Mary Phagan Kean remembering her murdered great-aunt Mary Phagan at her gravesite in Marietta, Georgia. The jews insanely made the trial of the perpetrator, Leo Frank, into an antisemitic issue, turning a pro-jewish state into a jew-hating one. The ADL was founded to repair the debacle and lie, bribe and threaten repercussions more smoothly the next time.
**** but (first) a Southern girl of today who cannot be beat
tfw no redneck catfish wrangling gf pic.twitter.com/PO2qecWC8n
— That Guy Mason (@masonlemarquis) July 25, 2021
****
[source: https://www.unz.com/article/mary-phagans-family-opposes-exoneration-of-sex-killer-leo-frank/]
The largest and most easily accessible online databases about the case are run by [xx] and John de Nugent, who claims warring species of ancient aliens colonized the planet, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Mary Phagan’s Family Opposes Exoneration of Sex Killer Leo Frank
Leo Frank was the manager of the National Pencil Company — a sweatshop factory where over a hundred children labored, and where the Sam Nunn federal building stands today. Little Mary Phagan was 12 years old when she started working there in 1912, and Frank admitted he was the last person to see Mary alive.
In fact, the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming and on August 25, 1913, after a month-long trial in the Fulton County Superior Court, Leo Frank was found guilty by a jury of his peers, and on the next day, he was sentenced to hang for the murder of Mary Phagan.
What followed was an unprecedented effort by Leo Frank and his legal team and supporters to pin this horrific crime on everyone but himself. It is an effort that continues to this very day. The Leo Frank case is no “cold case.” It is obvious to anyone who objectively considers the case evidence that Leo Frank was rightly convicted for this heinous crime.
Today, his supporters have targeted a black man named James Conley who worked as a janitor at the factory. Evidence shows that after Frank beat and strangled Mary he was unable to move the body. He called on Conley and ordered him to help him conceal the crime and swore him to secrecy. After initially concealing Frank’s crime Conley ultimately revealed to authorities the true events of that day. The detail he gave was so shocking and so convincing that he became the state’s star witness against Leo Frank. Frank and his legal team’s response was to accuse Conley of the murder, and that has been their story for a century.
But Mary’s killer was not James Conley, and the state of Georgia proved beyond any reasonable doubt that Leo Frank alone murdered Little Mary Phagan.
The Phagan family has no objection to anyone expressing their opinions about the Leo Frank case, but we do insist that organizations and personal campaigns not distort the truth and facts to use this case for their own political purposes. For over 100 years, each passing decade brought with it dubious revelations of “new historical evidence” falsely claiming to exonerate Leo Frank. The Phagan family has stated since 1982 that if there were clear-cut evidence to clear Leo Frank of this heinous crime, we would be the first to ask for an exoneration. However, such historical evidence has never come to light. Rather, there are considerable data, extensive documentation, revealing archival material, and legal, court, and government records that only support and even strengthen the guilty verdict.
Phagan Family’s Statement on the Latest Attempt to Exonerate Leo Frank
It was reported in the Atlanta Journal and Constitution that on April 26, 2019 [ironically 106 years to the day after Mary Phagan’s murder] that the Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard [defeated by Fani Willis on November 6, 2020] had established a “Conviction Integrity Unit” that he said would review the Leo Frank conviction of 1913. Those named as participants in this move were the following:
- Former Governor Roy Barnes
- Rabbi Steven Lebow
- Attorney Dale Schwartz
- Melissa D. Redmon, director of the University of Georgia Law School
- Former Supreme Court Justice Leah Ward Sears
- Former Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher
- Former Cobb County Superior Court Chief Judge J. Stephen Schuster
- Assistant District Attorney Van Pearlberg
The Family of Mary Phagan believes that these individuals have colluded since August of 2018 to find a way to vacate the murder conviction. ADL attorney Dale Schwartz was quoted thus: “we’re still trying to get a new trial that would, in effect, exonerate him.” [In 1914, several attempts were made to “exonerate” Leo Frank using “new evidence” that included witness affidavits later found to have been forged or obtained by bribery and other illegal means. See the Atlanta Constitution of May 5, 1914, p. 1.]
Clearly, the new agency was a blatantly political scheme that had nothing to do with justice. It was set up, it appears, at the behest of the above-mentioned Frank advocates for one purpose only — to help Leo Frank escape culpability for his crime. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (May 7, 2019), Fulton County D.A. Paul Howard stated, “The Frank Case helped inspire the creation of the new unit” and that former Gov. Roy Barnes “will serve as a consultant.” Barnes admitted that he “had lobbied the district attorney [Howard] to re-examine Frank’s case.”
Let us be clear what that means. Those statements alone convince us that the Conviction Integrity Unit has already determined the outcome of the Leo Frank case. According to the article, “Barnes said he is convinced that this will happen. ‘There is no doubt in my mind, and we’ll [Who is “we?” — Ed.] prove it at the appropriate time, that Frank was not guilty.’”
For years Roy Barnes has been promoting a fraudulent narrative about the Frank case, and in particular that the 1913 trial was illegitimate because it was “mob-dominated.” He said that “there were just mobs of people. And as the jury would go [to] the courthouse every day, the mob would scream, “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!”[1]Watch this video at 1:40 mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgKcqOXyhc
This charge is a blatant lie that has been disproven by the scholars of the case. It was made up long after the trial by an overzealous writer trying to make a name for himself. Only Barnes continues to repeat it.[2]See https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020…es.pdf For this and many other reasons Governor Roy Barnes is simply unfit to participate in any serious inquiry into the Leo Frank case.
Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard (with former Governor Roy Barnes) announces “Conviction Integrity Unit” to re-open Leo Frank case. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 7, 2019. Once again, most advocates and so-called experts who determine Leo Frank is not guilty have relied on blatantly false information and politically biased propaganda. Frank’s conviction was upheld by thirteen separate courts and judges in his thirteen appeals from Fulton County to the United States Supreme Court. Every court affirmed the trial was fair and the jury was not “mob terrorized.”
What’s more, driven by the need to exonerate a Jewish leader, they intend to convict an innocent African American man, James Conley — Frank’s employee that he ordered to help move the body. They ignore the 20 young girls and women who testified under oath that Frank sexually harassed them at the factory. Frank’s attorneys refused to cross-examine ANY of them, and later admitted that they were all telling the truth.[3]https://littlemaryphagan.com/the-murder-trial-testim…dence/
Nonetheless, Frank’s advocates spread fabrications, propagandize falsehoods, distort the facts and change headlines of original newspapers to promote the hoax of not guilty. The real miscarriage of justice is that in this time of the #MeToo movement, they seek to override a duly convicted child rapist and murderer’s conviction.
The Evidence Points to Leo Frank’s Guilt
Most people are not aware that there was blood and hair evidence at the murder scene, that Frank changed his alibi several times and lied to police, and that he sexually harassed his young girl employees. Most people are unaware that Leo Frank hired private detectives who planted evidence and bribed and intimidated witnesses to change their testimony. They even hatched a plot to murder the African American James Conley who became a key witness against Leo Frank.[4]Atlanta Journal, May 5, 1914, 2. Atlanta Constitution May 6, 1914, 1, 5. New York Times, May 6, 1914, 3.
Most people are not aware that the two detective firms Leo Frank hired; the Pinkertons’ National Detective Agency and the Burns Detective Agency concluded Leo Frank was guilty of the murder!
At his own trial Leo Frank refused to be sworn on the Bible and be cross-examined. A lot has been covered up about the case, including Leo Frank playing the race card to play to the white jurors’ prejudices about black men.
In 1915 and under intense political pressure Gov. John M. Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence to life imprisonment. But even as he signed that commutation order he also wrote that the U.S. Supreme Court “found in the trial no error in law” and had “correctly in my judgment [found] that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.”
The fact is that Leo M. Frank was found guilty under Georgia law with facts and evidence, not with political bullying. The good people of Georgia can make up their own minds about Leo Frank’s innocence or guilt by delving into the historical records themselves. Having researched the Leo Frank/Mary Phagan murder case, including spending thousands of hours examining court records, newspaper reports, and private and public archives, I ask you to please consider the following facts:
Sexual harassment by Leo Frank: the Harvey Weinstein of his era
On Saturday April 26, 1913, Leo Frank used the opportunity of a deserted factory and his power as the company boss to lure Little Mary Phagan to a back area of the factory and attempt to rape her. Mary resisted and, and in the struggle Frank struck her and knocked her unconscious, and then strangled her to death. He left a trail of clues leading to himself, so within a few days of the murder he was arrested.
Evidence showed that the murder was sexually motivated, and many of Leo Frank’s own female employees testified to Leo Frank’s history of sexual harassment. They testified that he “got too familiar,” “put his hands on” them, tried to corner them, and proposed sexual acts to them for money.
These teenagers bravely took the witness stand and spoke of Leo Frank’s lewd behavior. Sixteen-year-old Nellie Wood told the court how Frank had pushed himself against her and touched her breast. Fourteen-year-old Nellie Pettis—a witness for the defense—recounted how Leo Frank had propositioned her for sex. Twenty girls in all gave similar testimony about Frank’s improprieties. Several male employees described how they had witnessed Leo Frank “rub up against” young female workers “a little too much.” The testimony was so explicit that the judge had to clear the courtroom of women.
The defense attorneys did not even attempt to cross-examine any of the girls who testified at trial about Leo Frank’s lewd behavior. Instead, Leo Frank’s lawyers argued that his improper behavior was not wrong—that it was a sign of more liberal times! One even said in his closing argument, “Deliver me from one of these prudish fellows that never looks at a girl and never puts his hands on her…”
In the South the LOVE of Jews reigned supreme — not anti-Semitism!
“Anti-Semitism is absolutely not the reason for this libel that has been framed against me. It isn’t the source nor the result of this sad story.” — Leo M. Frank, interviewed by Abraham Cahan of the Forward newspaper
Most people are unaware that the prosecutor Hugh Dorsey first brought his case against Leo Frank before a 23-member grand jury that included five prominent members of the Jewish community (including at least two from Frank’s own synagogue), and all the grand jurors signed the bill of indictment against Leo Frank.
The trial judge, Leonard Roan, was once a law partner of one of Frank’s defense attorneys, Luther Rosser and, according to a confidential ADL memo: “In general, the rulings of the trial Judge had been favorable to the defense.” Leo Frank’s defense attorney even declared after the trial: “[W]e do not make the least criticism of Judge Roan, who presided [over the trial]. Judge Roan is one of the best men in Georgia and is an able and conscientious judge.”
The false claims of anti-Semitism before, during, and after the trial of Leo Frank are simply unfounded and untrue. The detailed daily accounts by the three Atlanta newspapers — the Constitution, the Georgian, and the Journal, each of which had Jewish editors — reflected no anti-Jewish bias at all. Leo Frank’s religion is only alluded to when it is reported that he is the president of ‘B’nai B’rith, and he is written of with the utmost respect for his prominence in the community. In fact, a University of Georgia study showed that the reportage by Atlanta’s three dailies was openly pro-Leo Frank and exhibited a pronounced pro-Frank bias.
Author Steve Oney, listed by the Anti-Defamation League as an expert on the Leo Frank case, reported: “To the extent that there was bias in the coverage, it was mostly in Frank’s favor…” He goes on to state that Atlanta’s newspapers, “evincing the prejudices of the time, ridiculed the state’s star witness—a black factory janitor named Jim Conley…”
It has been claimed that “anti-Semitism” and the “hatred of Jews” motivated Leo Frank’s conviction and lynching. And yet, incredibly, there was no anti-Semitism expressed by police, detectives, prosecutors, jurors, judge, or reporters! There was no “prejudicial trial” or “mob rule” or anti-Jewish bigotry of any kind.
Mr. Oney refutes the claim that there were anti-Semitic mobs shouting “Hang the Jew!” He told the Jewish Journal:
“[I]t didn’t happen. It was something that someone wrote a couple [of] years after the crime, and then it got stuck into subsequent recountings of the story….Jews were accepted in the city, and the record does not substantiate subsequent reports that the crowd outside the courtroom shouted at the jurors: ‘Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you.’” Though there is no record of “anti-Semitism” on the part of the crowd, the courtroom audience, the press, or the prosecutors, that doesn’t mean it was non-existent. As the evidence of his guilt became overwhelming, Leo Frank and his lawyers tried desperately to insert “anti-Semitism” into the trial as a diversionary tactic. They actually staged a courtroom confrontation with a prosecution witness over his alleged previous “anti-Semitic” statements. This officially brought “anti-Semitism” into the trial for the first time. Turns out that witness was working for the Leo Frank defense and was planted to promote their “anti-Semitism” agenda. It was yet another trick by the Leo Frank defense to undermine the court proceeding and to neutralize the evidence of his guilt.
The ADL has been promoting a lie for over a century!
“HANG THE JEW, HANG THE JEW” is what the Anti-Defamation League says was chanted during the month-long trial, but its own expert Steve Oney says it NEVER OCCURRED!
According to Steve Oney, at the time of Mary Phagan’s murder, “Atlanta was a philo-Semitic city. Its assimilated, German-Jewish elite were part of the financial and legal power structure…” Gov. John Slaton in his commutation order also addressed the false claim of an “anti-Semitic mob” surrounding the courtroom pressing to lynch Leo Frank: “No such attack was made and…none was contemplated.” Gov. John Slaton countered the false claim of an “anti-Semitic” atmosphere by reminding Leo Frank supporters that Jews were highly respected and appreciated in Georgia because they had been “conspicuous” contributors to the history and development of the state.[5]https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020…an.pdf
Frank’s Jewish defenders believed he was guilty
By the time of his lynching in 1915 many people — including his Jewish supporters — not only were repelled by Leo Frank’s abrasive personality but also believed he was in fact the murderer of Mary Phagan. Chicago icon Albert Lasker, a Jewish philanthropist and the “father of modern advertising,” paid millions (in today’s money) for Leo Frank’s defense, but he privately admitted that he was not even convinced that Leo Frank was innocent.
Lasker financed all of Frank’s post-conviction appeals and orchestrated his international public-relations campaign that involved media outlets across the nation, including the New York Times. Albert Lasker recalled the meeting in Frank’s jail cell:
“It was very hard for us to be fair to him, he impressed us as a sexual pervert. Now, he may not have been—or rather a homosexual or something like that…”
According to Lasker’s biographer, the men with him during that encounter took “a violent dislike to him.” Lasker “hated him,” and said, “I hope he [Leo Frank] gets out…and when he gets out I hope he slips on a banana peel and breaks his neck.”
Leo Frank’s Trial Defense was one of the most RACIST in American History
Though “anti-Semitism” was not a factor in his trial, Leo Frank’s racism certainly was: Frank’s defense attorneys used the word “nigger” and other racist slurs dozens of times in court. His main attorney told the jury: “If you put a nigger in a hopper, he’ll drip lies.”
Leo Frank argued in court that the many black witnesses that testified against him should not be believed — simply because they were black — and that “negro testimony” — as they referred to it — was by definition inferior and unreliable. At trial Leo Frank’s attorney castigated the white jurors for even considering the testimony of the black witnesses:
“They would rather believe the negro’s word….Oh, how times have changed. I hope to God I die before they change any worse than this…”
Leo Frank’s lawyers argued to the jury of twelve white men that murder, rape, and robbery were “negro crimes” and thus Leo Frank, “a white man,” could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. One defense attorney said that “the murder was the unreasoning crime of a negro,” that “It isn’t a white man’s crime.”
Leo Frank’s own racist thinking is reflected in an Atlanta Constitution front-page headline on May 31, 1913: “Mary Phagan’s Murder Was Work of a Negro Declares Leo M. Frank.” The newspaper quoted Leo Frank:
“Here is a negro [James Conley], not alone with the shiftless and lying habits of an element of his race, that is common to the South….No white man killed Mary Phagan. It’s a negro’s crime, through and through. No man with common sense would even suspect I did it.”
Leo Frank tried to pin his crime on two innocent black men
Leo Frank’s supporters then and now have played the race card and falsely represent an African-American man as the “real killer.” For over 100 years James “Jim” Conley has been scapegoated in nearly all the literature on the case. He was a sweeper in the factory on the day of the murder who was ordered by his boss Leo Frank to help move the dead body of Mary Phagan. When James Conley confessed to his accessory-after-the-fact role, Frank and his supporters tried to pin his crime on Conley. Leo Frank’s supporters continue to this day to smear James Conley as a devious criminal who got away with murder, but Conley’s very detailed statement—corroborated by the physical evidence at the crime scene — was so convincing that it became central to the prosecution’s case. (At trial, Leo Frank refused to be cross-examined by prosecutors, but James Conley withstood 16 hours of cross-examination—under oath.)
In 1914, Leo Frank supporters tried to hire a black woman named Annie Maude Carter to slip James Conley some poison while he was in jail waiting to testify at Frank’s hearing for a new trial. She identified the would-be assassins in open court as prominent members of the Jewish community. The plot was exposed in the May 6, 1914 edition of the New York Times.
Before he accused James Conley of the crime, Leo Frank worked overtime to pin the murder on another factory employee — the African-American night watchman who found Mary Phagan’s body, Newt Lee.Leo Frank hired private detectives who planted a blood-soaked shirt in the innocent black man’s home, and then Leo Frank’s attorney hinted to the police where they might find that damning “evidence.” When the newspapers reported that a bloody shirt was found at Newt Lee’s home, it almost caused an innocent man to be lynched. Luckily for Newt Lee, Leo Frank’s private detectives did such a sloppy job at planting the shirt that the police were not fooled at all, and it only increased their suspicion of Leo Frank. That is the point when the people of Atlanta came to believe—and rightly so—that Leo Frank was the murderer of Little Mary Phagan.
Alonzo Mann — the man that is supposed to have exonerated Frank in 1982 — would have CONVICTED him in 1913.
I, Mary Phagan-Kean, examined in detail the dubious claims of Alonzo Mann, who came forward in 1982 — after 69 years of silence — to say he saw Conley with the body of Mary Phagan. It turns out that his new statements hurt Leo Frank far more than they help him.
• Alonzo Mann (who died in 1985) was Frank’s “office boy” in 1913 and from the very start he gave many conflicting stories that are irreconcilable with the known facts: In May 1913 as a young teenager, Alonzo Mann told detectives 3 different stories in 3 separate interviews and gave yet another story in his sworn testimony at trial in August. In those interviews and in his trial testimony Alonzo Mann never mentioned seeing James Conley at all on the day of the murder. At age 83, in his 1982 videotaped session before the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, he gave still more conflicting versions that contradict the testimony of Leo Frank himself!
• What motivated Alonzo Mann to break his 69-year silence on the Leo Frank case by pinning the crime on James Conley? The answer was disclosed at the videotaped private hearing in 1982: behind Alonzo Mann’s obviously scripted, wavering “testimony” was a book and movie deal executed by the Tennessean newspaper—the same Tennessean that abandoned the truth and the facts of the case and any trace of journalistic ethics just to exonerate Leo Frank. So Alonzo Mann was induced to come forward for fame and fortune.
Alonzo Mann in 1913: Tells 4 different versions, and 2 more in 1982. The Phagan family was consulted by the Board in the run-up to the 1983 pardon decision, since the surviving members of the family had a great deal of personal knowledge of and documentation about the case and would be directly and profoundly affected by any decision. It was our Little Mary who had been strangled and very likely raped, after all. And the Board denied that pardon application.
The Jewish organizations tried again in 1986, but this time the Phagan family was not consulted. They were told about the upcoming pardon decision after the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) and its well-heeled allies: Atlanta Jewish Federation and American Jewish Committee had been meeting with and lobbying the Board for six months or more. Why the secrecy? Obviously, the Jewish groups — led by Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith board member and attorney Dale Schwartz — didn’t want the victim’s family to have any say on the matter or any time to alert the public as to what was afoot.
Thus, in 1986 the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a posthumous “pardon” to Leo Frank on the basis of the state’s failure to protect him while in custody, but it did not absolve him of the crime of murdering Mary Phagan and Frank’s conviction remained intact.
The state’s 1986 “pardon” did not overturn the guilty verdict
Believe it or not, there are still documents from the Leo Frank case that are being hidden from the public because they have been classified as “GEORGIA STATE SECRETS”! Our repeated attempts to obtain them from the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles were denied again in December 2020. What could they be hiding? What could be so secret about a case that is 106 years old!? And why aren’t the media pursuing this extraordinary government action?
My book, The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is available free at: http://www.littlemaryphagan.com
Sources Banned and Censored
On the 100th Anniversary (April 26, 2013) of Mary Phagan’s rape and murder, the trial Brief of Evidence and appeals records of the Leo Frank case were digitized as well as the voluminous Atlanta newspaper reports about the crime.
These sources — and many, many more like them — used to be available on the internet until very recently. Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a balanced view of the case have been systematically removed from the internet SINCE THE Fulton County CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!
No Longer Available
- Original articles from the three major dailies covering the day-by-day progress of the case (removed from archive.org)
- Videos from YouTube that challenge the false idea that Leo Frank was “wrongly convicted.
- Official case documents like the Brief of Evidence, the appeals filings, and the published trial records have been scrubbed from the internet.
- Books that prove Leo Frank’s guilt and provide a serious case analysis have been banned and censored. My 1987 book titled The Murder of Little Mary Phagan has been removed from some websites where it was previously available for years. The Nation of Islam’s recent book Leo Frank: The Lynching of a Guilty Man has been mysteriously banned from sale on Amazon.com.
- Google searches EXCLUDE articles and documents that show evidence of Frank’s guilt.
- When we made an Open Records Request to the University of Georgia, they first said 70 records match the request. When we paid to have them mailed to us, all of a sudden, all 70 records vanished with no explanation!
Fortunately for the Fulton County Conviction Integrity Unit, the public and the media will still be able to access those critical official documents that the Leo Frank crusaders are trying to hide. We have made them available at LittleMaryPhagan.com where we believe they will be safe from the Leo Frank censors and their internet cleansing campaign.
Fulton County District Attorney, Paul Howard was defeated in the last election but the Conviction Integrity Unit he set up is still operating under the new District Attorney Fani Willis. Ms. Fani Willis might do well to ask why the original documents in the case all of a sudden have been removed from the internet, and who had the power to remove them and why. How can the case be carefully reviewed without them? Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a full and balanced view of the case have been systematically removed SINCE THE CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!!! Obviously, Truth has become offensive or objectionable and has been deemed “hate speech” in order to impose censorship. But FACTS ARE NOT HATEFUL!
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis inherited this corrupt process, but will she bow to the same pressure that was put on her former boss to exonerate a man who raped and murdered our family member?
As of today, no word from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis on whether her office will finally give long overdue justice to the victim, Mary Phagan. Can we expect that she will stand by her own words?: “Cases won’t be for sale under my administration. Not for an endorsement, not for money, not for anything.” “You have my word, during my tenure as district attorney in Fulton County, we will become a beacon for justice and ethics in Georgia and across the nation.” “[D.A.] Willis vowed to bring ‘transparency and accountability’ to the DA’s office,” reported the Atlanta Journal and Constitution.
She would be the first to do so. We’ll see.
Notes
[1] Watch this video at 1:40 mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgKcqOXyhc
[2] See https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/FINAL-Barnes.pdf
[3]https://littlemaryphagan.com/the-murder-trial-testimony-brief-of-evidence/
[4]Atlanta Journal, May 5, 1914, 2. Atlanta Constitution May 6, 1914, 1, 5. New York Times, May 6, 1914, 3.
[5]https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Steve-Oney-Says-No-New-Evidence-to-Exonerate-Leo-Frank-for-Murder-of-Little-Mary-Phagan.pdf
[end]
— 25 July 2021 $500 in cash from S in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
— 22 July 2021 40 euros, photos and note from M in France
— 21 July 2021 30 euros via PayPal from M in France
— 20 July 2021 400 Euros via PP from C in Germany
— 16 July 2021 400 euros, photos and card from M in France
–15 July 2021 400 euros via Moneygram from C in Germany
–15 July 2021 $25 via Amazon gift card from S in unknown location
— 14 July 2021 $400 via Amazon gift card from J in Nevada
–13 July 2021 two superb historical books from J in New Mexico, Stalin’s War of Extermination by Joachim Hoffmann, and Chief Culprit, by the Soviet jew and military historian Suvorov, proving that Stalin was just about to massively surprise-attack Germany, in August 1941 (despite the Berlin-Moscow Non-Aggression Pact of 1939) when Hitler Germany instead, with full justification, surprise-attacked HIM.
–13 July 2021 book from Stan Hess in Idaho Defensive Racism by the late WN lawyer Edgar Steele, who was later tragically framed for attempted murder on the word of honor of a convicted felon who had stolen thousands in silver coins FROM HIM! Then the FBI created a deep-fake audio — using tech from the Media Lab at MIT — of Steele supposedly discussing ON THE PHONE having his own wife bumped off, which his wife Cindy never believed for a second. Steele was then railroaded into prison, given “diesel-therapy” (moved around constantly from prison to prison (in a diesel-powered bus, hence “diesel therapy”) with his mail never forwarded, so he had almost no communications with his friends, supporters and family for months). He then died in prison due to the feds withholding his medications and probably despair as well. This book is superb. You can see from it why the jew-feds hated and feared him.
— 12 July 2021 100 dollars Australian [ = US$75], ltr, UFO/Annunaki info from J in Oz
— 10 July 2021 200 Euros from M in France
— 9 juillet 2021 50 Euros et cartes de S en Allemagne
–29 June 2021 200 euros and letter from M in France
— 29 June 2021 100 euros, silver bracelet for Margi, and a copy in Italian of the famous Serenity Prayer from E in Italy
The Serenity Prayer from Reinhold Niebuhr
— 28 June 2021 $23 in cash and ltr from W in Tennessee
— 25 June 2021 50 euros via PP from M in France
–24 June 2021 $190 in cash and ltr from N in Georgia
–21 June 2021 200 euros, photos from the Louvre Museum, and a kind note from M in France
–18 June 2021 150 euros, photos of the Roman arena in ancient Paris, then called “Lutetia,” and card from M in France.
–17 June 2021 200 euros, photos and card from M in France. (Lower-right: I always carry a sandwich in case I get hungry …)
— 16 June 2021 100 Australian dollars ( = $60 US) from Australian comrade P
He ends his kind letter:
TO ALL MY AMERICAN FRIENDS!
Please send John a donation — whatever you can spare.
John is doing wonderful work on the vaccine issue.
He is trying to save lives!
— 11 June 2021 $20 and note from T in New York State
— 8 June 2021 US$500 and kind note from C in North Carolina (Internet/phone cut-off notice on pink paper on the right)
— 8 June 2021 100 euros from M in France
— 4 June 2021 $300 via Amazon gift card from G in Cicero, Illinois
These Amazon gifts pay for vital things I need or that keep Margi healthy so I can do my mission without a beloved spouse who is sick and dying on me, draining me in every way.
Among them, this incredible $40 book Virus Mania:
— 4 June 2021 100 euros ( = same in dollars) and Versailles pictures from M in France
–29 May 2021 $100 via Amazon gift card from J in Nevada
–29 May 2021 $200 loan from P in Florida
.
— 28 May 2021 200 euros, photos and letters from the heroic M in France, who rightly quoted Mussolini to me: “If one cannot give his blood, at least one can give money.”
. 
.
— 24 May 2021 150 euros from M in France
.
.
— 22 May 2021 $100 via Amazon gift card from J in Nevada
.
–May 16, 2021 $300 via Amazon gift card from G in Illinois
.
— 16 May 2021 $50 via PayPal from H in Denmark
.
Kronborg Castle, Helsingfors
.
Deleted:
.
.(Not the donor) This was Povl [ = Paul] Riis-Knudsen, a very, very brave Danish national socialist whom I met several times via Matt Koehl, the then leader of the NSWPP.
.
.
For generations jewry has owned or controlled the main newspapers in Scandinavia (as well as in Holland), successfully brainwashing Germany’s neighbors and blood kindred to hate themselves, their race, all their German cousins — and obviously Hitler and his national socialists.
.
Incredibly, Denmark let SEVEN THOUSAND little German children, evacuated from East Prussia in 1945 to escape the mass murderers of the Red Army, perish of hunger and a total lack of medical care in Danish barbed-wire death camps after the war. Inconceivable with such an otherwise highly civilized and decent nordic people!
.
Anyway, Povl was a true hero to stand up for NS in a country that the Jews had taught day and night to hate our sacred cause, the true cause of the Scandinavian peoples too who now are being overrun by Muslim savages!
.
A comrade urged me to not overglorify nordic genes. Believe me, I do not. To let little children perish over the course of months over a Holocaust that the Germans never committed — and over an occupation which was a military necessity but also extremely mild — was a staggering crime against humanity and little blond Germanic children by their fellow nordics.
.
If people say, well, the Jews brainwashed the Danes, well, from 1940-45, under German occupation, they had also gotten THE TRUTH! And they rejected it! This is truly a benighted planet…
.
— 15 May 2021 Five letters containing generous donations (100 euros x 4 plus 60 euros) arrive suddenly from M in France!
. 
. 
. 
– May 14, 2021 check for $20 from M in Indiana (US)
— 11 May 2021 220 euros, letter, photos of the Paris Métro and of Freemantle in Australia
–28 April 2021 $25 Amazon gift card from T in Florida
.
A Jew talking about the Negro’s propensity for lying. Now that there is rich. You always read or hear about how rough Blacks had it during slavery but I would wager that poor White children like Mary Phagan slaving away in some pencil factory 12 or more hours a day at 12-13 years old worked harder than any Black slave in the cotton fields ever thought about working. And children and adult workers in the South made even less than their Northern counterparts in places like Chicago, Boston, etc.
So Leo Frank was accused of sexual misconduct by 20 White women. And lest we forget that MOST of the men accused in those #MeToo cases the last few years have been Jews like Matt Lauer, Weinstein, Eric Schneiderman, among others. You have to wonder how many of these Hollywood Jews like Roman Polanski, Woody Allen and others were involved in this type of deal in the past. The list would probably be mind boggling. And lest we forget that some male child actors like Corey Feldman have claimed they were abused, so it isn’t just underage girls or women.
Leo Frank? Yet another Jew who was guilty of raping a child or guilty of sexually molesting a woman or underage girl. COHENcidence? You decide.
• Replies: @Lancelot_Link
The “love” of Jews is a crime,and a sin.
• Replies: @Stan d Mute
What an anti-Semite. Away with her!
• Replies: @anonymous
IF Blacks only knew how Jews really feel about them? haha. Wasn’t it about 40% of all Jewish homes in the South owned slaves. My parents grew up in a small southwestern Georgia town and a Jew owned a local lumberyard there which employed a great deal of the working class poor, both Black and White, including some of my uncles. This greedy Jew paid next to nothing and worked the employees like dogs. This greedy Jew also owned a store there as well so the little money he dished out to these poor souls for toiling in his lumberyard went right back in his pocket when they bought groceries and other items from his store. We are talking the 1940s and 1950s in the Deep South long before Walmart, Costco, or even an A&P for small towns in the rural South.
As for this Alonzo Mann character, what kind of scumbag at 80 something years of age LIES to obtain money and attention? Bad enough if some human turd pulls this off when they are young, but you might could excuse it due to having to worry about the future, paying bills, etc., but to lie about something as serious as a murder/rape when you have one foot in the grave and are about to meet your Maker shortly? Rewind it here, young or old, there is absolutely no excuse EVER to lie about a charge this serious. This Alonzo Mann was a real turd. Pretty sure this guy had some explaining to do in the afterlife so I hope his family or Mann enjoyed the money while it lasted because it sure isn’t doing him any good where he is at now.
• Replies: @Philip Power
, @Stan d Mute
, @geokat62
“THE JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD”!
The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.
The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:
[MORE]
“THE JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time.
IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…”
The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions.
— Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson (1)
Or consider this from The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, in the entry
“PHARISEES”:
The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.
Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.
— R. Travers Herford for the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. (2)
Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein, Instructor of Talmud, and later president of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, writes:
Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew reads his prayers, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement and Passover Eve, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies.
— Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein (3)
SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”
This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:
SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
(footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”
KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood(a dildo).”
(footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.
SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?”
SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”
(footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”
Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up!
• Replies: @Tony Hall
@Trinity
THE DOGMA THAT THE BLACK IS A SLAVE BY NATURE IS RABBINIC IN ORIGIN
Canaan is identified as a black man and blacks as in inferior people, only in the Gemara, which is to say the latter part of the Talmud, the Midrash and later writings of the rabbis. This invective, this racism, is not anywhere in the bible concerning the black race.
[MORE]
The rabbinic account of the malediction against Ham stipulates that his son Canaan, and all Canaan’s offspring, are to fated to suffer perpetual slavery and black skin without the chance of their condition being ameliorated. It is this Rabbinic gloss that influenced those fifteenth century Renaissance humanists who had crossed over into the forbidden territory of the Talmud, the Midrash and the Kabbalah as part of a supposedly enlightened act. It is an irony of history that as a result of this supposedly progressive development, the abominable view of blacks as a perpetual race of slaves became entrenched among the western liberal intelligentsia for at least the next three hundred years.
MOSES MAIMONIDES
The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion refers to Moses Maimonides as “THE SYMBOL OF THE PURE AND ORTHODOX FAITH.”
The book GUIDE TO THE PERPLEXED is considered the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy:
“[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational ANIMALS. To my mind THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RANK OF MEN, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man BUT HIGHER THAN THE RANK OF APES. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OF APES.”
“Those who are incapable of attaining to supreme religious values include the BLACK coloured people and those who resemble them in their climates. Their nature is like the MUTE ANIMALS. Their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey.”
(Maimonides, Guide To The Perplexed, Translation from the Hebrew Version)
I congratulate Mary Phagan-Kean for being such a staunch defender of the truth after so many decades, and for having the immense courage to stand up to vicious and racist organisation whose business is to lie. Respect!
• Replies: @niteranger
Seems like Frank was quite the sexual predator and like many men who sexually assault children the fear of being found out left him no choice but to kill her. She was disposable and he probably thought his legal ‘Dream Team’ could pin the crime on the negro janitor.
For this scheming and refusal to face up to his guilt I am glad he was pulled from his cell and lynched- in Mary Phagan’s hometown of Marietta. Thing is I doubt he would have lasted long in prison anyway. Child rapists were likely just as unpopular amongst convicts in 1915 as they are today!
If anybody’s interested in keeping score, four of the eight members of the Conviction Integrity Unit are Tribe (Lebow, Schwartz, Schuster, Pearlberg), all with a documented past interest in exonerating the accused. The two females are both blacks who owe their judicial careers to toeing the Tribal line (i.e., not being independent-minded “wrong-thinkers” of the Cynthia McKinney variety). Old Roy is a failed one-term governor, the first Democrat to lose that office in Georgia since Reconstruction, largely due to his role in removing the Confederate battle emblem from the state flag, a noble sacrifice for which he has been lionized by the ADL, just like his long-ago predecessor Slaton. So that’s at least 7-1 in favor of exoneration.
Why is this exoneration so important to the ADL? Even with all the evidence and witness testimony, they seem incapable of accepting the fact that a member of their Tribe could ever do anything wrong. They just keep pushing and pushing, lobbying and stacking committees until they get their way.
Who appointed the members of this Conviction Integrity Unit? Sounds like a lynching of the justice system to me.
And who has been scrubbing and censoring information off the Internet? Another lynching, this time of information.
A sweet little girl was murdered over a hundred years ago, and yet to the ADL she is not important. Leo Frank is.
Thank you for the good article. I hope your family stays strong and continues fighting for the truth.
• Replies: @Colin Wright
, @Angharad
, @Mulga Mumblebrain
, @Sarah
, @Rabbitnexus
, @Deep Thought
jews are indeed the ORIGINAL DINDU NUFFINS. Blacks have nothing on the j people when it comes to lying and sexual misconduct. And some things NEVER change as I mentioned earlier about all the jewish males named in the #MeToo movement.
Timing? Well with even normies getting wise to the jews, maybe that is why a century old murder/rape case is being brought up AGAIN. Epstein, Weinstein, and Schneiderman, sounds like a damn law firm. haha. Pretty soon the criminal thugs over at the ADL will condemn accusing jewish males of raping White Gentile females an act of antisemitism that is punishable by up to 5 years in prison and/or a 25 thousand dollar fine. Think I am kidding? These freaks really think like that. The old Polish proverb about the jew crying out in pain as he strikes you is spot on. These sociopath, psychotic, perverts are demonic and sick as hell. jews and Blacks WANT to have laws criminalizing anyone who accuses jews and/or Blacks of crimes and making it illegal to not only arrest jews and Blacks, but even to suggest one of these special people are guilty of any wrongdoing. Bad thing is you have White Gentiles who adore the jew and Negro so much they are cowardly enough or stupid enough to worship these POS and grant them immunity against any criticism much less being arrested for a crime they committed.
@Thomasina
‘Why is this exoneration so important to the ADL? Even with all the evidence and witness testimony, they seem incapable of accepting the fact that a member of their Tribe could ever do anything wrong. They just keep pushing and pushing, lobbying and stacking committees until they get their way…’
It is an exasperating trait. Jews actually weaken their position with this absurd insistence on their absolute, lily-white, invariable innocence. So Leo Frank was probably guilty. So what?
The Jewish community never should have involved itself in the case in the first place, and now here they are, more than a hundred years later — digging themselves in deeper.
Even in this age of the totally-retarded #metoo and #racialreckoning, the truly-heroic Phagans don’t stand a chance. Next up: redeeming the legacies of Leopold and Loeb, and cancelling Hitchcock’s Rope.
One down.
5,999,999 “burnt offerings” to go.
@Thomasina
You’ve answered your own question in your post. Jews always blame others for the loathing and emnity they incurr. It’s always the Other Goy’s fault. JEWS REFUSE TO ACCEPT A SHRED OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR CRIMES. For their monstrous treatment of Humanity. They won’t ever even acknowledge the harm and ruin they’ve caused others, and this is what they’ve done for centuries.
@Thomasina
It is important as a symbol of Jewish inviolability, their total impunity from any judgment by any goy for any crime. Like Israel that defaecates on International Humanitarian Law to the TOTAL indifference of every Western MSM presstitute, or political scum-bag.
@Bartolo
I feel sorry for this woman and what her family has had to endure. The Jews will stop at nothing to control every aspect of society and remove anything that gets in their way whether they are documents or people. There is a reason Jews are so hated for thousands of years for this type of behavior. They will continue trying to rig the system and I wish this woman success in fighting the Criminal Empire of the Jews.
@Trinity
I’ll have you know Woody Allen is a New York jew!
How ya like them apples of god’s eye? 😉
@Philip Power
Good history lesson on an important subject. Thanks Philip Power.
Jews will win. America is ruled by paedophile and sex maniac Jews. The only way out is for Americans to muster the courage and rise up against Jews.
Mary Phagan-Kean and the rest of the Phagan clan must continue to stand tall and reject this ridiculous attempt to change a guilty verdict against a predator from over 100 years ago. We salute you and we stand with you. Who would or could be surprised that Organized Jewry in the form of the ADL and other groups would attempt to rewrite history based on a narrative created out of thin air and supported by dishonest goys greased by Jewish money. It’s the Holocaust all over again, a propaganda program that MUST succeed. Actually, the red-pilled and black-pilled should be shining a light on this silly game that they’re playing, and we should be comparing THIS travesty (the innocence of Leo Frank, brought to you by Organized Jewry) with THAT travesty (the 6 million, also brought to you by the unhinged, ethnocentric tribe).
When you hear about this in mixed company, give a hearty laugh and say with a smile: “You people want to rewrite every piece of history, really too rich! You know what I’m talking about!” Then smile!
Leo was an evil POS and he got a well-deserved lynching. End of story. That a hundred years later some Jewish organizations are trying to turn him into an innocent dindu kosher is really bizarre and speak of their own evil intent. Look, there are German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese serial killers or perverts. This doesn’t reflect on their nation at all. Most people accept that there are a few rotten apples in every nation’s cart. But these Jewish organizations can’t accept that, they see “anti-semitism” everywhere, and appear bent on defending their worst people. Will they defend Maddoff and Epstein too? Well, some gangsters and traitor spies got a hero’s welcoming in Israel, so you never know.
But what reflects badly on Jewish people is not that they have a few murderers or perverts or gangsters, all nations might have that — is that their organizations defend those evil pieces of shit.
• Replies: @dimples
If a black guy wanted to rape and strangle a young girl he would not do that in his boss’s factory. He would have ample opportunities to do that in a secured area of his neighbourhood. My opinion is the man who committed the heinous crime paid for it with his life; which is not payment enough.
Another possibility, of course, is that the lynching was faked, and that Leo Frank was actually removed from prison to be taken to a safe location with his rich peers, a la Epstein. That appears to be what some such as Mathis imply. Who knows. In any case, to defend such an unpopular and ugly character is a stupid and evil idea.
@Gaspar DeLaFunk
It is unless you are a Jew. Which makes it so disturbing to me that so many, most actually, of my fellow Northern European descended peers claim to so fervently worship the JewGod. JewGod fanatics (of exactly the same type we see today smashing Confederate statues and planting BLM signs in their yards and demanding that CRT be taught to your children) back then smashed the statues of OUR gods. They purloined our traditions, our holidays, and for the most part our values (they did instruct us to spread the other cheek).
That so many of us are incapable of noticing this, only due to the early childhood indoctrination that we all received, is incredibly important to notice in itself. This is how it’s done. They’re doing it right now to YOUR kids just like in a whiter era you were indoctrinated with the JewGod narrative of your era.
And then there are those who can see but have taken the gold or who have been “compromised”..
It’s depressing as hell to have clear vision.
• Replies: @ivan
I note that the author points out the philosemitism of the community at the time. Then as now. The negro has always been the visible irritant committing crime and being a highly visible minority. The Jewish malefactor, like the white psychopath or sociopath, blends into the background when he chooses. The evangelical JewGod worshippers were probably donating money to Frank’s B’nai B’rith before, during, and after the trial so crucial to them is the Jewish mythology and mysticism. When you literally get on your knees and pray to the Jewish Messiah, it’s hard to argue that you are anything but philosemitic even if you do think they ought to be “saved.”
Nothing has changed in the century has it?
What’s telling and important for at least some people to notice, is that there are globally powerful Jewish lobbying groups working a century later to erase just this one Jew’s crimes. Have they done this before? Tried to erase Jewish crimes from History? Were they successful? And what motivates them to try to scrub history and fabricate the lie? What other fabrication might they have foisted on us?
@Trinity
As this site’s resident Detriot ghetto honkie (and thus unfortunately all too familiar with what the “typical” negro thinks), let me say that the reverse is a far more common and prevalent sentiment. The typical negro sees the Jew as “super honkie” – that is to say that everything he hates about us regular whites is turbocharged for the Jew (and increasingly the Oriental).
There are some number of Jews who idealize the negro. Some (I’ve known them) believe that there are negro Jews and that they belong in Zion. This isn’t reciprocal.
@Thomasina
What could I add ? Nothing more, just repeating the same :
Thank you for the good article. I hope your family stays strong and continues fighting for the truth👌🤗
@Thomasina
Whatever reason the ADL want it reversed, won’t make them any more likable I bet.
I’ll warrant any motive will be for something equal to or worse than child rape and murder. I have personal knowledge of a Rabbi in the ADL, which experience only adds fuel to the fire.
Great article, Mary. Thanks!
Why are the Jews forever on the attack? The Jewish Onslaught by these fake Semites, fake victims, eternal aggressors, is becoming more and more widely known.
The take away for Christians in this case is the small hats will make the most bald faced lies about anything. Their ability to change quotes should be a warning to all of us, that the small hats have zero regard for the truth.
The Leo Frank case is a perfect way to introduce the naive to how the small hats operate.
@Stan d Mute
The JewGod – Jesus Christ, had Himself warned about Jews like Leo Frank. So there.
What really is the REAL REASON ADL & Jewish groups seek to have 100 years old conviction overturned? Is it to in defence of prominent Jew Leo Frank? Am unable to think of a rational and overriding reason why expend time, resources and underhand schemes to have Leo Frank pardoned when overwhelming evidence condemned him over 100yrs ago.
Pride of the tribe, maybe?
• Replies: @White Elephant
I grew up in Marietta and had never heard of Mary Phagan or Leo Frank until a Jewish kid whose parents recently moved to town started talking about the case and taking kids (teens) to Mary Phagan’s grave at night. Prior to that, I had unknowingly passed by the cemetery and the site of Frank’s lynching countless times without knowing. Unless it was some deep, dark secret that the elderly talked about in private (which I seriously doubt) Leo Frank was not an issue in town, and neither was anti-semitism.
The last time I went home, the local theater company was putting on a play about the framing of Leo Frank, and the lynch-site is now some sort of local landmark.
I’ve read transcripts from the trial in the past, and I think it is obvious that Frank was guilty. His wife’s refusal to be buried by his side is pretty damning, also.
It really is puzzling that the Jewish community is still so obsessed with clearing Leo Frank that the campaign has lasted over 100 years and the Frank supportes are willing to lie, slander, and bribe the whole time to clear Frank’s name. That is sick, and we are all lucky that the Phagan family is around to tell the truth.
Anyone familiar with Georgia politics knows that Roy Barnes is dishonest and no friend of Georgians. Like Slaton before him, Barnes is willing to put himself, his personal integrity, and the interests of Georgians in the hands of outside interests. Having Roy Barnes on your side doesn’t speak to the integrity or justness of your case.
• Replies: @Garliv
This, along with the holocaust, should never be forgotten nor forgiven. Whether one life is taken or six million, they all count. And the negro Judas, no doubt paid well to stand by and watch a fellow black, innocent, be accused. When looking up Howard’s name and background I see that he has some history as well.
Paul Howard, showing the world what a good ‘house nigger‘ he is and certified ‘shabbos goy‘
Leo Franks was clearly guilty of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, but you see, this just goes to show three things about the jew:
1. They WILL NOT be taken to any court and tried by a goy.
2. They steal from, rob, rape and murder any goy with impunity.
3. That they have complete control over the US and its majority goy population.
What do all the above clearly prove? They prove that the only supremacism, at play in the USA (and throughout the west) is jewish. This case should never have been revisited, let alone contemplated.
It’s interesting that this article should appear when I was doing research on the new Rothschild movie by Mel Gibson and finding clear condemnation of his ‘anti Semitism’ from the jew media. They castigated and pilloried him for his ‘Passion of the Christ’ correctly detailing the Pharisees’ murder of Christ and techincally the exoneration of Leo Franks, is no different.
In the society, controlled by the jew, he/she can do whatever they wish to the goy, because it’s permitted in their talmud. The good news is that cases, such as Leo Franks and his exoneration, continue showing the world precisely there’s only one kind of supremacism in this world.
I’m so glad they at least lynched that disgusting kike after. Back when Americans had some balls.
Good article, and bless Mary Phagan-Kean for her strenuous effort to protect the truth.
@Thomasina
THAT is really a very minor and insignificant example. To murrika, the other Asians are not important. The Japs are!
• Replies: @HdC
@Garliv
I think it’s because, they’re trying to promote that Leo Franks was found not guilty and that his subsequent lynching, immediately upon leaving the court room, was wrong, even though he should have been found guilty and publicly hanged thereafter. I also believe as well that they want to promote that no jew, should ever be tried by any goyim, regardless of his crime, as promoted in their talmud.
The jew has complete control over the goyim, courtesy of their control of the entertainment industry, along with the msm, politics and academia. They have managed to complete indoctrinate the goyim into protecting their slave masters at all costs and to see all jews as exempt from prosecution. They’re essentially creating a two class society – jews and non jews with the former having complete authority over the latter to do with as they please. The teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) now in schools and colleges, is a blatant example of this, that is the denigration of the majority into second class citizens in their own civilization. It shows the immense control that they are not only teaching this, but getting away with it. If anyone attempted to reverse the CRT teaching back on the jews and teach of the perfidy of jewry, they’d end up arrested for hate speech. They’re proving that the law is what the jews say the law is. They’re also proving Ezra Pound correct when he said:
He forgot to mention the media and entertainment, two other institutions vital to the subversion of the western civilization by the jew.
From Jesus to William of Norwich to Leo Frank, the jews have a pathological desire to absolve themselves of any guilt.
@OilcanFloyd
Just curious, why would a Jewish kid be taking other kids to Mary Phagan’s grave? And at night! Weird…
• Replies: @OilcanFloyd
@Trinity
According to the work of two prominent Jewish demographers, Ira Rosenwaike and Lee Soltow, 75% of Jewish households owned slaves in the 1830s, compared to 36% of white households.
and thus Leo Frank, “a white man,” could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. Of course , now the jew is a “GOY”…blending in for all eternity. By the way, judging by most of the comments , Uncle Adolf was right. Herr Göring , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjbsD-TYi3s I love how the conversation starts… “A RAT catcher catching rats”… How prescient of the Jew to state such a thing. He knows what his people are.
Putting Jack the Ripper in charge of investigating all the murders he has committed…
https://www.brighteon.com/61cd465e-5963-4444-baeb-476ab9a75c46
The more they probe the more Jewish pedophile and homicidal maniacs will be unearthed. When you’ve been granted unconditional impunity and allowed to escape the justice system, the more diversified and egregious your crimes, with predatory sex thrown into the mix.
@Irish Savant
I’ve worked with them in the Big Bagel, and I’m sure it’s the same elsewhere where their numbers are toxic, so you get used to the many subtle looks implying the anti-Semitic canard. “I know you’re only disagreeing with me because I’m Jewish” look. Or, “I see you’re staring at my big nose and hate me because I’m a Jew” look. In politics this is apparently subconsciously conveyed to uncritical naifs in a look or phrase that gets votes by implying, “Won’t you elect even one poor Jew this year”? For non-New Yorkers’ general edification, no non-Jewish New Yorkers put up with their shit face to face, at least no one I’ve ever known, which speaks volumes about the lickspittles the Jews place on our ballots like McConnell and McCarthy.
They do this locally in the towns their presence ruins, at least in every one I’ve lived in. I saw it in Chappaqua, NY, before moving to Connecticut to get away from them and the inevitable high taxes they bring in their wake. They’re able to turn the best family towns into hellish images of the Democratic Party because once they’ve moved in and moved on from the library committee and school board they run for elected office, always with the subtle implication that any opposition to them is anti-Semitism. “I know the only reason you don’t like me is because I’m a poor Jew” look. So, the well-meaning townspeople cave in because, after all, “We can’t have that here, now can we”?
Every major thing that’s wrong with this country can be traced to the Jews, not by my say-so, but according to the ADL and SPLC by implication of their hate lists denouncing bedrock America, such as “white patriots,” Ron Paul supporters, pro-life organizations, and especially America’s vets. You know, the white soldiers dying in the ME so good Jewish boys need not be bothered–like the former’s grandfather’s generation who, while the Jews stayed home as draft dodgers, died during WW II in the pathetic and tragic belief they were helping to save Europe’s Jews. The Jews’ ingratitude toward this country that gave them everything, including so many lives of its best young men, is stupefying in it’s psychotic hatred and matched only by the cowardice of those who serve them in Congress, the deep state, and local politics.
This was a very strange case. Everyone involved in the case with the exception of Frank and a few others was at least a twelfth cousin. While that is a very distant relation and people have millions of twelfth cousins, mathematically the odds are very heavily against everyone involved being that closely related are very high. Twelfth cousin is obviously not a relation that will put people in personal contact. But a few were as close as second or third cousins, which can be, especially the former. EP Dobbs, future Georgia Senate President and lyncher of Frank, was third cousin of Lemmie Quinn, one of the defense witnesses of Frank. Albert Guthman, a grand juror who voted to indict Frank, was openly a Jew and was second cousin of two of the defense attorneys of Frank, Herbert Haas and Leonard Haas.
I believe that there is at least reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Frank, though Jim Conley is not a plausible suspect. There was another suspect arrested by police who is more plausible in my view, James Gantt. He was reported by John Phillips, a hotel manager, to have attempted to register a room with Mary the night before, he and Mary knew each other well personally, and he had openly shown sexual and romantic interest in Mary. Frank did not know Mary well personally, even if he was lying when he claimed not to know who she was, Gantt did know her well personally. Usually in sex murders like this the victim and the murderer know each other personally.
Paul Bowen was another suspect arrested by police. He was arrested in Houston, Texas when a woman heard him talking to himself, ranting that he regretted an evil he had done. His only alibi came from family and friends. He had lots of photographs of Mary Phagan and letters that police thought might be from her to him. Paul Bowen was 3x great grandson of Captain Mordecai Abraham, who was openly a Jew. So if Bowen was involved with her killing it would support my suspicion that Frank was the fall guy for other Jews in this.
There is much more that I could say but it would make my comment too long to say more.
I know absolutely nothing about this case. I had never even heard of Leo Frank before seeing the above headline on the Unz homepage. After reading this article I went and read other articles about this murder. None of them, including this article, persuades me about the guilt of Frank one way or another, but what struck me was the tone of the Wikipedia article, which seemed determined to pin the blame on James Conley, which it all but accuses of the murder. This is in striking contrast to, for instance, the Wikipedia article on Jack the Ripper, which doesn’t try to pin the Whitechapel prostitute murders on any particular person. Since Wikipedia is, as everyone knows, a fount of truth that would never, ever, lie, I can only conjecture that in 2021 blaming a Jewish person for a crime, even if there is evidence indicating that he is guilty, is “anti Semitism”. Trying and condemning, by keyboard, a black man who isn’t alive to defend himself is preferable to that.
• Replies: @DanFromCT
, @Sir Launcelot Canning
As evidenced for all to see: killing, raping, dismembering and drinking the blood of a white, non-Jewish girl is not considered a crime to Jews. This is what they are saying. Wake up people.
A few thoughts:
1. Some of the inconsistencies in Frank’s statements that supposedly indicate guilt reflect nothing more than the fact that memory is fallible. At one point, Frank said he didn’t go to a parade because it looked like rain. At another time, he said he had work to do. Well, lots of people have multiple motives for actions. At the time, maybe he thought, “It looks like rain and I have work to do, so why don’t I stay in the office.” Later, he remembers one reason. And still later, the second reason. This is not lying. It is fallibility.
2. The same argument applies when he says he was in his office and a woman said he wasn’t. He said he may have used the bathroom. I don’t remember every time I use the bathroom. I suspect that most people don’t.
3. Frank should never have been put on trial. The key witness, Conley, changed his testimony FOUR times. In addition, he was a chronic alcoholic. Addicts and alcoholics are not reputable witnesses because alcohol depletes B vitamins, which leads to brain damage, which leads to “confabulation,” or making up things that never happened.
4. The murder notes were not only in Conley’s handwriting, they also had Conley’s speech patterns.
5. The fact that Frank and his lawyers resorted to gutter racism at a time when it was, alas, very common, is evidence of desperation, not guilt. Yes, the racism makes them look bad, but lawyers then and now use every tactic they can to sway jurors.
6. While I don’t think this article mentions it, some police reports commented on Frank’s nervousness. Well, maybe he was just a nervous guy. Maybe he had hyperthyroidism, which made him thin, made his eyes bulge, and made him appear nervous.
7. Alcoholics and other addicts are skilled liars. Conley could easily have sounded convincing to police and jurors and still be lying his head off.
BUT:
1. Frank was a sexual harasser, as the article says. Many writers tend to discount this testimony by saying the women were either manipulated into lying or , implicitly, that they were so trashy they didn’t count. When there are that many women coming forward, I am inclined to give credence to their claims.
2. Conley had a criminal record but his crimes were stupid things like barroom brawls. His criminal record did NOT include sex crimes.
3. None of the women in the factory reported sexual harassment by Conley.
4. It seems odd in the extreme that IF an African-American man had murdered a 13-year-old white girl that he would have stayed there to write TWO notes. The factory was all but empty. He could have fled. Why take the chance that someone –a night watchman, a foreman, a supervisor–would have come in and caught him with the body? Plus, Jim was an alcoholic. If robbery was a motive, he probably would have taken her pay and gone to the nearest bar.
5. I can envision Frank threatening and bribing Conley. ”
Here’smoney for whiskey. Breathe a word and I’ll say you did it. You know what lynchings are like.”• Replies: @Ron Unz
@Garliv
It is strange. There are places and graves around town that are supposedly haunted that local kids visited, but that wasn’t one of them.
The Jewish kid was friends with my older sister’s boyfriend and took them to the grave and told them about Mary Phagan being murdered. I don’t know that he put a slant on the case, but it is weird that an outsider would have introduced Mary Phagan and Leo Frank to local kids and taken them to the grave at night. I remember my sister and her friends talking about how weird it was.
@Dumbo
They won’t defend Madoff. He burned a lot of fellow Jews, the ultimate crime.
@JessicaR
There’s actually quite a lot of additional information, very strongly pointing towards Frank as the likely culprit. Here’s a link to an article I published a couple of years ago on exactly this topic:
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/#the-leo-frank-case-and-the-creation-of-the-adl
• Replies: @Paul Bustion
And the ADL continues to wage open ethnic-race war against The NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN WORKING CLASS HISTORIC MAJORITY in 2021….
The ADL wants our People fucking dead dead dead dead dead dead…
1913
1965
1967
Nov 3 2020(The ADLs nonwhite post-1965 pets nullified the Native White Working Class Vote)
@Ron Unz
There is at least reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Frank though. I believe that he should not have been convicted or lynched because of reasonable doubt. And there are suspicious circumstances in the case, the ones I mentioned in my previous comment. Given this, I think that we should not certainly conclude that Frank was guilty.
• Replies: @Ron Unz
@Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist
I can only conjecture that in 2021 blaming a Jewish person for a crime, even if there is evidence indicating that he is guilty, is “anti Semitism”.
In 2021, saying that Israel or Jews are even so much as capable of doing something wrong is “anti-Semitism.” Just ask any Republican member of Congress, he’ll gladly tell you so once his office receives his talking points back from the ADL.
What a tragedy that continues for the Phagan family. It’s the power of the Jew that keeps this story from ending. God speed to the Phagan’s and their defense of TRUTH.
Ay least the snake was lynched soon after his death sentence was commuted.
Is there a legal fund for Mary Phagan-Kean that we can donate to?
There needs to be some kind of chink in the armor of the ADL. (Besides the ongoing publication of TUR.)
It is way past time for them to receive some kind of public humiliation, even a small one.
@Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist
When I see those ads by Wikipedia begging for money I laugh.
@Deep Thought
From what I read, any such experiments were performed with convicted prisoners who were promised their freedom if they survived the experiments.
This is contrary to to the USA were medical experiment were conducted without the consent or knowledge of the subjects involved.
The victors write the (lying) history books.
@Paul Bustion
Not really. Everyone involved in the case agreed that the killer was either Frank or that black employee of his. If it had to be one or the other, the evidence suggests a 99% chance that Frank was guilty.
The theory proposed by the pro-Frank side is that the local police and judicial officials deliberately fabricated evidence to frame Frank, a wealthy local white businessman, so that they could allow a black rapist and murderer to go free in the community and presumably attack other white women and girls. If you believe this happened in the Old South a hundred years ago, you’re beyond rationality.