More than a third of Ukraine, in the east, speaks Russian and IS ethnic Russian. Do any Amurrikins understand this?
Russia will not stand by and watch its brothers be oppressed or slaughtered, any more than I tolerated Poles slaughtering their German minority in 1939.
And here is an American example of the same thing. There are 100,000 white Americans living in retirement on the very cheap and beautiful peninsula of Baja California, down on the Mexican side, and seen in the northwestern peninsula on this map.
If these Americans were being massacred by the Mexicans, the US would 100% intervene with military troops. As they should. And what leader of a powerful country could survive politically while letting part of his people be stomped on?
Well, one of the Durans discusses below how the doddering, weak, unpopular Joe Biden, faced with the rise of the Russo-Chinese power bloc, is finally making quiet noises about Ukraine never joining NATO, or at least not for ten years — thus fulfilling a key Russian demand.
.
So…. is the danger of a war over?
.
IMO, no, not at all.
.
The outstanding movie “13 Days” about John and Robert Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Criss of 1962 shows how the US military and Deep State sought to trick Kennedy and get a war going with the Soviet Union, and they nearly got it, though these generals knew it easily could have turned nuclear.
.
The truth is that the Soviets had as much “right” to put their nuclear missiles into Cuba, bordering the United States, as we did to station our Jupiter nuclear missiles in Turkey, right next to the USSR. BOTH placements meant the enemy capital could be vaporized in five minutes. And it is a sad commentary on the American people 1) are terrible at geography and foreign languages, and thus have no idea where Turkey even is (!), and 2) they forget that other countries have security requirements as well.
.
Kennedy, however, a Harvard man, was well aware of these things. He was always willing to make a fair deal with the Russians, and in the end one happened. But his generals literally wanted a war instead. A lot of the movie is about the fierce friction between JFK and them.
.
.
The only reason Kennedy prevailed over his war mongers in 1962 was his brilliance at figuring their war-triggering schemes out and his massive popularity with the American people. To go against the beloved and respected Kennedy would have looked very bad for the generals.
And he, along with the American people, could see how just one “small” incident could start a process which led, step-by-tep, to a nuclear war.
.
Great way to start a war: They claimed we needed low-altitude photos of the Soviet missiles. Really? So the Pentagon sent US fighter bombers just above the treetops of Cuba (violating their airspace, obviously) and flying directly over and AT the Soviet missile base there.
They looked exactly like an attack force that could drop bombs or fire missiles, and not just click a camera. The Cubans or Soviets would then try to shoot them down — and the war would be on if US jets did go down in flames, their pilots were killed and the jewspaper ran tear-jerking stories about their bereaved widows and children.
I knew such a family — Colonel Charles Shelton, USAF, his wife Marion, and their five kids.
.
.
But Joe Biden not only is neither brilliant nor popular, but everyone knows he stole the election, he is a fake president, and he has no legal authority at all. Kamala is even worse.
John Kennedy was the opposite, and a respected war hero in WWII to boot, an officer who saved almost all his crew after the patrol boat he commanded was sunk by the Japanese. He towed a burned sailor three miles to safety. And in the end, he personally swam alone, another three miles through shark-infested waters, to get a message which he had carved on a coconut – about how the crew had survived and needed rescue – to friendly natives on another island to bring to the US Navy via the Australians.
.
So a John Kennedy could stand up to his war mongerers but a Joe Biden cannot.
.
I can see the Pentagon and/or Deep State egging Ukraine on to step up the shelling of the ethnic Russian areas in the east until Putin acts militarily.
.
Or Turkey, its economy worsening and with neo-cons plotting against Erdogan, suddenly closes the Dardanelles and Russian warships are cooped up in the Black Sea, into which, however, Turkey does let NATO ships pass.
.
The Big Jews understand that if they do not crush Russia now, they will never fulfill their dream of ruling the entire world as masters over slaves.
.
And then every jew gets 800 slaves.
What happens in 10 years time when the Ukraine joins Nato and the EU? Will Russia tolerate that?
What happens when Turkey joins the EU or allows Nato forces to be stationed there as in Poland ?
It threatens southern Russia up to Moscow …. No more Warsaw Pact buffer states.
IMO, this is all just theater. The Jews financially own Russia and the U.S., as well as the defense contractors in both countries, and likely in China, too. This current war-drum beating is just a way for them to make more money – “the best enemies money can buy.” This is what the Cold War was all about, IMO – it was just a prolonged Jewish money-making scheme, since they owned the USSR, USA, and CCP, and still do.
That’s not to say that WWIII won’t happen – I think it will happen, probably sometime between 2024 – 2030. But this current business with Ukraine is just part of the warm-up, IMO, and won’t lead to WWIII yet, even if Russia invades Ukraine. If Russia invades Ukraine, the U.S. will economically sanction Russia, but won’t get involved militarily, as Biden has recently hinted at:
https://www.rt.com/russia/542522-cutting-swift-financial-system
https://www.rt.com/russia/542421-west-us-sanctions-banks
Same thing with China invading Taiwan, which will happen sometime after 2024, and will be allowed by the U.S., since by that time we will have sufficient chip fabrication plants operational here in the U.S. to no longer need Taiwan’s TSMC chip fabrication plants. As I commented earlier, TSMC, Samsung, and Intel are all hurriedly building chip fabrication plants in Arizona and Texas at a cost of many billions of dollars, which will be operational by the end of 2024, likely to prepare for China’s annexation of Taiwan sometime after 2024. The U.S. will economically sanction China, but again, won’t get involved militarily.
Joel Skousen says that the trigger for WWIII will likely be South Korea, which, unlike Taiwan or Ukraine, has some 28,000 U.S. troops stationed there. North Korea is communist China’s puppet state, headed by the “rogue madman” Kim Jong-un, who does whatever China tells him to do. China, in turn, like Russia and the U.S., does whatever the Rothschilds tell them to do. BTW, these are my words, not Skousen’s, who never mentions the Rothschilds or the Jews.
So, IMO, WWIII will begin when the Rothschilds and their bankster associates decide that it’s time to implement their long-planned “New World Order” and a world government run by them, after WWIII. They tried to do this after WWI with their failed “League of Nations,” and tried again after WWII with their semi-successful “United Nations” (U.N.).
The nuclear WWIII they are planning will dwarf the previous two in terms of destruction and loss of life, and will force the U.S. to join their world government, as we will no longer have a government or military of our own – both will have been completely destroyed, leading to total chaos, anarchy and millions dead – a complete societal collapse similar to that portrayed in “The Road”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bO8EqMsxOiU
An attack on the South by North Korea’s massive 1.5-million-man army would overwhelm the South Korean and U.S. troops, and would likely force the U.S. to use tactical nukes to repel the invasion. This would give China and Russia a justification to launch a nuclear attack on U.S. military bases across the mainland U.S..
And since Bill Clinton implemented PDD-60 in 1997, which disallows “launch on warning” of our ICBMs in the face of incoming enemy ICBMs, it means that we would have to absorb a nuclear strike on U.S. soil before launching our own ICBMs. The problem, as one U.S. general said, is that we would have nothing to retaliate with, since all of our ICBMs would have been destroyed in their silos.
I’ve also read that one of our arms agreements states that the U.S. must always keep a certain number of our nuclear-missile-capable submarines docked in port, where they can be easily destroyed by Russian or Chinese ICBMs. I believe Bill Clinton was responsible for that foolish agreement, too.
https://historyheist.com/pdd-60-clinton-changes-nuclear-response-from-launch-on-warning-to-after-1st-strike