That is a great article, John. I’m of Lithuanian descent and pro-Hitler.
I also think Putin is a great leader, as he stands up to Israel although I wish he’d attack them.
There will never be another Hitler. I try waking people up about the most lied-about man in history.
Thank you for doing what you do, John. I also followed you on FB under Rae Cat. I’ve had more accounts there than you can count. 😉
But it’s an honor to know you. Again, thank you. 🙂
I replied:
Thank you so much, Rachael!
Zuckerberg deleted me, with 2,600 FB “friends” with no warning whatsoever in early 2020, and I now refuse to go back, spend so much time sharing stuff, and then have it all deleted by some jew with one mouse-click all over again.
He also deleted Margi’s FB account with 1,000 friends, and even her apolitical one with 5,000 friends, the max possible! She had done a cancer fundraiser there. To delete a woman fighting cancer and whose page was apolitical shows you what vicious, heartless, sadistic thugs these khazars are.
Us at the Mayo Clinic when she, weighing just 72 pounds, was on death’s door — and Zuckerbastard deleted her APOLITICAL FB page, her so-called “vanilla account” — no politics, no race, no jews…..
dav
I will never forgive this arrogant jewboy, married to a Red Chinese
…..and 40X-billionaire…through stealing the Aryan invention of the Facebook concept by the handsome Dutch-American Winklevoss identical twins from Michigan while they were studying at Harvard,,,,
…..for his deleting Margi’s FB page while she was fundraising for her cancer treatments.
sdr
Margi and me today, after her victory over Stage III throat cancer!
There will indeed never be another Hitler, but there will be his reincarnation and this time even better.
Live and learn, or rather….
Live — die — see a life-review video — discuss your life with angels, both the mistakes and the triumphs — learn — and reincarnate to grow even more. 🙂
……My 2017 article (updated)
Slavic “Outlaw Songs” 🙂
.
.
If Russia had a Second Amendment, it would be very tempting for all of us to move there and help ensure the existence of our people, and a future for white children.
A Belarussian girl – if these Slavs are not Aryan, who is?
Russian elementary-school kids in Kaliningrad, the former Königsberg, East Prussia
Spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Colonel Igor Konashenkov
Another spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Igor Klimov
Under President Vladimir Putin, honoring the WWII generation that fought in what is now called “the Great Patriotic War,” has become a very popular event. Russian civilians march, carrying photos of their relatives who fought. This is a brilliant psychological bonding — For all my faults and setbacks in life, I descend from patriots and heroes.
.
Vladimir with a photo of his father, who was a sailor, then a soldier
A comrade wrote:
Quote:
John, the analysis you provide in your latest post is, as usual, brilliant! At this point, it should be joyously obvious to every member of this forum, and to every White Nationalist world-wide, that we now have our long-awaited Leader.
Yes, I feel my time has come. And the Republican dwarves are all gone. McCain is gone, Palin, Romney, Christie, all the fake-conservative, pro-Israel, tax-cuts-for-billionaires RINOs, the Republicans In Name Only.
The only man who will stand up to Frank Davis Junior, the Black Knight, is I. And I have awaited the full crisis to make my move.
The book to electrify the masses and recast our whole struggle in its spiritual dimensions — that is now the key. Do our souls live on if we perish fighting for liberty and our dignity as a race?
People will have to know these things before they face the awesome material power of ZOG. And the answer is in my book.
I hope to do some interviews with the Russian community here, John, and I will keep you informed. One guy, a former member of Vlasov’s Russian Liberation Army has some interesting things to say. He tells of how they were 200,000 strong and keen to destroy Bolshevism, but Hitler would under no circumstances allow it. Even Goebbels was begging for them to be used, yet 180,000 half-Jews etc. were allowed to serve in the armies of Germany but not the Russians?
…..I see Saddam Hussein and Adolph Hitler in EXACTLY the same light –both worked for British/Jewish interests, both went their own way, and spent their own people, and so BOTH had to go. If you have time, please send me your views.
You raise, as always, some thoughtful points, brother Brendon. I think that my record of loyalty to this great man’s values is unmatched, and no, he was NOT an agent of the British or Jewish network.
But that does NOT mean I agree with all his decisions and choices.
The issue is this:
Did Hitler offer to liberate the Eastern Slavs or did he plan to subjugate them?
.
Did he several times reject Russian general Andrei Vlasov’s plan to set up a huge Russian National Liberation Army — until late 1944, when it was far, far too late?
If Hitler did not like Vlasov, why did he not then work with General Peter (Pyotr) Krasnov, a “White” general who actually became a member of the NSDAP in the early Munich years? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Krasnov)
“White” ( that is, anti-Red and anti-communist) generals Anton Denikin (left-center) and Pyotr (Peter) Krasnov(right-center)
Did he intend a free Russia that would be a partner of Germany postwar — or a slave colony where only certain individual blond Ukrainians and Russians would be taken as children to Germany and “germanized”?
Pregnant Russian married women expecting their next baby, a delightful picture.
Did Hitler ever renounce his Lebensraum policy of seizing giant swaths of Russia and Ukraine for the Reich as agricultural bastions? I am amazed at those who have never read Mein Kampf –– as I have twice, in German and in English, and cover to cover — and yet claim to me Hitler never said this when he did!
In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote (in the second-to-last chapter, XIV, “GERMANY’S POLICY IN EASTERN EUROPE”):
MK was written in prison (volume one) and later in a cabin on the Obersalzberg mountain (volume two).
December 1924: Adolf Hitler (1889 – 1945) receives visitors, including Rudolf Hess (1894 – 1987), (second from right), during his imprisonment in Landsberg jail. (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)
Without consideration of traditions and prejudices, Germany must find the courage to gather our people and their strength for an advance along the road that will lead this people from its present restricted living space [in relatively tiny Germany, the size of Minnesota and Wisconsin, yet so crowded with 90 million people and unable to feed itself] to new land and soil, and hence also free it from the danger of vanishing from the earth — or of serving others as a slave nation [as it is now of the US and Israel].
The National Socialist Movement must strive to eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area, viewing this latter [the area of Eastern Europe and Russia] as a source of food as well as a basis for power politics between our historical past and the hopelessness of our present impotence.[27]
The acquisition of new soil for the settlement of the excess [German] population possesses an infinite number of advantages, particularly if we turn from the present to the future …
It must be said that such a territorial policy cannot be fulfilled in the Cameroons [once a German colony in Africa] but today almost exclusively in Europe.[63]
In an era when the earth is gradually being divided up among states, some of which embrace almost entire continents, we cannot speak of a world power in connection with a formation whose political mother country is limited to the absurd area of five hundred thousand square kilometers.[65] …
Volume two was written here (torn down after the second world war by the jewmericans)
For it is not in colonial acquisitions that we must see the solution of this problem, but exclusively in the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the entire area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude.[67]
Germany will either become a World Power or will not continue to exist at all.
But in order to become a world power, it needs that territorial magnitudewhich gives it the necessary importance to-day and assures the existence of its citizens.
Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through the line of conduct followed by pre-war [pre-WWI] Germany in foreign policy.
We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the South and West of Europe — and turn our eyes towards the lands of the East.
We shall finally put a stop to the colonial and trade policy of pre-War times and pass over to the territorial policy of the future.
But when we speak of new territory in Europe to-day we must principally think of Russia and the border States subject to her.
German-blood and German-language areas in 1937, about the size of the American state of Texas. The green “sprinkles” are isolated German colonies. Rulers over the centuries WANTED hard-working, smart, inventive and honest Germans to come to slavic areas and develop under-utilized land. But Germans had great friction with Slavs, and Hitler did not invent this hatred: It was “Lazy, drunken, thieving, sloppy Slavs” versus “arrogant, sarcastic, harsh, picky Germans.” 😉 It was a huge difference in mindset. Better would have been “Very funny, brave, generous, practical Slavs with a big heart” led by “incredibly organized, creative, disciplined Germans.”
.
Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way for us here. In delivering Russia over to Bolshevism, Fate robbed the Russian people of that intellectual class which had once created the Russian State and were the guarantee of its existence.
For the Russian State was not organized by the constructive political talent of the Slav element in Russia, but was much more a marvellous exemplification of the capacity for State-building possessed by the Germanic element
in a race of inferior worth.
[There is some truth in this: Russia was actually founded by germanic Vikings, called the “Rus,”
and many of Russia’s aristocrats, even tsars, were German or of part-German blood. The greatest tsar, actually tsaritsa (the female form of the title) was born in Germany, Catherine the Great…. in Zerbst, Saxony Anhalt, a place Margi has thrice visited.
And the last tsar’s wife, Alexandra, was from Germany, too. She suffered greatly from anti-German feeling at the court in St. Petersburg, and specifically from the hatred of her Danish mother-in-law. 🙁
Germans and Slavs, sadly, basically do NOT get along, though there is certainly some respect for the achievements of the other.
In a nutshell, Slavs like to laugh, shrug off their troubles with friends and vodka, and enjoy life; German are often hyper-serious and obsessed by work, rules, deadlines and precision.
The two bloodlines simply HAVE to learn to cooperate despite these huge psychological differences so our race survives, faced with the common jewish enemy, the Genociders.]
Thus were many powerful Empires created all over the earth. More often than once inferior races with Germanic organizers and rulers as their leaders became formidable States and continued to exist as long as the racial nucleus remained which had originally created each respective State.
For centuries Russia owed the source of its livelihood as a State to the Germanic nucleus of its governing class.
But this nucleus is now almost wholly broken up and abolished. The Jew has taken its place. Just as it is impossible for the Russian to shake off the Jewish yoke by exerting his own powers, so, too, it is impossible for the Jew to keep this formidable State in existence for any long period of time. He himself is by no means an organizing element, but rather a ferment of decomposition.
This colossal Empire in the East is ripe for dissolution. And the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a State. We are chosen by Destiny to be the witnesses of a catastrophe which will afford the strongest confirmation of the nationalist theory of race.
[So basically the theory is that the rulers of slavic Russia had mostly had germanic DNA, but the jewish bolsheviks had exterminated this elite in the 1917-21 Lenin period. Since jews can only destroy, in Hitler’s view, the USSR should be beatable in a war with a radically unified NS Germany. All this is only partially true; the jewish state of Israel is thriving, not self-destroying, and so is a very slavic Russia under the firm rule of Putin.]
But it is our task, and it is the mission of the National Socialist Movement, to develop in our people that political mentality which will enable them to realize that the aim which they must set to themselves for the fulfilment of their future must not be some wildly enthusiastic adventure in the footsteps of Alexander the Great but industrious labour with the German plough, for which the German sword will provide the soil.
I have great regrets about this policy, based on half-truths and wishful thinking.
Sitting in a Subway sandwich shop at a local Walmart in Houghton, Michigan…. willing to rethink everything for victory.
And that massive country next door to “settle” was indeed Russia.
Yes, Hitler (I) did a preventive war to prevent Stalin’s own attack, as Russian scholars themselves have revealed in their discussions of the Soviet plan called “Operation Icebreaker” [http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223] Hitler did indeed hit Stalin in June 1941 — before Stalin could hit Hitler in July of that same year — but Mein Kampf came out in 1925, advocating that Germany take land from Russia 16 long years before “Icebreaker.”
A cartoon from 19239 when Stalin and Hitler signed their Non-Aggression Pact
A Russian tank commander in WWII –not blond enough? (from the movie “White Tiger”)
A Russian higher officer
an ad during Soviet times
Yes, Hitler and the Germans were right, some Slavs (Russians, Poles, Ukrainians, etc.) do lie, steal and get drunk.
But as we see now, when the full effect of degenerate Jew TV, drugs, divorce, abuse and corruption are everywhere, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Keltic people do all these things as well, and this always happens when morality is destroyed by the Jews, when the family is broken up into feuding individuals, when the man is no longer the respected breadwinner and head of the family but instead becomes a ridiculed, irresponsible buffoon, and when total moral anarchy reigns!
And some, some Slavs have a bit of Mongol blood but western White people are mixed too with all kinds of genes! How many Americans have some Amerindian blood, which is also Mongolian?!
Dana Loesch (German name) was a popular spokeswoman for years for the NRA (the National Rifle Association). She is from Georgia and part-Amerindian as well as White, like many, many working-class Whites in the US.
The fact is that the reason so many German officers turned against this great leader, who had been brilliant from 1933, when he came to power, until 1941, when he invaded Russia, was that he continued a policy of subjugating the Slavs even AFTER the holocaust at Stalingrad (300,000 dead).
Hitler had been invincible until Russia, and had fully earned the indescribable gratitude of his German people.
He had indeed lifted them from defeat in WWI, political chaos and the Great Depression to wealth, power, honor, freedom and victory.
But come WWII, his own German officers who had fought on the eastern front understood how much the Slavs whom they were fighting were 1) ver brave and 2) also hated communism and the Jews, and therefore could have been, or might yet become, their natural allies against the jews.
But the most Hitler would do is let the Slavs work behind the lines — as farm or factory labor, or as anti-partisan troops — not, however, as front-line infantry or tank forces directly fighting the Soviets.
After a while, he let a relatively small Ukrainian SS arise. But he did not want to arm the Slavs because he intended that the Russians should have no say in postwar affairs in their own country. The reasoning: ff they did not fight for Germany, and shed their blood, they could not have a seat at the table.
Vassili Grossman, Soviet Jewish writer and war reporter
What Hitler said to Leon Degrelle, a Belgian volunteer who wanted to hear pan-Europeanism, and what he did are two different things. Léon Degrelle asked him if he felt more German or more European. Hitler answered: “I am a Hellene.” This meant he identified with Ancient Greece and the highest expressions of European culture.
But that did not include the Slavs.
Tragically, this entire page from our white brothers at VHO in Europe (affiliated with Germar Rudolf) is accurate, on the topic of
Quote:
New Aspects of Andreij Vlassov
The Russian Army of Liberation (ROA) Corrective Revision by Russian Historians
by the distinguished writer Wolfgang Strauss, and especially this quote:
“The reasons for the delay [in setting up this Russian Liberation Army], he tells us, were the crassly differing and often diametrically opposed views of Third Reich leaders regarding their Eastern policy.
Until the turning point in the Fall of 1944, the ROA [Russian National Army] consisted almost solely of individual Russian units in the Wehrmacht. It was not until the catastrophic military situation on the Eastern Front had become clear to everyone, that the decision was finally made to create a politically autonomous Russian central command and organize powerful Russian combat units under Russian commanders.”
And this quote is also accurate:
“Drobjasko describes the ROA’s heavy weapons in detail: heavy artillery, anti-aircraft artillery, as well as the training schools for officers and noncoms, the training camps, even press relations (there was no German censorship). Colonel Meandrow served as commander of the officers’ school. When he was captured in August of 1941, interrogating officer Herre of the German General Staff asked his opinion about whether Soviet resistance would soon collapse. Meandrow, Chief of Staff of an entire Soviet corps, replied:
Quote:
“I have the highest regard for the Wehrmacht.
Nevertheless the German army will not be able to defeat the Soviet Union unless they are able to mobilize the Russian people against Stalin.”
Mobilize the Russians against Stalin! At the end of 1944 it was already too late.”
.
.
.
.
I, and resolute national socialist such as Roy Armstrong, Manfred Roeder of Germany and others with decades of sacrifice, veterans of street battles and even prison, all acknowledge that Hitler was anti-Russian, anti-Slav and that he “blew” his one chance to defeat the Jews and Stalin by his overreaching goal of winning the war without arming the Russians — because he wanted their land.
The Russians are a white people. Hitler’s choice was morally wrong and strategically wrong.
One can, and I do, admire to the supreme level the genius, altruism and vision of Adolf Hitler in his social policies and pan-Aryan values.
But when he left the solid foundation of pan-Aryanism and retreated into narrow German nationalism, he lost the war.
I for one was disappointed in his Political Testament, because it spoke ONLY of ‘Germany this’ and ‘Germany that.’ What about the rest of us Whites, facing after 1945 a world that would be totally Jew-ruled?
I say all these things to you, comrade, with unspeakable sadness.
WE COULD HAVE WON THE WAR.
If a new Hitler arises for our race, he will learn from the mistakes of the past, and have the broadest possible pan-Aryan vision. And he will SEEK an alliance with the great white nation called Russia.
And so in answer to your question, Hitler was absolutely sincere, and never a tool of the Jews or Wall Street. But in the East he was very wrong. Nevertheless, who can match what he DID achieve against all odds? He was an incredible, brave, visionary Aryan genius. If there is any chance of “reincarnation,” then he will come back chastened.
As I wrote on Facebook:
It is sad to see this: “The Russian Lower House has approved a bill that provides up to five years in prison for denying the facts set out in the Nuremberg Trial, rehabilitation of Nazism and distributing false information about the actions of Russia and its allies during WWII.”http://rt.com/politics/154332-russia-nazi-rehabilitation-ban/
BUT as I have often written, this is the latest bitter fruit of Hitler’s slavophobia. Had he invaded the USSR to liberate its peoples in 1941 from the Jews, Georgians and Bolsheviks….
Two Georgian Bolsheviks, Stalin and Beria (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavrentiy_Beria), in 1936. They both used Jews as their main human weapon of mass murder to annihilate every Russian with any intelligence or backbone.
.
…..he would have gotten the support of 100 million suffering Slavs.
Twice Hitler rejected the proposal of General Vlasov to create a 5-million-man “Russian National Liberation Army” — even after the disaster at Stalingrad. https://johndenugent.com/…/russian-women…
No one is more pro-Hitler than am I, and I have proved this in literally HUNDREDS of blogs, essays, and speeches.
But Hitler went into Russia to conquer it for Germany, exactly and precisely as he stated in “Mein Kampf” 17 years before, to take “Lebensraum” for GERMANS from it — and not to liberate Russia and make this gigantic nation Germany’s ally.
So, to this very day, even very, very pro-German Russians like Putin do not like Hitler or his movement.
And thus this legislation is being passed.
I say today that the new national socialism must be for all races, white and non-white, and all peoples around the world that are threatened by Jewry. And this is the only way we can win, and this is how we WILL win! The whole world now hates the Eternal Wall Street, bloodsucking JEW!
.
Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere! No man is free if another is a slave!
Not just Hitler, but most Germans and even many Anglo-Saxons disliked Russians or saw them as brutal semi-barbarians, so Hitler was a creature of his times, his generation and the mindset of his era.
Also, he feared the pan-Slavic movement, which was a real threat to Germany, and led the Russian tsar foolishly to end his alliance with Germany, which Bismarck had wisely created to the benefit of both countries, and the tsar allied his nation with France and Britain to seek war with Germany in WWI..
The pan-Slav goal was to push the Germans behind the Elbe River, and reverse 1,000 years of German history of eastern expansion, that is, restricting them to western Europe. British and French intelligence funded this movement heavily as a means to pit Russia against Germany and Austria-Hungary.
The goal of the last tsar was to push Germany back westward to the year 1000 and unite all the Slavs of Europe
.
So Hitler was not “crazy” as a German leader to fear pan-Slavism — it was a huge movement and fundamentally anti-German.
.
But in the struggle against Bolshevism he should have changed course, because “the enemy (Slavs) of my enemy (the Jews) is my friend.” As we know, the outcome of the war was not Germans in Moscow but Russians in Berlin.
.
Russian soldier raises Soviet flag over the Reichstag in Berlin in 1945
German woman wanders about devastated after being raped by Soviet troops; two million German women suffered this horrific fate.
John D. Nugent And as the Americans showed after 1945, via NATO, a “liberating” superpower can bind the countries it has liberated to it, and not even with open brutality. Germany could have liberated Russia and yet 1) installed a pro-German elite atop the new Russia and 2) integrated the German and Russian economies and 3) cultures so that Russia would never turn anti-German again.
.
Russians admire Germans anyway for their hard work and brilliant organization, and not only that — there would have also been tremendous gratitude by Russians toward Germany for ending the genocidal nightmare of Bolshevism.
.
I translated for The Barnes Review magazine almost the entirety of this 55-page monograph by German historian Udo Walendy on Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 700-page book of suffering, Two Hundred Years Together, volume two, which was on how the Jews treated the Russians under Bolshevism. Every Russian family suffered disappeared relatives; Solzhenitsyn says 60 million were murdered.
Here Solzhenitsyn is greeted by President Putin at his home. Putin awarded him in 2007 the highest medal of Russia. This was the second visit by Putin to Solzhenitsyn’s dacha(country home) outside Moscow.
So a liberated Russia would have been a pro-German Russia.
My view of Putin: not an angel, not a devil, nor a great visionary or world leader, but a noble gangster, a clever man, who does the right thing when he can afford to, but does not want to openly confront the Jews, at least NOT YET, and end up as Hitler or Khaddafi did:
#Orthodox Nationalist
orthodoxnationalist@gmail.com
73.200.248.171
Excellent article. Now I fully understood why many in the so called WN “movement” are thumbing their noses when I mention your name. What I really dislike is their arrogance when it comes to “other” white people, in my case being eastern European. Hitler did not wanted any real nationalist movement in eastern Europe. He agreed to the elimination of Corneliu Codreanu in Romania and ordered German troops to back general Antonescu in his coup against The Iron Guard government when he faced a mutiny in the Romanian Army. All the Iron Guard members who escaped to Germany and seeked asylum in 1941 were interned in camps like Buchenwald, treated well however, but they were not allowed to fight in the German Wehrmacht or Waffen SS until August 23rd 1944 when they started a Waffen SS regiment and a Romanian division under the command of Gen. Platon Chirnoagă. I see that these WN that I’m encountering now, are not true WN but are mostly anglo-saxon supremacists that dislike any kind of religious ideas, basically being neo-marxists profoundly materialsts. This is why there is so much support for the Azov type brigades in Ukraine that in fact are doing the deeds of NWO. Than you Mr. John de Nugent, you’re doing great work.
…..Another and more devious option
In reality, Hitler had another option besides liberation, a clever pseudo-liberation, American-style, where Russia became a pro-German puppet “ally” just as the FRG is now a pro-American puppet “ally,” and this too Hitler did not do:
Putin has recently extended invitations to Brits and Germans to settle in Russia, especially in the East where the country is sparsely populated! Did not notice any invites to Africans or Arabs though, maybe Putin is racist? ;-D
I agree 100 percent with your excellent analysis! Hitler’ policies towards the Slavs was very wrong and very short-sighted indeed! Let’s NOT repeat the mistakes of the past!…
In fact, I mean that few true things are known about Hitler’s views regarding Slavs.
For example, the so-called « political testament » is a forgery (banker François Genoud confessed he wrote it) ; one million (one million !) Russian soldiers served in the German Army (Vlassov), and many SS-Divisionen recruited Slavs, who were cinsidered as Aryans.
Between Germanics and Slavs there was from long a big trouble : no efficient natural border. As a consequence Slavs and Germanics were not only neighbours but also opponenents.
Thus nationalist Slavs frequently regarded themselves as opposed to German nationalism. Because they wanted Danzig (90% German), Poles entered in a war against Germany, which was the aim of capitalists leading Wall Street and the City ; the consequences were awful, both to Germans and to Poles – but not to capitalists’ eyes.
The true problem in Europe was that, everywhere, most nationalists considered themselves as making a perpetual war against all the other European nationalists : the consequences were wars, and, during WW II, guerillas and bloddy reprisals.
All true, but I think you did not read my article. Mein Kampf itself was explicit, as on every topic, on the reasons for a needed German war with the USSR.
Well, it seems you refuse to read the article. Okay. 😉
The key ideas behind “Barbarossa” were decided in 1925: using the necessity of an anti-bolshevik crusade to seize land from the Slavs for Germany to have a breadbasket. This is explicit in Mein Kampf, and in the 1929 “Second Book,” and laid out clearly for the reader to ponder.
That is a great article, John. I’m of Lithuanian descent and pro-Hitler.
I also think Putin is a great leader, as he stands up to Israel although I wish he’d attack them.
There will never be another Hitler. I try waking people up about the most lied-about man in history.
Thank you for doing what you do, John. I also followed you on FB under Rae Cat. I’ve had more accounts there than you can count. 😉
But it’s an honor to know you. Again, thank you. 🙂
Zuckerberg deleted me, with 2,600 FB “friends” with no warning whatsoever in early 2020, and I refuse to go back, spend time sharing stuff and then have it all deleted by some jew with one mouse-click all over again.
He also deleted Margi’s FB account with 1,000 friends, and even her apolitical one with 5,000 friends, the max possible! She had done a cancer fundraiser there. To delete a woman fighting cancer and whose page was apolitical shows you what vicious, sadistic thugs these khazars are.
June 1941 : Hitler had 3,600 tanks ; Stalin had 24,000 ones.
So who was ready, from long, for an invasion ?
Soviet Union leaders claimed their will to conquer Germany before Hitler had written Mein Kampf – even before in was in jail in Landsberg !
In 1812 Napoléon invaded Russia in a pre-emptive offensive ; so did Hitler in 1941.
In Mein Kampf Hitler said Germany had to avoid a war on two fronts, so what he made in 1941 was just the opposite of what he had written in Mein Kampf.
« “It was undeniably a purely preventive war. What we found out later on was the certainty of enormous Russian military preparations opposite our frontier. I will dispense with details, but I can only say that although we succeeded in a tactical surprise as to the day and the hour, it was no strategic surprise. Russia was fully prepared for war.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Meltyukhov
« Meltyukhov’s study Stalin’s Missed Chance has also been valued positively for covering Soviet military plans before the outbreak of German-Soviet war in 1941, relying on documents that were previously inaccessible. [12] While the theory that the Soviet leadership was indeed planning to strike Germany in 1941 remains disputed, Meltyukhov’s data has been used [13] by authors who do not support the Soviet assault plans thesis mentioned above. However, some reviewers who agree that the USSR intended to attack Germany, have also criticised Meltyukhov for including pro-Soviet views (justifying aggressions on the basis of Soviet ‘national interests’ etc). [14] »
Whatever Hitler had think about the Slavs, he had no escape : he had to order Barbarossa in June 1941.
Hitler, in every other way than this, was a very, very great man, as I have said since 1978, possibly even before you were born. 😉
But he went into Russia not just with the preemptive-strike motive, which was justified for the sake of both Germany and the whole world, but also with a horrible secondary motive, the same kind of motive as the Zionist jews had who entered Palestine, to take it away from the natives for themselves.
And THAT is why Hitler lost the war. He did not enter Russia to liberate it, which would have won the hearts of the men and women of that bolshevism-tortured nation, but in order to conquer it, and give the minority of Russians who would be allowed to stay simply a new master, the Germans, instead of the old master, the bolshevik Georgians and Jews.
And now, comrade, either you will choose to read my factual article and learn something, whether it is enjoyable or not, because it is TRUE (and this means to stop worshiping Hitler as a god when he was only a man, albeit a great hero and genius), or, honestly, this exchange is really wasting both our time, is it not? 🙂
In reality, Hitler had another option besides liberation, a pseudo-liberation, American-style, where Russia became a pro-German puppet “ally” just as the FRG is now a pro-American puppet “ally,” and this too Hitler did not do: (please scroll down 2/3rds here)
1. Russia’s appreciation of John de Nugent.
The extra billboard for johndenugent.com, which Russian state television deliberately over-illuminated, makes clear the following:
1) JdN’s site has had to be read carefully by Russian decision-makers for many years, because such recommendations must be given thoughtfully, after careful consideration
2) Maybe the Russian decision makers resorted to spiritually developed personalities who verified the claimed John-de-Nugent-Hitler connection. Provided it exists and its authenticity has been confirmed, JdN’s self-critical thoughts and analyses on Russia naturally carry additional weight; you don’t give a “crackpot” a free billboard at prime time on state television.
2. As in other countries, there is indeed a Russian revisionist vanguard in Russia, researchers who are not interested in Russian group sensitivities, who exclusively want to research and clarify the historical facts and who have long since proven that the attack and expulsion of all East Germans (the real East Germany: Prussia, Königsberg, Silesia, etc.) was already planned for a long time, you do indeed point out in your article the Pan-Slavist efforts in this regard, which have been pushing this goal since the 19th century.
The Russian feature film “White Tiger” contains many German-friendly scenes. When the German Tiger tank could have completely shot the Russian tank (defenseless from behind), it only shoots the tank chain: Here German chivalry in battle is appreciated. Also the later said, that he, the “White Tiger”, would only have retreated (present position of the weakness of Germany/German peoples) is a tribute to the German spirit, and of course at the very end also the appearance of Hitler.
3. Yes, it was a mistake of Hitler to want to remain in Russia. After the 100% justified counterattack against the deployment of the Red Army [1], which would have Bolshevized Germany and Europe, Hitler should have supported a comprehensive arming of the Ukrainian and Russian civilian population, followed by a subsequent reconstruction of the Russian and Ukrainian armies, with subsequent withdrawal of the German troops. The pro-Russian freedom fighters and the German (or international army! [4]) would have been unbeatable in restoring the rights of the Russian people, there would have been an incomparable friendship of nations had Hitler ordered the withdrawal of the troops instead of staying and speculating on land. It is indeed pointed out in your article that politicians and military officers considered this decision disastrous, in every sense of the word.
4. Germany and Russia, Steiner, spiritual development: The Germanic peoples, of course, include those living in England and the United States, not just those living in Germany.
The spiritual essence, the cultural life, despite all differences, contains a great common intersection. In the world plan it is supposed to be intended that the Germanic peoples and Russia spiritually-mentally and culturally fertilize each other. And exactly this the background powers want to prevent under all circumstances, hence the constant destruction efforts against Germany and the attempts to prevent any rapprochement with Russia (Pan-Slavism!). Of course the FRG is not Germany, so slowly even FRG believers understand that the FRG never was a German government and that it never represented German interests. In Russia, of course, the decision-makers know that there was no German government between 1918 and 1933 and since 1945, but the majority of the Russian people probably do not know.
5. Russian self-criticism? – Does not exist! In spite of everything, one must not make it too easy for the Russian people: Apart from the avant-garde, Russian self-criticism does not exist, they do not want to know anything about, for example, [1][3] etc. From the Russian side, countless anti-German historical lies have been spread for many decades, and still are, in inconceivable dimensions. Lying violence has serious consequences, and sooner or later also the Russians will have to face up to their anti-German history lies and that they annihilated millions of people and blamed them on the Germans and falsified their own numbers of victims to inconceivable heights.
How will later generations think about the fact that from Russia a comprehensive war of aggression and extermination was already in the general mobilization phase, that the German armies were in fact completely justified in waging a defensive war, unhindered by the fact that Hitler wanted to remain in Russia? What will they think that they were not the victims, but on the contrary, that they were the attackers and aggressors? That they destroyed millions of people and accused the Germans of these acts, executed German military men for it? That they wrote and supported 100% the biggest historical lie of mankind? That they, like the other Allies, waged a war of extermination against the German people?
… No, this will be extremely bitter for the future Russian generations. For all the genius and brilliance of the Russians in the sciences (mathematics, physics, engineering, crafts, artistic craftswork, literature, teaching, etc.) and arts: every Russian who has even a little sense and decency will then turn away in disgust and nausea from the victory parades in Moscow, because it is a horrible staging of the lie, the absolute lie and contempt for humanity!
But again: The Russian decision-makers know that John de Nugent is a key figure, that he also has a hinge function, as a mediator between the peoples. This is the only reason why they gave him the precious TV broadcasting time, because it was certainly intended to make the viewers curious about his other articles and analyses.
“Re-education lies and falsification of history
Thus, contrary to the pronouncements in the course of the current anti-German political correctness, the Wehrmacht did not intend to take Leningrad. Nor was the siege intended to bring about the creeping death of the civilian population. No civilian was prevented from leaving the city by the German side. A narrow strip of land was kept free for civilians to flee to Inner Russia by explicit order of Adolf Hitler[3]. However, Stalin prevented the Russian population from leaving the city on pain of death. Bolshevik figures put the number of civilian inhabitants of the city who lost their lives as a result of Stalin’s order at about 1.1 million. Most of these victims starved to death. The mass death by starvation was deliberately brought about by the Bolsheviks and is unprecedented in the world on this scale.
The casualty figures of more than one million postulated by the Soviet side only after the war against Germany are, as usual, far exaggerated. Realistically, the number of victims is probably around 500,000, which also corresponds roughly to the number of Red Army soldiers encircled in the city. Destructions that were observed in the city are to a large extent due to Soviet-Bolshevik mines exploded and previously armed during the shelling of military installations and industrial plants.”
Deutschland, Rußland, Steiner, Hitler, John de Nugent
Sehr geehrter John de Nugent:
1. Rußlands Wertschätzung für John de Nugent
Die extra Werbetafel für johndenugent.com, die das russische Staatsfernsehen absichtlich überdeutlich einblendete, verdeutlicht folgendes:
1) JdN’s Seite muß seit vielen Jahren von den russischen Entscheidungsträgern aufmerksam gelesen werden, denn solche Empfehlungen müssen wohlüberlegt gegeben werden, nach eingehender Prüfung
2) Möglicherweise griffen die russischen Entscheidungsträger auf spirituell entwickelte Persönlichkeiten zurück, die die behauptete John-de-Nugent-Hitler-Verbindung verifiziert haben. Sofern diese existiert und die Echtheit bestätigt wurde, haben JdN’s selbstkritischen Gedanken und Analysen zu Rußland natürlich zusätzliches Gewicht; man schenkt keinem “Spinner” zur besten Sendezeit im Staatsfernsehen eine kostenlose Werbetafel.
2. Wie in anderen Ländern gibt es in Rußland in der Tat eine russische revisionistische Avantgarde, Forscher, die russische Gruppenbefindlichkeiten nicht interessieren, die ausschließlich die historischen Fakten erforschen und klarstellen möchten und die bereits seit langem nachgewiesen haben, daß der Angriff und die Vertreibung aller Ostdeutschen (das echte Ostdeutschland: Preussen, Königsberg, Schlesien etc.) bereits lange geplant war, Sie weisen in Ihrem Artikel ja auch auf die diesbezüglichen panslawistischen Bestrebungen hin, die dieses Ziel bereits seit dem 19. Jahrhundert forcierten.
Der russische Spielfilm “White Tiger” enthält viele deutschfreundliche Szenen. Als der deutsche Tigerpanzer den russischen Panzer völlig zerschießen hätte können (wehrlos von hinten), schießt er lediglich die Panzerkette an: Hier wird deutsche Ritterlichkeit im Kampf gewürdigt. Auch das später sinngemäß Gesagte, daß er, der “White Tiger”, sich lediglich zurückgezogen hätte (jetzige Position der Schwäche Deutschlands/der deutschen Völker) ist eine Würdigung des deutschen Geistes, und natürlich ganz zum Schluß auch der Auftritt Hitlers.
3. Ja, es war ein Fehler von Hitler, in Rußland verbleiben zu wollen. Nach dem zu 100% berechtigtem Gegenschlag gegen den Aufmarsch der Roten Armee [1], die Deutschland und Europa bolschewisiert hätte, hätte Hitler eine umfassende Bewaffnung der ukrainischen und russischen Zivilbevölkerung, gefolgt von einem anschließenden Wiederaufbau der russischen und ukrainischen Armeen unterstützen müssen, mit anschließendem Abzug der deutschen Truppen. Die pro-russischen Freiheitskämpfer und die deutsche (bzw. internationale Armee!) wären unschlagbar gewesen, um die Rechte des russischen Volkes wiederherzustellen, es wäre eine unvergleichbare Völkerfreundschaft entstanden, hätte Hitler den Abzug der Truppen befohlen, anstatt zu verbleiben und auf Land zu spekulieren. Es wird ja in Ihrem Artikel auch darauf hingewiesen, daß Politiker und Militärs diese Entscheidung für katastrophal hielten, in jeder Hinsicht.
4. Deutschland und Rußland, Steiner, spirituelle Entwicklung: Die germanischen Völker umfassen natürlich auch die in England und in den USA lebenden, nicht nur diejenigen, die in Deutschland leben.
Das geistige Wesen, das kulturelle Leben, enthält trotz aller Unterschiede eine große gemeinsame Schnittmenge. Im Weltenplan soll es vorgesehen sein, daß sich die germanischen Völker und Rußland spirituell-geistig und kulturell befruchten. Und genau das wollen die Hintergrundmächte unter allen Umständen verhindern, daher die ständigen Vernichtungsbestrebungen gegen Deutschland und die Versuche, jede Annäherung mit Rußland zu verhindern (Panslawismus!). Natürlich ist die BRD nicht Deutschland, so langsam begreifen auch BRD-Gläubige, daß die BRD niemals eine deutsche Regierung war und daß sie niemals deutsche Interessen vertrat. In Rußland wissen die Entscheidungsträger natürlich, daß es zwischen 1918 und 1933 sowie seit 1945 keine deutsche Regierung mehr gab, das russische Volk weiß es aber vermutlich mehrheitlich nicht.
5. Russische Selbstkritik? – Existiert nicht! Trotz allem darf man es dem russischen Volk nicht zu leicht machen: Abgesehen von der Avantgarde existiert keine russische Selbskritik, sie wollen nichts wissen von beispielsweise [1][3] usw. Von russischer Seite wurden und werden seit vielen Jahrzehnten unzählige antideutsche Geschichtslügen verbreitet, in unfassbaren Dimensionen. Lügengewalt hat schwerwiegende Folgen, und früher oder später werden sich auch die Russen ihren antideutschen Geschichtslügen stellen müssen und daß sie millionenfach Menschen vernichteten und diese den Deutschen in die Schuhe schoben und ihre eigenen Opferzahlen in unfaßbare Höhen geshichtsfälschten.
Wie werden spätere Generationen darüber denken, daß von Rußland aus ein umfassender Angriffs- und Vernichtungskrieg bereits in der Generalmobilmachungsphase war, daß die deutschen Armeen in der Tat vollkommen berechtigt einen Abwehrkrieg führten, ungehindert der Tatsache, daß Hitler in Rußland verbleiben wollte? Was werden sie denken, daß sie nicht die Opfer waren, sondern im Gegenteil, daß sie die Angreifer und Aggressoren waren? Daß sie Millionen von Menschen vernichteten und den Deutschen diese Taten unterstellten, deutsche Militärs dafür hinrichten ließen? Daß sie die größte Geschichtlüge der Menschheit zu 100% mitschrieben und mitunterstützten? Daß sie, wie die anderen Alliierten, einen Vernichtungskrieg gegen das deutsche Volk führten?
… Nein, das wird äußerst bitter werden für die zukünftigen russischen Generationen. Bei aller Genialität und Brillianz der Russen in den Wissenschaften (Mathematik, Physik, Ingenieurstum, Handwerk, Kunsthandwerk, Literatur, Lehre usw.) und Künsten: Jeder Russe, der auch nur ein bißchen Verstand und Anstand hat, wird sich dann angewidert und angeekelt von den Siegesparaden in Moskau abwenden, denn es ist eine grauenvolle Inszenierung der Lüge, der absoluten Lüge und Menschenverachtung!
Aber nochmal: Die russischen Entscheidungsträger wissen darum, daß John de Nugent eine Schlüsselfigur ist, daß ihm auch eine Scharnierfunktion zukommt, als Vermittler zwischen den Völkern. Nur deshalb schenkte man ihm die kostbare Fernsehsendezeit, denn mit Sicherheit war damit auch beabsichtigt, die Zuschauer neugierig auf seine anderen Artikel und Analysen zu machen.
“Umerziehungslügen und Geschichtsfälschungen
Entgegen den Verlautbarungen im Zuge der gegenwärtigen antideutschen politischen Korrektheit wollte die Wehrmacht Leningrad somit gerade nicht einnehmen. Die Belagerung sollte auch nicht den schleichenden Tod der Zivilbevölkerung herbeiführen. Kein Zivilist wurde von deutscher Seite daran gehindert, die Stadt zu verlassen. Es wurde für Zivilisten auf ausdrücklichen Befehl Adolf Hitlers ein schmaler Landstreifen zur Flucht nach Innerrußland freigehalten[3]. Allerdings hinderte Stalin die russische Bevölkerung bei Todesstrafe daran, die Stadt zu verlassen. Bolschewistische Angaben gehen von etwa 1,1 Millionen zivilen Bewohnern der Stadt aus, die infolge Stalins Befehl ihr Leben verloren. Die meisten dieser Opfer verhungerten. Der Massentod durch Verhungern wurde von den Bolschewisten gezielt herbeigeführt und ist in diesem Ausmaß weltweit beispiellos.
Eine inoffizielle Straße über den zugefrorenen Ladogasee diente fast ausschließlich der alleinigen Versorgung der Roten Armee. Das Leiden der Bevölkerung interessierte Stalin nicht, sondern die russischen Einwohner sollten als menschliche Schutzschilde dienen. Die des öfteren postulierten angeblichen Evakuierungen betrafen Deportationen von Deutschen aus Leningrad in die bolschewistischen Vernichtungslager. Russische Zivilisten, die den Weg über die einzige offene Straße dennoch zur Flucht nutzten, wurden von den Bolschewisten erschossen.
Die erst nach dem Krieg gegen Deutschland von Sowjet-Seite postulierten Opferzahlen von mehr als einer Million sind, wie üblich, weit überhöht. Realistisch dürften etwa 500.000 Opfer sein, was in etwa auch der Zahl der in der Stadt eingekesselten Rotarmisten entspricht. Zerstörungen, die in der Stadt zu beobachten waren, gehen zu einem großen Teil auf das Konto der beim Beschuß von militärischen Einrichtungen und Industrieanlagen mit explodierten und zuvor scharf gemachten sowjet-bolschewistischen Minen.”
John, have you by chance read the book “Hitlers Revolution” by Richard Tedor? He does a very good job retracing the hand-prints of the traitors centering around Admiral Canaris and the Abwehr. Apparently, Canaris and his network were responsible for sabotaging potential Russian defectors (entire divisions wanting to defect to the German cause), but Canaris and the conspirators made sure the offer was never forwarded to the German high command, basically resulting in Hitler never even hearing about the mass defections.
Of course I don’t deny Hitler had some Slav-phobia, but there was some serious internal subversion happening that might have contributed to the slow German-Russian collaboration. Had Hitler received these reports of mass defections, would he have changed his mind and seized the opportunity? who knows, but apparently Canaris and the Abwehr saw fit to never tell him about it.
.
.
.
.So Hitler was not “crazy” as a German leader to fear pan-Slavism — it was a huge movement and fundamentally anti-German..But in the struggle against Bolshevism he should have changed course, because “the enemy (Slavs) of my enemy (the Jews) is my friend.” As we know, the outcome of the war was not Germans in Moscow but Russians in Berlin..Russian soldier raises Soviet flag over the Reichstag in Berlin in 1945
German woman wanders about devastated after being raped by Soviet troops; two million German women suffered this horrific fate.
John D. Nugent And as the Americans showed after 1945, via NATO, a “liberating” superpower can bind the countries it has liberated to it, and not even with open brutality. Germany could have liberated Russia and yet 1) installed a pro-German elite atop the new Russia and 2) integrated the German and Russian economies and 3) cultures so that Russia would never turn anti-German again..Russians admire Germans anyway for their hard work and brilliant organization, and not only that — there would have also been tremendous gratitude by Russians toward Germany for ending the genocidal nightmare of Bolshevism..I translated for The Barnes Review magazine almost the entirety of this 55-page monograph by German historian Udo Walendy on Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 700-page book of suffering, Two Hundred Years Together, volume two, which was on how the Jews treated the Russians under Bolshevism. Every Russian family suffered disappeared relatives; Solzhenitsyn says 60 million were murdered.
Here Solzhenitsyn is greeted by President Putin at his home. Putin awarded him in 2007 the highest medal of Russia. This was the second visit by Putin to Solzhenitsyn’s dacha(country home) outside Moscow.
So a liberated Russia would have been a pro-German Russia.My view of Putin: not an angel, not a devil, nor a great visionary or world leader, but a noble gangster, a clever man, who does the right thing when he can afford to, but does not want to openly confront the Jews, at least NOT YET, and end up as Hitler or Khaddafi did:
Putin has recently extended invitations to Brits and Germans to settle in Russia, especially in the East where the country is sparsely populated! Did not notice any invites to Africans or Arabs though, maybe Putin is racist? ;-D
China needs more Africans and Mexicans also israel needs 50 million
I agree 100 percent with your excellent analysis! Hitler’ policies towards the Slavs was very wrong and very short-sighted indeed! Let’s NOT repeat the mistakes of the past!…
Everything about Hitler’s views regarding Slavs is as biased as topics about what I call Santa Claus’ chamber.
Do you mean that Hitler was biased against Slavs? If so, I agree, and, to be fair, so were almost all Germans and in fact most Anglo-Americans now.
In fact, I mean that few true things are known about Hitler’s views regarding Slavs.
For example, the so-called « political testament » is a forgery (banker François Genoud confessed he wrote it) ; one million (one million !) Russian soldiers served in the German Army (Vlassov), and many SS-Divisionen recruited Slavs, who were cinsidered as Aryans.
Between Germanics and Slavs there was from long a big trouble : no efficient natural border. As a consequence Slavs and Germanics were not only neighbours but also opponenents.
Thus nationalist Slavs frequently regarded themselves as opposed to German nationalism. Because they wanted Danzig (90% German), Poles entered in a war against Germany, which was the aim of capitalists leading Wall Street and the City ; the consequences were awful, both to Germans and to Poles – but not to capitalists’ eyes.
The true problem in Europe was that, everywhere, most nationalists considered themselves as making a perpetual war against all the other European nationalists : the consequences were wars, and, during WW II, guerillas and bloddy reprisals.
All true, but I think you did not read my article. Mein Kampf itself was explicit, as on every topic, on the reasons for a needed German war with the USSR.
It was not just an anti-bolshevik crusade.
Don’t know if such links may be agreed here :
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=200409
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t290720-7/
Thanks for having agreed my links.
And Hitler would have avoid a war against USSR if he could. Barbarossa was decided when it became obvious Stalin was going to invade Europe.
Well, it seems you refuse to read the article. Okay. 😉
The key ideas behind “Barbarossa” were decided in 1925: using the necessity of an anti-bolshevik crusade to seize land from the Slavs for Germany to have a breadbasket. This is explicit in Mein Kampf, and in the 1929 “Second Book,” and laid out clearly for the reader to ponder.
That is a great article, John. I’m of Lithuanian descent and pro-Hitler.
I also think Putin is a great leader, as he stands up to Israel although I wish he’d attack them.
There will never be another Hitler. I try waking people up about the most lied-about man in history.
Thank you for doing what you do, John. I also followed you on FB under Rae Cat. I’ve had more accounts there than you can count. 😉
But it’s an honor to know you. Again, thank you. 🙂
Thank you so much, Rachael!
Zuckerberg deleted me, with 2,600 FB “friends” with no warning whatsoever in early 2020, and I refuse to go back, spend time sharing stuff and then have it all deleted by some jew with one mouse-click all over again.
He also deleted Margi’s FB account with 1,000 friends, and even her apolitical one with 5,000 friends, the max possible! She had done a cancer fundraiser there. To delete a woman fighting cancer and whose page was apolitical shows you what vicious, sadistic thugs these khazars are.
I am on VK, however. Are you?
https://vk.com/johndenugent2021
There will indeed never be another Hitler, but there will be his reincarnation and this time even better.
Live and learn, or rather
Live — die — see a life-review video — discuss your life with angels, the mistakes and the triumphs — learn — and reincarnate to grow some more. 🙂
June 1941 : Hitler had 3,600 tanks ; Stalin had 24,000 ones.
So who was ready, from long, for an invasion ?
Soviet Union leaders claimed their will to conquer Germany before Hitler had written Mein Kampf – even before in was in jail in Landsberg !
In 1812 Napoléon invaded Russia in a pre-emptive offensive ; so did Hitler in 1941.
In Mein Kampf Hitler said Germany had to avoid a war on two fronts, so what he made in 1941 was just the opposite of what he had written in Mein Kampf.
« “It was undeniably a purely preventive war. What we found out later on was the certainty of enormous Russian military preparations opposite our frontier. I will dispense with details, but I can only say that although we succeeded in a tactical surprise as to the day and the hour, it was no strategic surprise. Russia was fully prepared for war.”
4. This portion of Jodl’s testimony, given on June 5, 1946, is in the IMT “blue series,” vol. 15, pp. 394-395. »
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n3p40_Michaels.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Meltyukhov
« Meltyukhov’s study Stalin’s Missed Chance has also been valued positively for covering Soviet military plans before the outbreak of German-Soviet war in 1941, relying on documents that were previously inaccessible. [12] While the theory that the Soviet leadership was indeed planning to strike Germany in 1941 remains disputed, Meltyukhov’s data has been used [13] by authors who do not support the Soviet assault plans thesis mentioned above. However, some reviewers who agree that the USSR intended to attack Germany, have also criticised Meltyukhov for including pro-Soviet views (justifying aggressions on the basis of Soviet ‘national interests’ etc). [14] »
Whatever Hitler had think about the Slavs, he had no escape : he had to order Barbarossa in June 1941.
All true, and all beside the point.
Hitler, in every other way than this, was a very, very great man, as I have said since 1978, possibly even before you were born. 😉
But he went into Russia not just with the preemptive-strike motive, which was justified for the sake of both Germany and the whole world, but also with a horrible secondary motive, the same kind of motive as the Zionist jews had who entered Palestine, to take it away from the natives for themselves.
And THAT is why Hitler lost the war. He did not enter Russia to liberate it, which would have won the hearts of the men and women of that bolshevism-tortured nation, but in order to conquer it, and give the minority of Russians who would be allowed to stay simply a new master, the Germans, instead of the old master, the bolshevik Georgians and Jews.
And now, comrade, either you will choose to read my factual article and learn something, whether it is enjoyable or not, because it is TRUE (and this means to stop worshiping Hitler as a god when he was only a man, albeit a great hero and genius), or, honestly, this exchange is really wasting both our time, is it not? 🙂
In reality, Hitler had another option besides liberation, a pseudo-liberation, American-style, where Russia became a pro-German puppet “ally” just as the FRG is now a pro-American puppet “ally,” and this too Hitler did not do: (please scroll down 2/3rds here)
https://johndenugent.com/a-win-win-plan-to-solve-for-good-americas-perpetual-black-problem-how-hitler-could-have-solved-the-russia-problem/
Sehr geehrter John de Nugent:
Dear John de Nugent:
1. Russia’s appreciation of John de Nugent.
The extra billboard for johndenugent.com, which Russian state television deliberately over-illuminated, makes clear the following:
1) JdN’s site has had to be read carefully by Russian decision-makers for many years, because such recommendations must be given thoughtfully, after careful consideration
2) Maybe the Russian decision makers resorted to spiritually developed personalities who verified the claimed John-de-Nugent-Hitler connection. Provided it exists and its authenticity has been confirmed, JdN’s self-critical thoughts and analyses on Russia naturally carry additional weight; you don’t give a “crackpot” a free billboard at prime time on state television.
2. As in other countries, there is indeed a Russian revisionist vanguard in Russia, researchers who are not interested in Russian group sensitivities, who exclusively want to research and clarify the historical facts and who have long since proven that the attack and expulsion of all East Germans (the real East Germany: Prussia, Königsberg, Silesia, etc.) was already planned for a long time, you do indeed point out in your article the Pan-Slavist efforts in this regard, which have been pushing this goal since the 19th century.
The Russian feature film “White Tiger” contains many German-friendly scenes. When the German Tiger tank could have completely shot the Russian tank (defenseless from behind), it only shoots the tank chain: Here German chivalry in battle is appreciated. Also the later said, that he, the “White Tiger”, would only have retreated (present position of the weakness of Germany/German peoples) is a tribute to the German spirit, and of course at the very end also the appearance of Hitler.
3. Yes, it was a mistake of Hitler to want to remain in Russia. After the 100% justified counterattack against the deployment of the Red Army [1], which would have Bolshevized Germany and Europe, Hitler should have supported a comprehensive arming of the Ukrainian and Russian civilian population, followed by a subsequent reconstruction of the Russian and Ukrainian armies, with subsequent withdrawal of the German troops. The pro-Russian freedom fighters and the German (or international army! [4]) would have been unbeatable in restoring the rights of the Russian people, there would have been an incomparable friendship of nations had Hitler ordered the withdrawal of the troops instead of staying and speculating on land. It is indeed pointed out in your article that politicians and military officers considered this decision disastrous, in every sense of the word.
4. Germany and Russia, Steiner, spiritual development: The Germanic peoples, of course, include those living in England and the United States, not just those living in Germany.
The spiritual essence, the cultural life, despite all differences, contains a great common intersection. In the world plan it is supposed to be intended that the Germanic peoples and Russia spiritually-mentally and culturally fertilize each other. And exactly this the background powers want to prevent under all circumstances, hence the constant destruction efforts against Germany and the attempts to prevent any rapprochement with Russia (Pan-Slavism!). Of course the FRG is not Germany, so slowly even FRG believers understand that the FRG never was a German government and that it never represented German interests. In Russia, of course, the decision-makers know that there was no German government between 1918 and 1933 and since 1945, but the majority of the Russian people probably do not know.
5. Russian self-criticism? – Does not exist! In spite of everything, one must not make it too easy for the Russian people: Apart from the avant-garde, Russian self-criticism does not exist, they do not want to know anything about, for example, [1][3] etc. From the Russian side, countless anti-German historical lies have been spread for many decades, and still are, in inconceivable dimensions. Lying violence has serious consequences, and sooner or later also the Russians will have to face up to their anti-German history lies and that they annihilated millions of people and blamed them on the Germans and falsified their own numbers of victims to inconceivable heights.
How will later generations think about the fact that from Russia a comprehensive war of aggression and extermination was already in the general mobilization phase, that the German armies were in fact completely justified in waging a defensive war, unhindered by the fact that Hitler wanted to remain in Russia? What will they think that they were not the victims, but on the contrary, that they were the attackers and aggressors? That they destroyed millions of people and accused the Germans of these acts, executed German military men for it? That they wrote and supported 100% the biggest historical lie of mankind? That they, like the other Allies, waged a war of extermination against the German people?
… No, this will be extremely bitter for the future Russian generations. For all the genius and brilliance of the Russians in the sciences (mathematics, physics, engineering, crafts, artistic craftswork, literature, teaching, etc.) and arts: every Russian who has even a little sense and decency will then turn away in disgust and nausea from the victory parades in Moscow, because it is a horrible staging of the lie, the absolute lie and contempt for humanity!
But again: The Russian decision-makers know that John de Nugent is a key figure, that he also has a hinge function, as a mediator between the peoples. This is the only reason why they gave him the precious TV broadcasting time, because it was certainly intended to make the viewers curious about his other articles and analyses.
Footnotes:
[1] “Who Started World War II? by Viktor Suvorov”, Vortrag 2009 USA, 49 Minuten,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYSy80WlmWY
[2] With English subtitles: (“The Wehrmacht and Stalinist Bolshevism”) “Die Wehrmacht und der stalinistische Bolschewismus”, 4 Minuten.
https://odysee.com/@FlacheErdeDeutschland:a/Bolechewiki:5
[3] Small translated excerpt from “Siege of Leningrad” (“Belagerung von Leningrad”),
https://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Belagerung_von_Leningrad
“Re-education lies and falsification of history
Thus, contrary to the pronouncements in the course of the current anti-German political correctness, the Wehrmacht did not intend to take Leningrad. Nor was the siege intended to bring about the creeping death of the civilian population. No civilian was prevented from leaving the city by the German side. A narrow strip of land was kept free for civilians to flee to Inner Russia by explicit order of Adolf Hitler[3]. However, Stalin prevented the Russian population from leaving the city on pain of death. Bolshevik figures put the number of civilian inhabitants of the city who lost their lives as a result of Stalin’s order at about 1.1 million. Most of these victims starved to death. The mass death by starvation was deliberately brought about by the Bolsheviks and is unprecedented in the world on this scale.
The casualty figures of more than one million postulated by the Soviet side only after the war against Germany are, as usual, far exaggerated. Realistically, the number of victims is probably around 500,000, which also corresponds roughly to the number of Red Army soldiers encircled in the city. Destructions that were observed in the city are to a large extent due to Soviet-Bolshevik mines exploded and previously armed during the shelling of military installations and industrial plants.”
[4] https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Waffen-SS_foreign_volunteers_and_conscripts
——–
In German:
Deutschland, Rußland, Steiner, Hitler, John de Nugent
Sehr geehrter John de Nugent:
1. Rußlands Wertschätzung für John de Nugent
Die extra Werbetafel für johndenugent.com, die das russische Staatsfernsehen absichtlich überdeutlich einblendete, verdeutlicht folgendes:
1) JdN’s Seite muß seit vielen Jahren von den russischen Entscheidungsträgern aufmerksam gelesen werden, denn solche Empfehlungen müssen wohlüberlegt gegeben werden, nach eingehender Prüfung
2) Möglicherweise griffen die russischen Entscheidungsträger auf spirituell entwickelte Persönlichkeiten zurück, die die behauptete John-de-Nugent-Hitler-Verbindung verifiziert haben. Sofern diese existiert und die Echtheit bestätigt wurde, haben JdN’s selbstkritischen Gedanken und Analysen zu Rußland natürlich zusätzliches Gewicht; man schenkt keinem “Spinner” zur besten Sendezeit im Staatsfernsehen eine kostenlose Werbetafel.
2. Wie in anderen Ländern gibt es in Rußland in der Tat eine russische revisionistische Avantgarde, Forscher, die russische Gruppenbefindlichkeiten nicht interessieren, die ausschließlich die historischen Fakten erforschen und klarstellen möchten und die bereits seit langem nachgewiesen haben, daß der Angriff und die Vertreibung aller Ostdeutschen (das echte Ostdeutschland: Preussen, Königsberg, Schlesien etc.) bereits lange geplant war, Sie weisen in Ihrem Artikel ja auch auf die diesbezüglichen panslawistischen Bestrebungen hin, die dieses Ziel bereits seit dem 19. Jahrhundert forcierten.
Der russische Spielfilm “White Tiger” enthält viele deutschfreundliche Szenen. Als der deutsche Tigerpanzer den russischen Panzer völlig zerschießen hätte können (wehrlos von hinten), schießt er lediglich die Panzerkette an: Hier wird deutsche Ritterlichkeit im Kampf gewürdigt. Auch das später sinngemäß Gesagte, daß er, der “White Tiger”, sich lediglich zurückgezogen hätte (jetzige Position der Schwäche Deutschlands/der deutschen Völker) ist eine Würdigung des deutschen Geistes, und natürlich ganz zum Schluß auch der Auftritt Hitlers.
3. Ja, es war ein Fehler von Hitler, in Rußland verbleiben zu wollen. Nach dem zu 100% berechtigtem Gegenschlag gegen den Aufmarsch der Roten Armee [1], die Deutschland und Europa bolschewisiert hätte, hätte Hitler eine umfassende Bewaffnung der ukrainischen und russischen Zivilbevölkerung, gefolgt von einem anschließenden Wiederaufbau der russischen und ukrainischen Armeen unterstützen müssen, mit anschließendem Abzug der deutschen Truppen. Die pro-russischen Freiheitskämpfer und die deutsche (bzw. internationale Armee!) wären unschlagbar gewesen, um die Rechte des russischen Volkes wiederherzustellen, es wäre eine unvergleichbare Völkerfreundschaft entstanden, hätte Hitler den Abzug der Truppen befohlen, anstatt zu verbleiben und auf Land zu spekulieren. Es wird ja in Ihrem Artikel auch darauf hingewiesen, daß Politiker und Militärs diese Entscheidung für katastrophal hielten, in jeder Hinsicht.
4. Deutschland und Rußland, Steiner, spirituelle Entwicklung: Die germanischen Völker umfassen natürlich auch die in England und in den USA lebenden, nicht nur diejenigen, die in Deutschland leben.
Das geistige Wesen, das kulturelle Leben, enthält trotz aller Unterschiede eine große gemeinsame Schnittmenge. Im Weltenplan soll es vorgesehen sein, daß sich die germanischen Völker und Rußland spirituell-geistig und kulturell befruchten. Und genau das wollen die Hintergrundmächte unter allen Umständen verhindern, daher die ständigen Vernichtungsbestrebungen gegen Deutschland und die Versuche, jede Annäherung mit Rußland zu verhindern (Panslawismus!). Natürlich ist die BRD nicht Deutschland, so langsam begreifen auch BRD-Gläubige, daß die BRD niemals eine deutsche Regierung war und daß sie niemals deutsche Interessen vertrat. In Rußland wissen die Entscheidungsträger natürlich, daß es zwischen 1918 und 1933 sowie seit 1945 keine deutsche Regierung mehr gab, das russische Volk weiß es aber vermutlich mehrheitlich nicht.
5. Russische Selbstkritik? – Existiert nicht! Trotz allem darf man es dem russischen Volk nicht zu leicht machen: Abgesehen von der Avantgarde existiert keine russische Selbskritik, sie wollen nichts wissen von beispielsweise [1][3] usw. Von russischer Seite wurden und werden seit vielen Jahrzehnten unzählige antideutsche Geschichtslügen verbreitet, in unfassbaren Dimensionen. Lügengewalt hat schwerwiegende Folgen, und früher oder später werden sich auch die Russen ihren antideutschen Geschichtslügen stellen müssen und daß sie millionenfach Menschen vernichteten und diese den Deutschen in die Schuhe schoben und ihre eigenen Opferzahlen in unfaßbare Höhen geshichtsfälschten.
Wie werden spätere Generationen darüber denken, daß von Rußland aus ein umfassender Angriffs- und Vernichtungskrieg bereits in der Generalmobilmachungsphase war, daß die deutschen Armeen in der Tat vollkommen berechtigt einen Abwehrkrieg führten, ungehindert der Tatsache, daß Hitler in Rußland verbleiben wollte? Was werden sie denken, daß sie nicht die Opfer waren, sondern im Gegenteil, daß sie die Angreifer und Aggressoren waren? Daß sie Millionen von Menschen vernichteten und den Deutschen diese Taten unterstellten, deutsche Militärs dafür hinrichten ließen? Daß sie die größte Geschichtlüge der Menschheit zu 100% mitschrieben und mitunterstützten? Daß sie, wie die anderen Alliierten, einen Vernichtungskrieg gegen das deutsche Volk führten?
… Nein, das wird äußerst bitter werden für die zukünftigen russischen Generationen. Bei aller Genialität und Brillianz der Russen in den Wissenschaften (Mathematik, Physik, Ingenieurstum, Handwerk, Kunsthandwerk, Literatur, Lehre usw.) und Künsten: Jeder Russe, der auch nur ein bißchen Verstand und Anstand hat, wird sich dann angewidert und angeekelt von den Siegesparaden in Moskau abwenden, denn es ist eine grauenvolle Inszenierung der Lüge, der absoluten Lüge und Menschenverachtung!
Aber nochmal: Die russischen Entscheidungsträger wissen darum, daß John de Nugent eine Schlüsselfigur ist, daß ihm auch eine Scharnierfunktion zukommt, als Vermittler zwischen den Völkern. Nur deshalb schenkte man ihm die kostbare Fernsehsendezeit, denn mit Sicherheit war damit auch beabsichtigt, die Zuschauer neugierig auf seine anderen Artikel und Analysen zu machen.
Fußnoten:
[1] “Who Started World War II? by Viktor Suvorov”, Vortrag 2009 USA, 49 Minuten,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYSy80WlmWY
[2] Mit englischen Untertiteln: (“The Wehrmacht and Stalinist Bolshevism”) “Die Wehrmacht und der stalinistische Bolschewismus”, 4 Minuten.
https://odysee.com/@FlacheErdeDeutschland:a/Bolechewiki:5
[3] Kleiner Auszug aus “Belagerung von Leningrad”
https://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Belagerung_von_Leningrad
“Umerziehungslügen und Geschichtsfälschungen
Entgegen den Verlautbarungen im Zuge der gegenwärtigen antideutschen politischen Korrektheit wollte die Wehrmacht Leningrad somit gerade nicht einnehmen. Die Belagerung sollte auch nicht den schleichenden Tod der Zivilbevölkerung herbeiführen. Kein Zivilist wurde von deutscher Seite daran gehindert, die Stadt zu verlassen. Es wurde für Zivilisten auf ausdrücklichen Befehl Adolf Hitlers ein schmaler Landstreifen zur Flucht nach Innerrußland freigehalten[3]. Allerdings hinderte Stalin die russische Bevölkerung bei Todesstrafe daran, die Stadt zu verlassen. Bolschewistische Angaben gehen von etwa 1,1 Millionen zivilen Bewohnern der Stadt aus, die infolge Stalins Befehl ihr Leben verloren. Die meisten dieser Opfer verhungerten. Der Massentod durch Verhungern wurde von den Bolschewisten gezielt herbeigeführt und ist in diesem Ausmaß weltweit beispiellos.
Eine inoffizielle Straße über den zugefrorenen Ladogasee diente fast ausschließlich der alleinigen Versorgung der Roten Armee. Das Leiden der Bevölkerung interessierte Stalin nicht, sondern die russischen Einwohner sollten als menschliche Schutzschilde dienen. Die des öfteren postulierten angeblichen Evakuierungen betrafen Deportationen von Deutschen aus Leningrad in die bolschewistischen Vernichtungslager. Russische Zivilisten, die den Weg über die einzige offene Straße dennoch zur Flucht nutzten, wurden von den Bolschewisten erschossen.
Die erst nach dem Krieg gegen Deutschland von Sowjet-Seite postulierten Opferzahlen von mehr als einer Million sind, wie üblich, weit überhöht. Realistisch dürften etwa 500.000 Opfer sein, was in etwa auch der Zahl der in der Stadt eingekesselten Rotarmisten entspricht. Zerstörungen, die in der Stadt zu beobachten waren, gehen zu einem großen Teil auf das Konto der beim Beschuß von militärischen Einrichtungen und Industrieanlagen mit explodierten und zuvor scharf gemachten sowjet-bolschewistischen Minen.”
[4] https://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Ausl%C3%A4ndische_Freiwillige_der_Waffen-SS
Thank you very much.
Ego triggers ego and humility humility.
I will make the first move. 🙂
Very interesting about Stalin’s order to shoot Russians who tried to flee Leningrad INTO Russia.
DE:
Vielen Dank.
Ichsucht löst beim Anderen auch Ichsucht aus und Demut Demut.
Ich werde den ersten Schritt machen. 🙂
Sehr interessant über Stalins Befehl, alle Russen zu erschießen, die versuchten, aus Leningrad NACH Russland zu fliehen……
John, have you by chance read the book “Hitlers Revolution” by Richard Tedor? He does a very good job retracing the hand-prints of the traitors centering around Admiral Canaris and the Abwehr. Apparently, Canaris and his network were responsible for sabotaging potential Russian defectors (entire divisions wanting to defect to the German cause), but Canaris and the conspirators made sure the offer was never forwarded to the German high command, basically resulting in Hitler never even hearing about the mass defections.
Of course I don’t deny Hitler had some Slav-phobia, but there was some serious internal subversion happening that might have contributed to the slow German-Russian collaboration. Had Hitler received these reports of mass defections, would he have changed his mind and seized the opportunity? who knows, but apparently Canaris and the Abwehr saw fit to never tell him about it.
Yes, cover to cover. We were both major, frequent Barnes Review contributors.