lithicist and coworker (he was good enough to create Clovis points from scratch) who thought the resemblance in thinning by overshot flakes between Clovis and Solutrean bifaces was quite significant.
Not so fast, Martin R. the DNA results from one child 500 to 1,000 years after the beginning of the Clovis Era in no way invalidates the Solutrean hypothesis for the origin of Clovis Points. A small number of Solutreans could have made it here only to have their “patent” for flintknapping tech copied by [Siberindians]. And being a flintknapper myself, I can definitely attest to the extreme similarities of the basic knapping methods of Solutrean and Clovis knapping tech …
***
And all the technical progress made by the Solutreans ceased when the White males were wiped out.
Ten thousand years later the Indians still had not invented the wheel, or a written language, or metal tools [they knew about copper but used it only for jewelry!), or even a sail for harnessing wind power to propel their canoes! Ten thousand years of breezy days in North America — yet it never occurred to any of them to make a sail.
Indian “braves” in their canoe with captive white women, who may be raped and even killed and eaten, as we know of the Ojibway Indians here in the UP of Michigan.
If hungry, Siberindians blithely killed and ate their prisoners. In war, Indians would eat a fallen enemy’s heart — right during the battle — and they did this to a captured white American army lieutenant in the belief this would give them his courage.
A 1592 drawing of South American Indians. They especially enjoyed eating a woman’s breasts.
Aztecs eating body parts of their victims
Jean de Brébeuf was a Jesuit missionary from Normandy, France whom the Huron Indians captured, tortured, killed, and then partially ate (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_de_Brébeuf#Death):
Throughout the torture, Brébeuf was reported to have been more concerned for the fate of the other Jesuits and of the captive Native converts than for himself. As part of the ritual, the Iroquois drank his blood and ate his heart, as they wanted to absorb Brébeuf’s courage in enduring the pain.[31] The Iroquois mocked baptism by pouring boiling water over his head.[32]
Wiki:
It is said that the modern name of the Native North American sport of lacrosse was first coined by Brébeuf, who thought that the sticks used in the game reminded him of a bishop’s crosier (crosse in French, and with the feminine definite article, la crosse).
Going back to Indians and their 10,000-year failure to make sails….
Since they made wigwams, or teepees, they certainly knew how to make huge leather sheets which could have been made into sails, with stout sticks as masts and booms (the wooden bottom edge of a sail! This is a perfect example of what I outlined in Mein Kampf: one race tends to destroy, the Blacks; bottom e can preserve a technology, the East Asians; and one, the Aryans, is truly innovative, inventive and creative.
(And the same is true of Black (sub-Saharan) Africans. The Amerindian IQ is just 85, the same low average as for African-Americans.)
….Here now is the article supporting the Solutrean truth:
The Younger Dryas Impact Debate – Is It Settled Yet?
[source: https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-important-events/younger-dryas-0012216
Asteroid Day this year, June 30, 2021, is 113 years after the Tunguska impact event in Siberia, which destroyed an area of pristine forest the size of Tokyo. With blasted and burnt tree trunks leveled and stripped bare over such a vast area, it is as though a large atomic bomb had been dropped on the forest.
The debate still goes on in the research literature, but a popular theory is that this impact was caused by a small comet fragment, in the region of 328 feet (100 meters) in diameter, that exploded at an altitude of around 5 miles (8 kilometers). Its immense downward momentum caused the resulting fireball to target the forest below, like a great blast of dragon breath. No crater was formed, and due to its remote location, it’s thought nobody was actually killed.
Tunguska meteoroid impact, a fraction of the Younger Dryas event. Trees were knocked down and burned over hundreds of square kilometres.
The date of the impact and its apparent direction of travel suggest it was likely caused by a chunk of comet originating from the Taurid meteor stream, the largest meteor stream seen from Earth. The impact energy has been inferred from seismic records at the time of the explosive event as well as computer simulations of the air burst and resulting damage on the ground. At around 5 to 15 megatons of TNT, the magnitude of the Tunguska explosion is often compared to 1000 Hiroshima bombs.
Collision with a larger comet, say 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) in diameter, would have generated an explosion around 1000 times larger again, i.e. 1 million Hiroshima bombs. It’s hard to imagine the scale of such an event, but this is the kind of energy scale that has been proposed for the Younger Dryas impact event.
A new paper by Dr. Martin Sweatman of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Engineering has just been published in the journal Earth-Science Reviews. It reviews the impact evidence for the Younger Dryas event and covers several of the topics discussed below in more detail.
This infrared image from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope shows the broken Comet 73P/Schwassman-Wachmann 3 skimming along a trail of debris left during its multiple trips around the sun. The flame-like objects are the comet’s fragments and their tails, while the dusty comet trail is the line bridging the fragments.
When did the Younger Dryas event happen?
The Younger Dryas impact is thought to have occurred between 10,800 to 10,900 BC. Again, it might have been caused by the Taurid meteor stream, although this time the general view is that we collided with a swarm of comet debris, rather than a single object. The impact was so devastating and covered such a wide area, that it is thought to be responsible for an entire geological age (a mini ice-age lasting 1,300 years) known as the Younger Dryas period when temperatures in the northern hemisphere were 27 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius) lower than they are today.
The event caused the extinction of many large animals, especially in the Americas, such as the mastodon and sabre-tooth tiger. Quite possibly, many of today’s well-known myths and religions, including Ragnarok and Christianity, derive originally from a comet-cult inspired by this event. It could hardly be a more important topic.
The Debate on Younger Dryas
The research debate surrounding this impact event has been very contentious. Supporters of pre-existing theories for the demise of the American megafauna and the occurrence of the Younger Dryas mini ice age have, naturally, been highly critical of this recent interloper into their long-standing stalemate.
But ultimately, it is not evidence of large animal extinctions or rapid climate change that determine whether a cosmic impact event occurred at this time, as these effects are not diagnostic for such events. That is, these effects can also be generated by other mechanisms. To discover whether a cosmic impact occurred at the beginning of the Younger Dryas period, or the YD ‘boundary’ as it is known, we should instead consider the geochemical evidence, which consists of unusual chemicals or materials generated by the impact remaining in the ground, as this is diagnostic.
Normally, a large asteroidal impact will leave a crater, even if the impact occurs into an ocean – the crater will be in the sea bed in this case. No crater has yet been confirmed for the YD event, although one, and perhaps two, geologically young but very large impact craters under the Greenland ice sheet, discovered only in the last few years, appear to be good candidates.
An image from NASA showing the ice sheet removed in the region around the Hiawatha Glacier and the bed topography under the ice clearly showing the Hiawatha crater. [JdN: This is a CGI of the earth’s surface under the glacier.]
Wiki:
The proposed impact structure was identified using airborne radar surveys that showed the presence of a 31 km (19 miles) wide crater-like depression in the bedrock beneath the ice.[6] Shocked quartz grains and melt rock clasts have been found in fluvio-glacial sediments deposited by a river that drains the area of the structure.
From an interpretation of the crystalline nature of the underlying rock, together with chemical analysis of sediment washed from the crater, the impactor was argued to be a type of iron asteroid with a diameter in the order of 1.5 kilometres (0.9 mi). If an impact origin for the crater is confirmed, it would be one of the twenty-five largest known impact craters on Earth.[6]
The crater’s condition indicates the impact might even have occurred toward the end of the last ice age, which would place the resulting crater among the youngest on the planet.
In the summers of 2016 and 2017, the research team returned to the Hiawatha Glacier to map tectonic structures in the rock near the foot of the glacier and collect samples of sediments washed out from the depression through a meltwater channel.
“Some of the quartz sand coming from the crater had planar deformation features [the earth’s surface is punched down] that are indicative of a violent impact; this is conclusive evidence that the depression beneath the Hiawatha Glacier is a meteorite crater,” said associate professor Nicolaj Larsen of Aarhus University in Denmark, one of the authors of the study..
***
Green dot = Greenland location of the Hiawatha glacier impact zone
***
Nevertheless, because the ages of these craters are not yet established, we should instead consider the kind of geochemical signals left behind by Tunguska-like air-bursts at the YD boundary. In fact, many types of exotic material, potentially of impact origin, have been found at this boundary, which appears as a conspicuous band of discolored sediment, or ‘black mat’, at many sites across North America and beyond. Arguably, the three most convincing types of evidence are an abundance of iridium-enriched magnetic grains, nanodiamonds, and high levels of platinum group metals, such as platinum itself or iridium, at the base of the YD black mat.
The Younger Dryas boundary lies at the base of the YD black mat
JdN: Note the black line, called a “black mat.” Sometimes it contains charcoal, indicating a fire; other times it is just rapidly dying masses of vegetation….Was this from a sky that had became radically overcast for years due to some event, such as a fire, in an impact which produced masses of fine dust and ash that blacked out the sun, killing plant life off and thus wiping out most of the animals that grazed on it? Only the bison somehow survived the catastrophe.
Magnetic grains, often too small to see with the naked eye, can be formed from iron, common in asteroids and comets, vaporizing at very high temperature, in a massive explosion for example, and then condensing into microscopic magnetic iron droplets, like water condensing as rain. If formed within a cometary air-bust they would be flung through the atmosphere for great distances, creating a carpet or layer of fine magnetic grains over a large expanse of Earth’s surface. Therefore, a sudden large peak, or abundance, in a layer of sediment of iridium-enriched magnetic grains is a good indicator of a cosmic impact, since other sources should be relatively constant over time.
Likewise, nanodiamonds are thought to form within carbon-rich droplets condensing from vaporized carbon generated by a high-temperature and pressure explosion. Asteroids and comets can be rich in carbon, and a cosmic impact might create the conditions required for the formation of carbon droplets containing nanodiamonds. Alternatively, nanodiamonds are common within some asteroids and comets, which means an impact event would simply distribute them over a large patch of Earth’s surface. Therefore, a sudden large peak in nanodiamonds within sediments also very likely indicates a comet or asteroid strike.
Nanodiamond aggregates from the Popigai crater, Siberia, Russia. a) is composed purely of diamond. b) is composed of a mixture of diamond and small amount of lonsdaleite. A half millimeter is 2% of an inch.
The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
The YDIH suggests that the climatic devastations of the Younger Dryas were the result of a major cosmic episode of multiple airbursts/impacts about 12,800 +/-300 cal bp. There is no impact crater that is known to be linked to such an event, but proponents argued that it could have occurred over the North American ice shield [which included Greenland].
That cometary impact would have created wildfires, and that and the climate impact are proposed to have produced the black mat, triggered the YD [Younger Dryas], contributed to the end-Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions and initiated human population reorganization across the Northern Hemisphere.
The YDIH adherents have argued that black mats hold the key evidence for their cometary impact theory.
What is a Black Mat?
Black mats are organic-rich sediments and soils that form in wet environments associated with spring discharge. They are found throughout the world in these conditions, and they are abundant in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene stratigraphic sequences throughout central and western North America. They form in a wide variety of soils and sediment types, including organic-rich grassland soils, wet-meadow soils, pond sediments, algal mats, diatomites, and marls.
Black mats also contain a variable assemblage of magnetic and glassy spherules, high-temperature minerals and melt glass, nano-diamonds, carbon spherules, aciniform carbon, platinum, and osmium. The presence of this last set is what the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis adherents have used to back up their Black Mat theory.
***
Lastly, platinum group metals (like platinum and iridium) are rare in Earth’s crust, but not so rare in asteroids and comets. Therefore, an abundance, or spike, of a platinum group metal within a sediment layer is another very good indicator of a cosmic impact event. This indicator can be spread very widely around the globe carried within fine dust particles created by the impact explosion.
There is really no alternative mechanism for producing a platinum-enriched layer of dust over a large patch of Earth’s surface, other than via a cosmic event like a comet impact, especially if it coincides with an abundance of nanodiamonds and magnetic grains. Indeed, an iridium abundance at the dinosaur-ending 66 million year-old Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary helped to close that debate out.
The Younger Dryas boundary (YDB) nanodiamond field
Each of these lines of geochemical evidence has been found at the YD boundary by the Comet Research Group and later confirmed by several independent research groups. Independent verification of the evidence, by research groups unconnected with the Comet Research Group, is crucial. It means the evidence is real and not mistaken. If other researchers could not find these signals, and there were some negative reports initially, they must have been doing something wrong.
This boundary layer of strange chemicals, which was most likely produced by a swarm of comet debris, has been found spanning three continents. According to the latest research, the debris field now extends to the tip of South America, and to the Near East where we find the world’s earliest megalithic monument – Gobekli Tepe in southern Turkey. Incredibly, the Younger Dryas impact seems to have been recorded there via an early form of proto-writing on its giant stone pillars, and probably inspired its construction.
Pillar 2 at Gobekli Tepe, likely describing the path of the radiant of Taurid meteor stream circa 10,000 BC
One of the clearest geochemical signals of the impact is recorded in a Greenland ice core, which displays a substantial platinum anomaly precisely at the beginning of the Younger Dryas cold period (corresponding to when the oxygen isotope trace, a proxy for temperature plummets). This suggests that this mini ice-age was, very likely, triggered by a cosmic impact. The ice-core date of 12,890 cal BP for this event translates to a calibrated date of around 10,870 BC in real terms. Platinum anomaly (red, left axis) and oxygen isotope trace (blue, right axis) in the GISP2 Greenland ice core.
Despite all the evidence in its favor, the Younger Dryas impact theory has been attacked many times by other researchers desperate to see it repudiated. Initial attempts at refuting it focused on the difficulty of reproducing the geochemical data. But, as has been said, these signals found across several continents have now been confirmed by multiple independent research groups. After this clarification, its opponents accepted the geochemical signals existed, but instead disputed their coincident timing. If they are correct, it implies there could not have been a single, huge, continental-scale Younger Dryas impact event.
However, these attempts to debunk the YD impact theory are all fundamentally flawed, as they make the same basic mistake. Essentially, they fail to properly take the experimental uncertainty in the radiocarbon measurements for these different archaeological sites into account. So, the problem these researchers identify is purely one of their own invention.
Indeed, in 2015, perhaps prompted by this radiocarbon dating controversy , a proper statistical analysis of Younger Dryas sediments was published, from which a date for the event of 10,835 BC, to within 50 years at the level of 95% confidence, was established. This means the geochemical evidence is consistent with a single event, most likely between 10,785 and 10,885 BC, in excellent agreement with the platinum spike in the Greenland ice core.
Is the Younger Dryas Dispute Settled?
This appears to have settled the matter. There have been no further reports since 2015 that dispute the Younger Dryas impact theory on the basis of new evidence for these specific lines of geochemical signal. Meanwhile, evidence in its favor continues to accumulate.
For example, similar geochemical signals have been found among the twisted and extensive remains of mega-fauna frozen into Alaskan and Yukon perma-frost, and it has been estimated that around 10% of the world’s land surface was set ablaze by the impact. It is easy to imagine that wildfires as extensive as this, and the choking soot that would have resulted, could have blocked sunlight for many years, killing animals and destroying the plants they feed on.
Traditionally, the sudden occurrence of the Younger Dryas ice age is blamed on a switch in massive oceanic circulation currents that transport vast amounts of heat around the globe. In turn, this oceanic switch is blamed on huge flows of cold and salt-free meltwater running off northern ice-sheets. But recent climate simulations suggest that, by themselves, these effects cannot account for the suddenness and magnitude of the Younger Dryas cooling, and a degree of atmospheric dusting is needed.
A cosmic impact, therefore, seems to be able to provide the conditions needed for both the megafaunal extinctions and sudden climate change at this time. Perhaps it was the trigger for all these effects.
So, What Does Younger Dryas Mean For Us?
How does this affect us today? Is it relevant to our lives?
Absolutely. An impact on the scale of the Younger Dryas event is often ruled out by some scientists as being too large to have occurred so recently. There are simply not enough asteroids of the required size currently in near-Earth space, they say, to make this scenario plausible. While this view is reassuring, it is almost certainly wrong.
It is wrong because it fails to take account of how quickly near-Earth space can change. We now know that giant comets from the outer reaches of the solar system can become trapped within the inner solar system, near Earth, on a reasonably regular basis, and this likely occurred relatively recently, say within the last 50,000 years. And, giant comets can appear, fragment into millions of pieces, and decay to dust quite quickly, meaning that today’s skies are no basis for judging the impact risk a few tens of thousands of years ago, or a few thousand years into our future.
Instead, constant vigilance is required.
The paper ‘The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: Review of the impact evidence’ is published in the journal Earth-Science Reviews.
Martin Sweatman’s book Prehistory Decoded is available from Amazon and Wordery.
Visit his blog here: https://martinsweatman.blogspot.com/
Kennewick Man DNA:
I delved into the DNA research available online, years ago. There was discussion about this on several genetic science blogs, made up of professionals in the field. Political Correctness greatly subdued forthright science.
My conclusion was that the following chicanery was employed: The official resolution was that Kennewick Man was a genetic ancestor of the Red Men living in the present day State of Washington. The Red Men, along with woke science and the enemy media, declared that this was a victory and conclusive proof that Kennewick Man was Amerind.
However, pre-Columbian Amerinds were approximately 1/3 Europid. Being the descendant of Kennewick Man’s captured daughters does not mean that Kennewick Man was a redskin. Clearly, his skull wasn’t Asiatic. They also said that KM was related to the Ainu. The Ainu were once mainly White. The original Siberians were White “Europeans.” Whites have been genocided throughout their original territory, which included parts of China, Siberia, and evidently North America.
Thanks.
My late wife said that we need maps of all the areas the white man first settled and now he is basically gone.
This would possibly include Japan; the Tokharian area (western China, Uyghur country now); the Medo-Persian area; Egypt (white middle and upper class); and Berber northern Africa (from Libya to Morocco)!
It is a matter of record that Whites are very good at war. Arguably they are the best, even the best by far. But it does not follow that Mongols from Russia (Indians) who came down from an ice bridge connecting Russia with Alaska during the last Ice Age did not kill the Solutreans. If they greatly outnumbered them, they could have. I think that is what happened to the Solutreans who lived in what is today the United States.
I could not agree more!
I believe, based on the evident extinction of all sorts of large North American mammals, that the same catastrophe that wiped them out also drastically reduced the numbers of Solutreans.
https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/05/24/chesapeake-timeline-humans-americas/
An island with new evidence found.
Very interesting!
Thank you!