An aerial battle over Nuremberg, Germany in 1561, so probably not any US Air Force top-secret craft 😉
10 Comments
When I saw this short YouTube clip on the theorized “Nemesis” sun in our solar system which emits only infrared light, thus making it invisible to us, I immediately thought of the ancient Aryan “black sun” symbol:
None of the Apollo astronauts left Earth orbit, due to deadly deep-space radiation. The unmanned Artemis Moon rocket’s only real purpose is to test deep-space radiation, because NASA supposedly figured out 53 years ago (1969) the flight calculations and necessary space hardware for a round-trip Moon shot. Yet now, they are extremely worried about deep-space radiation:
Look at all these radiation detectors and experiments onboard the upcoming Artemis unmanned mission to the Moon. It’s obvious that radiation testing is the only reason for the Artemis mission. Yet somehow, none of this radiation testing was necessary before sending the Apollo astro-NOTS to the Moon, even though the dangers of deep-space radiation were well-known in 1969:
I think NASA is in a real bind with this Artemis unmanned mission, tripped up by their own lies due to their previous Apollo Moon landings hoax, because what will they do if all the radiation detectors and experiments come back proving that deep-space radiation is deadly to human life? If NASA reveals these results to the public, then how will they explain how the Apollo astro-NOTS supposedly sailed through that radiation unharmed?
And if NASA lies, and says the radiation detectors and experiments showed no problems, will they still send astronauts to the Moon and Mars, knowing that they will get radiation poisoning and die of cancer either en-route or soon after returning to Earth? Then how will they explain why the Apollo astro-NOTS returned perfectly healthy?
So, I think NASA is in a real bind due to their previous lies about the Apollo Moon landings, and they don’t know what to do. This is probably the real reason the unmanned Artemis mission to the Moon keeps getting delayed.
“On this day, May 9, in 1962, a pulse light laser beam sent by a team of scientists from MIT successfully bounced off the moon, the first lunar laser ranging experiment. Later similar experiments used a reflector left on the moon’s surface by the Apollo 11 mission to increase accuracy.
The Laser Ranging Retroreflector mirrors were also deployed on Apollo, 14, and 15 missions and a similar device was also included on the Soviet Union’s Lunakhod 2 spacecraft. BUT THE ORIGINAL APOLLO REFLECTOR IS THE ONLY ONE STILL OPERATIONAL. [emphasis mine]”
“The first successful lunar ranging tests were carried out in 1962 when Louis Smullin and Giorgio Fiocco from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from the Moon’s surface using a laser with a 50J 0.5 millisecond pulse length.[5] Similar measurements were obtained later the same year by a Soviet team at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory using a Q-switched ruby laser.[6]”
Most scientists who work for NASA fully believe that Apollo astro-NOTS went to the Moon from 1969 – 1972, and are therefore puzzled as to why the laser reflectors allegedly left there are only returning 1/10th of the expected signal:
“But if scientists are to continue using the surface panels far into the future, they need figure out why SOME OF THEM [emphasis mine] are returning only a 10th of the expected signal.”
Since the reflector supposedly left by Apollo 11 is the only one still operational, they can only be referring to it.
They attribute this lack of signal from the Apollo 11 reflector to dust kicked up by micrometeorites, but notice that there is no mention of any degradation over time – only that it’s returning 1/10th of the expected signal, likely since 1969.
The truth is that there are no reflector panels placed by Apollo astro-NOTS on the Moon, and any lasers bounced off the Moon since 1969 are simply bouncing off the Moon’s surface as they did in 1962, which is why they only return 1/10th of the expected signal.
In reply to NASA not being a true space agency: Does the sun’s radiation pass through earth’s atmosphere just the same as other planets without atmospheres? So going to these planets would expose astronauts to higher radiation levels.
.
Is space radioactive if there’s no atmosphere? Does radiation travel through a vacume,such as space?
.
All planets without an atmosphere as a defence — have they absorbed radiation for millions of years? And if so, are they too radioactive to land on?
.
Just interested.
Carl, deep-space radiation is composed of highly energetic subatomic particles which can travel through solid materials and can easily travel through Earth’s atmosphere:
“Cosmic rays are high-energy protons and atomic nuclei that move through space at nearly the speed of light. They originate from the Sun, from outside of the Solar System in our own galaxy,[1] and from distant galaxies.[2] Upon impact with Earth’s atmosphere, cosmic rays produce showers of secondary particles, some of which reach the surface, although the bulk is deflected off into space by the magnetosphere or the heliosphere.”
These highly energetic particles from deep space can easily pass through solid materials. I’ve read that it would take 3 feet of lead or 10 feet of water to stop them. So, it’s not our atmosphere that keeps Earth largely safe from deadly deep-space radiation – it’s Earth’s protective magnetic fields, which extend out into space, and diminish in strength the farther out you go. These magnetic fields deflect the incoming solar and deep-space cosmic radiation particles and trap them in the Van Allen radiation belts, and are also responsible for the Aurora Borealis (North Pole) and Aurora Australis (South Pole).
Note: Many of the Moon rocks referred to in the above article allegedly brought back by Apollo astro-NOTS have been proven to be fake (one was actually a piece of petrified wood from Earth). Any genuine Moon rocks collected by NASA were chunks of the Moon’s surface blasted into space by asteroid collisions, which fell to Earth and were later collected on the ice fields of Antarctica, where they were easily spotted sitting on the ice, unlike any that have fallen in forested areas, deserts, lakes, oceans, etc. This also explains why Wernner von Braun traveled with a team of experts to Antarctica in 1967 to collect Moon rocks for the upcoming fake Apollo Moon landings:
“WELLINGTON, N. Z., Jan. 3 (Reuters) A group of United States rocket experts headed by Dr. Wernher Von Braun flew today from Christchurch, N,Z., to Antarctica to study conditions that may have some bearing on problems related to a projected manned moon landing.”
(The problems being that they needed actual Moon rocks to pass off as being brought back by the Apollo astro-NOTS, since scientific analysis would be done on these rocks.)
“The surface of the Moon is approximately two to three times as radioactive as the International Space Station, and up to 1,000 times as radioactive as the surface of Earth.”
Here is a NASA article (!) admitting that the Moon’s surface is highly radioactive. Yet they give no explanation for why the Apollo astro-NOTS were not affected at all by this radiation! The level of cognitive dissonance displayed in this article is truly incredible:
“The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
… Out in deep space, radiation comes from all directions. On the Moon, you might expect the ground, at least, to provide some relief, with the solid body of the Moon blocking radiation from below. Not so.
When galactic cosmic rays collide with particles in the lunar surface, they trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!
So which is worse for astronauts: cosmic rays from above or neutrons from below? Igor Mitrofanov, a scientist at the Institute for Space Research and the Russian Federal Space Agency, Moscow, offers a grim answer: “Both are worse.””
“According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent.[1][2] The discomfort is triggered by the person’s belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.[1][2][3]”
For many people, especially Americans like myself, the alleged Apollo Moon landings are a source of national pride, similar to a religious belief. If one tries to point out that this Apollo Moon Landings religion is a lie based on a hoax, one is figuratively crucified and burned at the stake. But the truth cannot be hidden forever, and will win in the end.
I didn’t know about the moon rocks being radioactive. And possibly fake. A bit like a certain diary and lampshades!
During a war, Make lampshades !
John, take a dig into the Van Allen Belt. It is an area of extreme radiation that varies in depth around the Earth depending on the state of the Magnetic Field around Earth. It would take from a few hours to over a day to transit the Van Allen Belt. The radiation from less than an hour in the belt would be lethal. No human from Earth has ever been to the moon.
Oh, I know all about it. As a kid in the 1950s, I heard NASA figures on tv talking about it.
But as I have explained many times since I began blogging in 2008, there is both a real US space program, using anti-gravity and US- built UFOs, and a fake one, still putting around with 1930s-era rocket engines.
The real space program features energy sources and technologies which would put the trillionaire Rockefeller’s oil industry out of business tomorrow, and that is just not permitted.
When I saw this short YouTube clip on the theorized “Nemesis” sun in our solar system which emits only infrared light, thus making it invisible to us, I immediately thought of the ancient Aryan “black sun” symbol:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2Tf_z_xeHCs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sun_(symbol)
Article on “Planet X”:
https://www.sibrel.com/world-news/is-planet-x-gods-end-times-tribulation-
None of the Apollo astronauts left Earth orbit, due to deadly deep-space radiation. The unmanned Artemis Moon rocket’s only real purpose is to test deep-space radiation, because NASA supposedly figured out 53 years ago (1969) the flight calculations and necessary space hardware for a round-trip Moon shot. Yet now, they are extremely worried about deep-space radiation:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/space-radiation-won-t-stop-nasa-s-human-exploration
Look at all these radiation detectors and experiments onboard the upcoming Artemis unmanned mission to the Moon. It’s obvious that radiation testing is the only reason for the Artemis mission. Yet somehow, none of this radiation testing was necessary before sending the Apollo astro-NOTS to the Moon, even though the dangers of deep-space radiation were well-known in 1969:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/artemis-i-space-radiation-research-to-help-moon-mars-explorers
The unmanned Artemis missionq to the Moon has been conveniently postponed until November, at which time it will probably be postponed again:
https://blogs.nasa.gov/artemis/2022/10/06/inspections-underway-for-rocket-spacecraft-before-setting-launch-date
I think NASA is in a real bind with this Artemis unmanned mission, tripped up by their own lies due to their previous Apollo Moon landings hoax, because what will they do if all the radiation detectors and experiments come back proving that deep-space radiation is deadly to human life? If NASA reveals these results to the public, then how will they explain how the Apollo astro-NOTS supposedly sailed through that radiation unharmed?
And if NASA lies, and says the radiation detectors and experiments showed no problems, will they still send astronauts to the Moon and Mars, knowing that they will get radiation poisoning and die of cancer either en-route or soon after returning to Earth? Then how will they explain why the Apollo astro-NOTS returned perfectly healthy?
So, I think NASA is in a real bind due to their previous lies about the Apollo Moon landings, and they don’t know what to do. This is probably the real reason the unmanned Artemis mission to the Moon keeps getting delayed.
Then how is there a mirror on the moon reflecting back lazer ?http://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/36-mirrors-on-moon.html
Scientists have been bouncing lasers off the Moon and measuring its distance from Earth since 1962 – no man-made reflectors are necessary!
http://www.famousdaily.com/history/laser-beam-first-bounced-off-moon.html
Key paragraphs from the above article:
“On this day, May 9, in 1962, a pulse light laser beam sent by a team of scientists from MIT successfully bounced off the moon, the first lunar laser ranging experiment. Later similar experiments used a reflector left on the moon’s surface by the Apollo 11 mission to increase accuracy.
The Laser Ranging Retroreflector mirrors were also deployed on Apollo, 14, and 15 missions and a similar device was also included on the Soviet Union’s Lunakhod 2 spacecraft. BUT THE ORIGINAL APOLLO REFLECTOR IS THE ONLY ONE STILL OPERATIONAL. [emphasis mine]”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
From the above Wikipedia article:
“The first successful lunar ranging tests were carried out in 1962 when Louis Smullin and Giorgio Fiocco from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from the Moon’s surface using a laser with a 50J 0.5 millisecond pulse length.[5] Similar measurements were obtained later the same year by a Soviet team at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory using a Q-switched ruby laser.[6]”
Most scientists who work for NASA fully believe that Apollo astro-NOTS went to the Moon from 1969 – 1972, and are therefore puzzled as to why the laser reflectors allegedly left there are only returning 1/10th of the expected signal:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2020/laser-beams-reflected-between-earth-and-moon-boost-science
From the above article:
“But if scientists are to continue using the surface panels far into the future, they need figure out why SOME OF THEM [emphasis mine] are returning only a 10th of the expected signal.”
Since the reflector supposedly left by Apollo 11 is the only one still operational, they can only be referring to it.
They attribute this lack of signal from the Apollo 11 reflector to dust kicked up by micrometeorites, but notice that there is no mention of any degradation over time – only that it’s returning 1/10th of the expected signal, likely since 1969.
The truth is that there are no reflector panels placed by Apollo astro-NOTS on the Moon, and any lasers bounced off the Moon since 1969 are simply bouncing off the Moon’s surface as they did in 1962, which is why they only return 1/10th of the expected signal.
In reply to NASA not being a true space agency: Does the sun’s radiation pass through earth’s atmosphere just the same as other planets without atmospheres? So going to these planets would expose astronauts to higher radiation levels.
.
Is space radioactive if there’s no atmosphere? Does radiation travel through a vacume,such as space?
.
All planets without an atmosphere as a defence — have they absorbed radiation for millions of years? And if so, are they too radioactive to land on?
.
Just interested.
Carl, deep-space radiation is composed of highly energetic subatomic particles which can travel through solid materials and can easily travel through Earth’s atmosphere:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray
From the above article:
“Cosmic rays are high-energy protons and atomic nuclei that move through space at nearly the speed of light. They originate from the Sun, from outside of the Solar System in our own galaxy,[1] and from distant galaxies.[2] Upon impact with Earth’s atmosphere, cosmic rays produce showers of secondary particles, some of which reach the surface, although the bulk is deflected off into space by the magnetosphere or the heliosphere.”
These highly energetic particles from deep space can easily pass through solid materials. I’ve read that it would take 3 feet of lead or 10 feet of water to stop them. So, it’s not our atmosphere that keeps Earth largely safe from deadly deep-space radiation – it’s Earth’s protective magnetic fields, which extend out into space, and diminish in strength the farther out you go. These magnetic fields deflect the incoming solar and deep-space cosmic radiation particles and trap them in the Van Allen radiation belts, and are also responsible for the Aurora Borealis (North Pole) and Aurora Australis (South Pole).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora
Yes – the Moon’s surface is highly radioactive, because it does not have a protective magnetic field like the Earth:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a37339645/moon-magnetic-field
Note: Many of the Moon rocks referred to in the above article allegedly brought back by Apollo astro-NOTS have been proven to be fake (one was actually a piece of petrified wood from Earth). Any genuine Moon rocks collected by NASA were chunks of the Moon’s surface blasted into space by asteroid collisions, which fell to Earth and were later collected on the ice fields of Antarctica, where they were easily spotted sitting on the ice, unlike any that have fallen in forested areas, deserts, lakes, oceans, etc. This also explains why Wernner von Braun traveled with a team of experts to Antarctica in 1967 to collect Moon rocks for the upcoming fake Apollo Moon landings:
https://www.nytimes.com/1967/01/04/archives/us-space-experts-to-study-antarctica-for-lunar-lessons.html
“WELLINGTON, N. Z., Jan. 3 (Reuters) A group of United States rocket experts headed by Dr. Wernher Von Braun flew today from Christchurch, N,Z., to Antarctica to study conditions that may have some bearing on problems related to a projected manned moon landing.”
(The problems being that they needed actual Moon rocks to pass off as being brought back by the Apollo astro-NOTS, since scientific analysis would be done on these rocks.)
A photo of Wernher von Braun in Antarctica:
https://picryl.com/media/wernher-von-braun-033c4e
Again, the Moon is highly radioactive because it does not have a protective magnetic field like the Earth:
https://bgr.com/science/moon-radiation-exploration-levels
From the above article:
“The surface of the Moon is approximately two to three times as radioactive as the International Space Station, and up to 1,000 times as radioactive as the surface of Earth.”
Here is a NASA article (!) admitting that the Moon’s surface is highly radioactive. Yet they give no explanation for why the Apollo astro-NOTS were not affected at all by this radiation! The level of cognitive dissonance displayed in this article is truly incredible:
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2005/08sep_radioactivemoon
From the above article:
“The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
… Out in deep space, radiation comes from all directions. On the Moon, you might expect the ground, at least, to provide some relief, with the solid body of the Moon blocking radiation from below. Not so.
When galactic cosmic rays collide with particles in the lunar surface, they trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!
So which is worse for astronauts: cosmic rays from above or neutrons from below? Igor Mitrofanov, a scientist at the Institute for Space Research and the Russian Federal Space Agency, Moscow, offers a grim answer: “Both are worse.””
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
From the above article:
“According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent.[1][2] The discomfort is triggered by the person’s belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.[1][2][3]”
For many people, especially Americans like myself, the alleged Apollo Moon landings are a source of national pride, similar to a religious belief. If one tries to point out that this Apollo Moon Landings religion is a lie based on a hoax, one is figuratively crucified and burned at the stake. But the truth cannot be hidden forever, and will win in the end.
Thank you for this highly informative and enlightening information, comrade.
However, I am still open to debate about Apollo.
I didn’t know about the moon rocks being radioactive. And possibly fake. A bit like a certain diary and lampshades!
During a war, Make lampshades !
John, take a dig into the Van Allen Belt. It is an area of extreme radiation that varies in depth around the Earth depending on the state of the Magnetic Field around Earth. It would take from a few hours to over a day to transit the Van Allen Belt. The radiation from less than an hour in the belt would be lethal. No human from Earth has ever been to the moon.
Oh, I know all about it. As a kid in the 1950s, I heard NASA figures on tv talking about it.
But as I have explained many times since I began blogging in 2008, there is both a real US space program, using anti-gravity and US- built UFOs, and a fake one, still putting around with 1930s-era rocket engines.
The real space program features energy sources and technologies which would put the trillionaire Rockefeller’s oil industry out of business tomorrow, and that is just not permitted.