From Kate Tagseth, Canada (on VK, https://vk.com/wall521147597_7472):
In Ontario, the provincial government has decided to provide feminine hygiene products in schools for what two media outlets referred to as “menstruators”. It was infuriating that the spokespeople were all women.
And medical journals are using bodies with vaginas, birthing people, pregnant people, cervix havers. It’s beyond denigrating.
This is how inclusive, progressive, and gender erase women. The word “women” is now transphobic. Verboten.
No one says sperm maker, testicle owner, prostate haver. Saying “men” continues to be unquestioned; it’s the generic all “inclusive”. Anyone who doesn’t fit the alpha male stereotype is a type of non man. Some magically become women, and in that case, saying “woman” is totally fine.
When the people who pander to genderists abandon biology, how do you trust anything they say? Pregnancy is the single most profound, dangerous, and rewarding experience unique to women. And it’s being taken away as if anyone could have children, and pretending that’s possible.
The word is “woman”. Adult human female. And it’s exclusive. You can only join if you’re of the X-only-chromosome sex.
[End]
.
Interesting, John.
As they sow, so shall they reap.
Progressive women (and their cucks) have been having a go at ‘inequality’ for decades, and of course it comes to a logic conclusion: equality = no distinction = eradication.
This should really surprise no one.
But she cannot help herself, and screams for more ‘equality’ in the paragraph about men not being treated the same way. In other words: She is promoting the very sentiment that in the first place eradicated the ‘women’ term.
Either today’s women fight for their uniqueness as a sex AND their profound difference from men, or they are running the errands for nihilism.
‘We want equality but not this type of equality’ just does not cut it.
To whom and to what are you referring? I do not see this anywhere in her post.
The paragraph starting with `No one says sperm owner`.
The whole paragraph insinuates that if that had been the case, it would somehow have been more ok.
I do not want to erase the word `woman` any more than I want to erase the word `man`. But the obsessive drive for equality is bound to do it. And `woman` was the concept they tried to erradicate this time. I strongly disagree with her when she says the word `man` is not under pressure. It is.
Followers of woke are = wankers, followers of PC = brain dead sheep. Mother nature only does human male and female. Anything else is a mental disorder [].