February 2
Oh, today is a day for great-heartedness! You will not believe—if you allow yourself to experience it—the capacity of your own heart.
Or, you may have the complementary experience—knowing just how open and grand another’s love can be. And if you are very lucky, perhaps you will feel both today.
This is a day to find the treasure, the true and everlasting gem that is at the core of your divinity. As you have worked to grow, clear and become who you truly are, so you will be able to find, feel and share that divinity of the heart today.
Don’t expect permanence; don’t expect results in the traditional sense. Just allow your being to be fully present in your own heart, and then open as the waves move through you.
If you don’t have time or space to focus on this, so be it. Do what you can as you go about your day (this is a good plan no matter what your day is like), trying to remember to open, to give and to receive.
Don’t limit the potential recipients of your love, or the potential sources of love. The day will be charged with it, and we urge you to feel for it within, without, and everywhere you can.
Why not? Be happy today. Let yourself be in love with yourself.
*** One of the great lessons of Eckhart Tolle is to enjoy yourself!
You are loving, interesting, making progress, and often a noble person.
You don’t need to watch tv or read something on the Internet or in a book. Just enjoy you! Forgive yourself your little flaws and cherish the growing person you are!
If you are hard on yourself, you will not feel worthy of God’s love or that of your guardian angels and ancestors on the other side.
Say: I am loving and lovable.
Because you are!
***
Stop any unkindnesses, yours or others’, before they can lodge. Trust that all is as it was meant to be, that the power of the love that each of you and all the beings on your planet carry is enough to change your world and more.
Give it free rein and don’t worry about what it might mean, what anyone else might think, or where it will lead. Be in the moment, love and be loved.
That is our message for today. A joyous one, notice of a beautiful energetic gift, and a chance to connect with the deepest truth.
We love you so deeply and are so thrilled to watch you delve into the extraordinary realms of your own hearts.
Many blessings.
.
.
.
….CI weirdness
British WN Arthur Kemp, who wrote the magnificent March of the Titans, once said that the two nuttiest kinds of WNs he ever met in America were
1) “Creativity” people following an atheistic pseudo-religion (created out of his ass by the guy who invented the electric can opener, Ben Klassen), a religion which is the opposite of a religion. preaching that God is a figment of the imagination — and in fact only “the jew in the sky”!!),
and
2) Christian Identity, a group of Bible thumpers who refuse to eat pork and claim Whites are the true Israelites, as if any antisemite with all his marbles would ever want to be a jew!!!!!
They claim all jews are Edomites, fake jews, and that they are the real jews…..
Having read the Bible four times — in English and in German, and in several translations, it is full of appalling jewish behavior toward other peoples, incest, pimping (Abraham pimps his own wife out to the Pharaoh of Egypt!!!), theft, causing famines to enslave people, and outright lies, and its bloodthirsty, vengeful semitic deity, Yahweh, is an overt psychopath!
Thomas Jefferson, a brilliant scholar, key Founding Father and brilliant two-term US President who doubled the size of the US via the Louisiana Purchase (!) from the French emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, said it perfectly:
Semites such as jews inherit more neanderthal genes than we Aryans have, and are therefore not even fully modern humans, but violent, clannish, prehistoric people.
White people speak Indo-European languages; semites speak semitic languages with constant, horrid, throat-clearing, phlegm-hacking noises!
Anyway, people should read this magnificent book by Sorbonne graduate and French comrade Laurent Guyénot (here in English translation):
From Yahweh to Zion – Laurent Guyénot
So someone sent me a link to some pure drivel composed by some CI person. (I know he is CI because the give-away is that he refers to jews as “Edomites.”)
So here this nut tells us Hitler was a fake, there were two of them, one short and the other tall, one with a short nose, the other with a long one, and a British author was also actually Hitler, and was killed in WWI, or something like that.
https://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler-doppelgangers.html
I replied:
Comrade, this site was either written by a drunk or is designed to make a fool out of anyone who believes it, with dozens of factual errors.
This drunk cannot even spell. He writes a whole article about Hitler but cannot spell the name of his most famous book! My cat could spell M-e-i-n K-a-m-p-f!
I quote this twerp:
Nazi ideologue Houston Stewart Chamberlain was author of Mien Kamph [=Mein Kampf] and a plethora of other racist rants.
Hinderberg [=von Hindenburg] and Lundedorff [=Ludendorff] fought against the U.S. Marines in Belleau Wood
[Geez, no, they did not “fight the US Marines,” and it so happens I was one. Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff were not at Belleau Wood; they commanded the General Staff and the overall war effort. The German commanders at Belleau Wood were two men: Prince Wilhelm and Richard von Conta: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Belleau_Wood]
Anyway, this was a total waste of my time.
.
…..Frenchman Hervé Ryssen on the Bible and incest
Hervé Ryssen, a friend of me and Margi who also was a Sorbonne graduate, wrote a brilliant 2007 book Fanatisme Juif [Jewish Fanaticism]
My late and dear wife, Margaret Huffstickler, translated the chapter below from the original French into English, and I edited her work.
Chapter seven (pp. 354-365), entitled “L’inceste,” is found in part three of “Jewish Fanaticism,” entitled Psychopathologie du Judaïsme.
This is not, BTW, Monsieur Ryssen’s first foray into the topic of incest among the Jews.
In his “Psychoanalysis of Judaism” (p346), we read:
Quote:
The question of incest is very present in Judaism. The Torah [being the first five books of the “Old Testament,” called Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy] offers numerous examples.
We know that the rabbis found excuses for the daughters of Lot.[Ed.
“Father-daughter incest near the town of Tzo’ar.
In Genesis 19: verses 30 to 38, Lot’s two daughters got their father drunk on wine, engaged in sexual intercourse with him on two successive nights, became both pregnant, and eventually the daughters gave birth to two sons, Moab and Benammi.
Their sons are described as founding the Moabite and Ammonite nations.
The Jewish Bible claims the girls actually feared their dad was the last man on earth [, so they had to have sex with him, see, having no other choice, the poor jewish girls…..]
“Lot and His Daughters,” 1616, by Dutch painter Hendrik Goltzius. (I kinda doubt those ancient jewish girls looked so fair, blondish, pink-skinned and Dutch. 😉 )
Quote:
[. . .] One also sees in the Old Testament how Ammon, a son of [King] David, rapes his own sister, Thamar.
The woman then reacts this way:
“Ask for me [in marriage] from my father, the king [King David!!!!!!!], and he will not refuse you.”
[sic!!! and Sick!]
In his novel The Destruction of Kreshev, Nobel Laureate and Yiddish author Isaac Bashevis Singer also recalls the fact that these practices are found frequently in the Torah:
“Thus [the grandson of Father Abraham], Jacob [later renamed “Israel” by “an angel”!!!!!] fornicated with his own sisters, and Judah [Ed. “whence the word “Jew”] sleeps with Tamar, his daughter-in-law.
Reuben violates the bed of Bilha, his father’s concubine.
Josiah finds himself a hot wife in a bordello, and others did just as much.”
We [Ryssen speaking here as a Frenchman] also know all too well the controversial song by Serge Gainsbourg [original name “Ginzburg”, a Russian Jew] called “Lemon Incest.”
[sic; the title of this French “song” is in English]
* *Serge Gainsbourg (Ginsburg) sings “Lemon Incest” with his daughter Charlotte (mother: singer Jane Birkin)
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnKt84AdUHA
(See “Serge Gainsbourg” in Wikipedia, esp. the paragraphs there about his songs on oral sex (“Les sucettes” — meaning “female suckers”) and “Lemon Incest.”
The rest of the article is a typical “yet another great Jewish genius!” paean. Gainsbourg’s voice was one long, hideous croak, as necrotic as the Montreal Jew Leonard Cohen’s voice…..)
Some of the lyrics from the second part:
Quote:
(Charlotte, daughter)
Lemon incest
I love you, love you
Love you more than anything
The love that we’ll never make together
Is the purest, the most troubling, the most exalting.(Serge, father)
Exquisite child
Delicious child
Oh my baby, oh my soul
The topic of legalizing incest — sex between parents and children and between brother and sister — is far from esoteric. Jewish neo-con Jeff Jacoby wrote a column on May 2, 2007 for the Boston Globe entitled Lawful incest may be on its way. It turns out that the usual suspects are behind it — Jews (and their minions).
.
…..Good retort to the leftwing, gun-hating homo on Elon Musk’s new free-speech Twitter
.
.
……”From Yahweh to Zion”
[This is the opener]
FROM YAHWEH TO ZION:
THREE THOUSAND YEARS OF EXILE
Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land . . .
Clash of Civilizations
Laurent Guyénot
translated from the French by
Kevin Barrett
CONTENTS
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1: THE PEOPLE OF SETH
The Birth of Israel
Ezra the Proto-Zionist
Hasmonean Literary Production
Kenites, Midianites, and Arabs
Cain and Abel as mirror images of Seth and Osiris
Osirism versus Judaism
Chapter 2: THE THEOCLASTIC GOD
Jealousy and Narcissistic Hubris
No Goddess for Yahweh
From Deicide to Genocide
The Plunder of the Nations
The Levitic Tyranny
Endogamy and Monotheism
Chapter 3: THE PRINCE OF THIS WORLD
Death and Culture in the Antique World
Biblical Materialism
Biblical versus Heroic Cultures
The Eternal People
Chapter 4: THE LAST HERO
Jews, Greeks, and Romans
Jesus, Rome, and Jerusalem
Anastasis
The Return of Osiris and Isis
The Return of Yahweh
The Miracle of Constantine
The Levitical Vatican
Chapter 5: THE WANDERING CRYPTO-JEW
The Jews and Europe in the Middle Ages
Forced Conversions in Spain and Portugal
The Marrano Dispersion
Marranos and the Church
Assimilation or Dissimulation?
Chapter 6: THE IMPERIAL MATRIX
The Two Sides of Albion
The Triumph of Puritanism
The Disraeli Enigma
The Gestation of Zionism
The Balfour-Rothschild Declaration
The Treaty of Versailles
Chapter 7: THE BIRTH PANGS OF ZION
Marxism and Zionism
Russia and the Jews
Zionism and Nazism
Hitler’s Prophecy
“Judea Declares War on Germany”
“An old Zionist like [Churchill]”
Birth of the “Jewish State”
The “Human Material”
The Soviet Union and Israel
Nasser, the Useful Enemy
Chapter 8: THE INVISIBLE COUP
John F. Kennedy, the Lobby, and the Bomb
Who Killed Kennedy?
The Hijacked Conspiracy
Johnson, a “Jewish President”?
Serial Assassinations
The Triumph of Zionist Propaganda
Chapter 9: THE VICIOUS CABAL
Neoconned
The Hijacking of the Republican Party
Setting the Stage for the Clash of Civilizations
The “New Pearl Harbor”
The Controlled Opposition
The Fourth World War
Chapter 10: THE GREAT GAME OF ZION
Darwinism, Racism, and Supremacism
Judaism as Darwinian Strategy
Blood, Race, and Genes
Nomads and Refugees
Assimilation, Dissimulation
The Mission Theory
Hijacking Christianity
Reshaping the Cultural Environment
Chapter 11: CHILDREN OF THE MAD GOD
Yahweh, the Levites, and the People
What Is a Psychopath?
The Psychopathic God
Killing Yahweh
Jewishness and Selective Empathy
Universalism and the Chosenness Complex
The Holocaust Attitude
The Sociopathic State
ENDNOTES
PREFACE [by a sincere but very liberal antizionist Kevin Barrett of Wisconsin, who says he converted to Islam]
The book you are about to read is a major contribution not only to that
overspecialized field known as the History of Religions, but also to its more
generalized sibling, the History of Ideas. It is cultural critique of the first order.
It is timely, of such relevance to current events as can hardly be overstated. And yet it could never be published by a major publishing house in any English-speaking country.
Why not? After all, in our Brave New World, destructive criticism of almost
everything under the sun is permissible, if not encouraged or even required.
Brutal, not particularly sophisticated attacks on Islam, Christianity, religion in general, the Pope, Mother Theresa, public decency, and indeed almost every traditional value are ubiquitous, regularly appearing in publishers’ catalogues and bestseller lists, and assigned as required reading in universities and book clubs.
How, in such an anything-goes atmosphere, can a scholarly interpretation
of ideological history be so controversial as to be virtually unpublishable? How can a book about the history of the idea of God pose such problems in the year of our Lord 2018?
The answer is simple: This book traces the evolution of the concept of God
through its relationship to Jewish tribal power. And the rulers of our Western world have made one thing abundantly clear: though God may be criticized, Jewish power must not be.
But what is Yahweh, the earliest known God of the Abrahamic monotheists
and their descendants, if not an embodiment and representation of Jewish tribal power in general, and that of Jewish elites in particular?
How can we think about what monotheism means in the era of the clash of civilizations without considering this foundational question?
In From Yahweh to Zion, Laurent Guyénot uncovers a mind-virus endemic to Judaism, yet present to greater or lesser degrees in Christianity and Islam as well: a conception of God that stubbornly clings to tribalism and all that it entails, rather than surrendering absolutely to universalism [= the brotherhood of man, God is our heavenly father, and all are God’s children, no just the jews].
This misconception of God as tribal shibboleth provides a powerful weapon in the ideological arsenals of unscrupulous elites, whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim.
And it may have mutated and hidden itself inside the secularist fundamentalisms that are substitute religions for the modern educated classes.
When an Iraqi Muslim bombs innocent civilians in a mosque or market, an
American Christian flies a drone bomb into a wedding party in Afghanistan, or a secular French policeman forces a Muslim woman to remove her one-piece bathing suit, we may detect an atavistic tribalism driving the perpetrators of these acts to defile, subjugate, or destroy other peoples and their gods, as per the orders of the Old Testament god Yahweh.
For though not all ethnocentric intolerance derives from Yahweh—such episodes have occurred in the histories of all peoples—the Yahwist cult has left its mark on the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic worlds, and thereby on the world at large, in an especially destructive way.
Outbreaks of Old Testament fundamentalism have correlated with many of
our worst conquests, subjugations, and genocides—from the Wars of Religion to the Native American holocaust to the settler colonial annihilations and subjugations of the peoples of Africa, Australia and New Zealand, and (more recently) Palestine.
And in today’s postreligious age—unofficially inaugurated by what National Medal of Science winner Lynn Margolis called the “most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations” on
September 11, 2001—a hidden Yahwism seems to guide the hands of allegedly secular elites as they plot their new crusades.
Recognizing our own implication in such ideas and events can be difficult,
even painful. But it may also be necessary. Having come to Islam in 1993, and adopted its revisionist account of Old Testament folklore and mythology as my own, I find Guyénot’s critique of Yahwism disquieting and challenging.
But I also find it useful, especially in understanding my coreligionists’ lapses into tribalism and intolerance. ISIS, which lashes out at other religious approaches and their adherents as if they were false gods and idolaters, is a facile example.
But many mainstream Muslims who would never dream of joining ISIS
sometimes act as though fellow Muslims who take a slightly different path to God are mushrikîn (idol worshippers) rather than coreligionists and fellow human beings. The takfiris of ISIS and similar groups mirror the self-righteous, Yahwistic sides of ourselves.
Though Guyénot’s argument could easily be caricatured as simplistically
antimonotheistic and propolytheistic, I would not subscribe to that reading.
Guyénot draws a portrait of Yahweh as psychopathic father whose war on
idolatry amounts to an amoral, self-aggrandizing extinction of the other. Though such a reading may be largely warranted by the Old Testament and the Talmud, I don’t think it applies to the monotheistic religions of Christianity or Islam, at least not to the same degree. And there are aspects of Biblical tradition that cut in the opposite direction, notably those highlighted by René Girard in numerous writings such as The Scapegoat (1986).
Girard suggests that monotheism’s anti-idolatry impetus stems largely from
its half-conscious understanding that polytheistic “religions” are, in the final analysis, cults of human sacrifice. Thus, according to the Girardian reading, the story of Abraham’s near-sacrifice of his son is less about inculcating blind obedience to Yahweh than about ending the polytheistic pagan practice of sacrificing one’s own children to the likes of Moloch.
We could extend Girard’s insight to encompass Muhammad’s war on Meccan idolaters who buried their baby girls alive and sacrificed to monstrous gods around a defiled Kaaba in search of wealth and power for themselves and their cronies.
Such practices still exist, though they are no longer widespread. In today’s
North and West Africa, the practice of human sacrifice to gods or jinn by people seeking wealth and power continues on the margins of society, where it has been consigned by the reigning monotheism.
Similar abominations apparently persist among so-called dark shamans in parts of Latin America as well as in the satanic cults of Europe and America. Such are the “idol worshippers” denigrated in the most reliable monotheistic scripture, in my view, the Holy Qur’an.
But if there is a positive or at least defensible side to monotheism’s hostility
to polytheism and idolatry, it does not form part of Guyénot’s analysis in this book—which could be accused of one-sidedness in other ways as well.
For example: Where, one may ask, are the countless examples of noble, selfless Jewish behavior? What about all the wonderful Jewish high achievers in science and the arts? Where are the standard accounts of the endless gratuitous persecutions Jews have suffered everywhere they have settled? Is there not at least some truth to the stereotype of the Jew as eternal victim?
The answer to such objections is simple: Those stories have been endlessly
told and retold in all the dominant media of the postwar West. Yet nowhere are they questioned; nowhere are alternative accounts proposed; nowhere are the viewpoints of those who found themselves in conflict with Jewish tribalism given fair consideration.
Every historical conflict between Jews and goyim is assumed to be the fault of the goyim. If a man quarrels with everyone in his life —his neighbors, his boss, his coworkers, those he meets on the street—and then insists that all of those people are persecuting him for no reason whatsoever, few of us would take him at his word.
Yet we unquestioningly accept such interpretations of interactions between Jewish and non-Jewish communities, whether due to lack of curiosity or fear: fear of being called names, of being socially ostracized, of possibly even being deprived of our livelihood.
It is long past time to stop fearing and start thinking. This book’s task is to
provide a plausible revisionist interpretation of critically important questions, not to echo conventional tropes in hopes of appearing “fair and balanced.” By venturing boldly into forbidden territory, Laurent Guyénot forces us to think, freshly and critically, in a way that our culture habitually deems off-limits. A staunch antiracist, Guyénot makes it abundantly clear that he is critiquing ideas, not biology. And unlike much of the shrill, even hysterical “anti-Semitic” writing lurking in disreputable corners of the internet, this book is far less tendentious than the dominant discourse it critiques. Fair-minded yet unflinching, it is a magisterial work by an uncommonly erudite historian, and deserves the widest possible readership.
–Kevin Barrett
***
The whole work:
From Yahweh to Zion – Laurent Guyénot
I might just run the whole book here….. Learn what is REALLY in the “Holy” Bible…..
I like the Twitter caption by David Hogg.
The Jewish leadership betrayed jesus to the Romans. Pilate asked the Jewish leadership how they wanted him to deal with jesus.
They ordered his death as he challenged their power in the Jewish tribes.
Joan of Arc was betrayed by the French king to the English because she challenged the king’s power.
The British Royal Family blocked the Russian Royal Family from coming to Britain in 1917,to escape the bolsheviks.
Britain’s Royals feared the Romanoffs would replace them on the Throne. So they left them to be killed.
So as for David Hogg, jealous, power-mad people are the danger, not weapons. Weapons are inert. People kill people.
Your argument is childish, Hogg. Jesus armed with an AR 15? You forget Jesus died to save us all according to the Bible.
David Hogg is a 30-y/o crisis actor fag pretending to be a teenage highschool shooting victim.
He might well be a shooting victim yet. Thanks for the info.
Hello, John!
I am in contact with an 18-year-old German who is really intelligent and has nationalist views.
He is very sad that German girls show no respect for German boys or men in general.
They give you nasty answers and look down on men. It seems that white men in the western world are the only ones you can treat badly without any consequences.
Nevertheless, when he corresponds with East Asian girls, especially Koreans, they are friendly, respectful and sweet. They are feminine and have no tattoos or disgusting clothes.
Thanks to cultural marxism white, western girls have a strong disrespect for their own men. As a result, there is so much hatred for women in the white nationalist scene.
They believe that women are our misfortune, because they vote left wing, support anti-white parties, and kiss the ass of non white men while they treat thier fellow Whites as shit.
AND many girls these days are lesbians or transgender. Nearly every young nationalist I know is single.
They cannot find a women or thy simply hate women because of their sick behavior. Asian girls at least have respect for white men; they love their appearance, and they admire white culture.
It is such a sick society. The most important thing, IMO, would be to create a good relationship between white men and girls again.
Many young, white women here in Germany are like Katharina Schulz, a Green Party politician:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R1nWsB_yuA
This female is anti-white, hysterical, hard-core marxist, globalist and evil.
These Green women have no feminine behaviour at all.
Even blond and blue-eyed German patriots nowadays have litte Asian wives, because they respect their men, at least, while German girls are mostly like Katharina.
The enemy has done a great job in destroying white society…
Thanks for this.
I myself know three white nationalists with a Chinese or Filipino wife.
Interestingly, one, who had become an enemy, called me and Margi, apologized, and made peace with us at the urging of the Chinese wife,a sincere Buddhist.
Australia is full of divorced white men in their forties and fifties with a Chinese wife.
In divorce court, with the help of a white but feminist female judge, the former wife, white too, cleans the man out to the bone. He is then so broke no materialistic white women will have him, so he gets a mail-order bride from China.
The fact is that, just as you say, Asian women actually do sincerely like white men, find them attractive, and, ummm, I am told that size does matter. 😉
.
.
Western women think they don’t need a man, only his money. Some women are anti-men.
Yes, this is true, and by not living in the now, they can misinterpret a new romantic partner by how some other dude treated them 30 years ago, and they stay all bitter.
The power of now means old baggage fades away. It is okay to learn lessons from the past, but then you have to move on.
In der Menge der sozial unterentwickelten Menschen herrscht de facto ein Gleichgewicht, es gibt nicht mehr sozial unterentwickelte Frauen als sozial unterentwickelte Männer.
Jedoch: Die NWO gab und gibt diesen sozial unterentwickelten Frauen einen Freibrief zum Gesetzesbruch, seit sehr vielen Jahrzehnten, also de facto einen juristischen Freibrief: Frauen-Bonus auf jeder nur denkbaren Ebene, egal ob es um Falschbeschuldigung, Diebstahl, Körperverletzung, Mord, oder um Verbrechen und Mord an Kindern geht (“sie war psychisch überfordert.”) , oder um die lebenslange Totalversklavung und existentielle Vernichtung des Mannes im Falle einer Scheidung. Total doppelte Maßstäbe, Frauen bekommen im schlimmsten Falle Bewährungsstrafen, wo Männer für viele Jahre oder sogar lebenslänglich ins Gefängnis kommen würden. Von der NWO-weisungsgebundenen Scheinjustiz werden diese Männervernichtungsurteile gesprochen, es sind Direktiven von ganz oben.
Debütmenschen (Tiermenschen) mißbrauchen diesen Freibrief für das Begehen von Verbrechen rücksichtlos und gnadenlos. Aufgrund diesen Freibriefes fällt so ein schlechtes Licht auf die restlichen Frauen, die anders sind. Es ist einfach ein zu großes Risiko geworden, sich mit Frauen einzulassen. Nur wenn man spirituell entwickelt ist, findet man eine entsprechende Partnerin die keine NWO-Antiideale verinnerlicht hat, dann weiß man, wie man sich auf das Finden solch einer Partnerin einstimmen kann.
Durch den Wahnsinnskult um die Frauen ist diese Teilmenge der sozial Unterentwickelten auch zu einer total verblödeten Masse geworden, einfachst zu manipulieren, jeden Dreck der NWO-Presse verinnerlichend und nachplappernd. Widerspricht man ihnen, drehen sie durch (Prinzessinenen-Attitüde), deshalb schweigen viele Männere lieber, wenn Frauen NWO-Lügenpresse-Dreck (Feminismus-Propaganda-Lügen gegen Männer, Politlügen etc.) nachbabbeln, denn Widerspruch wird nicht geduldet (Prinzessinnen-Größenwahn, Kritik = Gotteslästerung). Folge: Totalverblödung, Totalverdummung, Totalmanipulierbarkeit eines Großteils der Frauen.
Und Totalmaterialismus, und leistungsloses Anspruchsdenken in Reinstform (wie bei US-Negern und Arabern und anderen Multikultis in Europa: “Es steht mir zu!”). Hypergamie in extremster Form: Nur die reichsten Männer interessieren, die anderen sind uninteressant (“Die guten Männer sind vergeben! Wo sind all die guten Männer nur hin?”). De facto muß sich ein Mann eine Frau laufend neu erkaufen, beim Kennenlernen als auch in der Ehe (populäre Umschreibung für Ehefrau: “Einmann-Nutte”): Teure Essen, teure Geschenke, teure Urlaube usw. usf. Aber von Hollywood und TV werden Männer von klein auf dazu programmiert, ins offene Messer zu laufen und zu heiraten, nichtsahnend, daß auch Eheverträge standardmäßíg(!) für null und nichtig erklärt werden vor den Familiengerichten.
Frauen haben dieselbe Gehirnkapazität wie Männer, aber der Verstand kann sich bei dieser Teilmenge nicht entfalten, aufgrund ihrer Totalprivilegierung und ihrer freiwilligen Entscheidung, die parasitäre NWO-Route zu wählen. Nur Emotionen, kein logisches Denken und schon gar kein Herzensgefühl, schon gar keine Intuition. Fordern fordern, fordern, die Ansprüche immer höher schrauen, die Männer sollen für alles sorgen: Autos, Haus, Riesen usw. Und wenn sie dann vor lauter Arbeit immer weniger Zeit haben heißt es irgendwann: “Wundert es dich, daß ich dich betrogen habe? Du hast dir nie wirklich Zeit für mich genommen!”
Die NWO-Saat ging auf: Mission accomplished! Wieso sollte ein Mann die Blödheit und Asozialität in Person, also die durchschnittliche NWO-Frau zur Partnerin nehmen? Es geht immer nur von oben nach unten, von Mann zu Frau: Mehr (entwickelter!) Verstand -> nach unten zur Frau, mehr Einkommen -> zur Frau (Manneinkommen = “unser Einkommen”, Fraueinkommen = “mein Einkommen”), mehr Verantwortung -> Unterverantwortklichkeit der Frau usw. usf.
Wenn jetzt alles zusammenbricht, wenn es kein mehr Geld vom Staat gibt (das von den weißen Männersklaven erwirtschaftet wird) werden sie alle wieder in Scharen zu den weißen Männern rennen, nichts mehr vom Feminismus wissen wollen. Hoffentlich bekommen sie dann einen Arschtritt, eine entsprechende Abfuhr, wiewohl viele weiße Männer mittlerweile mehr oder weniger alles mit sich machen lassen, jegliche Wehrhaftigkeit verloren haben.
So leid es mir tut, das sagen zu müssen: Die durchschnittliche weiße NWO-Frau ist der Prototyp eines dümmlichen, unaufrichtigen und supermaterialistischen Wesens geworden, das zudem höchstgefährlich ist (Lügen, Falschbeschuldigung usw).
Die spaltende ahrimanische/satanische Saat ging auch im Bereich der Beziehungen zu 100% auf, Leid und Elend wo man nur hinschaut, in allen Lebensbereichen. Diese materialistischen Tendenzen herrschen jedoch weltweit vor, viele Männer dachten, daß ausländische Frauen anständiger wären. Dort hat man exakt dieselben Probleme und soll dann sogar noch den ganzen Stamm, die ganze Großfamilie mitfinanzieren: Vom Regen in die Traufe. Hierzu ein paar Zitate zu ausländischen Frauen, die die Sachverhalte auf den Punkt bringen:
https://at.wikimannia.org/Detlef_Br%C3%A4unig#Erfahrungen_mit_Ausl.C3.A4nderinnen
Auch hier hilft nur Spiritualität: Durch Einstimmung auf innerer Ebene (mit Bitte um Assistenz des Schutzengels) kann man immer eine entsprechend geistig-entwickelte Partnerin finden. Nur muß man um diese inneren Hilfsinstanzen und Methoden wissen, und wer weiß das schon, im Zeitalter des Materialismus?
Man created god after his own image. Ben Klassen was one of the people who thought logically. If you want to understand the “old testament” read Velikovsky’s “worlds in collision”.
Facts:
Klassen was an atheist. He called God “the jew in the sky.”
And he denied the afterlife.
I stated in Mein Kampf that no religion can succeed without the clear teaching that life goes on after death.
I read Klassen’s book when it first came out in the mid-1970s.
His religion, which has neither God nor an afterlife, has therefore gone nowhere in fifty years.
Mein Kampf:
ah-praying-or-collecting-himself
Second, Hitler fiercely opposed atheism as BAD for society and the masses, and once he became chancellor, he dissolved all atheistic societies in Germany:
As Hitler knew, and Alfred Rosenberg, and Dietrich Eckart, right in the third chapter of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion) we read that the Jewish plan is to advocate atheism for the goyim:
“Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism.”
Now many are turned off by the Bible or the official Christianity of the various churches, but the key concepts and the reality of key religious doctrines are not limited to those three Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
Such core ideas as:
— God being a just and loving Creator of the universe,
— the immortality of your soul,
— the existence of good and obedient angels and of wicked, rebellious demons,
— of free will,
— of being judged in the afterlife after you die, based on the goodness or wickedness of your heart, words and deeds,
— and being assigned to one of many kinds of heavens or hells based on what you deserve and what you need to learn.
In fact, all these core ideas which we mentally associate with the three Abrahamic religions were basically stolen by the Jews from the very Aryan religion of Zorastrianism in ancient Persia. They began appearing without any attribution — without giving any credit — in Later Judaism.
Later Judaism was when the Jews had no more kings such as David or Solomon, and were not even living in Palestine any more. They had been conquered, then moved as the trouble-makers they were out of Palestine (which they had seized from the native Canaanites), by the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires.
Then they were living in exile in the major city of Babylon and actually happy there making money as merchants and slave traders.
Then the entire area was conquered by the Aryan Persians, and they became subjects of the Persian Empire.
The Persian Empire conquered every powerful ancient civilization in the Near East, including both Egypt and Babylon, excepting only the freedom-loving Greeks who were on the European side of the Aegean Sea, with such great city-states as Athens, Corinth, and Sparta.
The Persians’ religion was Zoroastrianism, named after the prophet Zoroaster, a white Persian.
The symbol of Zoroastrianism is Zoroaster riding on an eagle.
Later Judaism, having adopted these Aryan ideas, then passed them on 500 years later to its offshoot, Christianity, and then, 600 years after that, to another offshoot, Islam. But all these doctrines about the soul, the afterlife, God, and the battle between good and evil, were 100 percent Aryan in their origin.
As for the gods, all our white and Aryan ancestors believed in the existence of a Creator God and of various lesser gods, whether it was the Greeks, Romans, Kelts, the Vikings or, as discussed earlier, the Aryans of the East, in ancient India.
That is an undeniable fact, and we see to this very day the beautiful temples our white, pagan or heathen forefathers built to those gods and goddesses in whom they believed, and for whom they built very expensive and truly beautiful structures.
The Parthenon, Athens
Although I am Gottgläubig, I do not profess to know the nature of the Creator – a “Black Box” od an Entity of known function (creating the physical and unseen Worlds} but orherwuse an unknown structure:
Sentient?
Sexual?
But as a “Pagan,” I recognize that there ARE other, albeit lesser, gods in the cosmos.
Some are malignant, r.g.: Moloch and others of like ilk.
Many are indifferent: gods of a specific place or activity which I do not practice.
And some are benificent, and beneficial.
‘Tis a pity we only know their names in other cultures.
I, too, see Christianity as a psyop to entice non-Jews into the Abrahamic mythosphere.
Christianity does, however, make some sense to me.
Apology for typos. At age 78, my eyesight is failing.
Thanks for explaining. I fixed the typos. 🙂
Did you know you can make the print much bigger?
Yes.
Well, in later Odinism, our ancestors had Odin the Allfather, but the Pope banned Him. 😉
In editing, did I understand this correctly at the end?
“Christianity does, however, make some sense to me.”