Satanic end times — race-mixing and beating a “friend” to death for fun? IS REVOLUTION THE ANSWER?

Spread the love

The kid in the middle, Noah Presgrove, was beaten to death after a drunken, crazy party.

The three are typical of too many “Whites” today in heavily Hispanic or Amerindian areas. (Oklahoma is full of Cherokees, and many Amerindians are anti-white.)  With white race-mixing supposedly now “okay,” the nordic genes that were part of the greatness of America are basically going-going-gone.

Ben Franklin in 1750 wanted America to admit only northern Europeans. In fact,he wanted to exclude the southern Germans for often having dark hair, etc.! He was a total nordicist.

But a comrade in Orlando wrote me:  “All the young Whites here look a quarter latino.”

The de-nordicization of a once Northern-European country is the result of a keen and special hatred on the part of jewry for anything nordic.

A jewess had a whole specialty of photography crying blond children:

Jill Greenberg loves painting suffering blond children; prominent rabbi: we are aliens sent to conquer earth

Lieutenant John F. Kennedy in WWII and his patrol-boat 109 crew — every one of them was nice-looking and most had light or light-brown hair:

Look at these American high school kids from 1969. How many look this way now?

.

Beyond all this change in our DNA, I am shocked by the details of this murder.  Did Noah’s own “friends” do this to him? Was he hitchhiking after the party while totally drunk, stumbling along the road, and then did he get picked up by some Mexicans driving by?

….or by some outright satanists? ….by some thrill killers?

(There have been several cases of little kids, including white girls, murdering a ten-year-old “friend” for the sheer, wicked thrill of it.)

Clearly, these are End Times. Both our race and our culture are in terminal decline. Only something radically new can save us now.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13422041/Full-horror-Oklahoma-teen-Noah-Presgroves-injuries-explained-autopsy-results-chilling-insight-final-moments.html

.

.

……Australian comrade says only revolution can save us now

An Aussie (very angry, btw. about having been forced to take the vax) wrote this comment:

Joe Biden has full-blown dementia and he has been senile for years now. He’s being propped up as a mouthpiece by his jewish handlers in the Demoncrat party. He can’t even finish a sentence most of the time and he has no decision-making power.

There needs to be a civil war and blood spilt to achieve anything. It’s either that or a Brazil 2.0.

I would be preparing for a full-scale collapse of the U.S., a war between left and right, and a possible race war as well.

But if the military uses large-scale, powerful, military weapons against the white population, then they’re in big trouble.

Three things are certain:

  1. The election system will not allow anyone but a controlled puppet to become US president (and Nixon, Reagan and Trump, three Republican presidents whom I well remember were the focus of white hopes, but, under great pressure, they all totally betrayed us, whatever their initial intentions
  2. Early and Middle Bolshevism in Russia (1917-37) was 80% jewish, as is the ruling class in America now
  3. The jews SAVAGELY crushed every revolt during the Russian Civil War of 1917-21, torturing, starving, gassing and shooting millions of white, Christian, slavic Russians. This included taking and shooting, or working to death, tens of thousands of hostages. In a key battle, they used poison gas on White (anti-communist) insurgents who were in the forests.

 

…..The Tambov Rebellion

This was a serious, long-lasting uprising and not far from the capital, Moscow. It began when, as starvation gripped Russia in year three of the civil war, the Reds began to ruthlessly and mercilessly seize grain from rural farmers in order to feed Bolshevik forces and city residents, especially factory workers, who were their strongest supporters.

Read below what happened, and understand that our enemies are pure psychopaths who actually enjoy killing civilians. They are not reluctant to murder — they are EAGER.

We are dealing here with human devils.

As I have blogged before, some Germans and others were turned off by Hitler’s “iron-determination” face and fiery rhetoric.

General Ludendorff and Hitler before the November 1923 Beer Hall Putsch, which absolutely could have succeeded.

Why was success possible? Because

1) Germany was in extreme misery that year, what with the Great Inflation (wheelbarrows of cash to buy a loaf of bread) and the French occupation of the Rhineland (with negro colonial troops raping white German women), and

2) Hitler had personally arrested the Bavarian Cabinet at the beer hall. (Germans commonly held political rallies in beer halls.) Had he (I) shot Bavarian premier Gustav von Kahr, it would have shown we were true revolutionaries, we meant business, and we were not stodgy old conservatives out to save the rich. But instead he (I) trusted this Establishment conservative, who said all the right things to get released, and released him. Premier von Kahr then instantly organized the police and army to crush the putsch.  When we marched to the Feldherrenhalle, 16 of us were murdered by the police. The outstanding man literally next to me was killed, shot in the heart; I suffered a dislocated shoulder because our arms were interlocked, and when he went down like a sack of potatoes, his weight ripped me to the ground. (Of course, being suddenly on the pavement maybe also saved my life as rifle fire continued.)

Hermann Goering (winner of the Blue Max, btw, in WWI) was shot in the groin, and he suffered lifelong pain as a result. Hess and Himmler marched bravely right in the front ranks, btw.

Actually, in some ways Hitler (I) was too moderate. Read about the Tambov Rebellion and see why.

Tambov Rebellion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tambov Rebellion
Part of the Russian Civil War
Date 19 August 1920 – mid 1922
Location

52.5°N 41.8°E

Result Bolshevik victory
Belligerents
 Green armies Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic Soviet Russia
Commanders and leaders
Alexander Antonov
Peter Tokmakov [ru]
Ivan Ishin [ru]Executed
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist RepublicMikhail Tukhachevsky
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist RepublicV. Antonov-Ovseyenko
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist RepublicAlexander Schlichter
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist RepublicIeronim Uborevich
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist RepublicGrigory Kotovsky
Russian Soviet Federative Socialist RepublicSergey Kamenev
Strength
Probably 20,000 regular and 20,000 militiamen[1]


14,000 (August 1920)[2]
50,000 (October 1920)[3]
40,000[4] – 70,000[5] (February 1921)
1,000 (September 1921)[4]

5,000 (November 1920)[3]
50,000[6] – 100,000[7] (March 1921)[8]
Casualties and losses
50,000 civilians interned in camps[9]
15,000 dead[10][page needed]

The Tambov Rebellion of 1920–1922 was one of the largest and best-organized peasant rebellions challenging the Bolshevik government during the Russian Civil War.[11] The uprising took place in the territories of the modern Tambov Oblast and part of the Voronezh Oblast, less than 500 kilometres (300 mi) southeast of Moscow.

In Soviet historiography, the rebellion was referred to as the Antonovschina (“Antonov’s mutiny”), so named after Alexander Antonov, a former official of the Socialist Revolutionary Party, who opposed the government of the Bolsheviks. It began in August 1920 with resistance to the forced confiscation of grain and developed into a guerrilla war against the Red ArmyCheka units and the Soviet Russian authorities.

The bulk of the peasant army was destroyed by large Red Army reinforcements using chemical weapons in the summer of 1921;[7]

smaller groups continued resistance until the following year. It is estimated that around 100,000 people were arrested and around 15,000 killed during the suppression of the uprising.

The movement was later portrayed by the Soviets as anarchical banditry, similar to other left-wing anti-Bolshevik movements that opposed them during this period.

Background[edit]

Alexander Antonov (centre) and his staff

In 1904, Alexander Antonov was sentenced to twenty years in prison for blowing up a train, but received an amnesty from the Russian Provisional Government following the February Revolution and returned to his native Tambov, where he served in the local militia in Kirsanov.[12] As the Provisional Government refused to discuss agrarian reform, he joined the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries.[13]

The peasants of Tambov largely supported the October Revolution, since Vladimir Lenin‘s Decree on Land legalized the expropriation of property. Nevertheless, the Bolsheviks had problems in maintaining control of the governorate.[14] Unlike in the cities, the Bolsheviks had hardly any supporters in the rural regions, where in the elections of 1917 the Socialist Revolutionary Party had won large majorities.[15] In March 1918, the Bolshevik delegates in Tambov were even thrown out of the local soviets, following the ratification of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.[14]

Following the outbreak of the Russian Civil War, the newly established Russian Soviet Republic adopted the policy of war communism, in

which food for the cities was obtained by compulsory requisition from the villages without any financial compensation.

This was met with the resistance of the peasant population, especially as the requisitions were often violent in nature. Likewise, the amount of grain to be requisitioned were not measured according to production. Instead, commissions gave a rough estimate based on pre-war production, so that devastation, crop failures, and population decline were not included. Before the revolution, the peasants in Tambov produced around one million tonnes of grain. Of these, one-third was exported. On the basis of these figures, which did not include the dislocations of the civil war in the countryside, a high target for the procurement of grain was set.[15] The peasants often responded by reducing their acreage, as they no longer had the economic incentive to produce surpluses, which made the confiscations ordered from above hit them even harder.[16]

For the most part, the peasants had been indifferent to Bolshevik ideology,[15] but they came to hate the Bolsheviks for their forced requisitions, which had put them at the limit of survival, and for the forced levies [ = military draft] that had created numerous fugitives.[17]

In the summer of 1919, Antonov fled to the forest and formed a gang that murdered several Bolshevik activists.[13] This is how the first anti-Bolshevik guerrilla movements arose, made up of Red Army deserters, Socialist-Revolutionaries and peasants who resisted the searches in the forests. Their first acts were assassinating unpopular state officials and raiding state farms.[18] They killed more than 200 government grain collectors, and over the next year their forces grew steadily, growing from an initial 150 to 6,000 by early summer 1920,[18] but that would have to wait until after the defeat of Anton Denikin‘s White movement for there to be a real mass uprising.[19] The other leaders of this force were Alexander Antonov’s younger brother, Dmitri Antonov [ru], and the SR Peter Tokmakov [ru].[20]

Outbreak[edit]

On 19 August 1920, a revolt broke out in the small town of Khitrovo, where a

military requisitioning detachment of the Red Army had appropriated everything they could and “beat up elderly men of seventy in full view of the public”.[21]

In anticipation of an attack by the Red Army to enforce the procurement of grain, the farmers of the village armed themselves. Since only a few rifles were available, this was partly done with pitchforks and clubs. Other villages soon joined in the uprising against the Soviet authorities, and succeeded in repelling the Red Army.[15]

The peasants rebels, after their first success, attempted to capture Tambov, the capital of the governorate.[22] There, however, they were scattered by Red machine guns barely ten kilometers from their goal.[23] It was here that Alexander Antonov, a radical Left Socialist-Revolutionary, led the movement into a guerilla war against the Reds. Before the uprising, Antonov and a few comrades had fought an underground insurrection against the Bolsheviks and had been sentenced to death. Since he was able to escape capture by the Soviet authorities, he was a kind of folk hero to the peasants. He demanded that the free trade and movement of goods should be allowed, that the grain requisitions should be ended and the Soviet administration and the Cheka dissolved.[24] His troops carried out surprise raids on railway junctions, kolkhoz and the Soviet authorities. They were supported by the population and used the villages for cover and rest. Likewise, they often disguised themselves as Red Army soldiers to move about the countryside or to exaggerate the element of surprise.[15]

The insurgent peasants organized themselves through the Union of Working Peasants (RussianСоюз Трудовых Крестьян, STK),[25] which functioned as the political organization of the insurgents and with which Antonov worked.[26] Having their own political program gave them a strength and coherence that other peasant uprisings lacked.[27] However, this movement was still based on the weariness of the population but without having a clear idea of how to replace the government.[28] Instead, Antonov dreamed of marching on Moscow and ending Bolshevik rule.[29]

Antonov organized the farmers on the model of the Red Army in 18–20 regiments with their own political commissars, reconnaissance departments and communication departments. Likewise, he introduced a strict discipline. The farmers used the Red flag as their standard and thus claimed the central symbol of the revolution.[15] They had 14,000 or 18,000 men,[30] mostly consisting of deserters from the Red Army.[27] Of these, five to seven thousand had firearms.[31] By the end of the month, the rebels numbered six groups, each totaling 4,000 men with a dozen machine guns and several artillery pieces.[32] As the Bolshevik authorities were busy with the Polish-Soviet War and Pyotr Wrangel‘s offensive in northern Tavria,[33] they only had 3,000 unreliable troops in Tambov province.[34] These soldiers had been drafted from the local villages and often had little motivation to fight members of their own class.[15]

The rebels were able to control large parts of the region and managed to capture railway trains transporting requisitioned grain. The grain intended to supply Red Army units was instead re-distributed by Antonov’s men to local farmers.[15] The rebellion also spread to parts of other provinces: VoronezhSaratov and Penza.[35] This territory was populated by more than three million people, 90% farmers and artisans.[25] The region was densely populated, with rich, forested land that offered many jobs, especially as the land had been appropriated in 1917 and the owners expelled. But the demands of the Bolshevik government and the Russian Civil War prevented them from profiting, which only encouraged the insurrection.[36]

In the areas controlled by the rebels, all Soviet institutions were abolished. Around 1,000 members of the Russian Communist Party were killed by the insurgents.[15] By October 1920, the Bolsheviks had completely lost control of the rural territory of the governorate, dominating only the city of Tambov itself and a number of smaller urban settlements. After numerous deserters from the Red Army joined it, the peasant army numbered over 50,000 fighters. The rebel militia proved highly effective and even infiltrated the Tambov Cheka.[37]

Towards the end of October, the head of the Internal Guard [ru] in the Tambov GovernorateVasili Kornev [ru], engaged in a series of battles with the rebels. According to his letters, he killed 3,000, wounded 300, and captured 1,000 along with copious amounts of weapons, ammunition, and supplies (such as a telephone and a field kitchen). His casualties were 90 dead and less than 200 wounded.[38] However, he was blamed for the rebellion and removed.[39] Some sources say the rebels numbered just 8,000 horsemen in November.[29]

Climax of the rebellion[edit]

On 5 November, two to six thousand rebels, mostly on horseback, attacked the railway station at Sampur in two coordinated groups, capturing an artillery cannon, some machine guns, and numerous revolvers and rifles. However, they failed in their attempt to sabotage the railway lines and quickly withdrew.[40] At the time, Bolshevik reports said that two thousand partisans were still in the woods of Novokhopyorsk, near the station.[41] The main source of information that the peasants had about what happened on other fronts were the red prisoners.[42] In that month, there were barely 5,000 Bolsheviks in the region.[43]

At the height of his power, thanks to their strong popular support,[44] between October 1920 and January 1921, the rebels mobilized 50,000 partisans.[45] By February 1921, they were between 20,000[46] and 40,000-strong,[47] with half of them acting as full-time combatants and the other half part-time.[29] Around 6,000 were mounted, hindering the government troops, whose lack of mobility undermined their effectiveness.[32]

But they never formed an “organized guerrilla army”.[19] Because of this, most of their actions were impulsive assaults orchestrated by each band against the Bolshevik detachments in charge of requisitioning grain or repressing the villagers. This lack of coordination was, in addition to their poor weapons and training, ultimately decisive in their defeat.[48]

*** This is where you can see the greatness of a Michael Collins over in Ireland at the same  time, an organizer as well as leader. He systematically found out who the infiltrators into the IRA were, killed them, and then began assassinating key British officials and armed uprisings. At the same time, Eamon de Valera was IN THE UNITED STATES, rallying support from the gigantic Irish-American community (now numbering about 40 million White Irish-Americans). The British under Churchill (yes, that bastard) wanted to send in the Army and crush the Irish in a bloodbath —  the Black and Tans were a foretaste of that — but the Irish-Americans, the mainstay of the Democrat Party in the US, would never have tolerated a genocide of the Irish, nor other Americans.

Again we see that foreign help is a key to a revolution succeeding against an organized, technological, modern state with a secret security police.

***

They were organized in two armies divided into a total of 21 regiments.[29] Their use of guerrilla warfare was based on the old tactic of launching surprise attacks and fleeing immediately afterwards, thanks to their superior knowledge of the terrain and the mobility of their cavalry. Each village was in charge of equipping and maintaining a group of these combatants, which was easy since many were locals defending their own communities.[49] That localism also played into their hands. On the contrary, being too closed in on themselves prevented them from seeking allies in other peasant movements or marching against the big cities, the control of which was what the Bolsheviks worried about because their source of support was the industrial proletariat.[48]

By the end of the year the Greens had achieved one of the main objectives —  the Reds had stopped sending units to their territories to requisition grain. The officials in the south of Tambov were incapable of such action, as their resources were destined only to garrison the villages under their control. But the north was at peace, not being a large food-producing region; it never lived through the requisitions that had sparked the revolt.[50] The lack of heavy weapons prevented the rebels from taking over the cities, which became havens for communists and government officials.[51] During that December, reinforcements from the Cheka began to arrive, numbering 3,500 combatants in the area.[19] Two months later its leader, Felix Dzerzhinski, [head of the feared CHEKA and a true psychopath; not jewish but of Polish ancestry] would arrive to direct its operations.[52]

During this time garrison officers and local Bolshevik militants complained of their ever-increasing abandonment by Moscow, from where fewer and fewer supplies and reinforcements were sent to them. In fact the military circles of the Red command had decided to concentrate on a great campaign of pacification of Tambov: as soon as their troops flooded the province the movement would soon be finished. In addition, it was increasingly difficult to help them because their main communication links, the armored trains, were continuously attacked in the area.[53] During the winter of 1920–1921, food reserves in many towns were exhausted, as in Kozlov and Morshank, towns located on the edge of the rebel zone and whose communist garrison saw most of its inhabitants leave or turn to the black market to survive.[54]

On 23 January 1921, 250 mounted cadets of the 6th Volche-Karachan regiment managed to defend the town of Borisoglebsk from a large rebel contingent. For the Bolsheviks, it was key to keep Borisoglebsk and Kirsanov in their hands, since these were their bastions in the middle of the fields controlled by the rebels.[50] During that month, the Bolshevik authorities demobilized 4,000 locals who served in their garrisons because they were not trusted. They immediately joined the partisans.[55]

By this time, only half of the desired grain had been collected by the Bolshevik requisition squads. Antonov-Ovseyenko noticed from his own experience that every other farmer in Tambov was starving.[15]

To win over the population, Nikolai Bukharin was commissioned to draw up “non-coercive measures”, in which he recommended that the required grain quotas be lowered.[52] In response, on 2 February 1921, the Soviet leadership announced the end of the “prodrazvyorstka“, and issued a special decree directed at peasants from the region implementing the “prodnalog” policy. The new policy was essentially a tax on grain and other foodstuffs. This was done before the 10th Congress of the Bolsheviks, when the measure was officially adopted. The announcement began circulating in the Tambov area on 9 February 1921.[56]

On 20 March, a general amnesty was also announced for anyone who surrendered. During the two weeks that the amnesty was in place, about 3,000 rebels capitulated, but very few with weapons in hand.[57] By then, Bolshevik power had disappeared almost entirely from the region[49] despite having 32,500 foot soldiers and 8,000 cavalry plus machine guns and cannons in the area.[58]

By this time, the rebels were able to mobilize large field armies. On 11 April, Antonov gathered 5,000 partisans[59] and launched a pincer attack on Rasskazovo (an hour prior he launched a diversionary attack on Nizhne-Spasskoe with a small force).[60] The garrison consisted of a company of infantrymen, a unit of Bolshevik militants, a machine gun platoon, the Volga Infantry Brigade (which had arrived in January from Saratov), and the 2nd Cheka regiment,[59] and it quickly collapsed. The rebels’ goal was achieved: an artillery cannon with two or three hundred rounds, eleven machine guns, four hundred rifles, one hundred thousand ammunition, eighty telephones and 50 versts of cable.[60] On 24 April, they gathered in the village of Kobiaki [ru][61] five to ten thousand fighters under the command of “Vaska Karas” (identified as Vasili Nikitin-Koroliov [ru]) and Vasili F. Selianski. Not everyone participated in the battle. They intended to take the town of Kirsanov, garrisoned by a Moscow infantry brigade led by cavalry commander V. I. Dmitrenko.[62] A day later they launched two equally unsuccessful assaults, abandoning 22 machine guns, small arms and ammunition of the victors.[63] Pursued by the enemy cavalry, the rebels had 2,000 dead in the following days according to estimates by the communist government.[64]

Suppression[edit]

By January 1921, peasant revolts had spread to SamaraSaratovTsaritsynAstrakhan and Siberia.[37] But with the end of the Polish–Soviet War and the defeat of General Wrangel, the Red Army could divert its regular troops into the area.[37] In May 1921, Mikhail Tukhachevsky was ordered by Lenin as military commander-in-chief to suppress the uprising in Tambov. Assigned to him were tanks, heavy artillery and 100,000 soldiers,[65] mostly special units of the Cheka, with additional Red Army units.[24] As many members as possible of the communist youth organization Komsomol were assigned to him because they were considered politically loyal. The Red Army used armoured trains and engaged in the summary execution of “civilians”. The rebels responded with assassination attempts on Tukhachevsky and Ovseyenko, and the

kidnapping and shooting of family members of members of the Communist Party and Red Army.[65]

On 6 May, Tukhachevsky announced his pacification campaign. That month a large army of between 50,000[66] and 100,000 Red soldiers[67] reached the southern part of the oblast.[25] The plan was to “flood the rebellion area with troops”.[52] They included regular forces, Chinese and Hungarian internationalists and detachments of the Cheka, the Units for Special Purposes [ru] and the Militarised Guard [ru],[68] although the decisive contingents were the numerous cadets and horsemen who arrived.[69] They were supported by 70 heavy artillery pieces, hundreds of machine guns, 3 armored units, a plane,[6] armored trains[69] and chemical weapons left over from World War I stockpiles.[70]

On 31 May, seven armored vehicles commanded by General Ivan Fedko surprised 3,000 rebels in the village of Dve Sestritsy and dispersed them with heavy casualties.[71] Two infantry brigades and one veteran cavalry brigade under General Grigori Kotovski were assigned to the Tambov sector.[72] During the first two weeks of May, 15,000 Red Army officers concentrated in Tambov to prepare for the campaign.[73] On the dawn of 1 June, Fedko with three vehicles armed with machine guns, Kotovski’s horsemen and the brigade of Siberian cavalry of M. D. Kovalev launched a surprise attack against Antonov and the 3,000 partisans with whom he occupied Elan [ru].

Although the rebels managed to repulse the armored vehicles with their rifles, they fled before Kovalyov’s cavalry.[71] On 6 June, the armored vehicles commanded by Fedko achieved another victory near Chernyshovo.[74] Between 1 and 9 June, three Bolshevik forces led by Uborevich launched a coordinated attack with seven armored vehicles against the rebel stronghold, near the town of Kamenka [ru], and faced 2,000 rebels led by Antonov and Boguslavski in six battles, during which 800 partisans died. The region between Tambov and Kirsanov was pacified.[75] These three forces intended to converge on Rzhaksa: Dmitrenko’s cavalry brigade (2,000 men from the Sampur in the Tambov uyezd), Kotovski’s cavalry brigade (1,000 soldiers from the Lomovis station in the Kirsanov uyezd) and the 14th cavalry brigade (1,000 cavalry up the Vorona River from Karai-Pushkino in Kirsanov’s uyezd).[76] Two weeks later rebel commander Aleksandr Boguslavski was killed in combat.[77] The same fate befell Tokmakov, Karas and Selianski.[78]

On 12 June 1921, Tukhachevsky received permission from Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko to begin the use of chemical weapons against the remaining rebels. They ordered their troops to clear the forests with poison gas, stipulating that it “must be carefully calculated, so that the layer of gas penetrates the forests and kills everyone hiding there.”[79] Publications in local Communist newspapers openly glorified liquidations of “bandits” with the poison gas.[80]

Antonov’s army was encircled and destroyed,[81] leaving the rebellion practically defeated by the end of June.[68] By the month of September, the rebels had been reduced to a thousand due to the massive arrival of Red troops.[82] By the end of that year, there were no more than 4,000 rebels left on the warpath.[83] With almost all their leaders dead, the last parties took refuge in swamps and forests under constant persecution.[69]

It took until the middle of 1922 for the province to be pacified completely.[81] The Antonov brothers and several of their last followers were killed in combat against a Red detachment on 24 June 1922[69] in the village of Nizhni Shibriai [ru], where they hid their few personal possessions. The Cheka wanted to arrest them[84] and set fire to the house where they took refuge. When they tried to flee, they were shot down.[69] By then, their movement was reduced to only a few groups.[85]

Consequences[edit]

As a result of the military operations against the rebels, around 6,000 of their fighters surrendered and were either shot or deported. The deportees were transferred from the local camps to special camps in the northern regions of Russia after the suppression of the uprising. These camps were otherwise reserved for officers of the White movement and captured insurgents from Kronstadt. In these camps there was a particularly high mortality of prisoners compared to the rest of the camp system.[86] The devastation of the fighting and punitive measures, together with the Bolshevik agricultural policy, led to a famine in the areas of the insurgents. In addition to Tambov, large parts of Russia were affected in the following two years.[87]

Family members of the rebels were usually used as hostages, others were held at random,[88] and in some cases entire villages were interned.[89] Between 50,000[82] and 100,000 villagers[90] including some 1,000 children,[86] were interned in dedicated concentration camps in July 1921.[91]

There they suffered severely from cholera and typhus epidemics.

The death rate is estimated to be around 15–20% per month for the fall of 1921.[81] Relatively few were released or executed, “barely” 15,000 were shot.[92] However, mass executions of suspected villagers and prisoners were frequent in the villages.[93]

Some villages were burned to the ground.[94] The properties confiscated from the arrested and exiled families were given to supporters or collaborators of the regime.[95]

The activities of the Cheka, the incorporation of thousands of locals into the Communist Party (with the benefits that it implied) and the concessions of the New Economic Policy helped the Bolsheviks in the spring of 1921 to defuse the situation, especially the end of grain requisitions.[96]

The uprising made the Soviet leadership aware of its failure to manage relations with the peasants and is seen as one of the factors that prompted Lenin to initiate the New Economic Policy. The Russian sociologist and contemporary witness Pitirim Sorokin even concluded that the insurgents had forced the NEP by their actions.[97] The new policy relied more on a natural tax on actual production instead of on compulsory collection of agricultural products.[81] In the military field it is mentioned that the Soviet Army Commander Mikhail Frunze was impressed by the guerillas’ resistance to regular forces. He therefore began studying guerrilla tactics as a commander in the Red Army. This is regarded as a precondition of the Soviet partisans‘ strategy in their World War II campaign against the Nazi invasion.[98]

[….]

.

…….So is revolution the answer?

It was for George Washington, of course.

But, as my essay has stated and proved, the American Revolution succeeded because so many of the other great powers feared and hated Britain, and did not want the British Empire to continue to spread out from the original thirteen coastal colonies all the way across the vast and fertile North America.

Imagine if Washington had lost. It was the dread of Paris, Madrid and Amsterdam that someday there would be 200 million British Americans, and all the vast resources of Britain’s richest colony were used to take over much of the world.

So the real reason we won was because France, Spain and Holland gave us huge aid for their own reasons…and because the British eventually “took the gloves off”after losing the northern colonies and resorted to exceptionally brutal tactics which smashed the myth of England as our loving “Mother Country.”  These including hiring Indians to scalp white American families.

I will end my answer herewith.  The enemy does not need to know my whole plan.

 

…..Why the failing American Revolution finally did succeed

On its last legs, the brave American Revolutionaries succeed — with massive French help

1) because of a t-i-n-y minority of intrepid men, American, German, Polish and French volunteers,

2) massive financial and military help from the king of France, 

3) the French fleet under Admiral de Grasse, in 1781, defeated the vaunted British “Royal Navy” outside of Chesapeake Bay, Virginia,

Plus there was more and more aid (especially cash) from Britain’s maritime rivals, Spain and Holland,

4) Finally, popular outrage in America boiled over over when Britain began paying Indian savages on the frontier (and this old designation “savages,” which Thomas Jefferson used in the Declaration of Independence, is still the most apt word for them) to scalp and massacre white frontier families, AND PAID THEM BY THE SCALP.

This was the “tipping point” — AFTER FIVE LONG YEARS — which energized even SOME of the do-nothing-but-criticiz-ers — who were the majority of “The People,” then as now  — to fully support George Washington and the demand for full independence from Britain.

Some “Mother Country” … to pay Indians to do this.

White men were stripped naked and driven around a pole on a rope as they were stabbed, and body parts were cut or burned off, often by the females, the squaws, who were worse than the males, the braves. Every time one groaned in agony, the Indians chortled in glee.

These torture sessions often lasted for three days until the Injuns got bored, and killed the white man, then went on the warpath to another frontier cabin to get another one.

The Marquis de Lafayette was dumbfounded how few Americans initially fought for their own freedom from Britain as he was doing. Lafayette a a true idealist, a foreigner, and an aristocrat, from faraway France. He had been born to immense wealth, and had nothing in common with these American farmers except a love of the idea of a free yet orderly new society.

Jut before the decisive 1781 Battle of Yorktown, George Washington was in despair over the lack of support.

Gilbert du Motier, the Marquis de Lafayette, who had sailed 3,000 miles to fight for the freedom of another country, disobeying his king’s direct royal order, confessed to General George Washington in December 1777, after six months stateside, that he was initially shocked by the lack of ardor for the freedom struggle of most Americans.

Generals Washington and Lafayette pass by a sentry standing in wind and snow at Valley Forge in December 1777, when all seemed very hopeless.

Within a few weeks, in February 1778, however, after the German Baron von Steuben arrived and began training American troops in German military tactics, and then the Americans began winning battles against England, France signed an alliance with America, Lafayette returned to France to strengthen it in many conversations with his king, Louis XVI — and within three years the war for American freedom was finally won.

It all had a happy ending — Lafayette and Washington celebrate a republic of both order and liberty.

.

.

.

.

.

 

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*