I found this on Facebook, and it is partly valid and partly erroneous as well as a bit hubristic and offensive. There is a whole clique of snooty, supercilious atheists in white nationalism who look down on “the little people” who did not go to Yale or another prestige school, and believe in “old wives’ tales.”
.
Well, one of the “believers” in God, in the afterlife, and in Jesus as a great Aryan, was the very Adolf Hitler whom these people usually highly revere, but they are in crass denial of this vital part of Hitler’s thinking, words and deeds.
.
First of all, as a national socialist and activist for 45 years, I totally agree with and endorse the consensus that any pro-jewish form of Christianity ( = that of Saul/Paul) is incredibly toxic for Whites and highly dangerous.
.
“Dangerous” as in backing the criminal and psychopathic State of Israel both militarily and economically to the very hilt, excusing all the Jewish state’s mega-crimes, and thus bringing us ever closer to a huge war in the Mideast against the powerful and fierce Iran (which is a formidable power now, and, under the name “Persia,” was a superpower for millennia in the past).
Persia was the world’s first empire, and it was vast
.
.
This Mideast war could ultimately cause World War Three, because Russia is now defending Iran and arming it with the daunting S-400 anti-air system to shoot down US and Israeli jets. This is a game-changer.
.
This is the size of Iran, which has around 90 million people, vast oil wealth, a part-Aryan population, and a fierce loathing for IsraHell:
.
.
Here is the Dalton screed, which is true in some and erroneous on other points:
It’s hard to believe in the present day, but yes, it’s true, there are still a lot of Christians out there in the world. According to some estimates, they number around 2.4 billion or about 30% of humanity. In terms of sheer numbers, the US technically has the most: about 245 million, representing around 75% of the country—although many of these undoubtedly are so weakly religious (“Christmas and Easter Christians”) that they would barely pass any theological litmus test. The next three largest Christian populations are hardly an honor roll (Brazil, Mexico, and Russia), and the countries that, percentage-wise, are the most Christian, are mostly laughable: East Timor, Armenia, New Guinea, Haiti, and Paraguay, among the Top Ten.Obviously, there is a huge variety in specific beliefs among these millions of Christians. The World Christian Encyclopedia infamously notes that, globally, there are some 33,000 “distinct denominations” of the Church, including 242 Catholic, 9,000 Protestant, and over 22,000 “independent.” We can only imagine the variation in beliefs among these groups—and of course, only one (at most!) can be right. I’d hate to pick the wrong one! (Do I hear, “Going to hell,” anyone?)But presumably they all must share at least a few core beliefs, simply in order to call themselves Christian. We can guess what these might be: (1) there exists a personal, moral God who loves us; (2) believers will prosper in the afterlife and non-believers will suffer; and (3) Jesus is the son of God and humanity’s redeemer and personal savior. Likely there are others—the Bible (or at least part of it) is the word of God, the Gospels (whichever ones we include) record Jesus’ life and teachings, and so on—but I will set these aside for now). Here I will focus on “the Man”: Jesus of Nazareth (or is it Jesus of Bethlehem? Those darn Gospel writers can’t seem to keep their story straight.First, I should note that there is a high likelihood that no such man ever existed. We can say this with confidence because there is no—literally, zero—contemporaneous evidence for his existence, either as a miracle-working Son of God, or even as a rather ordinary rabbi. We can understand the latter case—most ordinary rabbis from 2,000 years ago are lost to history—but not the former. If Jesus was anything close to the miracle-worker that the Bible describes, there would be a mountain of testifying evidence: documents, carvings, engravings, letters, etc. And these would exist from his followers, his skeptics, his critics, and the Romans who ruled the region. There would be a vast and well-documented account of a man who walked on water, raised the dead, healed with a touch, calmed storms, and fed thousands with “five loaves of bread and two fish.” These testimonies would all date to the time of his alleged ministry, roughly, 27 to 30 AD. And yet, from that time period, we have… nothing.In fact, nothing even close. In fact, nothing for literally decades. According to conventional dating, the earliest reference of any kind is in the letters of Paul, the earliest of which—Galatians and First Thessalonians—date to around 50 AD, two full decades after our man got crucified. The rest of Paul’s letters, intermixed with a few fraudulent ones attributed to him, appear between 50 and 70 AD, by which time (a) Paul had died, and (b) the Jews were defeated in Jerusalem by the Romans, and their temple destroyed.Only then did some other Jews—presumably followers of Paul—decide to write about Jesus’ life and sayings in their “gospels.” The gospel writers are formally anonymous; we know nothing about who they are, their motives, or the circumstances. The names attached (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) mean nothing; it would be like saying “Bob’s Novel” or “Joe’s Cookbook.” But based on textual evidence, scholars can roughly date the Gospel of Mark to around the year 70; Matthew and Luke to 85; and John to 95. We can only imagine how much veracity they contain, given that they claim to quote Jesus precisely and cite details of his life, 40, 50, or 60 or more years after his death. The obvious answer is: not much!The likeliest conclusion to this mess is that the Jew Paul and the anonymous Jewish gospel writers made it all up: that there was no miracle-working Son of God, no virgin birth, and no resurrection. They did so, not for fame or money, but because they believed that promulgating a pro-Jewish, anti-Roman theology would aid the Jewish cause. (Pro-Jewish, because the Christians are to worship the Jewish God, the Jewish rabbi Jesus, and the Jewish ‘virgin’ Mary; anti-Roman, because “the worldly powers” of Rome are a manifestation of Satan and must be defeated.[1]) And in the end, it did. Judeo-Christianity flourished, ideologically defeated Rome, and then took up residence in Rome itself. “Without doubt, Rome has been conquered,” as Nietzsche said.[2]But to the point: Although there is no direct evidence for either a miracle-Jesus or a rabbi-Jesus, I suspect that some such man by that description did live, and die, in Judea. And the reason is simply this: Since Paul and friends claimed something as true—a miracle-Jesus—that certainly did not exist, and that they knew did not exist, they were liars. Whether they were ‘noble’ liars or malicious liars, I will leave to another time. But liars they were. And any lie works best with a kernel of truth. Therefore, I consider it likely that an ordinary mortal, the rabbi Jesus, did live, likely did agitate on behalf of the oppressed Jews, and likely did get himself crucified—end of story.So let’s assume that a mortal Jesus did exist. What, then, do we know about him? Virtually nothing for certain. Apart from a few tidbits from Paul, literally everything that we think we know about him comes from the highly-dubious four Gospels; there simply is no other source. And in the Gospels, we find a striking claim: Jesus was a Jew.“Wait a minute!” says the Christian, with alarm. “Jesus can’t be a Jew! He’s the original Christian—the ur-Christian, we might say. He can’t possibly be a Jew!” Indeed—many Christians, both in the past and today, have attempted to argue that Jesus was a non-Jew, a Gentile, even an Aryan. They seemingly cannot bear the thought that their beloved Savior might be a Jew, and that therefore they must worship a Jew. And yet, all the evidence says he was.In fact, the evidence suggests that Jesus was a double-Jew: ethnically and religiously.[3] Let’s first see what it says in the Gospels themselves (which Christians must believe!).Start with his mother, the “virgin” Mary; she clearly was a Jewess. Mary was a blood relative of Elizabeth, of the tribe of Levi (Luke 1:5, 1:36). When Jesus was born, she, along with Joseph, “performed everything according to the [Jewish] law of the Lord” (Luke 2:39). And she and Joseph attended Passover services in Jerusalem “every year” (Luke 2:41). Since Mary was a Jew, this alone makes Jesus a Jew (on the orthodox reading) because Jewishness is matrilineal, being passed along by the mother; if you are born of a Jewess, you are a Jew.What about Jesus’ father? Let’s set aside the nonsense about God being his father, which is nothing more than regurgitated Homeric mythology about demi-gods on Earth. Joseph was of the “House of David,” as Luke (1:27) informs us. And as noted above, Joseph rigorously followed Jewish law and attended Passover annually. He was clearly an observant Jew, and (presumably) the biological father of Jesus.Paul obviously thought Jesus was a Jew. In the early Galatians (4:4) he says that Jesus was “born under the [Jewish] law,” and in Romans (9:5), he declares his own Jewishness (“my kinsmen by race…are Israelites”), adding that “of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ.”Likewise, the Gospel writers clearly viewed their Savior as a Jew. Jesus is repeatedly called ‘rabbi’.[4] He was circumcised (Luke 2:21) and celebrated Passover (John 2:13). The Gospel of Matthew opens with these words: “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham.” Even the non-gospel Hebrews remarks that “it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah” (7:14). Jesus regularly attended the local synagogue (Luke 4:16). He himself told the people that he came “to fulfill the [Jewish] law and the [Jewish] prophets” (Matt 5:17). And of course, everyone thought of him as “king of the Jews” (Matt 2:2; John 19:3).It could hardly be clearer: both by genetic heritage and according to his evident beliefs and practices, Jesus was a Jew. He was a biological Jew—surely embodying all those wonderful Jewish phenotypical characteristics—and he was a religious Jew.The few Christians willing to engage with this issue and to defend a non-Jewish Jesus typically offer one of two responses. First, “Jesus was from Galilee, and Galilee was a Gentile stronghold.” But this is a persistent myth, propagated by those averse to the notion of a Jewish Jesus. Over 100 years ago, E. W. Masterson wrote of a “Jewish Galilee,” one that was “hemmed in on all sides by hostile [Gentile] neighbors”.[5] More recently, we now have such works as The Myth of a Gentile Galilee (2002) by Mark Chancey, who acknowledges the stubborn idea but notes “how little data there is to support such a claim [of a Gentile Galilee].” Archeological evidence from Nazareth is scarce, but what we do have shows “evidence for Jewish inhabitants at several sites, [but] very little evidence for Gentiles.” Of the major, nearby town of Sepphoris, evidence of Gentiles is “extremely limited” during Jesus’ life; by contrast, says Chancey, there is “ample evidence” of Jews there at that time. In sum, while not denying that some Gentiles lived there, evidence for them is “practically invisible”; and as a confirmation, Chancey notes that Gentiles “are not prominent in literary discussions of Galilee either”.[6]Despite all this, some on the dissident-right, such as Internet bad-boy Andrew Anglin, who, despite his trenchant and humorous critiques of Jews, periodically displays his (apparently sincere) Christianity, occasionally railing against those who dare assert that Jesus was a Jew. Nick Fuentes dodges the question when put to him, saying “Jesus fulfills the law” and that the Jews “who remain” held on to “old sacrifices and old ways of doing things,” ultimately becoming “Talmudic Jews.” Obviously Jesus had no chance to become a Talmudic Jew, given that the Jerusalem Talmud was not written until the 300s (in Galilee!) and the Babylonian Talmud not until the year 500. Thus, despite the evidence, both men cling to their myth of a Gentile Jesus even as they (rightly) condemn Jewish domination and corruption in present-day society.The second defense one occasionally sees is both contorted and confused: that the teachings of the Old Testament represent “true” religion and that the Hebrews deviated from this true path, degenerating into a rabbinical and ultimately Talmudic Judaism. But Jesus, they say, adhered to the true, original teachings, to the Law and the prophets—later to be called “Christianity”—thus putting him into conflict with the fallen and erroneous Jews. This essentially admits that Jesus was an ethnic Jew, but that, implicitly, it is irrelevant. Furthermore, it overlooks the fact that the Talmud, and later documents like the Shulchan Aruch, are elaborations on Old Testament teachings, not deviations from it.[7] But the main point is that simply because Jesus (the Jew) had (alleged) conflicts with other elite Jews, this does not mean that he wasn’t an ethnic Jew, and it doesn’t mean that he adhered to any “true” religion distinct from Judaism.The ConsequencesThe implications of this short exposé are devastating for Christians and Christianity. Given the total lack of corroborating evidence, we can say with certainty that the miracle-man Jesus did not exist; therefore, Christianity is a farce and the Gospels are at least half fiction. If they contain even a shred of truth, then Jesus was an ordinary Jew whose life mission was to validate Old Testament prophecies and “fulfill the Law,” thus saving his fellow Jews from the evil Romans. In this case, Christians need to admit that they are worshipping a long-dead ordinary Jew who has no ability whatsoever to “save their souls.” Finally, in the case that there was no Jesus character at all, then Paul and the Gospel Jews are flat-out liars and need to be viewed with total contempt.Any way we look at it, it’s bad news for Christians. Under any plausible scenario, they have been duped into believing in a long-dead Jewish rabbi and his fake sayings—all constructed, years after the fact, by a handful of Jews interested in undermining the hated Romans, and indeed all Gentiles.“But what would we do without Jesus?” cry the believers. How about this: Build your life and your worldview around basic, universal, and age-old ethical ideals; defend and protect the Earth, which sustains all life; defend human dignity against corrupters, liars, and deceivers; work toward a transparent, human-scale society; spend time with your children and grandchildren; and celebrate the accomplishments of human creativity and the human spirit without yielding to Judaic nonsense.Just for starters.
Thomas Dalton
Reactions on FB by others, and then come mine:
.
This entire screed is rubbish… the Apostles of Jesus Christ all lived as poor men who gave their lives (and were murdered) for spreading the truth about Jesus Christ. Even the Romans wrote about the miracles He performed. See you at the Judgment Day.
What is wrong with you atheists that you feel you need to attack others’ beliefs? Does it make you feel smarter? You proselytize your faith more than religious people do.
Viva Cristo Rey! Christ is King!
There are no Roman records of Christian ANYTHING, until Tacitus in AD 116. If the Apostle Paul existed, no Roman, Greek or Jew noticed him in his lifetime, that we have record of. Ditto for Jesus, outside whatever embryonic cult.
Philo Of Alexandria lived at exactly the same time as Jesus, was a renowned expert on everything Jewish in the eastern Mediterranean, representing the Jewish community in Alexandria and even in a delegation to the Emperor Caligula, writing at length about the area and the Israelite religion. Dying in AD 50 after writing 50 works on various subjects that we can still read today, he never wrote one word about a Jesus miracle worker who was crucified.
John De Nugent replied
There is some truth here, but also some egregious error. For example, on Galilee, it is in Hebrew literally “Galil ha goyim,” meaning “the District [“Galil” in Hebrew] of the Gentiles.”
.
And the early Roman Christians were led by Peter, one of Jesus’ first and most notable disciples, and he obviously knew what Jesus looked like. In the catacombs outside Rome, the persecuted Christians met, and they painted Jesus. Voilà:
You’re God. The creator of all the universe. You send down a son as emissary of your Godliness. And…… Only a tiny few people notice him. None of the local governments or scholars. And even then, the accounts that turn up are in Greek, much later than his alleged life.
.
Sounds pretty silly. A God that plays tricks on human kind. We have all kinds of details about the Jewish revolt and crushing of it by Titus and Hadrian. We know all about Spartacus, for example. Many sources. Hannibal rampaging up and down Italy, and Scipio Africanus eventually wiping out Carthage. But nothing about Jesus Christ, until decades after his alleged existence.
Fred Frank Why would a small sect which engaged in zero violence and whose founder went quietly to his death, and merely preached and healed, be worth “headlines” in faraway Rome? Explain why a peaceful little sect in some weird province should do that, and why everyone in the Senate should have talked about it. Was this not just some obscure religion thing for those political elites? …
.
Oh, and you sidestepped my refutation, Fred Frank, about the records of many things by many authors and clerks. Don’t think I overlooked that. Are you convinced (and convincing) that 90% of ancient writings survived the fall of the Roman Empire and exist in our day? Hmmmmmmmm? Cat got your tongue?
.
Bart Ehrman PhD (an atheist and Christianity basher, btw) is a widely recognized authority on Christianity and The New Testament with six bestsellers, and a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary. He says Christianity was only about ten percent of the Empire in the time of Constantine, THREE HUNDRED YEARS LATER.
.
It was not very important to the Romans, partly because its adherents were docile, peaceful and law-abiding. What concerned the Romans were uprisings, invasions, the assassinations of emperors, Roman legions fighting each other, famines, droughts and plagues not a weak and peaceful sect, whose teaching was that God is love — not a weak and peaceful sect, whose teaching was that God is love, and (quote) “give to Caesar what is Caesar’s” (pay your taxes).
Feel free to believe in Santa Claus. Who am I to take that away from you?
Fred Frank There you go again, avoiding my arguments and resorting to personal ridicule. This former US Marine does not believe in the Santa Claus or the tooth fairy.
What does your status in the US armed forces have to do with whether Jesus existed or not?
Fred FrankyWhat does Santa Claus have to do with the subject of Jesus? You brought Santa up. And I was in a business with no delusions — killing.
In all that word salad you’ve effectively agreed with me that there is no historical record of Jesus Christ, outside of the alleged recollections of his inner friend circle, translated into Greek decades after the original apostles were dead.
Fred Frank Word salads come from Kamala Harris (who is married to and handled by her jew husband, btw.) I did not graduate with high honors from Georgetown and Phi Beta Kappa — meaning ranked in the top ten percent of the class and taking requisite science courses — by writing word salads.
.
As for documents, I say only that, unsurprisingly, no documents are extant today, that no documents survive from two thousand years ago about the founding and first years of a tiny sect, the creator of which was taken swiftly out of commission. (The Romans surely felt “problem solved.”)
.
So I suppose Zoroaster, Buddha and Mohammed never existed either, Fred. Their world religions just appeared out of nowhere. It took no hard work by any actual, gifted and charismatic founder.
.
What we do know, because the jewish Talmud confirms it (and the jewish Establishment, then, as now, was not out to do Jesus any favors) is that Jesus was real, His father was NOT Joseph, He did perform spectacular miracles, He opposed the jewish Establishment, He said he came from God, and He was killed.
.
Claiming His father was Pantera, a Roman centurion (a rank like a captain in the Roman army, and thus a combat/infantry officer), would be consistent with Him appearing to be white, as with many Galileans (from what in Hebrew is called to this very day “The Goy District”).
.
When the jews lie, like any good liar, they try to choose lies that seem credible by having a grain of truth, kinda like saying “Donald Trump is a convicted felon.” “True” technically — Trump was convicted in a rigged, all-Demoncrat show trial upon the testimony of a bottle-blond, silicone-boobed whore (“Stormy Daniels”) and a disbarred lawyer (Michael Cohen).
.
So Jesus’ white skin? That means a Roman father….
.
Well, anyway, Fred, how do you explain that the Talmud itself said that Jesus was real (plus evil, and a black magician who deserved to die)? And if his sect was so minor, why did the Talmud rail against Him?
.
….Why did the rabbis in the Talmud not write this one simple statement, Fred:
.
“Look how meshugge these Christian goyim are, worshiping a man that never existed!” ?? https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/book/jesus-in-the-talmud
….Why did the rabbis in the Talmud not write this one simple statement, Fred:
.
“Look how meshugge these Christian goyim are, worshiping a man that never existed!” ?? https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/book/jesus-in-the-talmud
I must say that I find it highly ironic that Thomas Dalton, of all people, who himself translated “Mein Kampf” into English, and very well indeed, insists that Jesus either never existed or if He did, He was just a jew, a rabbi of no note, and that He performed no miracles. (I say this while having great respect for Dalton in other matters.)
.
This directly contradicts Adolf Hitler, the author of “Mein Kampf,” whom presumably Dalton respects as an important thinker and leader, having taken the trouble to translate his massive book, which I have read twice (in the German language in which I am 100% fluent, and in English).
.
In Hitler’s earlier work, his “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin,” written with his mentor, Dietrich Eckart (a publication on which I am an expert, and which Dr. Wm Pierce translated, a booklet promoted by the NSDAP’s Eher Verlag publishing house) Adolf Hitler shows great reverence for Jesus, and this was not just to pander to the Catholic vote in Bavaria and to other Christians.
.
.
In fact, in private, and off the record, 15 and 20 years later, and in the books which Hitler read that were found by the US Army in his personal libraries at the Berghof and in the Reich Chancellery in Berlin,
.
.
.
Hitler also showed reverence for Jesus and fascination with Him, with one book on Jesus full of penciled underlinings, exclamation marks, and side notes. Why would Hitler do this for a nobody rabbi?
.
Author Timothy Ryback wrote on this subject of Hitler’s reverence for Jesus in a long “Atlantic” magazine article and in a full-length book.
.
French edition:
German edition:
.
Going back to Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin,” Hitler favorably notes Jesus’ denunciation of Judaism, he refers to the visceral jewish hatred for Jesus in the Talmud, and he states that Jesus had to be at least half-Aryan.
.
https://johndenugent.com/happy-128th-birthday-adolf-hitler-your-conversation-with-your-mentor-dietrich-eckart-on-bolshevism-from-moses-to-lenin/
.
Adolf Hitler also says that Christianity would be a good faith if and only if purged of ALL jewish and Old Testament elements, which of course the highly influential second-century “heretic” Bishop Marcion also felt.
.
Hitler and Eckart also said that Saul/Paul rejudaized Christianity as a means to get Gentiles to revere the jews as the Chosen People of God and to worship the jews’ deity. They also criticized Martin Luther, though not too harshly given the devoutly religious times he lived in, for only going halfway on the jews, writing in 1544 “Against the Jews and Their Lies,” yet keeping around for Christians the very jewy, gory, twisted, and anti-Gentile Old Testament.
.
Also, the Talmud was NOT written down centuries later, but was started around AD 100. This was within the lifespan of the sons of those same Pharisees who had known, hated, and framed Jesus for treason to Pilate, goading the Roman governor to kill Jesus. (Once the Temple had been destroyed, in AD 70, Judaism morphed into a religion of studying scriptures, hence the Old Testament, and commenting on them, hence the Talmud.)
.
I really wonder how Dalton explains that the Talmud, full of the vilest insults against Jesus, ipso facto concedes that He did exist — and also that He did perform miracles. In fact, the Tall Mud mentions and denounces a rabbinical student who, having fallen deathly ill, prayed to Jesus (the supposedly disgusting blasphemer), which, tha Talmud admits, saved his life.
.
The shocked rabbis told the young man that he should have chosen to simply die instead of praying to that wicked man boiling in hot feces in hell.
.
There is actually a middle ground on Jesus, which is the view of Hitler and Eckart, and I am bringing this view back to life, Jesus unjewed.
.
I will add that Dalton comes across as a scoffer at the very idea of anything supernatural. This was emphatically NOT the view of the very Adolf Hitler whom Dalton otherwise respects. Hitler genuinely believed in divine Providence, “die Vorsehung” in German, which meant then as now GOD. (Side note: My ancestor, Thomas Angell, helped found the actual city of Providence in Rhode Island in 1636, with the name selected to honor God as the Great Provider of opportunities and freedoms in a fertile new land.)
.
And Hitler cited a miraculous event in the trenches during WWI as evidence of God (or angels) and of miracles. While eating lunch with comrades, he suddenly heard a voice saying “Get up and move NOW!” He complied without hesitation, ran around the corner of the trench — and an enemy artillery shell landed, obliterating all his comrades.
.
I had a conflict with Dr. Wm Pierce, whom I in most things highly respected, a man for whom I worked very actively 1981-84. It was over the fact that unlike Pierce, Hitler was not only NOT an atheist, NOT a materialist and NOT an adherent of scientism, but was in fact both publicly and privately a vehement foe of atheism, materialism and scientism.
.
In fact, as Chancellor he banned in 1933 all atheistic groups in Germany, then called “Free Thinkers” (“Freidenker”), and gave a speech proudly proclaiming: “I have crushed atheism.” AND in 1936 he ordered that the SS punish any member who spoke derisively of the person of Jesus or claimed that Jesus was a jew. (But SS men were allowed to continue privately to denounce and reject any kind of Judeo-Christianity.)
.
.
Dalton et alia should finally get on the same page as Hitler about this if they say they revere the man, and stop agreeing with the libtards, marxists, leninists and stalinists — and the half of American jewry who say they are atheists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_atheists_and_agnostics) on the delusion that religion is only the opium of the people, and that only uneducated little old ladies believe in God, the afterlife, and in miraculous anomalies.
.
In the Third Reich, they would have been arrested by order of the Führer and Reich Chancellor, Adolf Hitler.
.
Hitler actually believed that an Aryan messiah would come, and in her autobiography Leni Riefenstahl goes into this.
Adolf Hitler believed that salvation — going to a much better place at death — came via reincarnation, and improving ourselves in each life — and that each life is something which we freely and bravely choose to have.
.
JESUS taught that we should ask both God and those whom we have wronged for forgiveness and then actually make the commitment to change our hearts, ours thoughts, our words and, most of all, our deeds.
.
.
.
Saul, however, invented the macabre idea that Jesus’ crucifixion murder was actually a sacrifice, just as in the jewish temple, a sacrifice that appeased an angry Yahweh and magically cancelled our sins without effort. Then we go forever to heaven as eunuchs and strum forever on harps.
.
The notion that we have just one life and then are judged for eternity is jewish, and a lie. And it gives rise to other absurd lies.
.
.
However, in rejecting judeo-christianity, the true religion of Jesus and Adolf cometh nigh, because I am here to do it, and because, as we all can clearly see, we cannot come to power again via the political path — but we MUST come to power!!!
.
In fact, we will see if even the jew-pandering Trump is ALLOWED to win at the ballot box. Will the jews steal his victory again, or will they just kill him? I read a report that a domestically based hit team was out there, seeking to shoot down Trump’s campaign jet with an anti-aircraft missile like the shoulder-fired Stinger.
.
But we CAN gain power the way the Ayatollah Khomeini did for Shiite Islam.
.
He went from exile in faraway Paris to supreme power in Iran. His movement still rules his country 44 years later, and it is more powerful than ever, now that the big boys, Russia and China, are arming and backing it, doing this to spite the hated US jew government.
.
We can still win. We must win, and it is our will to take our power back from genocidal jewry.
.
SATANISM & CHILD TRAFFICKING: Lara Logan Tells All https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_mKRbdtQq4&ab_channel=SLIGHTLYCLIPS
I am watching it now. Thanks. Grim…..
Your’e welcome, brother. Logan tells a bit more in the end of this video https://rumble.com/v5e5lzx-taylor-swift-insider-leaks-adrenochrome-contract-elites-must-sign-to-join-i.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
I agree with Thomas Dalton and i don’t belive in the supernatural either.
These historical interlectual figures you mention were deep thinkers and great philosophers, but they were still human and made mistakes.
And they did not have the answers for everything.
Hitler may have been intelligent for a politician and the greatest leader in modern times.
But on the grand scale of things he was not a genius and their were far more intelligent white European interlectuals then Hitler.
I find Charles Darwins theory of evolution more credible then any type of religious beliefe or spiritualism.
I know at the end of his life when he was dying on his death bed he said their has has be a greater power out there, meaning a god.
But when people are sick and dying they think with their emotions especially if it’s not a peaceful death.
My grandmother died nearly 4 years ago from heart failure.
She was in a lot of pain crying and kept saying her chest was hurting and i don’t want to die. Then she died several hours later.
Her health was terrible and she was morbidly obese with diabeties and almost blind.
But i think she would have lived a couple of more years if she did not have the 2 death jabs which finished her off very quickly.
I feel sorry for her even though she caused me a lot of griefe when i was a young child.
She was not an evil person but very mentally ill and later on she apoligised to me for the way i was treated. I don’t consider my childhood to be that bad compared to other people.
It was mostly neglect, psychological abuse and being disiplined for the wrong things.
I never suffered any form of sexual abuse though which is something that a lot of people can’t recover from, it’s the worst form of abuse.
I could never forgive my mother though because she is a very sick mentally unhinged horrible person and a control freak.
The slightest thing sets her off and she’s a complete narcissist , plus she made my grandmothers life horrible for the last few years of her life.
So i’ve put that behind me and it’s something i won’t waste my time thinking about anymore.
The point i’m making bringing this stuff up is that your not thinking straight when your dying on your deathbed.
So of course your outlook for the last moments of your life is going to be based on emotions.
Whether it’s sadness,despair being terrified or numbness, bitterness and hatred and resentment.
Unless ypur doped up on drugs then thats different all together.
Hitler did not believe in evolution but that doesn’t mean anything, Hitler was a an intelligent man who probably made up 0.4 percent of the population with an i.q of around 140.
Which even then is subjective because intelligence is very difficult to measure in a person.
There are many different types of i.q tests and an i.q test doesn’t always determine a persons intelligence.
Their have been mch more intelligent people then Hitler, Bobby Fischer who was half Jewish was a genius and much more intelligent then Hitler was.
I am sorry to hear about these sad things.
The harsh truth is that only an atheist could do such things, and I will explain. As God, as the creator of time, space, and the multiverse (meaning all dimensions). as a creator of galaxies, He can certainly see wha tou and I are up to and in fact sees through us and our rationalizations and excuses like an x-ray. And when we die, by His will, I might add, we get our comeuppance.
In my experience, atheists are often either wicked or at least narcissistic and selfish, and in 75%of cases liberals. Atheism and libtardism go together and all statistics show this. And if all law and order broke down, and they could after a nuclear war, meaning there would be no more cops, courts, judges, and jailers, and makr my words, atheists will reveal their true nature and do horrible things; theft, rape and murder. The bolsheviks were classic atheists. And every Demoncrat I know is an atheist. Boston and Washington DC are full of such leftists and libtards, and I got to know them.
In NDEs, Near-Death Experiences, 7%% of people go to a beautiful interlife, albeit only for a brief visit, because it is “Near-Death”. They
are actually dead, of course, with no heartbeat, breathing or brain activity, so all three life signs are gone.
But 25% go to a nasty place, and by nasty I mean they go to a very un-beautiful and bleak place where everyone is as nasty as they are. Obviously, this “negative NDE,” as it is called in the literature, is very disturbing to atheists. They are nonplussed to find themselves conscious somehow while their body, which they can SEE from above or off to the side, is lying there dead. They are shocked to be alive without that brain and body of theirs working, and mortified that they got sent to a bad place. This presupposes that Someone who is very powerful saw all their sh–, and decided to give them a stern warning via this highly unpleasant experience.
When NDE researchers ask revived patients what happened — and it is of interest, because, after all, they were literally DEAD for 15, 30 or 45 minutes, having had zero life activity — they are often hesitant and embarrassed to admit they got sent up sh–‘s creek. 🙂
Btw, these negative NDES happen a lot these days, and this is because of all the atheists and agnostics who are out there these days, and these days, you will concede readily, are the Era of Jewish Rule and of their gradual genocide of the white race.
When people dread their own death, and moan and groan and become profoundly sad at their approaching demise, it would be useful if they knew that OTHER people, like my late wife Margaret, are visited in a comforting way by friends and loved ones who had already crossed over.
I have told on this website the two things Margi said to me the night before she died, and I wrote this down two days after her passing:
https://johndenugent.com/the-need-is-now-for-a-strengthening-aryan-religion-margis-final-words/
The key excerpt:
***
Margi said to me two things. She put her dainty, warm, feminine hand on my forearm and said, looking right at me with her huge blue eyes, “You are my hero.” And then she said:
.
“I feel that tomorrow I am going to pass over.
Statistics show that the super-intelligent (+140) are often failures in life. The highest success rate is bright-but-not-a-genius, 130-140.
Ths is why I had special schools, such as the NAPOLA, so these genius kids did not become lonely, socially isolated, dysfunctional nerds.
https://www.osirisbuch.de/p/nordics-jan-van-helsing
Helsing mit einem neuen Buch über blonden Nordics. Möglicherweise geht es da auch immer die Reichsdeutschen
“The meek shall inherit the earth.”
Most think Jesus is advocating meekness, but didn’t Jesus say this planet is not my world. The meek need not apply.
Well, we will sadly never know what Jesus actually said and meant, as Hitler and Eckart agreed in “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin” (and nothing has changed in 101 years in this regard).
Nothing, apparently, was written down, and it was basically illiterate fishermen who were His disciples.
And what they expected was not at all what they got. The jews wanted a jewish messiah — an arse-kicking king of the House of David, with legions of violent, trained troops who would first expel the Romans and then rule the world.
What they got was a man who preached peace, love, compassion, and forgiveness who was slandered, arrested, framed, tortured, and publicly slow-killed.
Jesus will always remain a mystery man, including the 18 years he disappears utterly from the record. We know what the young George Washington, Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin were up to, and we know what the Buddha and Mohammed were doing as boys and teenagers, but Jesus vanishes.
We read that He is debating at the Temple as a 12-year-old with the elders……
…but the next thing we read is eighteen years have gone by and He comes to John the Baptist, his cousin, to be baptized in the Jordan River, and the Holy Spirit comes upon Him, appearing like a white dove. Then His brief ministry kicks in.
Eighteen years is a lot of missing time, especially in a very short life — dead at just over 30.
“Missing time,” btw, is a term from ufology. Aliens abduct you, do whatever, and you find that two hours have passed in one second, and you somehow are a mile or even much more away from where you were.
Years ago here in Ontonagon, I was at the local bar and grill where I have learned so much via conversations, because people open up and tell you things, or as the Romans said, “in vino veritas.” A man told me that he took his yacht out of the marina here and was heading up to Houghton, a 60-mile voyage, and suddenly he was already rounding the tip of the Houghton canal, as if no time had elapsed at all.
Was Jesus during some of these 18 years aboard a spaceship, or was he in Egypt, or in India?
Or was He really just learning carpentry from his father? (The Greek says Joseph was a “tekton,” which could be any trade.) How does one explain this Jesus phenomenon by a nobody who had learned carpentry?
Eckhart Tolle refers to Jesus a number of times, and to some of His truly mysterious sayings (and especially from the Sermon on the Mount,such as “the meek shall inherit the earth.”).
He wrily joked once, “It takes a good Buddhist to understand Jesus.”
But one thing is certain — Jesus preached against pride, haughtiness, judgmentalism — and holier-than-thou pharisaism.
Over and over He said that earthlings have no reason to be proud, preen themselves, and strut around.
And this is exactly what the Nordics say. This planet is full of f—ed-up people.
Jesus’ message was that God is kind and forgiving, and does not want us to live like this, in misery, divorce, sickness, war, poverty and death. But our minds are sick.
What the disciples record as Jesus denouncing “hypocrisy” and “the Pharisees,” Tolle calls “the egoic mind.”
The good thing about the Buddha, in contrast to Jesus, is he lived to a ripe old age, his disciples wrote his teachings down, and they were not illiterate or expecting him to teach THEIR ideas. They were there to learn and change, and no one said: “Why did you walk away from your kingdom, Prince Siddhartha?”
What we do know, because the Talmud confirms it (and they were not out to do Jesus any favors) is that Jesus was real, His father was NOT Joseph, He did perform spectacular miracles, He opposed the jewish Establishment, He said he came from God, and He was killed.
Claiming His father was Pantera, a Roman centurion (a rank like a captain in the Roman army, and thus a combat/infantry officer), would be consistent with Him appearing to be white. When the jews lie, they try to choose lies that seem credible.
White skin? Roman father.
The centurion Vorenus (a real legionary under Julius Caesar war) was an important figure in the HBO drama series “Rome”
.
.
This is a super-corrupt world, and when I saw this meme by a jewess, I had to make a comment:
Well, true but this is only half the story. Most people who say “I’m not interested in politics,” if you dig deeper, will add this: “I don’t even watch the news, because it is all rigged, all corrupt, there is not a damn thing I can do about it, and all it does it get me upset.”
.
When I lived in Buffalo township in Sarver, Butler County, Pennsylvania (where Corey Comperatore was the volunteer fire chief, the same man whom Matthew Crooks shot and killed who had shielded his wife and daughter with his own body), a former Marine who had served in Iraq said exactly these words to me.
.
And he added: “I have too much PTSD and depression, and there is no way I will ruin my health or peace of mind by watching the news. It is too depressing and it just makes me furious, what we went through over there, and that it was all a lie. If I watch tv at all, it is sports or movies, or something to make me laugh.”
.
I fully understood the man.
.
Everything affects everyone. Not everyone who has dropped out is uncaring. They are just waiting for a true leader and a vision how to move forward.
.
John, you say sadly we will never know what Jesus meant, but what about the afterlife ?
We don’t need Jesus for that. Evidence for NDEs and reincarnation has been around for millennia. 🙂
Jesus was about the egoic mind and seeing yourself in another person — his suffering, hopes and joys.
I just think if Jesus was an Aryan then we can never say never- he might be aiding us from the other side like the Gods .-)
He was a nordic starseed from a much higher planet, one of a dozen. They come to help, incarnate as earthlings, and are baffled how hard it is.
https://youtu.be/9NJuoHa_ZnQ?feature=shared
Gesù che difende gli Israeliti e rifiuta quella Donna in cerca di aiuto?!
Detto da un passo di Giuseppe Flavio.
Spero non sia vero.
Anche perché non reggerebbe neanche il Gesù morto nel 68 DC per difendere il tempio, il popolo e parte di Roma.
Alessandro ha comprato una biblioteca a quanto pare 😉
Sicuramente è il suo ultimo libro pubblicato 🙂
Purtroppo devo ammettere che per prendere potere(il tempio come la politica) a volte bisogna agire con altri mezzi perché non si arriva da nessuna parte con la giustizia.Basta guardare la fine di Trump e le votazioni.
Gli Erodiani ci hanno ingannato come gli Israeliti.Per questo il Vaticano ha ceduto la patente ai Rothschild e con il Vaticano anche Alessandro magno.
Alessandro ha inquadrato perfettamente tutta la situazione.Ora mi auguro che queste scoperte possano arrivare dove è giusto che arrivino perché 5000 anni sono Troppi..
Good channel about how most serial killers are CIA operatives https://odysee.com/@LOLFIELDANDLOVE:5?view=content
As I commented in another article, Russia has NOT given their S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran, and likely never will, as that would prevent Israel from destroying Iran’s leadership via airstrikes, as they have just done to Hezbollah’s leadership in Lebanon. America has been Jew-owned since the “Federal Reserve Bank” was created in 1914, and Russia has been Jew-owned since the Bolshevik Jewish Revolution in 1917, and the staged fall of Soviet communism in 1991 changed nothing.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/pauliddon/2024/08/07/russia-risks-reputation-of-its-weapons-systems-with-iran-air-defense-delivery/
As for the Jewish-created myth of Jesus, you already know where I stand on that. I am not an atheist, but I reject the Jewish Bible, both Old and New Testaments. Christianity is merely “Judaism Lite” for gullible, brainwashed Gentiles.
We will have to agree to disagree on Jesus and on Russia.
But you should read my version of Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin to understand that I revered Jesus in that life as Hitler, just as I do in this one. I deny vigorously that Jesus never existed. And it was Saul who created “Christianity,” a religion about Jesus and not the religion OF Jesus. I consider my continuing veneration of Jesus — whom the jews say in the Talmud was real but wicked and blasphemous and whom they loathe and defame — to be strategically, historically and spiritually correct.
In fact, my five years with the Jehovah’s Witnesses 1970-75 were bearable because of my reading the New Testament in the original koiné Greek to try to get at who Jesus really was behind all the accretions to the story.
In fact, for me Jesus was one of the great heroes of human history, attacking and exposing — especially for OUR race, but also for all earthlings of all races — the psychopathic danger posed by Judaism.
When Jesus’ primary goal of radically reforming Judaism failed, He then went to His secondary plan, which was to 1) beconme beloved and revered, and 2) goad and provoke the enemy jew establishment into bringing about His own murder, thus to expose the jews for who they truly are, the brothers of Satan and the sons of the demonic Yahweh.
“You are from the the father of the Devil” — John 8:44. Since the Devil is a prideful, fallen angel, and angels with free will were created by God, then the Devil’s father was Yahweh.
This is actually Jesus denouncing not just the jew leaders, but also the Devil — and his father, the savage Yahweh.
Pontius Pilate is shown puzzled by Jesus after He has been whipped and brought back to the governor’s palace. Jesus says nothing to escape crucifixion, and clams up.
In view of the fact that crucifixion was ghastly in its painfulness and duration — hours or even days — this decision was as noble as that of the 300 Spartans.
“Jews, do your worst. I preach peace, love, humility, forgiveness and compassion, and you jews murder me for it.”
Bart Ehrman PhD (Princeton Theological Seminary) was an Evangelical Christian until he began studying the New Testament and discovered serious contradictions in it and even that the religion of Jesus — show real remorse for your sins to be saved — was not the religion about Jesus that Saul cooked up, where Jesus becomes like an animal sacrifice in the Temple, and, extrapolating from that notion, and the belief is taught that believing He died for our sins is what saves us.
As Bart Ehrman, PhD correctly says, since many of the jewish masses and the disciples believed Jesus was the Messiah, and “mesiah” for them meant an earthly jewish king who would expel the Romans, they were shocked when Jesus did not fulfill any of those martial expectations but instead submitted peacefully to arrest and wordlessly accepted His crucifixion.
Along comes Saul with his doctrine that Jesus sacrificed himself — like any rabbit or sheep in the Temple whose throat is cut and put on an altar to appease an angry god. Saul was scrambling to claim that His death was not a very bizarre and shocking bad end that suggested Jesus that was just yet another false messiah, but instead His blood brought world redemption — for all believers in Saul’s teaching.
In reality, the death of Jesus was both especially heroic and yet also just one of many millions of murders by the jews of truth-tellers.
This was a near-murder, committed by three young jewish toughs (from the jewish Betar terrorist organization) against one aging man, Professor Robert Faurisson, outside his own house in Vichy, France (and no one was arrested!):
I had just met Faurisson for the first time a week before in Washington DC and a few days later also in California at an IHR conference. The professor stood about 5’7″.
Kicked repeatedly in the head and jaw by those three jewish psychopaths, he easily could have died.
Btw, Ehrman, now a self-proclaimed atheist, is certain that Jesus was a real person, was an itinerant preacher (one of many during a period of longing for the Messiah and hatred of the Romans), that He was indeed executed by the Romans, that he never said He was God, only on a mission from God, and that He preached salvation (going to heaven at death, and not facing divine wrath) via good works, true remorse and restitution, which is perfectly rational, not the mumbo-jumbo of Saul’s psycho notion that we must go to hell and burn forever because Adam and Eve ate the apple in 4000 BC, with Jesus sacrificing Himself to end God’s wrath.
This whole thing was so ghastly and convoluted that Lloyd George, the famous WWI British PM and later friend of Adolf Hitler, said this Adamic-sin/crucifixion-sacrifice stuff made him into an atheist.
For me, Ehrman’s atheism is simply stupid in our time when there has been a massive accumulation of evidence via NDEs and reincarnation studies at the University of Virginia Medical School that life absolutely does go on for everyone, including the wicked, and that a loving being does greet most people at death.
And Ehrman’s denial of the miracles of Jesus is equally unrealistic. How does a penniless Galilean enthrall the illiterate jewish masses if not by 1) being obviously an existing, real human being, and 2) doing such extraordinary things that the crowd is abuzz and the word spreads like wildfire that the new preacher has special powers?
Btw, others performed miracles, among them most notably Apollonius of Tyana:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonius_of_Tyana
The scholarly consensus, even among atheists and agnostics, is that Jesus did exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_myth_theory …. just as a real Henry Ford, by vision, hard work, the overcoming of setbacks, a humane attitude toward his workers, and self-education (coming from a Michigan farm family, he never went to college, and never studied engineering or business), created the gigantic Ford Motor Company. 🙂 (And he was also a vociferous enemy of jewry and a believer in reincarnation, as my website has proven.)
In fact, national socialism is specifically the fanatical affirmation that, as Thomas Carlyle said, “history is the biography of great men.” The masses, and we see this now more than ever, unfortunately are too often like putty — illogical lumps of hair, skin, muscle, fat and bone — whom both good and evil leaders can mold. Leaders must arise to mold that putty so the nation survives and thrives in a dangerous world.
So what we need are truly idealistic leaders who can mold the putty people, not that we WANT putty people, but putty is regrettably what they are, capable of swallowing the most incredibly threadbare lies as well as the most noble truths!
In fact, national socialism is the systematic grooming of future leaders. In school, in the Hitler Youth, in the Winter Help Works, in the Reich Labor Service, and in the military, we taught males and females to be vigorous, self-confident physically fit, warm and helpful comrades, and both followers and leaders. This meant really “walking the walk,” living out our NS values and applying our noble teachings to overcome every obstacle and win.
Regarding the Jesus myth, we’ve been over all this many times before, and I don’t want to press my case too strongly, as you will just ban me again.
But I do find it ironic that you used Jew-owned Wikipedia as proof that Jesus existed. I also note that the Wikipedia article you linked to had no mention of Acharya S. (D.M. Murdock), or Joseph Atwill, both of whom wrote books that destroyed the Jesus myth. D.M. Murdock was the most prominent Jesus mythicist of modern times, yet that Jew-moderated Wikipedia article makes no mention of her. Hmmm – I wonder why?
D.M. Murdock, who wrote her first book “The Christ Conspiracy” in 1999 using the pen name Acharya S., went on to write “Suns of God” in 2004, “Who Was Jesus?” in 2007, “Christ in Egypt” in 2009, and “Did Moses Exist?” in 2014. She died of a fast-spreading cancer shortly after publishing that last book, and I believe the Jews poisoned her for demolishing their Moses myth in that book. All of her books are scholarly, well-researched, and convincing. She correctly points out that there is no solid historical evidence for the existence of Jesus, and that the few mentions of Jesus by real historical people were interpolations (lies) inserted into the historical record by fanatical early Jewish Christians like Saul, to give credence to their Jesus myth. Jesus exists only in the Gospels, and nowhere else. And the real author(s) of the Gospels remain a mystery even today. They certainly were not written by Jesus’s apostles, who were all illiterate peasants.
Joseph Atwill, who wrote “Caesar’s Messiah” in 2011, presents a convincing case that the Jesus myth was invented by the Roman Flavian family (which included Titus and his father Vespasian) and Roman-Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, to pacify the rebellious Jews, who were threatening Roman order in Judea and calling for a warlike messiah to free them from Roman rule. Instead, the Flavians and Josephus gave them the mythical Jesus, who meekly accepted Roman rule – “Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s,” etc. You dismissed Atwill’s book by saying that he’s probably a Jew, but did you read his book, or any of D.M. Murdock’s books? You should read them before passing judgement on them. Truth is truth, whether it’s written by a Jew or a Gentile. By the standard you held Joseph Atwill to, Jewish chess master Bobby Fischer’s criticisms of the Jews were irrelevant and invalid, simply because he was a Jew himself.
Bart Ehrman says Murdoch was simply wrong on many things. This is one of her quotes, and wildly off:.
D. M. Murdock
I just did a blog on strong evidence that Jesus was real: https://johndenugent.com/romans-confirmed-jesus-was-real-founded-a-religion-and-was-executed/
I was shocked and sorrowed in 2015 to read that Acharya had died — and of cancer, a dreadful ailment. She was brilliant, and also quite attractive. 🙂
But “Jesus never existed?” Not only am I certain that this is incorrect, but it also goes against my mission to save our race.
To claim Jesus never existed is to bash the goyim as fools….exactly what jews do.
To claim this Atwil or Murdock were right would enrage many good Christian-oriented conservatives with whom we can agree on many things.
And women, who are strongly affected by the hormone estrogen, must be attracted to the white movement. They will be IF the message is ALSO about love, compassion, caring, happy marriages, sweet kids, home life, etc.
In creating Virtus as a viable religion, I am also trying to get the incels who have good qualities nice white wives who are not libtards but are up on race and the jews. We need happy marriages to have good children — so our race has a future. And it all begins with attracting and keeping millions of good white women happy with our views and our behavior.
My goal is to win. 🙂