……MY MOST IMPORTANT ESSAY

https://johndenugent.com/psychopaths-in-power/

Here is a list of identifiers for psychopathy, compiled from several authorities. If an individual has at least any four of the below in a very pronounced form, there are grounds for concern. Many people have a touch of several of these traits, but few have a majority of them in full measure. And normal people feel shame when they act in cruel or selflish ways, whether they are upbraided by others or are stricken by pangs of conscience themselves. But the psychopath CANNOT feel a bad conscience, ever.

The signs of psychopathy are:

1. Glib and superficial charm;
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth; narcissism; seeing the self as the center of the universe; feeling no one else is human, only I;
3. Focused self-advancement without losing any energy on others except as stepping-stones;
4. No moral taboos or inhibitions as to methods, aiding career success until caught;
5. Need for constant stimulation, action, and new ways to avoid boredom; typical actions of the psychopathic child include a) torturing animals, b) the deliberate setting of fires and 3) urinating in one’s own bed (though young children may do this rarely, and accidentally, they do not do this alongside setting fires and animal torture)
6. Lying as an art form to fine-tune and a source of pride;
7. Targeting and manipulation of the gullible;
8. Enticing people they do not love to naively love them;
9. Skill at faking emotions, including love, sincerity and regret;
10. Doing good work and good deeds solely to advance oneself;
11. Ruthlessness and “stopping at nothing”;
12. Enjoyment of the power to coldly end close relationships;
13. “Getting others back” as a peak experience;
14. Desire for vengeance when spurned;
15. Pleasure in firing or ruining people. In the U.S., where highly profitable firms routinely cut good employees to boost stock values, there are professional terminators who roam the country cutting staff and personally firing them;
16. Abuse and literal torture of living creatures;
17. Humiliating others physically, verbally, emotionally, psychologically or sexually;
18. Denigrating one’s own child or mate;
19. Callousness; lack of empathy and compassion;
20. Shallow or no feelings for others, even mates, children and friends;
21. No ability to feel remorse or undergo inner repentance;
22. Regret solely at being caught, embarrassed or punished;
23. Incomprehension of the angry reactions of those they hurt;
24. Underestimation of their own anger;
25. No sense of responsibility for one’s actions;
26. Parasitical world view: living by scams and not hard work;
27. Contempt for those who “play by the rules”;
28. Criminal talent, energy and innovativeness;
29. Warlike courage far above the norm;
30. Playing on the sympathy of others. To this one might add,in the purely subjective, non-scientific eye of many beholders, a curious dead look in the eyes of a psychopath, and that is the chilling part. Others speak of looking into such eyes and having a feeling that nothing is there.

The young Tony Blair

It is instructive to check this subjective hypothesis by looking at famous persons, in still photos but especially on moving film or television. Is there a warm life form expressing itself through the eyes, or is there a flat, soulless gaze, not unlike that of a large insect or reptile?

Although the story of Don Juan conjures up for many images of the classic “Latin lover” (above), he was in fact a brutal psychopath, although a fictitious character, given life by Spanish dramatist Tirso de Molino in his play The Seducer of Seville.

The painting Stone Guest(right), by Russian artist Ilya Repin (1844-1930), is based on the Spanish legend about Don Juan. Don Juan, a heartless and immoral man of noble origin, killed in a duel the commander of Seville. A stone statue was erected on the commander’s tomb. Don Juan met Donna Anna, the widow of the commander, at the base of the tomb and seduced her. The statue moved its head in anger. Taunting the statue, Don Juan invited it to a banquet. The invitation was accepted; the stone commander came and crushed Don Juan. The popularity and longevity of the Don Juan legend is a testament to the allure many average people feel for cunning and brutal psychopaths.

https://www.rt.com/uk/328435-gchq-spies-officers-agency/

‘Secret expansion’: GCHQ may be employing ‘thousands more’ than it officially admits www.rt.com GCHQ, the Cheltenham-based spy agency, reportedly employs thousands more people than it has publicly declared. The alleged expansion comes amid growing criticism of GCHQ, MI5 and MI6, for lack of transparency.

.

Screenshot of my webcam chat with Jack and his daughter Alexa

The woglet, says the Matt Tait-run wolfpack

The New Face of British Nationalism is Jewish

Destroy Zionism
February 28, 2014

The Telegraph says that “British nationalism has got itself a brand new face” “ Jack Buckby:

Jacks says that last July, just before starting a course at Liverpool University, he became enraptured by the idea of “culturalism.” Absolutely, definitely not fascism (his website’s slogan reads, “Love Culture, Hate Racism”), culturalism is a non-racial philosophy

Buckby says that “I heavily oppose Nazism and I heavily oppose fascism.”

Vice calls Buckby “the boy wonder of the British far right”.

In an interview, he even compares “Nazis” to “rapist sympathisers” and “paedophile supporters”.

He rejects anti-Semitism, but complains about Muslims. Only “loonies” and “conspiracy theorists” have anything against Jews, according to Buckby.

Buckby is a supporter of Israel:

. . . certainly, the BNP’s take on Israel and Zionism are not only unpleasant, but entirely laughable. This is a party that represents ignorance and conspiracy theorists with regards to Jewish people establishing a homeland. Would you believe that it is not difficult to find people in that party who believe there is a global Zionist conspiracy to take over/control the world and kill the white man? I kid you not.

On his Twitter, Buckby says that “It [Culturism] recognises that a people make a culture, but also accepts it is possible for some foreign people to embrace a non-native culture.”

Conveniently then, his ideology is one that places itself on the radical right, but which embraces or at least does not exclude Jews. This all sounds very familiar.

What could motivate Buckby? It is already well known among British nationalists that Buckby has Jewish ancestry. Buckby’s Jewish grandfather was in the Auschwitz labor camp.

Is this just a coincidence? Here we have a person who on one hand has clear Jewish ancestry and is very well aware of it, and on the other hand he supports Israel and Zionism, rejects anti-Semitism, dismisses “Nazis” as “loony conspiracy theorists” and tries to peddle an ideology which, because it emphasizes “culture” (actually a liberal distortion of Western culture) over ethnicity or race, does not exclude Jews.

Are we just “loony conspiracy theorists” to see a connection between these facts?

….an honest Jew and Adolf Hitler both agree on Jewish tactics