Sorry, Saint Albert (Einstein the jew), you were dead wrong; the electrical universe theory; what future for the earthlings?

Spread the love

Many huge things on various planets and even nebulae resemble electrical patterns. A nebula is a giant cloud of dust and gas in space, seen when stars are being born and beginning to form. Nebulae get their amazing colors from different gasses.

But it is electricity which fires them up, say the rebels against Einstein, and not the relatively weak force of gravity. In fact, they see the whole universe as a plasma field https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics), with plasma being charged particles that conduct electricity.

This gets into basic ways that Einstein, the great jew genius, was completely wrong…. It has been said of Einstein (and also of his co-tribalists Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx):

“Everything he taught that was new was not true; and everything he taught that was true was not new.”

This was a very good, though challenging episode of “The Why Files” below.

As usual, host A.J. Gentile makes an effort to be impartial — and “show both sides” — by trying to debunk some of the new, anti-Einstein, ideas, in this way shielding himself from attack, but he does so in this episode (and on this topic) with little enthusiasm.

And while some of Velikovsky’s theories in his book Worlds In Collision may well be wrong, A.J. is absolutely right to ask why the mainstream scientists went so ballistic on Velikovsky. (He was jewish, too, btw, and a scientist and medical doctor.)

 

A.J. hints this hysteria was like the Covid and vaxx mania we saw back in 2020-21. (He protests: ‘on this platform [jewtube] I cannot even SAY the “v”-word!’)

When the mainstream goes ape against a new idea, as A.J. says, this trashes the whole scientific spirit of free and open inquiry and debate.

If an idea is so wrong, then go and scientifically disprove it!

Don’t say the proponent is a “charlatan” and his followers “bozos” and “morons”!

Where does that come from, that vehemence? As A.J. says, that comes when VIP crooks grasp that lots of power and money are at stake.

A.J. also uses a great clip of Carl Sagan denouncing the trashing and  boycotting of Velikovsky.

With Velikovsky’s book, one of the biggest school-textbook publishers in the US, Macmillan, faced a huge boycott from science professors until it dropped the book, which had been a New York Times bestseller for eleven weeks in 1950!   (They sold the rights to Doubleday, and as is pointed out, how often does a publishing house dump a bestseller?)

The big issue is that all this suggests that the Rockefeller oil industry understands that the electrical-universe theory is right, and so we could be dropping their oil and gaoline — and accessing almost free energy for our cars, homes, and workplaces.

We could be flying swiftly and quietly in our own UFOs — silently and with no pollution or $60-a-week refills — and all if this would be powered by an electrical universe.

My late mother, Constance Colwell Nugent, said to me once:

“I have always wondered about something.  At the 1939 World’s Fair in New York City, I remember well that they were predicting that by 1959, in twenty years, we would have robots doing all the housework, and flying cars that would go up in the air and fly over the city. And now here we are — and where are those things?” 

.

In my religion, I emphasize how wonderful our lives could be, as it is on other planets. But first the jews have to go and the most despicable worms  of all, their goy lackeys.

Here, now, is the video:

I note also from the video that Einstein hated the so-called “quantum entanglement,” calling it, in a phrase that indicated his puzzlement, frustration, and discouragement,

“spooky action at  a distance”

This “spooky action” is when two particles become, in a way, twins or a couple, and then what one does, the other does the exact opposite, and instantly — even if located a million light years away! One particle spins upward, and so the other particle spins downward.

Why did the other particle not take a million years to get the signal?

This contradicts totally Einstein’s dogma that nothing travels faster than the speed of light.  In fact, this is beyond fast travel; this is instantaneous travel.

I had no idea, because we must always protect and revere our great jew genius Einstein, that the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics went to three men who proved Einstein wrong.

2022  Nobel Prize Physics to Aspect, Clauser and Zeilinger:

As this article says, they “invalidated the local realistic vision of the world defended by Einstein.” (https://www.optica.org/about/newsroom/news_releases/2022/october/aspect_clauser_zeilinger_awarded_2022_nobel_prize/)

A.J. makes the point that one of the two particle twins is not local, transferring information instantly across huge distances. But then how are particles communicating?

Plasma, which Russian physicist Nikolai Kozyrev and Nikola Tesla called “the ether.”

All this validates “zero point energy” (which is what runs UFOs  and also Fourth Reich craft) and also   Tesla’s Wardenclyffe experiment, sending electricity wirelessly through ten miles of dirt,as  Tesla did, to make a fluorescent light bulb light up!

Wireless electricity from an electrical universe!

The Wardenclyffe Tower on Long Island https://www.ufoinsight.com/conspiracy/technology/nikola-tesla-free-energy

Excerpt:

Wardensclyffe Tower was the next phase of proving and implementing free energy. His ultimate aim would be to install these towers all over the planet. Everything would be able to “tap into” the energy these towers would harness. There would be no need for wires, connections, or indeed perpetual costs. Once installed, the energy supply would be endless and come straight from the planet.

It is because everything is electricity.

Electricity, not Einstein’s gravity, gave the stars their energy, fired them up, and keep them going now (and not nuclear fusion, just as Nikolai Kozyrev said).

 

…..Exploring the Electric Universe Theory: From Plasma Cosmology to Controversy

https://www.electricuniverse.info/

Nico de Pauli

2 min read
·
Mar 3

The Electric Universe theory is a controversial hypothesis that challenges mainstream scientific understanding of the universe. At its core, the theory suggests that electricity, rather than gravity, is the primary force governing the cosmos. This idea has been met with both fascination and skepticism, with some proponents arguing that it offers a more elegant and comprehensive explanation for a range of natural phenomena, while others criticize it as unscientific and unsupported by evidence.

According to proponents of the Electric Universe theory, electricity plays a critical role in shaping the universe. Plasma, which is ionized gas, is the dominant form of matter in the universe, making up 99.999% of visible matter[3].

Proponents argue that plasma reacts strongly to electromagnetic fields and currents, and that this electrical activity is responsible for many natural phenomena, including auroras, lightning, and even the behavior of galaxies and other celestial bodies[1].

Northern lights over Lake Superior

One of the key claims made by supporters of the Electric Universe theory is that it provides a more comprehensive and elegant explanation for certain phenomena than current mainstream theories. For example, proponents argue that the theory can explain the formation of galaxies, which is a process that is currently poorly understood by mainstream astrophysics. In the Electric Universe theory, galaxies are formed through the interaction of electromagnetic forces, rather than solely through the influence of gravity[4]. Similarly, the theory proposes that electrical activity on the sun is responsible for its heat and energy output, rather than nuclear fusion[2].

However, critics of the Electric Universe theory argue that it is not supported by empirical evidence and is therefore not a valid scientific theory. They point out that many of the claims made by proponents of the theory are speculative and lack clear evidence to support them[10]. Additionally, some critics argue that the theory ignores or downplays the role of gravity in shaping the universe, which is a fundamental force that has been extensively studied and understood by mainstream astrophysics[2].

Despite the controversy surrounding the Electric Universe theory, it has gained a significant following and continues to attract interest from both scientific and non-scientific communities.

[end]

.

.

……Nordic aliens were super-high-tech, “beautiful people and compassionate”

This is an article about the famous 1954 Staffordshire, England UFO sighting, which for credibility is right up there with the Travis Walton abduction in New Mexico.That was witnessed in horror by his entire crew of forestry work buddies, who then reported this abduction to the sheriff. A search was begun, and then Walton was released by the Grey aliens, one of whom impersonated a Nordic, btw, a human, to try to calm Walton down, who was terrified of the Greys.

Source: https://www.blueblurrylines.com/2018/10/jessie-roestenburgs-1954-ufo-encounter.html

It starts out showing how comic books distorted what really happened, and made these Scandinavian-looking, advanced humans into truly hideous aliens!

 

 

The comic book, UFO Flying Saucers No. 7, August 1975 published by Gold Key (Western Publishing Company, Inc.) featured a brief adaptation of the first Jessie Roestenburg sighting,  “The Unsmiling Men,” a four page story illustrated by John Celardo.  Its chief departure from the original account is in the depiction of the saucer occupants, drawn here as weird aliens, not the beautiful angelic astronauts Jessie described. One interesting thing the story does well is to demonstrate is the peculiar angle the saucer would have to tip forward in order for the occupants and witnesses to be able to see each other.

 

TV Coverage
 

In 1976, Hugh Burnett was preparing a UFO documentary for the BBC, and he approached Charles Bowen and Gordon Creighton of Flying Saucer Review.

They gave him the contact information for Jessie Roestenburg. [Btw, she was British and married to a Dutchman.]

The documentary was titled Out of this World, and it was first broadcast May 10, 1977 on BBC 1. It’s largely responsible for reviving interest in the case, and today, most people are probably familiar with Jessie Roestenburg’s story via the YouTube clip of her from the programIt’s often shared with comments noting how genuine, sincere and credible she appears.

 

She describes the saucer as looking like a Mexican hat, and says occupants, says were beautiful people with long golden hair, wearing  coverings over their heads like a “transparent fishbowl.”
.
“They just looked, and I was absolutely paralytic with fear. I couldn’t move, although my mind was taking over. And they seemed so sympathetic that I was mesmerized, seemed to be – oh, ages, but it could have only been seconds. After checking on her boys, “I looked up and it was gone.”
.
Asked about the size of the object, she says it was “massive,” meaning that it was larger than the roof of the house. She said they saw the object again in the distance, that it circled them three times, then it shot off.
.
A spaceman in a fishbowl helmet, as seen in The Man from Planet X, 1951
More fishbowls from The Net, 1953
.
Mrs. Roestenburg appeared in another UFO program a few years later, and told her story again on the episode, “U.F.O.s” of Arthur C. Clarke’s Mysterious World, which was broadcast Nov. 4, 1980.
.
It’s interesting to contrast it with her previous clip from the 1977, Out of this World. Her description of the events are very similar,  sometimes word for word. In both she’s quite animated, but here she’s far less emotional, and perhaps convincing. 
 
This is how, this time, she describes discovering the flying saucer:

“To my amazement there, suspended on the top of the roof of this old farm, was this object that I can only describe as a huge Mexican hat. It was that shape, without the bobbles. It must have been fifteen to twenty yards from where I stood. It covered the roof, so in circumference it must have been about sixty feet, it was enormous.  

The people in the space-craft were just looking out, I could see them from the waist to the top of their heads. They were very beautiful people. They had long golden hair… (but no mention of the fishbowl helmets). and they just looked at us. Their eyes – the expression in their eyes – were full of compassion.”

And then all of a sudden, I felt the tension leaving me and I felt movement, and I turned around to touch my children and when I looked again it was gone.”

Moments later, her younger son pointed it out, then, “it circled round the farm three times, then it just shot straight up and away.”

“U.F.O.s” episode of Arthur C. Clarke’s Mysterious World  (link)
How Big was the UFO?  
 
The account from the two shows differ from the original version documented by Gavin Gibbons on several details, and none of the other subsequent events or sightings were discussed. The part about Jessie seeing the saucer ascend, then running inside to look for a pencil was dropped, and instead she remains outside for the entire sighting. Also, when seen again, the saucer makes not one and  a half circles, but three around the farm on its exit; but perhaps that’s an unimportant difference.
 
 
The biggest difference seems to be the size of the UFO. The figure Jessie gave for the saucer’s size in the first account was, “about 15 to 20 feet in diameter,” which matches the drawing she made for the newspaper. In her sketch, it depicts the saucer as room-sized, not house-sized. In the Jul-Aug 1955 FSR, investigator Wilfrid Daniels gave the size as “a 25-ft. saucer.” In her later television interviews the spaceship was described to be enormous,  large enough to cover the entire roof of the cottage. 
Thirty Years Later, New Details Emerge
Excepts from Jenny Randles’ Abduction (aka Alien Abductions), 1988, pages 68-70, Chapter 5, “Alien Abductions – The British Catalogue,” Type II: Contact Cases

21 October 1954 –a cottage at Vicarage Farm, Ranton, Staffordshire, England.

This case is legendary in UFO circles, having featured in several books during the 1950s, but no one seemed to have looked at it recently, so on 6 August 1987 I interviewed the chief witness, Mrs Jessie Roestenburg [married to a Tony Roestenburg from Holland].

She was in her late twenties in 1954 and had two children, Anthony (aged eight) and Ronald (six).

They do remember the events, but only vaguely. Jessie had felt ‘tingles’ all day, prior to 4:45 p.m., when the incident occurred. (Recap of sighting.)“It felt like hours passed, but it must have been seconds. Time was suspended. I was also paralysed. It was like I was in a vice. But my mind was working overtime.” 

“…nothing Jessie said indicated to me that she was familiar with UFO cases…”

Since then she has often thought about it: ‘This was something absolutely marvellous. The saddest part to me is that I have never been able to fully understand the greatness of this thing.’

However, she says that she has since had a ‘great, almost extreme, development of ESP. I know things about people. I understand situations. All this probably sounds crazy, but it is true.’

Some of the things that have happened include seeing the aliens again in her house ‘. . . out of the corner of my eye …. But I think it could be a “thought thing”. It could be my imagination’. 

These contacts have implanted feelings into her mind about the aliens:

‘I think they’ll be here when I need them …. They are surveying us. They’re afraid that we might panic. But some of them are living amongst us.’

Jessie Roestenburg impressed me because she had not become a ‘UFO nut’ and had seemingly read no books on the subject since 1954. She had seen the Spielberg film Close Encounters of the Third Kind but in typical fashion said about it, ‘I remember thinking whoever did this film has a good understanding of the subject. But when those little funny aliens came on, I almost stood up and shouted, “They’re not like that!” I don’t believe in little green men. Not after what I’ve seen.”  

Excerpts from the interview were carried in an article in The Star, Feb. 29, 1988,
 
 
1998
Timothy Good’s  Alien Base, 1998, contains an interview with Jessie Roestenburg that offers details I’d not found documented elsewhere, health problems following her first sighting.
 
Jessie‘s health began to deteriorate.
.
‘I went to see my doctor, who had read about what happened,’ she said, ‘but he thought I was round the twist. I insisted on seeing a psychiatrist and he said: “There’s nothing wrong with your mind but you do you need to go to hospital.”
.
He took me himself and they did a blood count. [It] was so low they couldn’t understand how I was still alive. They said they wouldn’t be surprised if I was suffering from radiation sickness. For a while, I was in a terrified mess but gradually got better.”
 
Good quotes Jessie from the news story by reporter Neil Thomas in the Staffordshire Newsletter, August 30, 1996, which gives her name as “Jessica Roestenburg.” She said, “To this day I don’t know what they were, I don’t believe they wanted to do us any harm. They are far more intelligent than we are.”
 
2011 (probably from 2006)
Sadly, Jessie Roestenburg passed away on May 12, 2017. Luckily John Hanson was able to interview her a few times in her later years for Haunted Skies.
 
From John Hanson 2006, Haunted Skies-Vol. 1. Photo by David Sankey
.
Excerpts from the Haunted Skies blog by John Hanson and Dawn Holloway
“Special Blog to celebrate Volume 3”
 
Jessie’s religious disclosure:

“I seemed to be in some way drawn, or compelled, to the top of the garden – almost as if I was being manipulated by an outside influence, of which I had no control. I glanced around and saw the amazing sight of this flying saucer-shaped object hovering 40-50 feet above the roof of the house.

Inside the ‘saucer’ I could clearly see what looked like two humans, wearing long golden hair down to their shoulders. I felt a mixture of emotions – amazement and fear run through my body, followed by the thought, ‘God will wipe away all tears’.

Immediately, all the tension left me, (something I have never disclosed to anyone before because of its religious significance).

I turned to my sons and asked them if they had seen the ‘flying saucer’. They replied, ‘yes’.”

 
Expanded Account of the Medical Treatment 

After the sighting, she felt revitalized, for a short time, until discovering a strange rash covering her face and front part of the body, accompanied by a considerable loss of weight over a relatively short period, which gave rise for concern.

Jessie sought the advice of her doctor, who was well aware of the UFO incident and intimated there was something wrong with her mental health.

Offended by this suggestion, Jessie contacted a psychiatrist – Dr. Wilson — who confirmed, after a medical examination, there was nothing wrong with her mental state of health.

“He asked me if I had been given a chest x-ray and blood tests. When I told him this had not been done, he personally escorted me to hospital, where a chest X-ray was taken but found to be clear. Unfortunately, blood tests showed the blood count was very low.

The haematologist said to me, ‘If it didn’t sound so ludicrous, l would say you have been exposed to a massive dose of radiation’. I was given injections of iron, twice a week, which caused all sorts of problems before the correct dosage was established.”

.

.

A short clip of Jessie Roestenburg when aged 90; recorded in 2015 by John Hanson and Dawn Holloway of Haunted Skies.
.
Although the Roestenburg children were involved in several of the UFO sightings, they were treated as bystanders in the news coverage and UFO literature.
.
Gavin Gibbons played with the children in his visits with the family and talked to them about the events. At the time, Karin was two and inside the house, but Anthony Jr. , eight, and Ronald, six, were outside and as close to the spacemen in the UFO as Jessie.
.
A year or so later, somewhat incredibly,Gibbons noted it was “an experience now largely forgotten by the children.” If they’ve commented on the family’s UFO sightings as adults, I’ve been unable to locate a credible source. Beyond Gibbons book, there seems to be nothing recording Tony Roestenburg’s sightings. Only Jessie’s story really lives to carry on.
. . .

.

.

……Four outcomes for Earth

Spiritual reading; four different possible futures ahead for earthlings; free advice and the secret person of the heart

This is about people under hypnosis relating their lives in the future.

Excerpt:

When the reports of the 2,500 people who participated in the project were tallied, several interesting features emerged.

First, virtually all of the respondents agreed that the population of the earth had decreased dramatically.

 Many did not even find themselves in physical bodies at all in the various future time periods specified, and those who did noted that the population was much smaller than it is today.  

In addition, the respondents divided up neatly into four different categories, each relating a different future.

One group described a joyless and sterile future in which [presumably earth had been ruined by some ecological disaster,  and so] most people lived up in space stations, wore silvery suits, and ate synthetic food. 

Another reported living happier and more natural lives in natural settings, in harmony with one another, and in dedication to learning and spiritual development.  

 

Type 3, the “hi-tech urbanites,” described a bleak, mechanical future in which people lived in underground cities or cities enclosed in domes or giant bubbles.

Type 4 described themselves as post-disaster survivors living in a world that had been ravaged by some global, possibly nuclear disaster.

People in this group lived in homes ranging from urban ruins to caves to isolated farms, wore plain, hand-sewn clothing that often was made of fur, and obtained much of their food from hunting.

Turn the clock back a thousand years…..but is kill-or-be-killed the fastest path to enlightenment? In warlord-world, the most brutal and treacherous will rise to the top and breed their DNA.

 

 

 

6 Comments

  1. https://photos.app.goo.gl/gdiERpT1FkHLb1mTA
    Un film della serie Loki 2.
    La Triade Annunaki Kurgan Elohim.
    Anu/Enlil/Enki.
    Grandi Costruttori Indoeuropei.
    Loki scopre che questi Tre hanno ingannato la razza umana LOL.
    Lui che viaggia nel tempo per ingannare gli Dei e gli Uomini.
    Bè Enlil rappresenta proprio Loki.
    Il Dio della Genesi che cacciò Enki e suo figlio Adamo dal Paradiso.
    Tutto per la “Corona”(Tavolette del Destino).
    I Kurgan hanno mantenuto i loro beni preziosi attraverso consanguinei(proprio come i Rothschild).
    Proprio come gli Erodiani e le famiglie nobili allacciate al Vaticano.
    Enki però rappresenta Prometeo 😉
    Enki rappresenta la razza umana.

  2. https://beyondenigma.com/was-venus-a-comet-ancient-celestial-event/
    È da un po’ che guardo queste cose.
    È vero.
    I pianeti e l’Universo hanno avuto un forte impatto sulla “visione” dell’Uomo.
    L’Egitto ce lo racconta benissimo.
    Questi miti raccontano la Vita del pianeta Terra e non solo.
    Questo è un ottimo sito.
    Venere.
    Saturno.
    Marte.
    Saturno/SatyaYuga.
    Saturno è anche SATOR.
    Mi chiedo perché il Deep State sfrutta la simbologia di questo pianeta.
    Forse un tempo non era così freddo, così lontano..come un Dio Caduto 😉

  3. Brother, I was just searching your site for ‘Freud’ and i didn’t find a blog on him. I just had a discussion with my mom about him and his disgusting theories about his fixation on sex and his disgusting theory that every male infant wants to ‘have sex with their own mother’ —I can’t get it through to her how evil and disgusting these Jews are.
    .
    Could you blog about Freud so I can show her the truth? donation coming!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*