…..Spiritual reading for July 19
Nothing stands in your way today. This is a remarkable state of affairs, you’ll have to agree. Or rather, we should say that nothing need stand in your way.
There are plenty of mountains you can impose between yourself and your aspirations, but it is important to note that it will be you yourself who are putting the blocks in the path.
The energetic field is wide open and will allow you to create as you will today. We are not saying that there will be any particular enhancement of your ability to generate and manifest and move; however, it should be much simpler and more straightforward than has been the case for a long, long time. You will not need to battle with adverse energies or deal with the obstructions which pull you away from your goals.
Inasmuch as you have been working with these challenges, today’s open field could let you feel like you are flying.
If you had the opportunity to leave behind something that was dragging you down yesterday, it is an ideal moment to put something new in its place today. You can look at exactly what it is that you would like to add to your being, and then, similarly to how it worked yesterday, you need only to identify with great clarity that which you have been longing to be.
To know. To become. We want to suggest that you try to be a little reasonable. Not too, too much so, but a little.
If you can find that which you have been climbing toward with all your being, then it will be made manifest for you. Again, your work is to know in the depths of your being, throughout your being, exactly what is next for you and to name that learning or ability or strength which has always been just ahead and has yet eluded you.
The day is a great gift and we hope you will be able to find the time to make use of its offering. Think of it: all you need to do is know what you want and it is likely that you will begin to get it.
You have so many tales of genies, and fairies and unicorns and other magical beings that grant wishes. What a deep desire you have for that intervention! And here it is. The only proviso lies in the nature of your wishes, but, of course, none of you are likely to attempt to abuse such a magnificent offering.
We send you all our love, and the profound hope that you fnd what you are looking for. Many blessings.
.
.
.
…..Playing God
.
Indo-European[edit] (ancient Aryans)
.jpg)
According to classicist Martin Litchfield West, satyrs and silenoi in Greek mythology are similar to a number of other entities appearing in other Indo-European mythologies,[12] indicating that they probably go back, in some vague form, to Proto-Indo-European mythology.[13]
Like satyrs, these other Indo-European nature spirits are often human-animal hybrids, frequently bearing specifically equine or asinine features.[14]
Human-animal hybrids known as Kiṃpuruṣas or Kiṃnaras are mentioned in the Rāmāyaṇa, an Indian epic poem written in Sanskrit.[15]
According to Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD) and others, the ancient Celts believed in dusii, which were hairy demons believed to occasionally take human form and seduce mortal women.[14] Later figures in Celtic folklore, including the Irish bocánach, the Scottish ùruisg and glaistig, and the Manx goayr heddagh, are part human and part goat.[16]
The lexicographer Hesychius of Alexandria (fifth or sixth century AD) records that the Illyrians believed in satyr-like creatures called Deuadai.[17] The Slavic leshy also bears similarities to satyrs, since he is described as being covered in hair and having “goat’s horns, ears, feet, and long clawlike fingernails.”[16]
***
A Sumerian god with an eagle head:
IN SEARCH OF THE SIRRUSH
During his reign (605-562 BC), King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylonia in Mesopotamia oversaw the creation of his empire’s capital, the holy city of Babylon, dedicated to Babylonia’s supreme deity – Marduk. Babylon was encircled by huge walls, wide enough for chariots to be driven along their summits, and pierced by eight huge gates. The most magnificent was the Ishtar Gate, through which visitors passed in order to enter the city.
Befitting such an important edifice, the Ishtar Gate was a spectacular sight, comprising a colossal semicircular arch, flanked by enormous walls and leading to a breathtaking Processional Way, along which visitors walked to reach the city’s religious centre. The gate, its walls, and the procession walls were covered by a brilliant panoply of highly-glazed enamelled bricks, yielding a backdrop of vivid blue for numerous horizontal rows of eyecatching and very realistic bas-reliefs of animals. On the gate and its flanking walls, six rows of fierce grey bulls alternated with seven rows of grim golden dragons, and along the processional walls were two rows of haughty marching lions, but the most important member of this trio of mighty beasts was the dragon – for this was the sacred beast of Marduk.
Following the eventual fall of Babylonia, its walls and gates became buried underfoot, and their glory was hidden for many centuries – until 3 June 1887 when German archaeologist Prof. Robert Koldeway, during a visit to the site of Babylon, found a fragment of an ancient blue-glazed brick that stimulated his curiosity and led to a full-scale excavation beginning in 1899. Three years later, the animal-adorned Ishtar Gate rose up from the dust of the past like a cobalt phoenix, revealing its bulls, its lions – and its exalted but enigmatic sirrush.
Most commonly referred to as the sirrush or mushrushu (two different transliterations of an Akkadian word loosely translated as ‘splendour serpent’), the Ishtar “dragon” (or whatever) was a source of great bewilderment to Koldeway.
For whereas archaeologists were well aware that the depicted appearance of all other seemingly fabulous, mythical animals in Babylonian tradition had changed drastically over the centuries, depictions of the sirrush (as also present on seals and paintings predating the Ishtar Gate by at least a millennium) had remained the same – just like those of real animals, like the lion and bull. Did this mean, therefore, that the sirrush was itself a real-life species? But if it was, what could it be?
Certainly, it did not – and still does not – resemble any animal known to be alive today. After all, what modern-day species has a slender scaly body, with a small head bearing a pointed horn (or a pair – the Ishtar sirrush is only depicted in profile) on its forehead and ringlet-like flaps of skin further back, a long slender neck, a pair of forelimbs with lion-like claws, a pair of hindlimbs with eagle-like claws, and a long tail? Some authors have suggested a giant monitor lizard, but the sirrush’s horn(s), ringlets, and extremely long neck contradict this identity. (from https://karlshuker.blogspot.com/2011/01/dragons-of-babylon-and-dinosaurs-in.html)
.
…..The Story of He Jiankui, Now Out of Jail After Editing DNA of Unborn Babies
He was jailed in late 2019 for violating medical regulations after announcing his work at a conference the previous year.
According to China’s Xinhua news agency at the time, a court found that He and colleagues “crossed the bottom line of ethics in scientific research.”
There remain many unknowns in the aftermath of He’s work, but he claimed that he used a gene-editing procedure known as CRISPR-Cas9 to rewrite the genomes of embryos before the children were born.
The aim of doing this, He said, was to make them immune to HIV by modifying a certain gene called CCR5. Twin sisters, known as Lulu and Nana, as well as a third child known as Amy, were later born to volunteer parents who took part in the research in 2018. He said Lulu and Nana were born healthily, though their status today remains a mystery.
The problem with CRISPR
A long-standing issue in gene editing is targeting DNA precisely. Previous editing techniques that used chemicals or radiation allowed no control over where in a genome a mutation might occur.
While CRISPR may have made improvements in this regard, it’s far from perfect. Dr. Kiran Musunuru, professor of medicine and director of the Genetic and Epigenetic Origins of Disease Program at the Perelman School of Medicine, thinks the scissors analogy overstates CRISPR’s accuracy.
“It’s kind of like if you accidentally tear a page, [you can] tape it up, but often the edges of the tear are rough. It doesn’t quite match up and you lose some words or you lose some letters; you obscure the meaning of the paragraph.
“So, if you look at it in those terms, it’s really crude, and there are potentially bad consequences. So again, using this analogy of making a tear, let’s say you accidentally tear through the whole page. Well, that can happen in the genome, too.
“So He Jiankui was trying to turn off a gene called CCR5. We know that people who naturally have this gene turned off are more resistant to HIV infection, and so he was trying to make babies who, as they grew up, would be resistant to HIV infection.
“That was the whole premise, and he was using this crude version 1.0 of CRISPR. It was basically just injecting it into embryos and hoping it would turn off the gene and not cause any problems.”
The reveal
He Jiankui’s project was not widely known prior to the international genome-editing summit in Hong Kong in late 2018.
Before the summit took place, He reached out to journalists via a publicist, offering them a scientific manuscript outlining his work that he was planning to submit to a scientific journal. Unsure what to make of it, the journalists reached out to experts for their insight.
“I realised that this was for real. He had actually done what he claimed he had done; that these were babies who had been born from embryos that had been edited with CRISPR. And the reason I knew that was because when I looked at the data, I immediately saw evidence that things had gone wrong—that there were off-target edits, as I described before; that the embryos had ended up being a patchwork of edits, so some of the cells were edited, and some were not and different cells had different edits. I could immediately see that looking at the data in the manuscript.
“I still don’t totally know whether [He] understood the implications of his own data… it was like he just didn’t understand what his own data was telling him.”
Musunuru, bound by a confidentiality agreement, could not publicly announce his concerns for several days. But with just days to go before the Hong Kong summit, Antonio Regalado, a reporter for MIT Technology Review, spotted details of He’s work on a clinical trials website. The story broke prematurely, and He’s work was suddenly thrust into the spotlight.
Despite He’s claims, his work met widespread condemnation and the Chinese government began investigating. Xinhua news agency reported that an investigation by the Health Commission of China found He had “deliberately evaded oversight.”
By January 2019, He had been fired from the Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech) in the city of Shenzhen. By December that year, a court in Shenzhen found He guilty of “illegal medical practices” and of forging ethical review documents.
Fate of the gene-edited children
Joy Zhang, a sociologist and founding director of the Centre for Global Science and Epistemic Justice at the University of Kent, chaired a meeting in March this year to discuss the ethical obligations to protect the three children who were affected by He’s work going forward. The meeting became the basis for a subsequent report.
Robin Lovell-Badge, head of the Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology and Developmental Genetics at the Francis Crick Institute, had spoken to He shortly after news of his experiments emerged and criticized the work. He also took part in Zhang’s meeting earlier this year.
Lovell-Badge said that the three girls who were affected by He’s work should be able to grow up in as normal an environment as possible. “There would have to be very good justification to give any special labels to any of the three girls who are the products of He Jiankui’s experiment,” he told Newsweek. “We do not do so for children born after any IVF procedure such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and we all have unique ‘mutations’ that occur during the development of the egg, sperm and early embryo that gave rise to us.
The other question is what He will do next. Musunuru does not think there is much concern of any further tests on the scale of He’s previous work. “Given his notoriety and, presumably, close monitoring by his government, I don’t think anybody’s too worried that He Jiankui will pick up where he left off,” he said.
“It’s worth noting that he never had a medical license, since he was not a physician and had no medical training whatsoever—which of course was one of the major problems with his ‘clinical trial.’ I’d also expect that Chinese institutional ethical committees that are charged with approving clinical trials will have a much higher bar than they evidently had in the past.”
Have you heard about the latest anti nazi spectacle from Jew Hollywood ? The reason I bring it to your attention is that the villain is – get this – a NASA scientist of German descent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Jones_and_the_Dial_of_Destiny
Yes, and it has not done well.
Wiki:
“It has been deemed a box-office bomb due to a lack of wide appeal for moviegoers.”
The producer is the jew James Mangold…..
I think audiences preferred the anti-pedophile movie “Sound of Freedom” with Jim Caviezel.
Are audiences getting a bit tired of “evil Nazis” when there is REAL evil visibly going on today? And it is being done by jews named Epstein, Maxwell, Zuckerberg, Soros, Schumer, Fink, and Zelensky?
I note that Wiki says a film critic named “John Nugent” liked the action. “John Nugent of Empire Magazine gave the film four out of five stars.”
Well, John DE Nugent is glad it is bombing. 😉
It is time again for the ultimate Nazi. 🙂