Spiritual reading; four different possible futures ahead for earthlings; free advice and the secret person of the heart

Spread the love

Aryans are on on many planets, but on this one we are at a fork in the road — heaven if we want it, or millennia of even worse hell than now. The Third Reich was a real-world taste of what is possible.

.

.

….spiritual reading for August 16

When the sun rises tomorrow, no matter where you happen to be, both you and your world will have changed. As you know, there is nothing more than the moment and yet living as you do, in a material plane, the past and future are largely undeniable. And often you deny them at your peril should you wish to try.

One of the great challenges of living in physical form is to find the space, at once both infinitesimally small and limitless, where the moment is the clear truth and the exigencies of life in a body are taken fully into your consideration. Sometimes these instances come purely as grace and at other times you cultivate them, work hard and pay attention and are rewarded with a sparkling of illumination.

Today, if you do not fight it, there is a good chance of having some of these moments through grace alone. All you have to do is breathe and be willing to allow it.

There is a great deal that is happening around you, as we have no doubt that you are aware. If you close your eyes and feel into it, we bet that many of you can actually sense the rapidly shifting and swirling energies that are affecting you and the planet itself.

If you cannot feel them yourself, take our word for it—there are energetic storms of all sorts which are moving and changing the world all the time. And if you don’t want to take our word for it, look around at how human beings are acting, how furiously and often strangely many of your sort are behaving, and that should verify for you that there is plenty of unseen action causing the effects you get to read and hear about in the news.

That having been said, the best thing that you can do is to find your way to ride out or on the energetic storms that pass through your environment, which it is important to note very much includes your own being. Tune in to the current pulse, feel it out to know whether it something you should shelter from or
something that can carry you, and then act.

*** This one song is an energetic storm, and is going up by two million views a day, being now at 14 million views
.
Note that the singer does not grin or smile at the end. He is in no mood to sugar-coat anything or take a numbing swig of beer, any relaxing pot or watch any zombyizing tv.

This is one seriously fed-up, angry white male.

Rich Men North of Richmond
.
[Verse 1]
I’ve been sellin’ my soul, workin’ all day
Overtime hours for bullshit pay
So I can sit out here and waste my life away
Drag back home and drown my troubles away

[Pre-Chorus]
It’s a damn shame what the world’s gotten to
For people like me and people like you
Wish I could just wake up and it not be true
But it is, oh, it is
.
[Chorus]
Livin’ in the new world With an old soul
These rich men north of Richmond
Lord knows they all just wanna have total control
Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do
And they don’t think you know, but I know that you do
‘Cause your dollar ain’t shit and it’s taxed to no end
‘Cause of rich men north of Richmond

.

Northern Virginia is now a cancer full of CIA, Pentagon, bureaucrats, rich Masonic pedophiles, and hordes of libtards, muslims, Mexican illegal aliens, and childless white homos — far more dogs and cats than white kids. I lived there for years.


.
[Verse 2]
I wish politicians would look out for miners
And not just miners on an island somewhere
Lord, we got folks in the street, ain’t got nothin’ to eat
And the obese milkin’ welfare
.
[Verse 3]
Well, God, if you’re 5-foot-3 and you’re 300 pounds
Taxes ought not to pay for your bags of fudge rounds
Young men are puttin’ themselves six feet in the ground
‘Cause all this damn country does is keep on kickin’ them down

[Pre-Chorus]
Lord, it’s a damn shame what the world’s gotten to
For people like me and people like you
Wish I could just wake up and it not be true
But it is, oh, it is
.
[Chorus]
Livin’ in the new world
With an old soul
These rich men north of Richmond
Lord knows they all just wanna have total control
Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do
And they don’t think you know, but I know that you do
‘Cause your dollar ain’t shit and it’s taxed to no end
‘Cause of rich men north of Richmond

[Outro]
I’ve been sellin’ my soul, workin’ all day
Overtime hours for bullshit pay

(scowls)

***

When we say ‘act’ we are referring primarily to the energetic stance you take. Do you hunker down in order not to get caught up in a tornado, or do you go out and open up like a flower to a spring rain? More than at any time in the past, if you fail to read these movements of energy, or fail to read them correctly, you stand to suffer in one fashion or another.

Our role, of course, is to help you to feel into them so that you not only don’t suffer, but can grow and flourish and be an important and integral part of the transformation that is afoot.

To this end, we want to encourage you all to set aside time, if you do not do this already, each and every day, in whatever format works for you, to practice feeling the nature of the energies which are present around you. It needn’t be more than a minute or two—not a big commitment of time, but rather a commitment of intent.

Many of you are adept at knowing the nature of your own energies, those that originate within. Many of you have explored and plumbed, devoted attention and time to understanding your own nature.

This is critical because ultimately, you need to know the difference between that which is yours and that which is not.
.
Then you practice feeling outward so that you can know the feeling of the energies that are not yours but which will profoundly impact you each day. It is often easiest to do this when you are not confronted with the energies of other beings. Big surprise, right? In other words, don’t try to do this in a mall or a subway or a grocery store on Saturday morning. Sitting, walking, simple working: any of these provide many people with the space they need to feel out into the universe with the greatest clarity.

It may or may not come easily, but we hope you’ll try. And try again. Use the tools you have—they are the right ones for you. And this—try to trust what you find. It is quite an easy matter to discount your own intuition, so be on guard against that, please.

A sense of the energetic mood on a daily basis will assist you as you work with your own knowing of how things feel and how you can best interact with the forces which are with you all the time, know it or not.

We send much love.

.

.

…..From The Holographic Universe four different outcomes

A comrade in California sent me $100 and this legendary masterpiece of a book.

 

The book is basically about how physicists at the highest level have been realizing since 1900 that this physical universe is a very real-seeming construct, a perfect illusion, a game with rules which we agree to play when we incarnate here — to spiritually grow through hardships and challenges.

All this is in harmony with what I said in another life:

Life is struggle, and if you refuse to struggle, you don’t deserve to live.

Anyway, in chapter 7, “Time Out of Mind,”  the author, Michael Talbot (a Norman name, btw), says that renowned textbooks of therapeutic hypnosis for psychiatrists warn that the professional hypnotist should not be shocked if a hypnosis session — designed to unearth and address early childhood trauma — glides right over into the person’s traumas from PREVIOUS LIVES.

Talbot writes, on pp213-14

Dr. Joel Whitton, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto [Canada] Medical School, has used hypnosis to study what people unconsciously know about themselves. […] An expert in clinical hypnosis, he also hold a degree in neurobiology, and asks them about their past, their distant past, to be exact.

For the last several decades, Whitton has been quietly gathering evidence suggestive of reincarnation. […]

The main thrust of Whitton’s hypnosis research is based on a simple and startling fact. When individuals are hypnotized, they often remember what appear to be memories of a previous existence.

.

For 500 years the German Aryans waged war on the Roman Aryans. I visited a battlefield in the south of France naer the commune of Pouirrières (https://www.reconstitution-romaine.com/pourrières%202013.html) where the germanic Ambrones and Teutons were slaughtered by general Marius. From thousands of sun-bleached thigh bones local farmers literally made fences.

Why, O Romans, did you not stop trying to conquer this gifted Germanic nation and enslave them, and instead just let them come in one by one or in small groups, as the incredibly valuable nordic, white immigrants they could have been (which is what millennia later the Americans, Russians and other countries would   do)? Even Emperor Augustus’s own bodyguards consisted of Germans!

List of Roman-German wars and battles

 

Some incarnations were relatively quite happy, and often we have a fondness for certain things or people connected to an earlier life. You may meet someone and feel an instant bond. (This is how I was with Margaret. Within one week of us meeting on April 20, 2005 she moved in with me.)

 

The phenomenon [of  hypnotized patiens recalling details of previous incarnations] is widely recognized, even by skeptics.

For example, the psychiatry textbook Trauma, Trance and Transformation warns fledgling hypnotherapists not to be surprised if such memories surface spontaneously in their hyponotized patients.

The author of the text [Edelstine] rejects the idea of rebirth, but notes that such memories can have remarkable healing potential nevertheless. 

.

.

(Yes, Edelstien was a jew, but so was the doctor who, in my last life, cared deeply for my mother Clara with her awful breast cancer. I said at the Berghof: “If every jew were an Edeljude [noble jew] like Dr. Bloch, there would be no need for antisemitism.” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Bloch) )

Talbot then says, on pages 224-225, that under hypnosis patients also describe one of four very different future for the earth, three of them being bleak and one very grim indeed — back to the Stone Age.

In other words, the majority of earthlings of all races stay, to be frank, even as the curse of the ego becomes obvious to us all, the selfish assholes that the majority is now, denying all sorts of reality.

Yes, they reject any truths that could end up getting them ostracized, shunned, fired or arrested, whether about jews, the Holohoax, race, the Covid clot-shot, Putin-is-out-to-reconquer-Europe-for-a-neo-Soviet-empire, or other hot-button jew LIES.

And so the sheeple get one of three miserable futures which they richly deserve based on their thoughts, words and deeds: 

more pain, more enslavement, more exploitation, mere existence — meaningless drudgery ending in a bleak death.

“Life’s a bitch and then ya die.”

So Earth stays, in three of the four scenarios, as the trailer-park planet of this solar system. 😉

Note, however, that in one of the four scenarios, earthlings do awaken, evolve, and our earth becomes a wonderful, peaceful garden planet where people love and cooperate with each other, embracing the fact that we are here to change, grow and blossom by sincere honesty about our flaws. 🙂

People are happy. 🙂

I guess that if you have never been to a truly warm Christian congregation (whatever flaws may exist in their doctrines, such as the core flaw of judeophilia) that is imbued with “God is love” you have never felt this kind of atmosphere.

I have, by having been a Jehovah’s Witness long ago, 1970-75,  and from having visited Mormon congregations. (Margi had the same experience at a Mormon “ward” in Asheville, North Carolina. The love buzz is palpable in the air….) I also experienced this with Mel-Gibson-type Latin-Mass Catholics….. a wave of love you can feel, and with beautifully behaved children all about (often with above-average looks).

I am talking LARGE white families (4-6 kids), and husbands and wives who clearly, visibly are close and love each other.

.

If you reject all this as superstition, as “Christian bullshit,” and grumble that “Jesus was a jew” (which I sincerely and categorically refute, and I did so in my last life, too) then you just have never experienced WHY Christianity took off…. that agapé feeling of fellowship, friendship, caring, compassion, and a roll-up-your-sleeves desire to actually help a “brother” or “sister” in need with some practical problem they may have.

Maybe they need a babysitter, or a ride to the doctor, or their lawn mowed when ill, or a brake job, or help in moving. I saw JWs a hundred times help others in practical ways. It was beautiful to see both loving speech and loving deeds. 🙂 With the Jehovah people, over a five-year period I also saw Blacks and Whites truly getting along perfectly despite all the real differences between our races.

So I have experienced MASSES of humans (people just like you and me) who are getting along great. 

So yes, there could be a great reform of humanity and then this beautiful planet would also have beautiful behavior, attractive cities, lovely gardens and parks, and humans who live 200 years or more, growing all the time. And no one dies miserable and alone,, but passes over surrounded by friends and children.

After showing you this scan from The Holographic Universe, I am typing out for you the actual passage.

Excerpt, recounting the findings of a book by Helen Stewart Wambach, PhD (1925-85, a San-Francisco-based psychologist) and her colleague, psychologist Chet Snow, entitled Mass Dreams of the Future:

Another past-life researcher who turned up evidence suggestive that the mind has a hand in creating one’s destiny was the late San Francisco-based psychologist, Helen Wambach Ph.D.  [photo r.]

Wambach’s approach was to hypnotize groups of people in small  workshops, regress them to specific time periods, and ask them a predetermined list of questions about their sex, clothing styles, occupation, utensils used in eating, and so on.

[JdN: To aid analysis, subjects were hypnotically regressed and guided to choose a past life from a selection of time periods, such as 2000 BC, 500 BC, 25 AD, 1200 AD, 1500 AD or 1850 AD.]

Over the course of her 29-year investigation of  the past-life phenomenon, she hypnotized literally thousands of individuals, and amassed some impressive findings.

 

One criticism that is leveled against reincarnation is that people only seem to remember past lives as famous or historical personages. Wambach, however, found that more than 90% of her subjects recalled past lives as peasants, laborers, farmers, and primitive food gatherers.

Less that 10% remembered lives as aristocrats, and none remembered being anyone famous, a finding that argues against the notion that past-life memories are fantasies. 

Her subjects were also extraordinarily accurate when it came to historical details, even obscure ones. For instance, when people remembered lives in the 1700s, they described using a three-pronged  fork to eat their evening meals,  but after 1790 they described most forks as having four prongs, an observation that correctly reflects the historical evolution of the fork. 

Subjects were equally accurate when it came to describing clothing and footwear, types of foods eaten, et cetera. 

Wambach discovered that she could also progress people to future lives. Indeed, her subjects’ descriptions of coming centuries were so fascinating that she conducted a major future-life progression project in France and the United States. Unfortunately, she passed away before completing the study, but psychologist Chet Snow, a former colleague of Wambach’s, carried on her work, and recently published the results in a book entitled Mass Dreams of the Future. 

When the reports of the 2,500 people who participated in the project were tallied, several interesting features emerged.

First, virtually all of the respondents agreed that the population of the earth had decreased dramatically.

 Many did not even find themselves in physical bodies at all in the various future time periods specified, and those who did noted that the population was much smaller than it is today.  

In addition, the respondents divided up neatly into four different categories, each relating a different future.

Chet Snow

Chet and his wife Kallista, who is from France,  where Chet lived in 1985; they have lived for years in Sedona, Arizona

One group described a joyless and sterile future in which [presumably earth had been ruined by some ecological disaster,  and so] most people lived up in space stations, wore silvery suits, and ate synthetic food. 

Another reported living happier and more natural lives in natural settings, in harmony with one another, and in dedication to learning and spiritual development.  

 

Type 3, the “hi-tech urbanites,” described a bleak, mechanical future in which people lived in underground cities or cities enclosed in domes or giant bubbles.

Type 4 described themselves as post-disaster survivors living in a world that had been ravaged by some global, possibly nuclear disaster.

People in this group lived in homes ranging from urban ruins to caves to isolated farms, wore plain, hand-sewn clothing that often was made of fur, and obtained much of their food from hunting.

Turn the clock back a thousand years…..but is kill-or-be-killed the fastest path to enlightenment? In warlord-world, the most brutal and treacherous will rise to the top and breed their DNA.

 

 

….More on Helen Wambach

The Pioneering Work of Dr. Helen Wambach

March 8, 2023

 GROUP HYPNOSIS AS A METHODOLOGY TO RECALL PAST-LIVES – DAVID PYE (IS.32)

Home JRT Article The Pioneering Work of Dr. Helen Wambach: Group Hypnosis as a Methodology to Recall Past-Lives – David Pye (Is.32)

by David Pye

Abstract—In this article, David Pye begins in an engaging style by introducing his own journey of curiosity around the notions of life, death and the afterlife and how his encounter with the work of Dr Helen Wambach further illuminated his ideas. David then explains the prevailing culture within which Dr Wambach’s work was embedded before explaining the research methodologies she developed as she sought to understand whether or not past life memories were merely fantasies or had a basis in reality. The article then progresses towards Helen’s findings via an interesting selection of research participants descriptions associated with her specific questioning techniques, and historical graphs, before sharing Dr Wambach’s ultimate conclusions that past life memories are facts not fictions.

Introduction

As a child growing up in the 1950’s I was like many other boys seeking some kind of adventure, so I joined the boy scouts. Our scout hut was the church hall and part of the deal of joining was an expectation to attend Sunday school. This I duly did and was surprised to be told that we all go to heaven when we die. Even at my young age this seemed rather strange as I surmised that this meant that heaven must be absolutely full with all the billions and billions of people that had died and gone to heaven. Even more packed out if we include all the pets that apparently also join us in heaven. How does God keep a handle on all these dead people and what do they do all day, especially as they seemed destined to live up in heaven forever? It seemed to me that it must get pretty boring up there! It also seemed very unfair that some people lived long happy lives on earth, whilst others suffered under famine and war or died at a very young age. None of it made much sense.

I sought an answer from my Sunday school teacher who could only tell me that “God moved in mysterious ways” but he had a plan for everyone so it would all work out. That of course was a remarkably unconvincing answer, but it was the best I could get.

It was some years later that I happened on a book about Buddhism and the concept of reincarnation. “Ah”, I thought, “This makes far more sense”.  Humans die, their souls go to heaven, and are reborn again to live another life. The recycling of souls appeared to be a very efficient mechanism and evened out all the inequalities in the world.

Bad people get reborn into lives of suffering as a punishment whereas good people get to be reborn into happy lives as a reward. A satisfactory concept all round, I concluded.

To be honest though, reincarnation still seemed to involve a lot of suffering, even folks who live apparently happy lives still have a fair share of worry and stress. “There must be more to this”, I pondered thoughtfully. Buddhism does explain that the aim is to get off this continuous cycle of death and rebirth through meditation practise and to ultimately reach a state of Samadhi where you no longer get reborn. “What happens then?” I wondered. Do souls just hang around for ever in this Samadhi state in some Buddhist heaven? Also, what happens when people die, are their souls shoved straight back down into a baby? Who decides whether you have been a good bunny or a bad bunny? There were still many unanswered questions.

Over the following years I read many books on the topic of death. I particularly liked the spiritualist approach where dead people would communicate through mediums and say what a splendid place, they were in. The dead lived in houses the same as on earth, but everywhere was clean and perfect, and if they wanted anything they could, with a bit of effort, just visualise it and it would appear. They also had lots of other friends and family members who had passed over to keep them company and everyone was exceptionally friendly. This all sounded rather nice I thought.

It was in the late 1970’s that I came across two books by Dr Helen Wambach. Both published in 1979 ‘Reliving Past Lives’ and ‘Life Before Life.’ These two books were a complete game changer for me and for the first time I felt I had an understanding around the mechanism of reincarnation.

Allow me to explain what is so different and so ground-breaking about Dr Wambach’s research and her unique approach to the topic. But first we need to consider the environment in which Dr Wambach started her research.

Background Environment of Dr Wambach’s Work

Back in 1950’s America there was a spectacular case of reincarnation which seemed to excite the nation. In 1952 US Housewife Virginia Tighe was hypnotically regressed by amateur hypnotist Morey Bernstein. Virginia was taken back to her childhood, then back through her birth and death to what appeared to be a previous life. This past life was as Bridey Murphy in Cork, Ireland during 1798 to 1864.

Under hypnosis, Virginia revealed many facts about her life as Bridey which were later verified by investigations in Ireland. A vast amount of information was found, and it was claimed as ‘proof’ of reincarnation. Virginia had never left the US and had certainly not been to Ireland. Bernstein wrote a book called ‘The Search for Bridey Murphy’ (1956) which was later made into a film by Paramount Pictures (Langley, 1956).

The excitement was so great that even Bridie Murphy songs and dances were created. Eventually certain newspapers dispatched investigators over to Ireland to check the details. It was soon found that certain key ‘facts’ which emerged via hypnosis, including that Bridey was the daughter of a doctor, were not true. Bridey was actually a servant. Other claims were also unfounded, such as the church where Virginia stated she was married (as Bridey) did not exist. But what really put doubt into the case was the discovery that when she was 5 years old Virginia had a neighbour who was an Irish Immigrant, and her name was Bridey Murphy.

It was quickly concluded that little Virginia had heard stories told by Bridey and had incorporated them into her own memory. A process known as Cryptomnesia which is defined as: “A memory that has been forgotten and then returns without being recognized as such by the subject, who believes it is something new and original” (Porge, 2018, p.1). As a result, the whole Bridey Murphy proof of reincarnation story was debunked. The reason I cite this case is to inform the reader of the type of environment that Dr Wambach was in when starting her research, and why she wanted to find out if past lives were fantasy or real. I will briefly summarise some of Dr Wambach’s findings, as reported in her two books, below.

The Research

Dr Wambach was a clinical psychologist at JFK University in San José, California [an accredited university that operated from 1965-2020, a period of 55 years, when its programs were absorbed into National University, another accredited university, which is located in San Diego, California].

The research into past lives she engaged in was not funded by the university but was self-funded by Dr Wambach.

She approached her research into past life regression on the assumption that it was probably fantasy – not deliberately made up with the intention of deceiving but created by an obliging mind eager to answer questions under hypnosis. Adopting an open-minded but sceptical stance she decided that a standard procedure and standard questions could be formulated and adopted to readily expose fantasy past lives. In an attempt to avoid the pitfalls of an individual hypnotic regression, as in the case of Virginia Tighe, she created a protocol of group hypnosis which involved taking several people at once back into their past lives.

She reasoned that if the phenomenon of past life memory retrieval was fantasy then a past life would be more likely to be:

  1. A famous or interesting life (who wants to recall a life slaving in the fields all day, more likely to be Napoleon or an Egyptian Pharaoh)
  2. More upper class than lower class (similar reasons to above)
  3. More male lives than female (males had more freedom and opportunities in the past than women)
  4. Time periods familiar to the subject (wild west, gangsters, or other lives derived from films and books)
  5. Population changes in time periods not reflected in lives reported (as noted by Wambach (1979b, p.138) world population was fairly steady for thousands of years up to 25AD, began to rise sharply from 1200AD, quadrupled in the 1800’s, then accelerated rapidly to its present level of 7 billion)

Method

As noted above, the method chosen to investigate was not by individual hypnotic regressions but by group regressions with up to 30 subjects at a time. Subjects brought cushions or mats to lie on and Dr Wambach talked the group through a regression. To aid analysis, subjects were hypnotically regressed and guided to choose a past life from a selection of time periods, such as 2000BC, 500BC, 25AD, 1200AD, 1500AD or 1850AD. Subjects were then asked a series of questions and told they will remember the answers on waking and be able to complete a special answer form.

Three separate regression sessions were undertaken with an identical procedure for every group to allow for research rigour in terms of reproducibility of the approach and the data. It should be remembered that there were no computers available to help assess and correlate the data. It was all tediously interrogated and statistically analysed. The funding of the research was helped by charging each participant who attended the workshops a small fee. By all accounts there was no shortage of subjects willing to take part.

Questions

The questions chosen were quite detailed and included: the type of clothes worn, utensils used for eating food, diet, skin colour, gender, money, social class, date and type of death. Subjects were also asked to recall their death experience.

Further questions were asked on what happens in between lives, how is the current life chosen, who helps decide, why this life, why this time period and what is the purpose.

Also the birth experience into their present life, and at what point did they connect with the foetus. Lastly, questions were asked as to whether people in their present lives were known to them from previous lives. As a consequence of Dr Wambach telling the research participants under hypnosis that they would be able to answer the questions she got very detailed answers at the end of the sessions.

Results

The data sheets completed at the end of each session revealed some fascinating results, an example from ‘Life Before Life’ (Wambach, 1979a, p.28) is evidenced below:

Yes, I chose to be born. Someone did help me choose and it seemed to be some voice that I trusted greatly. It was kind, helpful and wise, very wise. My feelings about the prospect of being born were very positive. When you asked the purpose for this lifetime, it flashed that I was to broaden people’s minds.

I chose this time period to be born because it is a great period of change where people need stability within themselves. I am supposed to help them somehow. I did choose to become a male, because it is good for my work, and I enjoy that role.

My mother was my wife in a past life, my father was my son. I got some faint flashes of mates or lovers, but nothing clear. As to children and other relatives, I felt uncertain except for one uncle who came through clearly as someone I knew before. I did have many friends from past lives.

I attached to the foetus when I decided to meet it in the womb of my mother just before birth. The feelings of my mother were very positive and loving and warm. When you asked for the birth experience, I felt odd, tingling sensations around a fleshy ball that was me. My impression after birth was one of happiness and the doctor seemed pleased and my mother was very happy. I feel that this lifetime feels very good and positive for me and I feel a burst of energy and a purpose after this session.

There are many more examples from Life Before Life, the one below (Wambach, 1979a, p.37) is an example of someone who was reluctant to be born:

No, I didn’t choose to be born; I was instructed to return. It seemed to me that I just followed instructions (but don’t know who was instructing). I felt no rebellion, just that it was not really my choosing. I was quite apprehensive about living the coming lifetime.

One of the purposes for this lifetime seemed to be to teach and to minister to mankind and to work on the development of the greater use of the mind to ultimately teach. I chose this time period because somehow the psychology field flashed into my mind, and I felt that psychology was moving too slowly and hampering the spiritual development of mankind. I didn’t seem to have chosen my sex. My mother had been my sister in a past life where we fought all the time. My father had been my grandfather in another lifetime. My husband was a Sioux Indian when I was a French padre, and I didn’t like him then either!

I seemed to have an attachment to the foetus from the inception, but this is vague. My mother was very happy. In the birth-canal experience, I started to hold my breath and then breathe very heavily. After birth, I was mostly aware of being happy to be in a wanted situation. This has been a very enlightening hypnotic experience, as I have had the feeling since my earliest memories that I was here for a reason and have had some interesting mental talents develop.

Fact or Fantasy

So, is this fantasy? We said above that if it was fantasy, we would expect more male lives than female, because males had more freedom and opportunities in the past than women. What Helen found was that out of 1,100 past lives recorded at the time of publication the split overall was 50.3% male and 49.7% female, exactly what you would expect if they were genuine past lives; as evidenced in the following diagram (Wambach, 1979b, p.124).

We also said above that if the past life memories were merely fantasies, then we would expect more upper-class lives rather than lower-class lives – on the grounds that who wants to recall a fantasy life slaving in the fields all day, when the psyche could allow the fantasy of being someone like Napoleon or an Egyptian Pharaoh, or at least someone with money and opportunity. It was straightforward to tell what class people were in from the detailed descriptions given after the group hypnosis sessions.

Helen found that over 70% of the 1,100 lives were lower-class with around 20% middle class and under 10% upper class. Which, again, is exactly what you would expect from historical evidence; as shown in the following diagram (Wambach, 1979b, p.115).

A similar pattern occurred with population spread, with the majority reporting lives in the more populated time periods from 1500 upwards and less in the low population time periods. Again, the graph she produced mimicked the historical population spread. There were other correlations associated with clothing, utensils, skin colour, and so on, which all tied up convincingly with historical fact.

So for all intents and purposes, these lives appear not to be fantasy, but to represent genuine past lives.

In Dr Wambach’s own words: “All the data described…tended to support the hypothesis that past-life recall accurately reflects the real past rather than it represents common fantasies. None of the data indicated that fantasy was at work” (Wambach, 1979b, p.146).

The Death Experience

One of the most important findings in the research conducted by Dr Wambach is in terms of the of the death experience. Despite our modern society treating death as if it is something to fear, the research indicated the complete opposite to this – death is a great release and a returning home.

When hypnotically regressed to a past life, the research subjects were asked to recall their death and remember the feelings they had (without any associated pain). 85% of study participants had very positive experiences. A typical reported experience is noted below from ‘Reliving Past Lives’:

Dying was like being released, like going home again. It was as though a great burden had been lifted when I left my body and floated up towards the light. I felt affection for the body I had occupied in this lifetime, but it was so good to be free (Wambach, 1979b, p.140).

The 15% that reported not so positive death experiences were those who had died in childbirth or had undergone violent deaths. Dr Wambach reports on the comments of a subject who died in childbirth:

I feel so bad because I’m leaving my two children behind…I worry about who will take care of them, and I stay around my body trying to comfort my husband (Wambach, 1979b, pp.141-142).

Another kind of disturbing experience at death was that of being killed accidentally or violently, usually at a young age. One subject said:

I was hit by a car while I was running across the street… I seemed to continue running across the street and wasn’t really aware that I was dead. Then I felt very frustrated and lost, because I didn’t understand what was happening to me. Finally, I was in a place of darkness, and then I saw a bright light. Then I went soaring up through the darkness toward the light (Wambach, 1979b, p.142).

Some subjects who expressed negative feelings at death were fighting in a war:

I was fighting and then my body crumpled. I kept on fighting, but I couldn’t seem to affect anything going on around me. I was still on the battlefield, but then I seemed to be joined by others who had died. I couldn’t seem to leave that scene (Wambach, 1979b, p.142).

.

Other subjects experienced sorrow because of others’ grief at their death. The sorrow was not for themselves but for the people who remained on earth. About 25% reported a brief period of darkness followed by light. More subjects, about two thirds, experienced soaring up high above their body into a light-filled world, where they were greeted by others and had an instant sense of companionship. One subject reported:

I soared up high in the sky after I left my body. I didn’t want to look back. I seemed, then, to be surrounded by others, who were congratulating me in that lifetime. I felt a sense of homecoming and great joy. There was life all around me (Wambach, 1979b, p.142).

We can see from the above that there is nothing to fear about death. In fact, if anything, it’s a welcome release from a life well lived. Interestingly Dr Wambach found very few suicides in her research, and those she did find reported a realisation that suicide was not a way out of their problems, no matter how bad it might have seemed.

Not taking your own life is a test of resilience and it seems that if a person does commit suicide, then there is little option but to come back in a new life and start over again. After all, this life was chosen to be able to learn and overcome difficulties — and there are no shortcuts.

Research Conclusions and Concluding Comments

There are several conclusions we can draw from the research:

  1. The research shows that what was being reported did not appear to be fantasy
  2. Although not reported here, the research method has been shown to be repeatable with different hypnotists and different groups. By the time of Dr Wambach’s death in 1985 she had collected over 6,000 reports
  3. We choose or were guided to choose our present lives
  4. The birth experience is traumatic and the majority of ‘souls’ enter the foetus just before birth
  5. We incarnate with people we have known from past lives
  6. We have had many past lives, some of which might appear quite dull and laborious but there are always relationships to work out and goals to be achieved in every lifetime
  7. There is nothing to fear about death. When death occurs, it is a great release, a return to our true home and a reunion with all the people we know

We can conclude that there appears to be a mechanism and a grand plan for life on earth. We are incarnated here as souls in a physical body. Our reasons for being here are to learn, experience and achieve certain lessons and objectives that will add to the greater knowledge of our souls. We are helped in this process by incarnating with souls we have known from previous lives. When we die, it is a great release and our souls return to a spirit realm where we can recuperate and take stock of the experience and share that experience with other souls.

Once rested we can plan our next incarnation. Each life lived adds to our soul’s growth, and as a consequence, all the experiences of all the billions of lives lived adds to the greater knowledge of the universe.

In this article I hope to have gone some way towards doing justice to Dr. Wambach’s pioneering research and her excellent and informative books. I also hope to have re-ignited interest about Helen’s body of work which may now be sadly forgotten; and perhaps even inspired and encouraged the reader to delve more deeply into her findings. I must tell the reader that sadly both books went out of print in the late 1990’s but I am happy to relate that following campaigning by myself and others they are now back in print, as of 2020, with White Crow books as the new publisher.

Biography— David Pye lives near Glastonbury in Somerset, England.  He encountered the work of Dr Helen Wambach several years ago and regards it of such high importance that he set up a website dedicated to her pioneering work (See http://reincarnation.me.uk). He also gives talks about death and reincarnation, which include Dr Wambach’s ground-breaking research. David spent 20 years as a research scientist and is currently an IT consultant. He also holds a Master’s degree in digital media production. Over the last 20 years David has set up several UK companies, and successful local charities which specialise in energy efficiency and organic gardening.

References

Bernstein, M. (1956). The search for Bridey Murphy. London: Hutchinson.

Langley, N. (Director). (1956). The search for Bridey Murphy. [Film]. Paramount Pictures. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJHD8fY3PlE

Porge, E. (2018). Cryptomnesia. Encyclopedia.com. https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/other-religious-beliefs-and-general-terms/miscellaneous-religion/cryptomnesia

Wambach, H. (1979a). Life before Life. UK: Bantam books.

Wambach, H. (1979b).

…..Free advice

A reader and non-donor sent this “advice”

What you pay for hosting and maintenance is a bit on the crazy side it seems at a minimum or maybe you are straight being ripped off.

Why not innovate and get your site redone with new cheaper updated technology and cheaper hosting. If a $500 freelancer job and a new $30 a month hosting gets your best 30% of your work online and ends the waste, then wouldn’t that be better than the constant risk of losing it all?

A guy in Bangladesh moved a much lager site than this for $50 for me some years back. I am not saying that is the same solution or price today but apply some innovation, and get a solution other than the same methods.

I say this out of the utmost respect and appreciation for your work.

 

I replied:

s this guy’s site being hacked by the NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and the Israelis?

Answer me that.

Is this Bangladeshi attacking the Jews and exposing racial diffences?

Does this Bangladeshi say he is the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler?

My site is being HACKED BY JEWS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS. My site is banned by libraries all across the Collective West, at cyber-cafés, and by cell-phone internet service providers all over Britain for „hate speech.“

Those who have been reading me for years remember the year 2017, before I got my current two-man IT support team, when my site was down literally 50% of the time.

And beware, comrade, and look into your own heart: people rationalize their FUNDAMENTAL miserliness. Deep down, they just do not want to chip in at all. THEY DO NOT WANT TO DONATE.
But they will never admit to themself or others that they are miserly bastards, and thus face an ugly aspect of their own nature. In fact, they are unwilling to do a goddamn thing (for me or for any other white activist) except offer „free advice,“ so they go with a nice, positive cover story, an excuse.

„John could get this site done on the cheap.“

Really?

What you are really implying is that I am not being hacked at all, because I represent no threat whatsoever to jewry.

In my essay on George Washington and the American Revolution, I lay out how appalled the Marquis de Lafayette was when he came from France to Washington’s winter base at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, near Philadelphia, to help the Americans with his own ship, dozens of Frenchmen, lots of his own money, and his very life. (He was disobeying a direct order frOm King Louis XVI tO not sail over to America, which he did by sneaking off to Portugal, and help the American rebels. he could have been beheaded for this disobedience.)

The Marquis found to his shock and consternation that 90% of Americans were not freedom fighters at all, but cheap-shot critics who did not lift a finger for the Revolution, donate a penny, or even sell flour, leather, bandages and medicine to the suffering, shivering, hungry Continental Army soldiers.

In fact, Washington had to tell the Marquis de Lafayette from France, and soon after Baron Wilhelm von Steuben from Prussia/Germany, another aristocrat with a golden heart who came as a volunteer, that he had no food, medicine, pay or shoes for his troops.

The newspapers, always ready to trash-tral anyone who was actually DOING something, were calling him a „coward“ and a „do-nothing“ for not sallying forth to attack the British forces in nearby New Jersey.

Washington wrote a secret letter to the Continental Congress, saying „In this situation, I must let the newspapers call me a do-nothing and a coward, because if I defended my honor with the awful truth that because YOU have not sent me the means to continue this war, my troops are unshod, standing barefoot at their post in the snow, and are unable to attack or even stay warm and fed. If I told the truth, and stopped suffering slander in silence, the British general would realize our disgraceful weakness, and he would attack us immediately with all his forces to annihilate this army and end this revolution. and then YOU, gentlemen, would all be hanged, drawn and quartered for treason.‘

https://johndenugent.com/english-at-the-end-of-its-tether-the-american-revolution-succeeds/

So I repeat my question:

Was this Bangladeshi with the dirt-cheap website costs also

.
— exposing the jews,
– revealing the ritual jewish murder of white children,
— showing that Israel was the main instigator of the assassination of John F. Kennedy,
— refuting the Holocaust as a pack of lies,
— defending and praising Adolf Hitler and National Socialism,
— teaching about real racial differences,
— proving that White people came to North America ten thousand years before the American Indians, that Whites are the true Native Americans, and that Indians genocided our ancestors,
— and saying, as I do, that the jews are committing incest on their own children (Jewish women having sex with their own sons, and Jewish men with their own daughters, which is why many jews are so incredibly ugly, from committing the most radical inbreeding imaginable),
— and that a major rabbi with a large following in both Moscow/Russia and Tel Aviv/Israel, Michael Laitman, has repeatedly said in public: „We jews were sent from our planet to this one to conquer the earthlings“?

What is your real motive? Is it really that you just don’t want to send even five dollars or euros?

Are you aware that the Joint Terrorism Task Force of Homeland Security has been three times to my house? That it took my Finnish assistant and put him for 87 days into solitary, threatening him with being gang-raped by ngrs and muslims, until he finally broke and agreed to slander me, whereupon all charges against him were dropped?

Did you know that when I tried to run for president in 2012, with sophisticated videos that cost me five thousand dollars and a moderate, attractive campaign website, the US POSTAL SERVICE ITSELF STOLE ALL MY MAIL FOR TEN STRAIGHT DAYS AND KEPT ALL THE DONATIONS which would have kept me going?

Did you know that twice the feds did extremely low-altitude chemtrail flights right over two different houses I was renting?

2010 in Sarver, Pennsylvania right over my rented house there:

2013 in Apollo, Pennsylvania right over my rented house at 681 Canal Road:

Did you know that after this video came out on jewish pedophiles on April 20, 2015, they began chemtrailing this isolated village of Ontonagon, pop. 1400, located an hour from any city, several times a week?

https://johndenugent.com/wp-content/uploads/JdN-German-subtitles-Kill-Them-All-Kinderschaender-ausrotten.mp4

Often they come with TWO jets for a village of 1400!

They have been blanketing this village in chemtrails for over eight years now because of ME, because of THIS website for which you refuse to send one penny, and because of my mission of creating an Aryan, heroic, warrior religion.
.
But thanks for the free advice.

My site, attacked 24/7/365, needs bodyguards, just like any

president, king or prime minister does,

and to pay bodyguards costs me money.

.

.

…..“At the end of its tether” the American Revolution succeeds!

At the Battle of Trenton (New Jersey) on the day after Christmas in 1776, the Americans stopped losing and won a major battle, and captured many prisoners, much food and ammunition.

The Battle of Trenton was a small but pivotal American Revolutionary War battle on the morning of December 26, 1776, in Trenton, New Jersey. After General George Washington‘s crossing of the Delaware River north of Trenton the previous night,

Washington led the main body of the Continental Army against Hessian auxiliaries garrisoned at Trenton. After a brief battle, almost two-thirds of the Hessian force were captured, with negligible losses to the Americans. The battle significantly boosted the Continental Army’s waning morale, and inspired re-enlistments.

The Continental Army had previously suffered several defeats in New York and had been forced to retreat through New Jersey to Pennsylvania. Morale in the army was low; to end the year on a positive note, George Washington—Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army—devised a plan to cross the Delaware River on the night of December 25–26 and surround the Hessians’ garrison.

Because the river was icy and the weather severe, the crossing proved dangerous. Two detachments were unable to cross the river, leaving Washington with only 2,400 men under his command in the assault, 3,000 fewer than planned. The army marched 9 mi (14.5 km) south to Trenton. The Hessians had lowered their guard, thinking they were safe from the Americans’ army, and had no long-distance outposts or patrols. Washington’s forces caught them off guard, and after a short but fierce resistance, most of the Hessians surrendered and were captured, with just over a third escaping across Assunpink Creek.

Despite the battle’s small numbers, the victory inspired patriots and sympathizers of the newly formed United States. With the success of the ongoing revolution in doubt a week earlier, the army had seemed on the verge of collapse. The dramatic victory inspired soldiers to serve longer and attracted new recruits to the ranks.

 

This in turn earned the respect of a key German officer, Baron von Steuben, who knew how to train men and run a professional army.

And it fascinated a key French aristocrat, the very wealthy young Marquis de Lafayette. Soon both noblemen would be in America to help us.

Within 18 months we were well-trained, constantly victorious, and then the king of France opened the floodgates of aid — to harm his enemy, England.

In 1783 a French fleet decisively defeated the Royal Navy, sent to rescue their surrounded General Cornwallis. Britain then gave up.  

I was watching the cable TV channel “H2” in 2014, and George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, the narrator was saying, all found the American people “vile and loathsome” — because totally unsupportive of their massive efforts to free them. But the Founding Fathers succeeded anyway. Here is how.

A REVOLUTION “AT THE END OF ITS TETHER” FINALLY SUCCEEDS

Some may be tempted cynically, while reading the below, to see this essay as quaint, superficial and outdated patriotic twaddle, glorifying a much earlier America of 200 years ago that has now blown so far off course since 9/11 that all the talk of Washington, Valley Forge, revolution and freedom seems tiresomely naive. In an age of “Homeland Security,” drones, surveillance cameras, the PATRIOT Act, and body scans, with a nearly omnipotent Jewish lobby calling almost every shot, is the Revolution of 1775-83 even relevant?

Yes, it definitely is, and for three reasons:

1) as shown below, it was won by willpower, by a triumph of the will, back when all the news seemed discouraging,

2) foreign powers joined our struggle for their own separate reasons and proved decisive in final victory; and

3) the only thin thread our entire white race is hanging on — including the fate, ironically, of our comrades in Britain — is the freedom of speech and freedom of gun ownership that the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights still guarantee — to individuals, groups and computer server owners — and the Revolution, won, gave us the Bill of Rights.

My friend from Perth, Australia, Brendon O’Connell, did three years in prison (January 2011-14) for criticizing the Israeli mistreatment of Palestinians. His crime: an argument with two Jewish Lubavitch kids at an orange stand in a supermarket. The two Lubavitch young men told the judge, who was in the Jews’ pocket, they felt traumatized and “threatened.”

All white nations except the United States of America have neither free speech on racial or jewish issues, nor have they our access to private guns, whose relevance lies in Thomas Jefferson’s famous dictum that the government should fear the people and not the people the government.

If America had stayed British, there would be hate-speech laws as in the United Kingdom, or its white ex-colonies of Canada, Australia and New Zealand that stayed with the Empire. Any exposés online of the Holocaust, of racial differences, of the real contents of the Talmud, of the heinous Israeli role in the USS Liberty and 9/11 attacks, and other critical issues, would be landing Americans today in PRISON.

IN FACT, THE ONLY REASON YOU CAN READ THIS NOW IS THAT GEORGE WASHINGTON WON THE REVOLUTION AND THEN SIGNED THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

Forensic reconstruction of Washington, taken from his skull and many descriptions of him, found at the Mount Vernon Museum

.

If you live in Europe or Canada, you too can read this because servers located in the USA are legally allowed to host this content. Without the American Revolution all Internet servers worldwide would be subject to censorship, and the entire white race would be plunged into utter informational darkness.

Yes, the American Revolution is still extremely relevant. Freedom is relevant, truth is relevant and the armed and successful overthrow of tyranny is of the utmost relevance.

Few realize when they see the trappings of American power – 100,000-ton aircraft carriers,….

The USS Ronald Reagan leaves Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

….vast football stadiums, skyscrapers, or the majestic US Capitol at night – how “iffy” the American Revolution was for much of its seven-year duration.

There were countless setbacks, desertions, defections, mishaps, a few mutinies, personal quarrels, financial scandals, mudslinging, and important battles that were lost through amateurish mistakes.

George Washington was the greatest human asset we had……

However, not one of his admirers would agree that he was a “military genius” or even half the general that Frederick the Great of Prussia was, Washington’s older contemporary, or Napoleon, his younger contemporary. In fact, the brutal truth is that the Virginia planter and surveyor, while competent, diligent, inspirational and diplomatic, won only three of the seven major battles he fought.

And were it not for a young French aristocrat who loved America, freedom, danger, and heroism, who adored George Washington as a father figure and his wonderful old state of Virginia (even giving to a son the first name of “Georges Washington” and to a daughter the name “Virginie”) the strange but vital alliance of 1778-81 between the absolutist French monarchy of Louis XVI with the fledgling American republic of Washington would have ended in defeat, disgrace and dozens or hundreds of executions for treason.

The Marquis de Lafayette

(For while Scots or Irish could revolt against England with some or much justification, there was no doubt that Britain — her government, money, ships and people — had indeed established “the 13 colonies” out of nothing. On paper, the Founding Fathers were all traitors who sought by bloodshed to overthrow their legitimate government. And the Boston Tea Party, while girded in a patriotic halo today, was the destruction of millions of dollars of British product; today it would be called terrorism.)

The Marquis de Lafayette visits with General Washington at his home of Mount Vernon, Virginia on the eastern porch, with a view of the Potomac River. Martha Washington is seated to the right.

But for this one idealistic young man of twenty, Gilbert du Motier, the Marquis de Lafayette, a a young man of the highest nobility in every sense, George Washington, Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson would have swung at the end of a rope as disgraced traitors, joining dozens of failed Scottish, Irish and English rebels against England in oblivion.

George Washington’s Mount Vernon from the west. Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Hancock and other Founding Fathers were self-made millionaires with fortunes to lose — and their lives — if the Revolution failed.

General Arnold (below), brilliant, dynamic, skilled at war, and genuinely angry over the behavior of Congress, also had an infamous weakness for money — and offered in September 1780 to surrender the American-held West Point, a key point on the Hudson River in upstate New York, to the British for what today would be $400,000. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Arnold) He then became a brigadier general in the British Army and immediately began attacking his former brothers-in-arms from Connecticut to Virginia, even burning down New Haven.

In fact, in 1781, the young Marquis de Lafayette, leading Virginia troops entrusted to him by Washington, actually helped rescue Thomas Jefferson from being captured by the hated traitor Benedict Arnold, who had changed sides, furious at what he perceived as 1) American ingratitude (Arnold had received lifelong wounds from several battles, and had also spent a great deal of his own money promoting the Revolution, but felt completely unappreciated,) and 2) political and military incompetence. The enraged Arnold had turned his huge talents into fighting the very Revolution he once had so aided.

Yes, the American Revolution was a very iffy thing for seven long years. Washington made his share of mistakes, including trusting Benedict Arnold with two huge assignments despite many complaints about his character. (Later the British and Canadians came to agree with the outraged American opinion of him.) In fact, in 1781, the year of the final American victory (though peace negotiations stretched out to 1783), things actually looked very gloomy until they very suddenly turned around — due to massive French help in warships, troops and cash, and both mighty Spain and fierce Holland going to war at sea with the Royal Navy.

Various passages from historian Samuel Eliot’s once renowned 1856 history of the USA, entitled Manual of United States History from 1492 to 1850….

1) From Eliot, p238, describing the year 1778, and note especially the ending, with Washington himself protesting a Congress angry at an army bleeding and dying in the field to protect said Congress and win.

George Washington at age 47, based on a forensic reconstruction that is shown at Mount Vernon. He had blue eyes and auburn hair.

.

2) Eliot, p240

Gilbert du Motier, the Marquis de Lafayette, was born in 1757 in the heart of France to an exceptionally warlike family. The du Motiers were guided for centuries by the Latin dynastic motto “cur non?,” meaning “Why not?” (The rank of nobility called “marquis,” like that of count, denotes a member of the high military nobility who is entrusted with defending a border province, a “march,” that must prepare for invasion. Austria was a “march” of Germany facing Hungary, and so was Brandenburg a “march,” but facing Poland.) Du Motier’s family history recalls the medieval division of society: some “laborant, orant, pugnant,” meaning “some labor [peasants], some pray [clergy and monks], and some fight [nobles and kings].” (This tripartite social order seems to have been the rule even back in Indo-European or “Aryan” times four thousand years ago.)

Coat of arms of France under the Bourbon dynasty

Family tree of 700 years of ancestors of Gilbert du Motier, the Marquis de Lafayette. (Click to enlarge. The Motier coat of arms is upper-right.)

According to legend, one ancestor of Gilbert du Motier recovered in Jerusalem the “Crown of Thorns” of Christ during the 6th Crusade (1228). Another of the Marquis’ ancestors was a “Marshal of France.” Gilbert de La Fayette III (the name was spelled both “de-la-Fayette” and “de-Lafayette”) was the military leader of Joan of Arc’s army in Orléans in 1428, and this victorious French siege turned the tide in the Hundred Years War.

Joan, a 19-year-old peasant girl, leads the charge at the siege of Orleans — and persists despite taking an arrow in the neck. The actual battle commander was Gilbert de La Fayette.

Gilbert’s great-grandfather was the Count de La Rivière, a lieutenant general in the Royal Armées. Lafayette’s uncle Jacques-Roch died fighting the Austrians and left the marquis title to Lafayette’s father. The father in turn, struck by a cannonball at the Battle of Minden in Westphalia, Germany, died in 1759 when Gilbert was a toddler of two. But thus Lafayette became the Lord of Chavaniac. and when his mother and her father both died in April of 1770 — Gilbert was 12 – he began to receive an income of 25,000 livres. La livre, from the old French-Latin word for “pound,” was a pound of solid silver….. and so 25,000 livres were worth about $13 million today. Upon the death of an uncle, the 12-year-old Lafayette inherited a further yearly income of 120,000 livres (about $65 million).

The young Lord of Chavaniac and Marquis de Lafayette was then guided to manhood by his paternal grandmother, Mme de Chavaniac. When he married a rich countess, her dowry brought another 400,000 livres to the estate ($211 million in annual income), and this arranged marriage gradually turned into a deep marital love.

Years later, when Gilbert was captured in battle and imprisoned by the Prussians and then the Austrians for five years – 1792-95 – his devoted wife joined him in his misery in 1795 and died thereafter from the conditions. The United States then exercised pressure for the release of the widower, who had won the love of the American people for his services in our Revolution.

Eliot, p268, on the reception by the American people of Lafayette in 1783 — after the seven-year-long Revolution — partly thanks to him — had been won.

His wife had been imprisoned by Jacobin forces, which had taken over the French Revolution, for years and had seen her mother, grandmother and sister all leave in a wagon for the guillotine. Her husband had sought a constitutional monarchy with good public order for France, not the Illuminati nightmare of the Terror.

Returning to the life of the young Marquis, he studied at one of the finest high schools in Paris, then joined the French Army like his forebears. In August 1775, the 18-year-old Captain du Motier hears at a dinner the visiting Duke of Gloucester, the brother of King George of England, mock the Americans and their “uprising,” and decides on the spot to join the Americans. (He had been stung by Queen Marie Antoinette laughing at the court of Versailles at his dancing skills and various abuses he found incompatible with his growing belief in political and religious liberty.) He disobeys a direct order of the French king to not go to America, buys his own 200-ton ship, La Victoire, and a 30-man crew, sets sail on April 26, 1777, then evades both French and British fleets looking for him in the Caribbean (France does not yet want war with Britain, and Britain wants no war with France while it is fighting America), and after seven weeks arrives in June 1777 in Georgetown, South Carolina. He demands that his French companions take an oath with him: “vaincre ou périr,” win (the American Revolution) – or perish.

As Samuel Eliot writes, on page 233:

September 11 is a somber date in American history…. and it proved to be so for Gilbert du Motier as well, the day a British bullet went into his leg and the Americans suffered a disastrous defeat at the Battle of Brandywine, Pennsylvania. We certainly all know about the events of September 11 in the year 2001.

But on September 11 of the year 1941 Franklin Roosevelt began building the Pentagon to carry out his war plans (ordering also that it violate Virginia laws mandating segregated dining facilities and bathrooms). FDR also ordered on that day the US Navy to begin depth-charging German submarines (Germany was NOT at war with the US, its submarines were of course avoiding the Americans — supposedly neutral — and the German U-boats were hunting only the British, who had declared war on them in September 1939. This incredibly provocative order was given by Roosevelt almost three months before Pearl Harbor.)

September 11 of the year 1777 was another bad day for America. The Battle of Brandywine, outside of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, turned into a near-route for the Americans, because General Washington, not immune from mistakes, had not keep his right flank strong. Confusion broke out, a friendly-fire incident happened and General Thomas Howe of Britain drove the Americans back.

The Americans at Brandywine — brave, but defeated by British skill, valor and experience

.

(His brother, Admiral Howe, commanded the Royal Navy squadrons attacking the 13 states.) The then American capital of Philadelphia humiliatingly fell to the “Redcoats” for nine long months, and the young Marquis, then 20, but a major general in the Continental Army, was shot in the leg. However, he heroically organized an orderly retreat so the bulk of Washington’s army was not annihilated, a fate which would have ended the Revolution right there. Not bad for a twenty-year-old in his first military outing.

Washington had taken an instant liking to the young man when he first arrived as a volunteer. But the General cautioned him that though he too had the rank of general, and American diplomat Silas Deane (more on him below) had arranged for Captain du Motier to be appointed as a major general at age 20, the Americans would not like taking orders from such a young man, Washington gently said, nor from a foreigner and aristocrat. He offered to the disappointed young marquis initially to be “a friend and father” to him, letting him travel with and be his aide. Washington saw Lafayette’s value as symbolic and morale-boosting, just as his ancestor, ironically, the Marshal of France du Motier had seen the presence of the young female Joan of Arc in 1428, 349 years earlier.

But both Joan and Gilbert became capable, popular, inspirational warriors and commanders. In any case, the then 45-year-old, six-foot-three Washington did indeed become a father figure to the 20-year-old Gilbert. The Virginian never could father sons or daughters himself, whereas his wife Martha – Lafayette once observed that she loved “her husband madly” — had born four children to her first husband, Daniel Custis, before he died.

Lafayette, 20, leads a charge at Brandywine. He paid his way to America and served for free for five years.

Morale-boosting was certainly the order of the day for both Washington and the nation after the defeat at Brandywine. Washington had already been thrown out of New York City in August of 1776, one month after the dramatic Declaration of Independence, by the relentless British general Howe, and now in August of the following year, 1777, George Washington had lost the largest city in the 13 independent states, Philadelphia, the “American capital” to boot and the location where the Declaration of Independence had been proclaimed.

When the Americans reconquered their capital, Washington made Benedict Arnold its military governor. Arnold then began dating a Loyalist (pro-British) woman named Peggy Shippen, living in a mansion and enriching himself… In 1779 Arnold entered into contact with a friend of William Franklin, the last colonial (British-appointed) governor of New Jersey and the son of Benjamin Franklin, also pro-British to his father’s lasting shock, about switching sides… In August 1780 Washington compounded his error by giving Arnold command of West Point as well as the entire Hudson River from Albany down to NYC, and Arnold agreed treacherously to accept 20,000 British pounds – $400,000 today – to surrender West Point to British general Clinton. West Point on the Hudson controlled this major river and had a huge chain stretched from it across to the other side to block British warships.)

In December 1780, under orders from his new British master, Clinton, Benedict Arnold led a force of 1,600 troops into Virginia, where he captured Richmond, the capital of that state, by surprise and then went on a rampage through Virginia, destroying supply houses, foundries, and mills. This activity brought Virginia’s militia out, and Arnold eventually retreated to Portsmouth to either be evacuated or reinforced. The pursuing American army included the Marquis de Lafayette, who was under orders from Washington to hang Arnold summarily if he was captured.

(In August of the next year, 1778 (every August was bad) the then major American port of Newport, Rhode Island was lost, with the American furious that the French fleet, in their eyes, had abandoned them. But the French had their own grounds for complaint about the Rhode Islanders and other militia. When the French fleet sailed into Boston for repairs there was nearly a riot against the French, and tempers flared on both sides. Lafayette, who had risked everything to get to, and fight for, America and to cement a Franco-American alliance, was deeply hurt.

It had been a long nine months. Building a winter camp at Valley Forge for the winter of 1777-78 not far from the British-held “Philly,” Washington wrote the Continental Congress he had no food, pay, medicine or shoes for his men, and added bitterly that he was being defamed as a coward in the newspapers because, lacking everything, he was refusing to give Howe battle. Of the 11,000 hungry, beaten American soldiers who entered Valley Forge, 2,000 died of disease, malnutrition and the overall psychological effects of defeat, bad morale and no pay to send to their families in a country economically racked by war.

Truly, as Thomas Paine had written,

“These are the times that try men’s souls: The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.”

Washington wrote that “the states are nominating officers not fit to be shoeblacks,” and that the militias are “a destructive, expensive and disorderly mob.” (Eliot, p231.) The Congress, terrified the war would be lost and they all hang, ordered on December 27, 1776 that Washington should exercise dictatorial power and take whatever he needed for his army, if the people would not sell it to him at a far price and that he could arrest anyone “disaffected from the American cause.” (Eliot, p232)

Baron von Steuben [pronounced SHTOY-ben]

The two gigantic saviors of the American cause were in fact the two European aristocrats, the Marquis de Lafayette and Baron Friedrich von Steuben of Germany (a fine officer who for all his idealism, wealth, success, fame and noble name never married or even dated women, and likely was asexual or a closet — or inactive — homosexual. See Wikipedia).

The Prussian officer came to Valley Forge to teach the bayonet, camp and field hygiene, discipline, marching and pride to the demoralized Americans. With the better hygiene, morale and combat skills taught by the German baron (see my article here: Of German Blood Pt.1), soon the Americans were beating British professional warriors in battle.

The marquis meanwhile was desperately writing back home to France that Washington was an outstanding leader, the Americans could win with French help, and that King Louis XVI should ally their country with the Americans against the dangerous common enemy of Britain.

When on May 6, 1778 it was officially announced that France had declared war on England and become a US ally, a thousand jubilant American soldiers shot their long rifles in the air in a massive gunpowder salute. Martha Washington took part in the camp’s May 6 celebration. Soon after the thunderous feu de joie, General Washington and his wife received other officers under a large marquee fashioned from dozens of officers’ tents. General Washington was said to have worn “a countenance of uncommon delight and satisfaction.”

But while the Marquis de Lafayette had played a huge role in arranging this alliance, as a high-ranked French aristocrat known to the King of France as a member of an impeccable military family, and as a personal friend of Washington, many others were involved in the desperate efforts to get the Americans a powerful ally. Ben Franklin as US ambassador to France did yeoman work.

But Silas Deane got the alliance with France really going, yet was branded a traitor, and died tragically in poverty in England.

Silas Deane took an active part in the movements in Connecticut preceding the War of Independence, was elected to the Connecticut House of Representatives in 1772, and from 1774 to 1776 was a delegate from Connecticut to the Continental Congress.

Early in 1776, he was sent to France by Congress in a semi-official capacity, as a secret agent to induce the French government to lend its financial aid to the colonies. Subsequently he became, with Benjamin Franklin and Arthur Lee, one of the regularly accredited commissioners to France from Congress.

On arriving in Paris, Deane at once opened negotiations with the Count de Vergennes, who was the French foreign minister.

Charles Gravier, Count de Vergennes, who nearly bankrupted France to aid American independence so Britain would not dominate the world and eventually conquer France (which it still legally claimed in the 1700s). The French financial crisis, caused by massive financial aid to the desperate Americans, led to the French Revolution, and thus to the death on the guillotine of the very king who had aided the USA, Louis XVI, and 40,000 of his nobles. The Marquis de Lafayette himself nearly lost his life to the guillotine for seeking a moderate path for the French Revolution and the establishment of a constitutional monarchy for France instead of the Jacobin nightmare of endless massacres and executions.

Deane organised shipment of many shiploads of arms and munitions of war to America helping finance the extremely important Battle of Ticonderoga, a decisive American victory. He also enlisted the services of a number of continental soldiers of fortune, among whom were Lafayette, Baron Johann de Kalb, Thomas Conway, Casimir Pulaski, and Baron von Steuben. Many of these officers soon became unpopular once they reached America for a variety of reasons. As Deane had signed the contracts hiring them, he was given the blame by politicians in Philadelphia.

His carelessness in keeping account of his receipts and expenditures, and the differences between himself and Arthur Lee regarding the contracts with Beaumarchais, eventually led to his recall and replacement by John Adams as US Ambassador to France on November 21, 1777. Deane was expected to face charges based on Lee’s complaints and on having promised the foreign officers commissions outranking American officers. Before returning to America, however, he signed on February 6, 1778 the treaties of amity and commerce and of alliance with France, which he and the other commissioners had successfully negotiated.

As a mark of approval for Deane’s conduct in Paris, the French government agreed that he should travel back to the United States aboard a warship carrying out the first French ambassador to the United States. Louis XVI presented Deane with a portrait framed with diamonds and both Vergennes and Franklin wrote letters commending Deane.

Deane reached Philadelphia on July 14, 1778, the second anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. In America, Deane was defended by John Jay and John Adams in 1778 in a long and bitter dispute before Congress, whose requests for copies of his receipts and disbursements were refused by France; since France had not officially made alliance with the Thirteen Colonies until February 6, 1778, they felt that any such evidence of their prior involvement with the Americans would be a diplomatic embarrassment. Deane in turn then agitated for a diplomatic break with France and questioned the integrity of members of Congress who disagreed with him.

He was finally allowed to return to Paris in 1781 to settle his affairs and attempt to find copies of the disputed records, but his differences with various French officials, coupled with the publication in Rivington’s Royal Gazette in British-held New York of private letters to his brother in which he repudiated the Revolution as hopeless and suggested a rapprochement with Britain, led to his being barred from entry and branded a traitor at home.

Deane eventually settled in the Netherlands until after the treaty of peace of 1783 between Britain and the US had been signed, after which he lived in England in a state of poverty. He published his defence in a book, An Address to the Free and Independent Citizens of the United States of North America (Hartford, Conn., and London, 1784).

In 1789 Deane planned to set sail back to America to try to recoup his lost fortune but mysteriously took ill and died on September 23 of that year before his ship set sail. Some historians argue that he was poisoned by Edward Bancroft, an American double agent working for the British who had been employed by both John Adams and Silas Deane for gathering intelligence during the Revolutionary War and may have felt threatened by a potential testimony from Deane to the American Congress. As it turns out Silas Deane was never found guilty of Arthur Lee’s accusations. His granddaughter Philura, through her husband, pressed his case before Congress, and about fifty years after his death his family was eventually paid $37,000 in 1841, about $700,000 today, on the ground that a former audit was “ex parte, erroneous, and a gross injustice to Silas Deane.”

Arthur Lee (1740 – 1792) had a less tragic but also bumpy career as a US diplomat to Paris. He did not appreciate the extravagant lifestyle of Benjamin Franklin, and told Sam Adams he would never be a good negotiator between a free people and a tyrant.

Later, in Paris, after helping to negotiate the Treaty of Alliance (1778) with France, he fell out with Benjamin Franklin and Silas Deane. He persuaded Congress to recall Deane to America, but he was himself recalled soon afterward.

As for Benedict Arnold, despite his many successes as a general fighting for the Americans, he was passed over for promotion by the Continental Congress while other officers claimed credit for some of his accomplishments. Adversaries in military and political circles brought charges of corruption or other malfeasance, but most often he was acquitted in formal inquiries. Congress investigated his accounts and found he was indebted to Congress after spending much of his own money on the war effort. Frustrated and bitter, Arnold decided to change sides in 1779, and opened secret negotiations with the British.….

As for the Marquis de Lafayette, he sailed back to France in 1778 so the alliance, signed in February, would keep going smoothly, even after the debacle of the Battle of Rhode Island — when the French (with some justification) abandoned the Americans at Newport. The king gave Gilbert a royal slap on the wrist for having disobeyed his order to not leave for America three years earlier — ten days of house arrest with his beloved wife Adrienne.

After the Franco-American victory of October 19, 1781 at Yorktown……

The French names of various generals all over the battlefield (left, center and upper-right) reveal the massive French role in the final victory, arranged by Lafayette, Ben Franklin, Arthur Lee and the maligned and tragic Silas Deane.

The key factor was however the French ships of Admiral de Grasse behind the British forces’ backs. There was no escape by sea for Cornwallis’s troops to Royal Navy vessels if they lost a land battle, and the French naval gunfire from those ships was in a position to decimate the British tents, headquarters and positions. The previous naval Battle of the Chesapeake (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Chesapeake) of September 5, 1781 (five weeks earlier) was thus the most important and most underrated naval victory in world history. It won decisively the American Revolution, leading to the rise of an American superpower and depriving the British Empire of by far its richest, most populous colonies. (Canada, by comparison, is too northerly and cold — and Australia too southerly, water-poor and hot, in fact mostly desert — to support very large populations. The thirteen British-American colonies, called once “the jewel in the crown of the British Empire” became instead the nucleus of a huge nation with six times the population of Britain itself, ten times that of Canada and twenty times that of Australia.

The British fleet’s return to New York City in tatters set off a flurry of panic amongst the Loyalist population. The news of the defeat was also not received well in London. King George III wrote (even before learning of Cornwallis’s surrender) that

“….after the knowledge of the defeat of our fleet … I nearly think the Empire ruined.”

The French naval success had left them firmly in control of Chesapeake Bay, completing the encirclement of Cornwallis. It was not until 23 September that Graves and Clinton learned that the French fleet in the Chesapeake numbered a huge 36 ships. This news came from a dispatch sneaked out by Cornwallis on the 17 September, accompanied by a plea for help: “If you cannot relieve me very soon, you must be prepared to hear the worst.” Two days after Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, General Washington acknowledged to Admiral de Grasse the importance of his role in the victory: “You will have observed that, whatever efforts are made by the land armies, [your French] navy must have the casting vote in the present contest.”

Two years after Yorktown, the British, after much debate, finally announced they had given up. Shortly thereafter, on April 19, 1783, General George Washington announced the cessation of all hostilities, exactly eight years after American farmers, Minutemen and other militia first faced off against British regulars at Concord and Lexington, Massachusetts.

The battle of Concord Bridge, Massachusetts on April 19, 1775. The war erupted after the American militia saw smoke pouring out of their village. The British had discovered there American guns, bullets, cannons and food, and were burning wagons containing them. Thinking incorrectly the British were burning the town, the furious Americans opened accurate fire — farmers, lawyers, druggists, teachers and teenage boys — against trained professionals. The British began a disastrous 30-mile retreat.

.

When the Brits lost at Yorktown, Virginia in 1781, they really lost heart as well. It was now America PLUS France, Spain and Holland at war with them.

And the Brits understood by 1781 that the whole country, the fledgling USA, now hated them and that after seven years of war all they controlled was some admittedly major seaports on the coast. But all the countryside and the mountains belonged to the armed “rebels,” who could just retreat further west even if beaten. (Ireland, another country that periodically rebelled against the British Empire, on the other hand, was an island that the Royal Navy could cut off from the world.) London finally understood that to re-enslave a huge, armed continent that hated them would be impossible, especially once the Spanish, Dutch and French got involved against them as well. (Russia under Catherine the Great also began leaning pro-American.)

The conclusion for our times? We too cand and shall win — by the same kind of tenacity, by expecting reverses and quarrels, even expecting some betrayal, by never giving up, and by getting foreigners to help our nation, foreigners who hate Jewashington for their own separate, different reasons from ours. In the end, though I object to many things about the current behavior of both the Muslims and the Chinese, they may be useful to us as allies against the Jewashington usurpers — just as Spain, France and Holland all declared war on Britain in the 1770s, not at all to aid our freedom struggle, but for their own reason, which was a desire to reduce the British threat TO THEMSELVES.

To end this essay, here is another passage from Samuel Eliot on how dire things were — in both reality and in the mind of George Washington — just a few short months before the crushing, FINAL Franco-American victory at Yorktown that ended the war.

Forensic reconstruction of George Washington’s face toward the end of the Revolution. At Valley Forge, in 1777, to quell a mutiny over a lack of food, pay, shoes and medicine, the general had begun reading some points he had jotted down on an envelope, appealing to his officers and men not to quit. His hair going white, his hands trembling, he took out small reading glasses his men had never seen. Washington said: “Forgive me, gentlemen but my eyes have grown weary in the service of my country.”

The officers wept — and the talk of mutiny ended.

But in 1781 the crises came back. As Eliot wrote on page 258:

.

In conclusion: pessimism is human, but optimism divine. Those who plan, think and work without relenting will rejoice when the sun shines down on their glorious day of victory. The American Revolution proves the fact that one must never give up.

Gilbert du Motier, the Marquis de Lafayette, who had sailed 3,000 miles to fight for the freedom of another country, disobeying his king’s direct royal order, confessed to General George Washington in December 1777, after six months stateside, that he was initially shocked by the lack of ardor for the freedom struggle of most Americans. (Eliot, p

Generals Washington and Lafayette pass by a sentry standing in wind and snow at Valley Forge in December 1777, when all seemed hopeless. Within a few weeks, in February 1778, France had signed an alliance with America, Lafayette returned to France to strengthen it — and within two years the war was over.

 

 

10 Comments

    • I suppose so, because even if the British in victory had savagely punished all the Founding Fathers as traitors with hanging, drawing and quartering — imagine them doing that to George Washington ! — in such a vast country, rebels would have just retreated westward to the Appalachian Mountains to fight on, and many of them were fierce Scots-Irish.

        • Thanks. Good, rousing song for morale.

          It would have been nice if the British had just “thrown down their drums and run,” but I am not sure that happened too often. 😉

          We and they were of the same stock and mettle, and the same went for the American Civil War — with both sides brave and skillful.

          The day is coming to fight our real enemy.

          • The English have screwed over every other White ethnic group for the Jews. They are a real enemy.

          • Since 1066, with the jew-financed Norman Conquest, there is truth in this.

            But one could also say, and many would: “Since the days of Woodrow Wilson, the Americans have screwed over every other White ethnic group for the Jews. They are a real enemy.”

            Who is behind NATO, the EU, drag queen pride, open borders in Europe, the war on Ukraine, blowing up the Nordstream pipeline, and overthrowing dozens of regimes around the world? The “American” CIA. 😉

            Note the nose on “Uncle Sam” since the beginning: 😉

            Sometimes when we feel a real passion against another nation, it could be because, in another life, we or our loved ones suffered awful things at their hands.

            I have written how Margi hated a beautiful Russian folksong, “Kalinka,” and I am sure she was a reincarnated German woman.

            She said: “Turn it off, John! The Russians would rape German women while they played that on the accordeon!”

            And she was serious that I SHOULD TURN IT OFF IMMEDIATELY….. 🙁

            Yes, England has some karma.. and it is haunting her now.

  1. Well, I would opt for the Type 2 – a future where people would live in harmony with nature!

    I might say this is the best way, and there are many signs it might happen. New ideas like veganism, raw diets, organic food, natural medicine and a back-to- nature sentiment have grown in recent years.

    Many of the “right-wingers” and conservatives dismiss many of these things as nonsense, which is totally undeserved.

    Yeah, sure, it´s not perfect. Some of these areas are a bit hijacked by liberals, and some have perhaps oo extreme views. However, I would pick up the greenie-leftist vegan every day over the conservative. Conservatives are in my book fat and ugly men with ties and suits, only interested in money and having a big car, eating meat and drinking beer.

    I would rather try to persuade the greenies of the importance of nationalism than bother with selfish conservative assholes.

    One of the founders of the German Green party later left when it was hijacked by communists and even spoke at nationalist rallies. In fact, it´s a real shame that the topic of environmental protection has fallen into the wrong (leftist) hands.

    But why refuse an idea just because most of the people currently following it are presumed lefties? It´s like refusing to breathe because someone you hate does it as well.

    In fact, it´s often not the case that the lefties live healthy.

    The fat chairman of the Greens – Ricarda Lang – eats McDonalds burgers rather than a healthy diet.

    On the other hand, the brave, politically incorrect Turk Attila Hildmann (to be clear: He is full-blooded Turkish, but was adopted by german parents, therefore he has a German surname) preached veganism and organic food. He is living now in exile in Turkey, because they destroyed his life in Germany after he spoke out against the COVID tyranny and the jews behind all that. They want him arrested for hate speech, yet Turkey refuses to hand him over to Germany.

    I would take Attila Hildmann as a friend any day over some disgusting, fat German man in a buskiness suit who rejects all thes truths.

    I also want to show you another amazing guy, Clemens Arvay, though unfortunately he is dead. It is said that he committed suicide at the beginning of this year. 🙁

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3f8d9YEYZA

    Together with Wolf-Dieter Storl, this was another great guy who says people should go back to nature.

    I don´t believe the theory of Clemens’ suicide for a second (especially as the officials claimed this). The positive vibes of the music don´t fit that. He was a calm, friendly and nature-loving man with a son whom he was raising as a single father. He also was working on a doctoral thesis, so he was looking into the future.

    Why should he commit suicide? I guess it was another “accident”…he had the hobby of climbing. Perfect for that…

    I guess his death should serve as a warning: They will even come for smaller dissidents. They want the future human to be fully dependent on the state, obeying and believing everything they say.

    Because they slander those advocating a life in harmony with nature as “conspiracy theorists”, as “unscientific” and all that, the truth doesn´t reach many people any more.

    I don´t care about that. In fact, I get even in more harmony with nature. A future without nature is neither possible nor desirable. I would rather die fighting the ones who want this 1984-like dystopia (and remember: the people in that novel also lived in disgusting high-rise buildings and believed themselves happy) or try to reach my goal.

    • Thank you for your comment.

      I was so sorry to hear about the death of this Clemens Arvay from Austria. (I lived in Kufstein, was married for twelve years to a Tyrolean woman from a small Alpine village, and have fond memories of the Austrians, especially before Austria joined the EU and became very judeo-americanized. In the 1970s the WWII generation was in power and it was in many ways more German than Germany. 😉

      I am watching this video of him.

      I do not know if he committed suicide. He seems like a sensitive, artistic, and gentle soul, and sometimes this world is too brutal and disgusting for them.

      I see a big Wikipedia article on him in English: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemens_Arvay

      It seems almost everyone loved him until he began objecting to the Covid vaccine. Hmmmmmm.

      I will watch more of his video about the ecopsychosomatics of communing with the forests. 🙂

      …and also this one:

      Thank you again.

      • I´m glad you could profit from his knowledge! For this guy to be gone is surely a big loss.

        It might be that it was in fat suicide, but I have my doubts. Especially when the officials say it.

        I found an older article from Arvay here:

        https://veganmagazin.de/2019/als-ich-vom-staat-bespitzelt-wurde/

        It describes how they tried to frame him for a crime he didn´t commit… And how they treated animal rights activists with something I would call lawfare.

        No doubt he has made enemies within the system by exposing this and other things.

        He also spoke out against the plandemic.

        Remember, they also killed Jörg Haider…and said it was an accident.

        It seems there are especially ruthless people in the Austrian Deep State. Austria itself might be a nice country (as is “Big Germany” in some parts still), and I guess in the rural areas the people are still more based.

        An associate of mine married a woman from Austria, has lived there for over 10 years, and says it´s much better and he earns more money than in Germany.

        Still, there are dangers in the BRÖ system.

        Arvay also wrote a book. It was also translated to english. Check it out here:

        https://annas-archive.org/search?q=arvay+biophilia

        • Thanks.

          Yes, I would agree that Austria is even more repressive than the Federal Republic of Germany. Just one example is that an activist can get ten years in prison for “Holocaust denial” in Austria, but half that, five years, in the FR Germany.

          I am always amazed whenever I look at the Austrian coat of arms, displaying quite openly since 1919 a communist hammer and sickle!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*