I received this comment from a Thomas Potter:
***
Thermite produces a blinding white light. The towers did not light up like sparklers on the Fourth of July! If they found chocolate chip cookie crumbs in the dust would that be the cause of destruction?
Let me introduce you to Dr. J. Douglas Beason
https://web.archive.org/web/20070317075918/http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/1011/spire1li0.jpg
New weapons and how they may change war subject of talk Thursday at Museum
Light-wave energy in the same spectrum of energy found in home appliances may soon be used in a new generation of weapons. On Thursday, the Laboratory’s Associate Director for Threat Reduction, Douglas Beason, will talk about America’s new directed energy weapons in a talk at the Laboratory’s Bradbury Science Museum.
The talk is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m., and is free and open to the public. After the talk, Beason is scheduled to sign copies of his new book, “The E-Bomb: How America’s New Directed Energy Weapons will Change the Way Future Wars will be Fought,” at the Otowi Station Bookstore next to the museum.
Beason, who was named Los Alamos’ Threat Reduction Directorate (ADTR) leader in January, is a leading expert in directed energy research. At the talk, he will describe the development of a new generation of weapons that discharge light-wave energy. The technology that supplies the same spectrum of energy found in microwave ovens or television remote control devices is a revolution in weaponry, perhaps more profound than the atomic bomb.
Beason will discuss these new weapons and answer the questions that everyone is asking: What is directed energy? How do these new weapons work? How lethal are they?
According to Beason, the first directed energy weapons are being tested now and their deployment is being planned for today’s battlefields.
The E-Bomb: How America’s New Directed-Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Future Wars Will be Fought
In science fiction, futuristic soldiers are often shown wielding light emitting weapons – Flash Gordon’s ray gun, Captain Kirk’s phaser, and Darth Vader’s light saber. Today, this imagined future of science fiction is on the road to reality. After more than two decades of research, the United States is on the verge of deploying a new generation of weapons that discharge light-wave energy, the same spectrum of energy found in your microwave or in your TV remote control. They’re called “directed-energy weapons” – lasers, high-powered microwaves, and particle beams – and they signal a revolution in weaponry, perhaps, more profound than the atomic bomb.
https://web.archive.org/web/20051119112050/http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev112905a.cfm
Those who control the energy control the people. But those who control their perception control everything.
The oil industry (leaded gas), tobacco industry (lung cancer), and more recently the NFL (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), have all spent millions and millions of dollars marginalizing scientific findings and the scientists that find them by way of “public relations” which is another word for propaganda. Lead in the food chain, carcinogens in the air, and brain damaged football players are all good for you, right?
What Sound?
The mass of each WTC tower was around 500,000 tons or 1,102,311,310.9 pounds.
https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/EricChen.shtml
Garbage trucks weigh around 33,000 pounds empty.
The destruction of each tower would equal the sound of 33,403 empty garbage trucks raining down. (a little over one quarter of all U.S. garbage trucks in service) That didn’t happen. The towers were turned into dust in midair, never hitting the ground. Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.
Both the super-duper thermite gang and the super-duper nuclear gang are covering up the lack of high heat when a careful observation of ALL the evidence concludes that the destruction was cold molecular dissociation produced by a type of directed energy. There is also the CGI/Remote-controlled-plane coverup gangs – when it was actually image projection of some kind. There are also gangs that coverup both lack of high heat and image projection technology.
What high heat?
High heat is part of the government’s official conspiracy theory and is as relevant as “19 bad guys with box cutters”. Using water and dirt to quench cold molecular dissociation is not evidence of high heat.
High heat? Why hasn’t the steam cooked these workmen alive? Why are the pressurized hydraulic hoses on the heavy equipment still working and not bursting under high heat?
Why is wet dirt
Steam? If this were steam, these workers would have been cooked. If this were as hot as a grill, these people would become something that looked more like a grilled-cheese sandwich. The hoses to their torches would melt and ignite the fuel.
On September 27, 2001, the four yellow dump trucks are heading south on West Street, toward the WTC complex. Each of the dump trucks carries a uniform load of what appears to be dirt.
WHY WOULD THE DIRECTED ENERGY COVER-UP TEAM WANT 9/11 JUSTICE FOR ALL?
A fallacy is an error in reasoning. This differs from a factual error, which is simply being wrong about the facts. To be more specific, a fallacy is an “argument” in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support.
Decredentializing a highly qualified expert like Dr. Wood by appealing to spite, ridicule, or willful ignorance does nothing to support a valid argument. Also, an opinion and an Internet connection does not qualify someone as an expert in forensic engineering and science, nor nuclear physics, nor structural engineering, nor materials engineering science, nor engineering mechanics (applied physics).
The empirical research Dr. Wood performed is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience, not by performing experiments. Steven Jones [Journal Of Nine Eleven Studies or J.O.N.E.S.] and Greg Jenkins used to ridicule Dr. Wood by claiming that it would take more than five times the world’s energy to destroy the WTC towers.
Does that mean their thermite came from off-planet or “outer space”? LOL What experiments would Dr. Wood perform?
What are the experiments for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look?
No assumptions needed with empirical evidence! A forensic scientific investigation involves the collection and analysis of ALL of the evidence. Even though A&E 911 Truth appeals to authority and popularity, a controlled group is not synonymous with evidence.
Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or “spacebeams”). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave at the University of California, Berkeley
…available here at timestamp 1:53:47
https://archive.org/details/liftingthefog_2006_11_11_session2
….telling his audience that “Judy Woods [Dr. Woods] says it’s a laser or maser from space” while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space.
Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT.
The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term “Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does, and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]
At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood’s book, she explains why playing the “name the weapon” game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting “HAARP” for “Bin Laden.”
In Dr. Wood’s book, the closest she comes to “naming a weapon” is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.
[end]
I responded:
Good comment, thanks, but why not both nanothermite and a directed energy beam?
And why the pointless vitriol about “super-duper thermite gangs”? Gangs? Dr. Steven Jones, PhD is a gang member? 😉
Purpose of doing both:
to ensure the WTC Towers are thoroughly destroyed.
They (the Israelis) obviously had time to pre-rig the buildings with nanothermite (with the full cooperation of the then new owner, the sayan Larry Silverstein) and then also use a Judy Wood beam to finish the job.
As with so many other disputes, one starts to see ego and personal attacks creep in.
I see no reason whatsoever to vilify Stephen Jones, who lost his university career over this, and he found nanothermite.
I used to live in Pittsburgh, where every steel mill has molten steel. It looks just like this.
(It is also a ludicrous straw man to claim anyone is ascribing the WTC collapse to chocolate chip cookies. No one is claiming, either, that objects such as pencils or white-out caused it, and yet, in the debris, there was likely plenty of both found in the two 110-story office towers.)
Nanothermite is a proved demolition chemical. It was found at the site.
IMO, it was both nanothermite and also a directed energy weapon.
More important than “how” is “who” did it and “why”:
1) Israel and American Jews is who planed and carried it out
2) to get enraged Americans to foolishly send troops to kill muslims and Arabs in the Middle East, over in Libya, Syria, Iraq and Iran, who just happen to be Israel’s enemies and regional neighbors. GOAL ACCOMPLISHED.
3) to create a police state in the US via the PATRIOT Act and the NDAA. GOAL ACCOMPLISHED.
This is the real problem. Jew dommination of America.
It is egotistical, cowardly, delusional and with some people, even a Deep State trick and classical divide-and-conquer maneuver to get people who all are sincere Truthers totally sidetracked into ranting and bickering on and on, fighting each other, about the technical issue of “how” they did it.
The problem is that they did it, and the same Jews who killed 3,000 Americans THEN have the same immense power today over America, and can use it to get us into a massive war with Iran, Syria, and yes, even with Russia.
And that could result in the end of much of the human race. Of course, the silver lining is that then the particle-beamer/nanothermiter feud at least will be over. 😉
The Jews did it. How is secondary.
http://www.drjudywood.com/wp/
.
The other point is that directed energy weapons could quite possibly be less reliable than explosives. The elite has probably had no opportunities prior to then to test that weapon on such a large public building, so if it didn’t work when it’s supposed to, that’s total plan failure.
Using two methods, even if neither of them could work on their own, creates redundancy and a higher chance of success.
.
Here’s an idea for why the thermite flashes of light were not seen, assuming the two-method idea is true:
.
The thermite explosives were used on the structural supports below ground where nobody could see them and the energy weapon covered for possible mistakes.
.
Big flashes of light through the windows would be a huge giveaway of an internal explosion. Anybody could record that and it’d be an open-and-shut case for the public.
Judy Wood says the explosion sounds people heard from below ground were just gas canisters that exploded due to the energy weapon, but I’m not so sure.
Either way, regardless of the mechanism, with evidence like Silverstein’s ‘extreme luck’ in taking out an insurance policy at the EXACT right time to profit off 9/11, it is all too obvious this was planned.
.
The focus on the mechanism allows people to avoid examining the whole picture, reject the whole theory based on one component, and ignore all the other related evidence.
.
.
.
Good reasoning, comrade. Thank you.
The Judy Wood evidence is really important, though,since if it was just explosives a lot more would have happened.Buildings do not just fall into their own footprint and disappear like that, the excuse was that they fell at free fall speed, but whether it was explosives, or a plane magically destroying supports as the news says, if you bring down a building what will happen is it’s eventually going to tilt over and fall down. That didn’t happen. Most of it got turned to dust.
The ‘building 7 destroyed by rubble’ argument would actually work if the WTC had fallen in a realistic way, tilted over one direction or another, and smashed into building 7, that would obviously be enough to take it down. But it fell into its own footprint in a straight line,that just makes no sense. Unless the whole thing was systematically turned to dust, so that the building just fell straight down and did not hit the other pieces of itself below,since it was all getting turned to dust. Normally, when the bottom parts hit the ground and hit the pieces of the tower that already hit bottom, the whole thing should disbalance and tilt over. Although, normally there should be no reason for the bottom of the building to be collapsing so parts above it can hit the ground, even though that would cause a sideways falling over anyways, if it was an impact from the side that would only affect the steel beams high up on the tower, the only way it could possibly fall down from a sideways plane impact is to fall over.If that plane impact just weakened structural supports and caused them to collapse later, it would be weakened on the side the plane hit from, and the top would fall over that way. Maybe the top half would end up splitting off from the bottom midway. Either way it definitely wouldn’t just fall into its own footprint and seemingly vanish.
Right, but Silverstein just came right out and admitted he ordered WTC-7 to be “pulled” — his words.
But that opens another can of works, since a 47-story building would take weeks to rig properly for the perfect demolition which we saw that afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001.
In this case, however, just one afternoon. I guess that is why they speak of a “New York minute.” 😉