Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – to protect the life and health of the test subjects – only be continued when a study concept is available that is suitable to address the considerable safety concerns that are being expressed by more and more well-known scientists against the vaccine and the study design, To take into account.

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test, a serious study must be carried out with what is known as Sanger sequencing. This is the only way to make reliable statements about the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of very different quality, neither the risk of the disease nor a possible vaccination benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is per se unethical.

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, for example by means of animal experiments, that risks known from earlier studies, some of which arise from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are particularly focused on the following points:

• The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an excessive immune reaction, especially if the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after the vaccination. This so – called antibody –  dependent enhancement, ADE , has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats. In the course of these studies, all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after they caught the wild virus.
• The vaccinations are expected to raise antibodies against the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. But also contain spike proteins among other things including syncytin-homologous proteins , which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely excluded that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise  infertility of indefinite duration  in vaccinated women could result.
• BioNTech / Pfizer mRNA vaccines   contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) . 70% of people  develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can  develop allergic, possibly fatal reactions to the vaccination.
• The far too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic assessment of the long-term effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, a planned emergency approval with subsequent observation of long-term consequences would possibly expose millions of healthy people to unacceptable risks.
• Nevertheless, BioNTech / Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

CALL FOR HELP:  Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask that as many EU citizens as possible sign their petition by sending the  email prepared here to the EMA .