December 25

Life in form is a bit like lace: exquisite, delicately wrought, elusive, sometimes ephemeral, fragile. The structure is so easily rent, and is itself constructed of and around untold numbers of open spaces.

This is the beauty of what you are living. It is not of whole cloth, nor should you strive to make it so. The light that shines through the intricate spaces is so much more precious for the shadows it creates. Your days and nights are dappled, bright and open, shaded by the poignancy of limitation, loss and longing.

What is real? What is illusion? Does it matter?

What matters, we tell you, is to live it all with everything you have, to weave yourself through that which opens and that which will not be swayed, to become woof to a warp that is ever in movement. Find the  openings and dance in them; don’t hold back. Seize the fretwork and build something upon it where you can, but don’t invest more than everything in that moment.

Some of you are far more reluctant to step into the ecstasy your odyssey offers than you are to dwell on the tasting of sorrow and grief. This may seem odd, but the joy which counters the separation inherent in form promises too much and some of you cannot bear the disappointment that seems inevitably to follow from allowing it full flower.

Others of you step away from pain instinctively, as if it were alien to your being, something that threatens your very life. This is not so, for pain too is a part of the breathtakingly gorgeous tapestry you have chosen to inhabit and contribute to.

Be willing to be pierced, to live asymmetrically, to follow the extraordinary and incomprehensibly complex whorls that are ever around you and before you.

Be a weaver and fear not the end of the thread, for like the spider, you will draw from within yourself that which is needed to dip and leap your way through the next stanza, ever-new, without precedent, and always perfect.

We send you all our love and many, many blessings.

.

.

.

….Still hating the Russians

A comrade wrote:

***

Yes, I have read your essay, and know quite well your belief that Hitler made a mistake in trying to subjugate Russia rather than enlist the Russian people to liberate it from its Jewish-communist rulers.

But Hitler was a masterful strategist and war-planner, who saw three steps ahead of everyone else, and I’m sure he considered that option, but rejected it for good reasons that have not been recorded by history. Enlisting the Russian people to topple the communist Soviet government would still have left a hugely-armed Russia close to Germany’s borders, just waiting for the next Russian dictator to come along and wage war against Germany.

Hitler probably also didn’t trust that the Russian army he armed and supported would be loyal to him, and could turn against Germany once deployed in the field. This, I’ve read, is the main reason Hitler didn’t want an anti-Stalin Russian army fighting alongside the Wehrmacht, and given the well-known duplicity of Slavs, his fear was probably well-founded. Perhaps Hitler had intelligence reports which suggested that such a Russian army would be turned against the Wehrmacht once deployed in the field. And, given that Stalin was preparing to invade and conquer Germany and the rest of Europe in 1941 when Hitler, in desperation, launched his preemptive Operation Barbarossa, one can understand why he would feel less than generous towards the Russians in general.

Also, Germany was winning the war on the Eastern Front in its initial phases, and German troops were close enough to Moscow to see its cathedral spires. The main reason Germany was defeated on the Eastern Front was due to the massive military and financial Lend-Lease aid given by the Jewish-controlled FDR administration to the communist Soviet Union. The vaunted Soviet T-38 tank was based on an American design that was never produced, and their vaunted AK-47 was a direct copy of a German assault rifle called the Sturmgewehr 44 or StG 44.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StG_44

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47

Also, as I’ve commented here, the All-Lies had cracked the German Enigma code even before WWII started, and were sharing German military plans and troop movements with the Soviets from the very beginning of Operation Barbarossa, which is why the Germans were encircled at Stalingrad and lost the huge tank battle at Kursk, to name just two examples. Those battles changed the course of the war, and led to Germany’s defeat in the East:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma_machine

The reason many Russians, mainly north-western Russians, appear Aryan is because the original Russia was established by the Rus’, a Viking tribe from Sweden that invaded and conquered the dark-haired, dark-eyed, part-Mongol Slavic tribes who inhabited most of what is now Russia. To the Viking Rus’, the Slavs were just slaves, which is where the word “slave” comes from. It was a derogatory name given to the Slavic tribes by their Viking Rus’ conquerors:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rus’_people

So, yes, many northwest Russians do look Aryan, but the further East you go in Russia, the more Mongol DNA is present in the population, and these are the half-Mongol barbarians who raped and killed defenseless German civilians by the millions in the closing months of WWII, thus incurring a huge karmic debt on Russia that will eventually be repaid.

***

I replied:

Alright, this is a reasoned response.

But 1) no, the AK-47, which came out after the war, in 1947 as per the name, was NOT an exact copy of the Sturmgewehr 44, and claiming it was reflects your very dangerous contempt and hatred of all things Russians.

Russia is very strong, thanks to Putin and the Russian people — and represents the ONLY important white country that is mostly free of jewry!

In the 1930s I made every effort to appease Fascist Italy, renouncing all claims to the ethnically German South Tyrol, its 250,000 population, and its beautiful alpine villages and cities, which Italy had seized in 1918.

Having lived in northern Tyrol in Austria, I am also very aware of the southern-Tyrol issue. In World War One, as in World War Two, the Italians infamously switched sides and betrayed their German ally.

Why? Well, in WWI, they wanted South Tyrol, up in the Alps, though it was almost 100% German — and yet the nauseating hypocrite, narcissist, and jew lackey Woodrow Wilson had brayed that the war was being fought for the lofty-sounding “self-determination of all peoples.”

After being awarded the German South Tyrol in 1919 for betraying their German alliance partner, the Italians then merely added an “o” or an “a” to the end of the crusty teutonic names of these Tyrolean, germanic towns, but that hardly makes them Italian, does it?

Meran, or excuse me, “Merano” — had been German for over a thousand years!

This renunciation of Südtirol, very painful for me as a born Austrian, a wise decision for which rightwingers mercilessly castigated me 1923-1933 as a “lackey of Mussolini,” paid off handsomely in 1933-39, when Mussolini signed off on our reintroduction of the draft, our revocation of the Versailles Treaty, and our annexations of Austria and Czechoslovakia.

(But yes, Italy was a burden during the war, as we all know.)

In the same way today, I look with a clear and rational head at any and all potential allies in our life-and-death struggle against jewry, looking toward the possibilities of the future and not the painful traumas of the past.

Every country does this. Look at this photo below of US President Dwight Eisenhower, as the US leader in 1953-61, embracing the Fascist dictator Francisco Franco, his enemy in WWII!

Why? Because both countries, Spain and the US, were now in agreement on stopping the Soviet Union! But in 1945 Eisenhower had threatened to INVADE Franquist Spain unless certain Germans, French and Walloon-French Belgian collaborators (such as Pierre Laval and Léon Degrelle) were extradited to Allied countries. Look at them in this pic, hugging away in 1959! 😉

Returning to the AK-47 issue….

Wiki:

The Soviet Union was quick to adopt the assault rifle concept. The AK-47 used a similar-sized intermediate round and followed the design concept, but utilized a rotating bolt as a part of its firing action.[31] In 1944 the US added an automatic fire capability to the M1 carbine, and issued it as the M2 carbine with 30 round magazines, fulfilling much the same function. Kits were distributed to convert M1 carbines to M2s.

The extent to which the Sturmgewehr influenced the development of the AK-47 is not clearly known. Apart from external layout similarity and the gas-operation principle, the AK-47 was not a copy of the German gun because the AK-47 used a very different mechanism. However, tens of thousands of Sturmgewehrs were captured by the Soviets and were more than likely provided to Kalashnikov and his team. In addition, Hugo Schmeisser was put to work by the Soviets at the Izhmash factory (factory number 74) in Izhevsk until 1952.

The understandable truth is that all militaries which are on their toes copy the successful designs of their enemy.

For example, it was Napoleon who introduced medals and ribbons for bravery, and EVERYONE copied that.

A bemedaled Captain James Nugent, USMC

Two lives ago, I wore these medals while I was fighting Napoleon’s troops commanded by Murat! It is okay to learn from your enemy!

 

The current Russian strategy in Ukraine is a “copy” of the German von Clausewitz’s dictum of 200 years ago that the making of territorial gains, or the glorious conquest of major cities, while very good for morale, is irrelevant; what counts is only one thing — the annihilation of the soldiers of the enemy army.

Russia is, in fact, gradually annihilating the Ukrainian army with awesome artillery barrages, just as it wiped out much of our Wehrmacht in 1944-45….

….and as a truly vast country, Russia has no problem whatsoever (except in terms of PR) in temporarily retreating.

And 2) Hitler — and let me remind you who I am before you speculate further on what “Hitler” intended; I know perfectly well what I intended — did indeed distrust the Russians per se.

And the Russians themselves are aware of the deficits in their national character, as are other peoples — and their self-deprecating jokes and humor reflect this.

But my Barbarossa goal, announced with crystal clarity in Mein Kampf — was a vast German conquest in the East, with Russians transformed (back!) into a population of serfs, working the land for their German masters and thus making the Third Reich food-independent, and thus far better off than was Imperial Germany in WWI, blockaded as it was 1914-19 by the Royal Navy and near starvation.

For this prospect — that of being mere serfs, without any rights, on their own land — obviously no Russian patriot would or could possibly fight and die.

And so why would patriotic Russian troops under General Vlassov, or ANY self-respecting Russian, NOT turn against their German allies at the right moment?

Did I ever renounce my Lebensraum policy of seizing giant swaths of Russia and Ukraine for the Reich as agricultural bastions? I am amazed at those who have never read Mein Kampf –– as I have twice in this life, in both German and also in English, and from cover to cover — and yet they claim to me, full of themselves and refusing to do the basics, the fundamentals of research, that “Hitler never said this” when he most plainly did!

In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote (in the second-to-last chapter, XIV, “GERMANY’S POLICY IN EASTERN EUROPE”):

Without consideration of traditions and prejudices, Germany must find the courage to gather our people and their strength for an advance along the road that will lead this people from its present restricted living space to new land and soil, and hence also free it from the danger of vanishing from the earth or of serving others as a slave nation.

The National Socialist Movement must strive to eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area, viewing this latter as a source of food as well as a basis for power politics between our historical past and the hopelessness of our present impotence.[27]

The acquisition of new soil for the settlement of the excess population possesses an infinite number of advantages, particularly if we turn from the present to the future … It must be said that such a territorial policy cannot be fulfilled in the Cameroons, but today almost exclusively in Europe.[63]

In an era when the earth is gradually being divided up among states, some of which embrace almost entire continents, we cannot speak of a world power in connection with a formation whose political mother country is limited to the absurd area of five hundred thousand square kilometers.[65] … It is not in colonial acquisitions that we must see the solution of this problem, but exclusively in the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the entire area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude.[67]

Germany will either become a World Power or will not continue to exist at all. But in order to become a World Power it needs that territorial magnitude which gives it the necessary importance to-day and assures the existence of its citizens.

Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through the line of conduct followed by pre-War Germany in foreign policy. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the South and West of Europe and turn our eyes towards the lands of the East. We finally put a stop to the colonial and trade policy of pre-War times and pass over to the territorial policy of the future.

But when we speak of new territory in Europe to-day we must principally think of Russia and the border States subject to her.

Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way for us here. In delivering Russia over to Bolshevism, Fate robbed the Russian people of that intellectual class which had once created the Russian State and were the guarantee of its existence. For the Russian State was not organized by the constructive political talent of the Slav element in Russia, but was much more a marvellous exemplification of the capacity for State-building possessed by the Germanic element in a race of inferior worth.

Thus were many powerful Empires created all over the earth. More often than once inferior races with Germanic organizers and rulers as their leaders became formidable States and continued to exist as long as the racial nucleus remained which had originally created each respective State. For centuries Russia owed the source of its livelihood as a State to the Germanic nucleus of its governing class.

But this nucleus is now almost wholly broken up and abolished. The Jew has taken its place. Just as it is impossible for the Russian to shake off the Jewish yoke by exerting his own powers [absolutely false! and it was Stalin himself who began purging the jews from all top positions of Soviet power after 1945, and also promoting Russian-Slavic nationalism!!!!], so, too, it is impossible for the Jew to keep this formidable State in existence for any long period of time. He himself is by no means an organizing element, but rather a ferment of decomposition.

This colossal Empire in the East is ripe for dissolution. And the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a State. We are chosen by Destiny to be the witnesses of a catastrophe which will afford the strongest confirmation of the nationalist theory of race.

But it is our task, and it is the mission of the National Socialist Movement, to develop in our people that political mentality which will enable them to realize that the aim which they must set to themselves for the fulfilment of their future must not be some wildly enthusiastic adventure in the footsteps of Alexander the Great but industrious labour with the German plough, for which the German sword will provide the soil.

 

I have the most profound regrets about this stupid and utterly unrealistic policy.

That massive country next door to settle was obviously Russia. 

Yes, I did launch a justified “preventive war” to prevent Stalin’s own surprise attack on us, as Russian scholars themselves have revealed in their discussions of the Soviet plan called “Operation Icebreaker” [http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223]

Hitler (I) did indeed hit Stalin in June 1941 — before Stalin could hit Hitler in July of that same year — but Mein Kampf had come out long before that, back in 1925, advocating that Germany take land from Russia. That was 16 long years before “Icebreaker.”
.
And cataclysmic defeat in 1945 was the result of my wrong-headed contempt for the awesome power and heroism in battle of the Russian nation.

We squandered the huge possibility of an invincible Germano-Russian alliance, with two great antisemitic peoples cooperating to stop the jews from annihilating us both.

Never will I forget the hard lesson that I learned — which is that Western Whites (America and Western and Central Europe) MUST get along with the Eastern Whites, with the Russians, or the jews will devour us both!

.
.
.