The Great Wall of Pelosi: protecting the Deep State from America; insane Pentagon tilts to confronting Russia with nice little “tactical” nukes

Because she felt threatened, Washington, D.C. has set up perhaps the greatest wall in America. They built it overnight. And it is an IMPECCABLE wall, truly.

.

.

.

…..Biden Administration relaunches anti-Russian policy

.

This my translation of a major article by the French weekly Rivarol, which just celebrated its 70th anniversary.

N ° 3458 – FEBRUARY 10, 2021 – RIVAROL 7

FOR four years, President Donald Trump has attempted to ease U.S.-Russian tensions despite continued hostility during his tenure from the U.S. Deep State, which continued the policy of sanctions against the Euro-Asian bear.

Barely installed in the White House, Joe Biden has already relaunched the unbridled anti-Russian policy of the United States which was pursued by the Obama administration. On the occasion of the extension of the American-Russian disarmament treaty “New Start”, the US government has announced the tune: Biden’s mandate will be partly devoted to anti-Russian geopolitics.

Thus, the head of diplomacy,  Secretaryof State  (((Anthony Blinken))) (1), said in the press release announcing the extension of the agreement (until February 5, 2026):

 

“At the same time as we work with Russia to advance American interests, we will also work to hold Russia to account for its antagonistic acts and human rights violations in close coordination with our allies and partners. ”

He added that the extension of New Start offered a respite to try to regulate “all nuclear weapons” with Russia, but also to try to “reduce the dangers posed by the modern and growing nuclear arsenal of China ”.

The agreement on New Start does not prevent the US from having “its eyes wide open to the challenges that Russia poses to the United States and to the world,” asserted Antony Blinken. (2)

Waving around, as usual, the pretext of human rights, the United States is organizing new anti-Russian propaganda with the Alexeï Navalny affair (a proven con man who has just been sentenced to prison in Russia).

The Anglo-American agent poses as the great opponent of Vladimir Putin and claims to have been poisoned by the Russian secret services.

In addition to human rights, the Biden administration accuses Russia of interfering in the US elections and of launching a massive cyber-attack on US government ministries.

During the telephone interview he had with the Russian president, Joe Biden “reaffirmed his firm support for the sovereignty of Ukraine in the face of the persistent aggression of Russia”, according to the spokesperson of the Russian Federation. White House, Ms. Jen Psaki. (3)

Stories of poisoning and the Ukrainian question are among the two main constant angles of attack of US geopolitics against Russia.

THE UKRAINIAN QUESTION IN UNITED STATES GEOPOLITICS

The strategy of containment and dismantling of the Russian Federation was updated by Zbigniew Brzezinski (1928-2017), in his book The Grand Chessboard: America and the Rest of the World (1997).

Outlining his vision of American geopolitics in Europe and Russia, Brzezinski wrote: “Independently of one another, France and Germany are not strong enough neither to build Europe according to their own views, nor to raise the ambiguities inherent in defining the limits of Europe, which is the cause of tensions with Russia. This requires a strong and determined involvement of America to help define these boundaries, especially with the Germans, and to settle sensitive issues, especially for Russia, such as the desirable status in the European system of the Baltic republics. and Ukraine… ”(4)

The aggressive stance of the European leaders against Russia in the Ukrainian affair is revealing of the American geopolitical strategy and the instrumentalization of the European Union and NATO to extend its hegemony; what Brzezinski did not hide when he advocated taking Ukraine out of the Russian sphere of influence in order to weaken it: “Ukraine’s independence changes the very nature of the Russian state. Because of this alone, this important new square on the Eurasian chessboard becomes a geopolitical pivot. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be an empire in Eurasia. “(5)

Brzezinski’s geopolitical strategy is a semi-success: in terms of the domination of the heart of Europe by the total submission of France and Germany, it is done (although Germany is starting to do shows a certain hint of independence), but as for the breakup of Russia into provinces, allowing the Americans to control all of Eurasia and extract its wealth, it is a failure. The dreams of US domination are shattered on the Putinian wall. But the crisis in Ukraine – a country to which Brzezinski paid special attention and which he absolutely wanted to separate from Russia – and the speech of the Biden Administration show that the Americans have by no means given up on their project.

So far, Putin’s Russia has held the Americans in check in Syria and has succeeded in taking advantage of Western policy in Ukraine, with the spectacular return of Crimea to Russian home (March 2014).

THE RUSSIAN SECRET SERVICES POISONING OPPONENTS IN POUTINE: A HOLLYWOODIAN SCENARIO

Russia is accused, at regular intervals, of assassinations (by poisoning or by bullets) of journalists and other Russian opponents, to demonize Vladimir Putin, justify new sanctions and try to isolate this great country.

The latest case is that of Navalny, the Russian hero of the West, who claimed to have been poisoned by the Russian secret service. According to the Western media account:

“The Berlin doctors who treated Alexeï Navalny made public, Wednesday, December 23 (2020), the clinical details of his poisoning with Novichok. The Russian opponent welcomes on Twitter and Facebook the publication of this medical “proof” that Moscow has been asking for months. “Serious poisoning with a cholinesterase inhibitor was diagnosed at [the] Charité hospital,” the scientists explain in this four-page article in The Lancet, which traces the symptoms for the first time. triggered by the nerve agent of the Novichok group developed by the USSR in the 1980s. ”(6)

It was the journal The Lancet that published the study on the poisoning of Navalny. The same review which, a few months earlier, had been at the heart of a planetary scandal after publishing a completely bogus study (May 22, 2020) on hydroxychloroquine. A study which led to the suspension of the use of this treatment in France. Finally, The Lancet, was forced to withdraw, in June 2020, its spurious article against hydroxychloroquine. (7)

Navalny then accused the Russian secret service of having been behind “the poisoning” with the aim of murdering him. Words deemed “delusional” by Moscow, which did not have access to evidence of intoxication. (8)

In the process, the European Union demanded explanations from Moscow and took, with Great Britain, sanctions to which Russia responded with countermeasures (9).

This is not the first story of poisoning attributed to Russia by the West. It is indeed a Hollywood “remake”.

PREVIOUS POISONING CASES

In 2018, a former Russian military intelligence colonel Sergei Skripal and his daughter Lulia (who survived) were poisoned. They were found unconscious on March 4, 2018 near a shopping center in Salisbury (England).

A week later, British Prime Minister Theresa May accused Russia, without proof, of being guilty of poisoning the Skripals.

JdN: May with a hooked nose like many “English” politicians all smiles with the leucophobic president of South Africa

.

London had already accused Vladimir Poutine in 2006 of having had the double agent Alexander Litvinenko murdered by poisoning.

The Le Monde newspaper reported on January 21, 2016:

“British justice did not hesitate to designate Russian President Vladimir Poutine in person as the ‘probable’ sponsor of the poisoning assassination in London in 2006 of the opponent Alexander Litvinenko”.

British judge Robert Owen, in his conclusions of the investigation conducted from January to July 2015, made public on January 21, 2016, declared: “The operation of the FSB (ex-KGB) intended to kill Mr. Litvinenko has bably approved by Mr. Patrouchev (Nikolai Patrouchev, ex-boss of the FSB, now general secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation) and also by President Poutine. “(10)

What about the evidence supporting the British judge’s public conclusions? There are not any. There are only clues, which have remained “confidential” …

But we still learned that the victim was employed by the British secret service, MI6.

Like Alexander Litvinenko, Sergei Skripal was a double agent, a former FSB agent who took refuge in the United Kingdom who was recruited by the British secret services.

In both of these cases we have double agents, working for the British, who may have been sacrificed by the Perfidious Albion in order to serve an anti-Russian foreign policy.

This was suggested by FSB general Vladimir Djabarov, who told AFP that the poisoning of Skripal could have been committed by the United Kingdom or a third country in order to “blame and blacken Russia” (11 ).

In these two assassination cases, we are told that the Russian secret services are stupid to the point of killing their ex-agents with poisons made only in Russia, in order to make it easier for the investigators and that they can thus go back to in the Kremlin …

In the case of Litvinenko’s assassination, it is polonium 210, a radioactive isotope “of which Russia is the only producing country” wrote Le Monde in its article of January 21, 2016; and Skripal, meanwhile, was poisoned by an innervating gas, Novichok, “manufactured only in Russia” writes the newspaper Liberation in an article of March 30, 2018 (12), from the pen of his correspondent in London.

The same Novichok used to poison Navalny… No evidence leads to the Russian trail, but Vladimir Putin has already been named guilty by the British government.

Regarding the assassination of Litvinenko, Kremlin spokesman Dimitri Peskov reacted to Judge Owen’s conclusions by declaring that the British investigation is “maybe a joke … obviously, we can relate that to the ‘elegant British humor’, quipping on the report ‘based on confidential information from unidentified secret services’.

Peskov behind Putin 

Theresa May, who was then Minister of the Interior (“Home Secretary”), was already at the forefront of accusing Moscow of the assassination of Litvinenko.

She was the link between Andrei Lougovoi and the Kremlin, because this ex-agent of the FSB, who became a deputy in the Duma, appeared on March 9, 2015 on the list of decorations and honors of President Putin and was awarded the medal of the Order of Merit because of its “great activity aimed at developing legislative and parliamentary relations”.

For Theresa May, the treatment which was reserved by Moscow to Lougovoi “says it all”.

Theresa May’s anti-Putin hysteria was not supported by any evidence of Russian guilt in the assassination of Sergei Skripal.

In an atmosphere of British-style neo-McCarthyism, Theresa May and the British establishment embarked on a veritable cold war against Russia, and internally, against Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn (who has since been ejected for anti-Semitism), treated as a Kremlin stooge by British MPs and newspapers, for asking for evidence that the suspected Soviet-era toxin was indeed linked to the actions of the Russian state.

Corbyn also posed the following question: Would the British authorities provide the samples of the suspected toxins to Russian investigators so that they could conduct their own independent assessment – a procedure mandated by the 1997 international treaty known as the Convention on chemical weapons (13)?

The UK expelled 23 Russian diplomats. The United States, under the Obama administration, expelled 60 Russian diplomats, France 4, Germany 4, Ukraine 13… In total, 29 countries expelled Russian diplomats, the majority of them from European countries.

In response, Russia expelled 60 American diplomats (14).

Biden administration revives anti-Russian policy

But a number of countries refused to participate in this coordinated diplomatic attack: Austria, Slovenia, Slovakia, Luxembourg, Cyprus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Malta, Turkey, New Zealand , Portugal, Greece, Mon-tenegro (15), as well as Israel (already in a bad position on the Syrian file and which did not wish to alienate Russia even more).

But Theresa May didn’t just kick out Russian diplomats; she said she was “ready to take more important measures”, recalling in the process that the British troops were stationed on a NATO base located in Estonia, a country bordering Russia (16).

NATO

RESUMPTION OF HOSTILITIES?

Keep in mind that Trump’s policy of detente vis-à-vis Russia was a parenthesis and that it was carried out by a minority of the American establishment who lost the battle to the state. deep.

This deep state which has completely taken over control as well as its constant warmongering and anti-Russian policy. In a way, the Biden administration is going to carry out the program of Hillary Clinton who lost in 2016. And at that time, the speech vis-à-vis Russia was extremely belligerent.

US Army General Mark Milley, Head of HQ in addition – a madman of Russophobia

.

The hysterical Hillary was not far from envisioning war against Putin’s country, and had repeatedly offered to raze Iran off the map.

In July 2015, to please the Israelis, Hillary Clinton declared: “I want the Iranians to know that if I am president, we will attack Iran… We will be able to obliterate them totally. “(17)

On the military side, the current Chief of Staff of the Armies (since September 2019), General Mark Milley, threatened Russia and China (while he was Chief of Staff of the Army, from 2015 to 2019), on the eve of the 2016 US presidential election, which, from the point of view of the US elite, was to win Hillary Clinton.

At the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting in Washington DC on October 4, 2016, Mark Milley said:

“The strategic will of our nation, the United States, is being called into question and our alliances are as they have not been for many, many decades. But I want to be clear; I want to be unambiguous. I want to be clear with those who are trying to oppose the United States… we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been before… we will destroy any enemy, anywhere , anytime… I warn America’s enemies… We are increasingly challenged by very capable potential adversaries who are clearly acting in opposition to our interests. But if deterrence fails, we as an army, we as a nation, must be prepared to fight! Other countries, Russia, Iran,China and North Korea have learned from us… They have studied our doctrine, tactics, equipment, organization, training and leadership. And in return they have revised their own doctrines and they are rapidly modernizing their armies today to outsmart our forces, in the hope of being able to defeat us one day… At this point we can develop a few points that we have learned in the course. of our intensive study this year on the future high intensity warfare between high power nation states. And the first is no surprise that it will be highly lethal, very highly lethal, unlike anything our army has known at least since World War II … “(18)And in return they have revised their own doctrines and they are rapidly modernizing their armies today to outsmart our forces, in the hope of being able to defeat us one day… At this point we can develop a few points that we have learned in the course. of our intensive study this year on the future high intensity warfare between high power nation states. And the first is no surprise that it will be highly lethal, very highly lethal, unlike anything our army has known at least since World War II … “(18)And in return they have revised their own doctrines and they are rapidly modernizing their armies today to outsmart our forces, in the hope of being able to defeat us one day… At this point we can develop a few points that we have learned in the course. of our intensive study this year on the future high intensity warfare between high power nation states. And the first is no surprise that it will be highly lethal, very highly lethal, unlike anything our army has known at least since World War II … “(18)in the hope that one day we will be able to defeat ourselves… At this point we can expand on a few points that we have learned during the study we have carried out intensely this year on the future high intensity war between nation states of great power. And the first is no surprise that it will be highly lethal, very highly lethal, unlike anything our army has known at least since World War II … “(18)in the hope that one day we will be able to defeat ourselves… At this point we can expand on a few points that we have learned during the study we have carried out intensely this year on the future high intensity war between nation states of great power. And the first is no surprise that it will be highly lethal, very highly lethal, unlike anything our army has known at least since World War II … “(18)

The man who made this speech is today, since September 2019, the Chief of Staff of the United States Armed Forces.

RUSSIA HAS BEEN READY FOR MILITARY CONFRONTATION FOR SEVERAL YEARS

Faced with this hawkish speech, the maneuvers of NATO at the Russian borders, the provocations in Ukraine and Syria, Russia has taken its steps. The head of the Russian diplomacy, Sergey Lavrov, evoked this state of affairs during the 53rd Munich Security Conference which took place on February 17-19, 2017:

“Ten years ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin made a speech that many in the West saw as a challenge and even a threat, although the message above all stressed the need to renounce unilateral actions in favor of honest cooperation based on mutual respect, international law, joint assessment of global issues and collective decision-making. Unfortunately, the warnings he then evoked about the negative consequences of hampering the emergence of a multipolar world have come true. Humanity is at a crossroads today. The historic era that could be called the post-Cold War Order has come to an end.

Its main result, we see, was the complete failure of the Cold War institutions to adapt to the new realities. The world has become neither “western-centric”, nor a safer and more stable place. This is evident from the results of the “democratization” of the Middle East and North Africa, and elsewhere.

NATO’s expansion has created a level of tension not seen in Europe for 30 years… We categorically reject the allegations of those who accuse Russia and the new centers of global influence of attempting to undermine the liberal order . This global model was pre-programmed for the crisis from the moment this vision of economic and political globalization was conceived above all as an instrument to ensure the growth of an elitist club of countries and its domination over all the others. It is clear that such a system could not last forever.

Leaders who have a sense of responsibility must now make their choice. I hope this choice will be made in favor of a democratic and just world order, a post-Western world order, if you will, in which each country develops its own sovereignty under international law and strives – will balance its own national interests with its partners, while respecting the cultural, historical and civilizational identity of each country. “(19)

Obviously, if Anglo-American officials refuse to accept the multipolar world, world war will remain the only way out.

And Russian leaders know it full well. Reason why they modernized their army to prepare for war, or to prevent it ( Si vis pacem para bellum: = [Latin] “If you want peace, prepare for war” ).

On February 28, 2017 in Geneva, before the Human Rights Council, then before the disarmament conference, the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs announced that:

“Everyone should understand that the US military is currently training European armies to use tactical nuclear weapons against Russia. “(20)

He further deplored Washington’s failure to comply with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

According to the Russians, the US military is training, in addition to the UK, European powers devoid of nuclear weapons to use those stored in their respective territories. These countries include the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and Italy.

On February 2, 2018, the Trump Administration unveiled a report dealing with US military nuclear doctrine – a document titled “Nuclear Posture Review” (NPR) (21) – in which they claim they can make use of it even if conventional attack.

This report suggests developing low power nuclear missiles, citing the “Russian threat” (22).

Reading the report, we learn that the United States is allowing itself the possibility of using nuclear weapons in “extreme circumstances, to defend the interests of the United States, its allies and their partners”.

The “extreme circumstances” in question can be “strategic non-nuclear attacks”, whether directed against civilian populations or against infrastructure of the United States, its allies or its partners.

But this is nothing new, the Obama administration had already mentioned this option in 2010 (23).

And it is Russia that is directly targeted. The new American “national defense strategy” is shaped by a will displayed by Washington to adapt its nuclear strategy to the “determined return to competition between the great powers” ​​that Russia would like (24).

The American authorities are alarmed by the fact that Moscow “is developing and deploying new nuclear warheads and new launchers”. Commenting on this report to the press, Greg Weaver, the head of strategic capabilities at the US General Staff, said that today there is a “disparity” between Russian capabilities and those of the United States and the United States. NATO. “We concluded that our current strategy and capabilities were clearly perceived by the Russians as potentially insufficient to provide deterrence,” he said.

To respond to this Russian “threat”, the NPR is proposing to develop a new type of low-power nuclear missile, which could be launched from submarines. Deputy Defense Secretary for Nuclear Policy Robert Soofer said told reporters: “Russia must understand that launching a nuclear attack, even a small one, will not achieve its objective, will fundamentally change the nature of the conflict, and will have incalculable and intolerable costs for Moscow. ”

On December 18, 2017, President Trump unveiled the new American security strategy (“National Security Strategy of the United States of America” (25)), which aims to preserve the military and economic domination of the United States.

Among the threats exposed in a report from the White House (26), the “revisionist powers (NDA: questioning the current international system), such as China and Russia” are at the top of the list.

These countries would seek, according to the document, to “form a world antithetical to the interests and values ​​of the United States”.

Kremlin master Vladimir Putin was quick to respond to American threats. During his speech to the Russian parliament in Moscow on March 1, 2018, the Russian president sent a clear message to the United States by unveiling the renewed power of his army (27). These are the constants of American geopolitics vis-à-vis Russia that the Trump parenthesis has momentarily and relatively overshadowed and which regain all their worrying force with the Biden administration.

Jean TERRIEN.

***

1. Antony Blinken was Deputy National Security Advisor (2013-2015) and then Assistant Secretary of State (2015-2017) under the Obama administration. Of Jewish origin, he is the half-brother of Léah Pisar, herself Jewish, Franco-American and former advisor to Bill Clinton. She is currently president of the Aladdin Project, which aims to fight Holocaust revisionism in the Muslim world and promote the cult of the Shoah there. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Blinken http://www.projetaladin.org/

Antony Blinken “repeatedly reiterated the vision of his stepfather, Samuel Pisar, a survivor of Auschwitz and other Nazi extermination camps. »Http://www.projetaladin.org/fr/antony-blinken-%C3%A0-la-t%C3%AAte-de-la-diplomatie-am%C3%A9ricaine.html

2. https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/les-etats-unis-face-aux-multiples-defis-poses-par-la-russie-1392946 3. https://www.lexpress.fr /actualite/monde/etats-unis-russie-ce-que-se-sont-dit-biden-et-poutine-lors-de-leur-premier-appel_2143577.html

4. Zbigniew Brzezinski, The great chessboard, America and the rest of the world, 1997, Bayard Editions, pp. 103-104.5. Zbigniew Brzezinski, op. cit., p. 74.6. https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2020/12/23/l-hopital-de-berlin-publie-les-details-de-l-empoisonnement-d-alexei-navalny-au-novitchok_6064348_3210. html

7. https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2020/06/04/hydroxychloroquine-trois-auteurs-de-l-etude-du-lancet-se-retractent_6041803_1650684.html 8. https: // www .lemonde.fr / international / article / 2020/12/23 / the-berlin-hospital-publishes-the-details-of-the-poisoning-of-alexei-navalny-au-novitchok_6064348_3210.html 9. https: //www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2020/10/15/l-union-europeenne-sanctionne-plusieurs-proches-de-poutine-pour-l-empoisonnement-de-navalny_6056134_3210.html 10. http: / /www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2016/01/21/affaire-litvinenko-poutine-a-probablement-approuve-le-meurtre-de-l-opposant-russe-selon-un-juge-brit Britannique_4851120_3214.html

11. https://francais.rt.com/international/48655-theresa-may-russie-accusation-empoisonnement-cirque 12. http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2018/03/30/empoisonnee-avec -son-pere-ex-espion-Russe-youlia-skripal-a-resumed-conscience_1639969 13. http://lesakerfrancophone.fr/la-nouvelle-guerre-froide-lancee-par-may-empoisonne-le-parti- labor-de-corbyn 14. https://fr.sputniknews.com/infographies/201803281035707917-affaire-skripal-russie-diplomates/ DR

15. https://fr.sputniknews.com/international/201803271035699915-expulsion-diplomates-campagne-abstentions/ 16. https://francais.rt.com/international/48655-theresa-may-russie-accusation-empoisonnement- circus 17. See the Global Research article, Hillary Clinton: “If I’m president, We Will Attack Iran”, 05/07/2015.

18. See the speech in its entirety on: https://www.les-crises.fr/nous-vous-detruirons-les-terrifiantes-menaces-du-chef-detat-major-des-usa-a-la- russia-and-china /

19. Read the full transcript of the speech: http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/264829

20. https://francais.rt.com/international/48368-lavrov-armee-us-entraine-etats-europeens

21. https://admin.govexec.com/media/gbc/docs/pdfs_edit/2018_nuclear_posture_review_-_nal_report.pdf 22. https://francais.rt.com/international/47812-etats-unis-prets-riposter -with-nuclear-weapon-meme-case-conventional-attack 23. http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pol-nuclear-trump-20180202-story.html 24. https: // francais .rt.com / international / 47425-washington-denounces-growing-threat-moscow-pekin-revisionist-powers

25. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf 26. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briengs -statements / president-donald-j-trump-announces-national-security-strategy-advance-americas-interests / 27. https://www.frstrategie.org/publications/notes/discours-1er-mars-vladimir-poutine -which-messages-2018 DR

…HELP US ! HELP RIVAROL! On November 4, 2020, the director of RIVAROL was sentenced by the 17th chamber of the Paris Criminal Court to three months suspended prison sentence, 4,000 euros fine and 11,000 euros in damages for various writings, dating from 2018 and early 2019, including an editorial on the pantheonization of Simone Veil. The law prohibits asking for donations for the payment of fines and damages, but it is possible to help us otherwise, in a completely legal way: l Subscribe, resubscribe (see the subscription form page 11 with all rates), even in advance (in which case your subscription will be extended by the same amount), subscribe friends, acquaintances, family, business associates or others.

That all those who can take the subscription of support (175 euros), of propaganda (210 euros) or for life (2000 euros). You can also subscribe to a combined paper and digital subscription for one year at 150 euros or take the digital subscription only for one year at 80 euros. l Contribute to the Friends of RIVAROL association for 2021 (simple membership: 20 euros. Donor membership: 40 euros. Benefactor membership: 100 euros and more). l You can also make donations, only for the payment of civil rights of procedure and legal fees to the Association des Amis de RIVAROL, either by check (19 avenue d’Italie, 75013 Paris) or by bank transfer. Here are the details of the account of our association at the Postal Bank: IBAN: FR91 2004 1000 0108 6027 7P02 005BIC:PSSTFRPPPARl You can also make a donation by Paypal for the same reasons by going to the home page of our rivarol.com site with the mention: Make a donation.

Thank you for anything you can do to help us in these difficult times. Small streams make great rivers. Top hearts ! Thank you in advance from the bottom of my heart for your Christmas present to RIVAROL.

 

.