My dear friend Vincent Reynouard explains (English subtitles) why the Holocaust is killing us and how the Germans of 1933-45 who knew the TRUTH were forced into silence as this Mega-Lie was deployed.
Reynouard, an engineer, teacher and son of a rich doctor, has now been sentenced three times to prison for Holocaust exposés, and has fled to a foreign country, not5 French-speaking btw, nearly broke, and losing both his first wife and contact with his eight kids, and now also the contact with his second wife and their little daughter. This video was made UNDERGROUND.
Révisionnisme les raisons du silence en Allemagne
DOTSUB.COM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PEPGhm9Gtw
OR
OR
Revisionism: The Reasons for Germany’s Silence
VINCENT REYNOUARD EDITORIALS Revisionism: Why this silence in Germany? A subscriber asked me: “Why since 1945 do the German people and their leaders – theones most concerned by these official lies – keep silence and are not the first to defend the historical reality and thus their lost honor?”
.
This question is important because one of the invoked arguments to reject –without examination — revisionist theses says that if revisionists were right many Germans would rise in large numbers in support.
.
So why is there this silence in Germany? A silence that has been going on since 1945.
.
Several reasons:
.
Propagande and denazification In 1945, Germany surrendered without conditions and the defeated regime was immediately swept away with the arrests of all its leaders.
.
.
British shabbaz goyim arrest Wehrmacht chief Jodl, armaments minister Speer, and Reich president Doenitz in Flensburg in 1945
Now in possession of the country, the victors had in hand all the means of action which allowed them to organize a broad operation of propaganda and denazification to inflict arrests, trials and sentences.
.
In such an atmosphere, those who wanted to publicly defend the country’s honor, not only couldn’t, but didn’t dare to, fearing imprisonment and awaiting the worst.
.
.
Paradoxically the only ones who dared to speak were those who were interviewed as part of the investigations before the so-called Nuremberg trial of war criminals. But they were statements made in the secret of a magistrate’s office. To discover them one has to dig into the archives. You can discover, for example, this woman’s statement who, during the war, worked as a housekeeper at a high officer’s home next to Dachau camp.
.
She assured that even in 1944, whereas restrictions worsened, the camp’s prisoners who worked outside received a second breakfast at 10 a.m. consisting of 200 gr of bread (a half-pound) and 100 to 150 gr (4-5 ounces) of sausage. She added that during winter the prisoners were not poorly clothed… they didn’t have to freeze… and that she never noticed any ill-treatment.
She also said that some prisoners were employed to clean her employer’s garden. They were considered as part of the household, ate with the family, and talked and played with the children. One of the prisoners was even called ”Uncle” by the children.
.
Again in Dachau:
This head of the Allach Command specified that prisoners were treated as civilian workers and they received food supplements in the form of bread, sausage, lard, cheese, milk, fruits, spices, tea and mineral water.
.
On January14, 1947, during the investigation before the trial of the Oskar POHL SS unit, this German told how — once informed of the terrible conditions at the Dora camp, under construction at the time — the Camp Administration had immediately responded by sending trucks of food, drugs and hygienic materials.
.
On his side, a company manager who employed deportees emphasized that they not only received coupons that allowed them to buy things at the canteen, but also work clothes, shoes and coats, food supplements, vegetables and potatoes, tobacco, cigarettes and chewing tobacco.
.
During the so-called ”Nazi Doctors” investigation trial, a colleague heard a witness stress that in the final period of the war, camps had received twice as many vaccines against typhoid as the Waffen SS.
.
On May 14th 1947, this German citizen, who worked at the office to provide clothing, revealed that once the supply shortage occurred, clothing was stolen from the Waffen SS to be given to camp prisoners, which was a blatant violation of the regulations.
.
.
.
Auschwitz inmates, well-fed by the Germans, talk to Soviet troops in January 1945
.
These actions also caused incidents. A camp prisoner who had found — in one of the pockets of the clothing he had been given -.- a letter from the donor, had written a card to the donor to thank her.
.
But the woman then complained to the authorities, claiming that she gave these clothes to benefit a soldier, not a prisoner. (The case was fortunately not followed up.) Nuremberg archives contain many documents relating to such anecdotes. But they were never published.
.
And in the post-war atmosphere, the authors of these stories never repeated them publicly. As those who were lucky enough to escape the Allies’ judicial machinery had only one thought: to be forgotten.
.
This is why a man like Adolf Eichmann, who was perfectly informed on the true story about the ”final solution,” never stood up to proclaim the truth to the world. He managed to flee and, knowing that he was hunted, he was hiding and was silent. Once he was arrested and sent to Israel for his trial, he adopted a so-called collusion defense, hoping to save his life.
.
.
One could say, since he knew he was doomed, he could have told the truth anyway. Such a typical response of the person who doesn’t know what it’s like to be caught up in the judicial machinery. We then cling to any hope, however small, or illusory.
.
Besides, if he had told the truth, the hearing would have been interrupted and in the following days he would have been reportedly found suicided in his cell.
.
About Eichmann, I have discovered in the Nuremberg archives some very interesting documents.
.
This is the transcript interview which took place on June 11th 1946 under the victor’s eyes between the SS lawyer and Eberhard von Thadden. During the war he was working for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a division which dealt with the Jewish Question.
.
.
As such, he had often met with Eichmann.
.
.
During interrogation he said that Eichmann had rejected all the propaganda rumors on an alleged extermination of the Jews. He explained that Germany was in such need of workforce for the war effort that it would have been senseless to exterminate the Jews. On the contrary, those who worked received proper food.
.
Then von Thadden asked him why children and elderly were also deported since they couldn’t work. Eichmann answered that the Reich Führer had ordered that no family should be separated. For separation brought about a decline in the efficiency of the one who was able to work. For that reason, all the Jewish work camps in the East were established as family camps.
.
.
Some will shout that it is a lie. But it is consistent with what the Soviet accusation declared on February 8th 1946 in Nuremberg. The Russian prosecutor said:
.
”The special investigation led by the Special State Committee of the Soviet Union established that at the front, beside their first line of defense, the Germans systematically created special concentration camps in which tena of thousand of children, women and elderly who were not able to work were inrterned. The outskirts of those camps were mined.”
.
Were they not those Jews that the Germans had deported to the East with all their families to park them in the work camps and that they had to abandon at the time they had to retreat?
.
Why, later on, did not von Thadden reveal to the world all what he knew about the Jewish Question, and notably about what Eichmann had constantly told him?
.
Simply because he feared the “justice system” of his country.
.
Hungarian patriots Laszlo Endre and Laszlo Baky, garroted (slow strangling by suspension) by Jews in Budapest, March 29, 1946
.
.
In 1950,von Thadden narrowly escaped its clutches when the charges against him were dropped. But a few years later, problems resumed again. Only his fatal car accident in 1958 ended the prosecution. But that is what prevented him from going on trial. Von Thadden is the perfect example of the man who knew a lot but who, for fear of the “justice system,” kept his mouth shut.
.
I would mention also Walter Dejako and Fritz Hertl, two architect engineers who were responsible for the construction of the Birkenau crematorium.
.
After the war, they were careful not to shout loudly the truth. Caught all the same by the judiciary, in 1972 they were brought to trial,a trial that ended in acquittal. But even after that, they chose to be forgotten.
.
Walter Dejako died in 1978 and in July of the same year Professor Faurisson went to see Fritz Hertl. He wanted to obtain information about the crematorium designs that he had discovered earlier in the archives of Auschwitz’s Museum.
.
.
Twelves years later, Professor Faurisson wrote: ”I met an old man distraught at the prospect of having troubles again. He obstinately refused to give me any information, but he said all the same that he had, for his part, never noticed any gas chambers in Auschwitz or in Birkenau.”
.
As we can see, even decades later, fear suffice to close many mouths. ‘were the Germans ”the first ones concerned”?
.
But the fear of their judiciary — or more generally, fear of all sorts of problems — is not the only reason.
.
You are surprised, dear subscriber, that the first ones affected by the official lies do no react. Your surprise is understandable but did it not occurr to you that most of the Germans would not be the first ones concerned?
.
One day, a student to whom I gave private lessons told me that during renovations around his house in Normandy the workers had recovered Nazi bullets. In fact, they were German bullets from the Second World War. But my young student’s words made me meditate at length. And I understood. Since 1945, National Socialism is seen as a dark block of suffering, violence and death. National Socialism is like, in the movie “Hellraiser” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellraiser) the eruption of hell on Earth. Hell with its share of agony. We deduce that National Socialism is not human. It is evil. Therefore, the Third Reich is a Germany possessed by the hitlerian demon. Except it is well known that the possessed is not himself any more. While it retains the same human appearance, he is only the tool of the demon.
.
Video game for teenagers; Latina with sword kills blond Nazi vampires
.
.
From that moment, National Socialist Germany could still have the appearance of Germany with its inhabitants and its landscapes, but it was not Germany anymore; it was the Reich haunted by the dictator Hitler.
.
In 1945, denazification was just an “exorcism” on a national scale. They had to take the Nazi demon out of Germany’s body. And the Allies did it. For many Germans, thus, it is not Germany that lost its honor; it is the National Socialist Reich.
.
This nuance is crucial. For these democrats, the Germans’ honor is to have been reinstated in the community of so-called civilized nations.
.
So don’t go talk to them about revisionism. This is not their concern. Because they feel, with regard to the Third Reich, as parents feel about a daughter who became possessed by a demon.
.
And the other Germans? Although all Germans are not like that, some know that National Socialism is far from this propaganda caricature.
.
But paradoxically, their goal is the same.
.
Oh, after several years of purgatory, they say, and a good anti-national socialist therapy, we have at least been “reintegrated into the community of nations.” It was unexpected, therefore we must not squander this chance.
.
And if you insist, they will answer: of course not everything was negative in National Socialism. Of course the victors’ propaganda was exaggerated, but what do you want? The fate of arms was against us.
.
And to reintegrate in the community of nations we had to accept those lies. National Socialism died in 1945, and nothing will revive it.
.
Zeppelin field, Nuremberg; the Führer speaks at night
.
.
Fascinating video on Nuremberg then and now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXA7tAZfTfA :
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXA7tAZfTfA
.
Therefore let’s look ahead and not behind. It will avoid many problems for us. We finally find out that moral utility which consists in favoring whatever is advantageous, regardless of truth or justice. Does this leave the field open to liars? Maybe. Is it unfair? Yes, maybe. But at least we can enjoy life without fearing problems.
.
Fear of problems– and the desire to live in peace. These are the two pillars that support the lie. No need to go look any further, for the entire explanation is right here.
.
Yes, you would say, but this fear is aroused by repressive laws. And in France the revisionist law was imposed by the action of the Jews, led by Laurent Fabius. This is not really the Gayssot law [Gayssot was some communist deputy in the National Assembly; Fabius was and is a wealthy and powerful Jewish politican and later prime minister]; this is the Fabius-Gayssot law !
.
Maybe. So what can we do ? Yell ”Death to the Jews”? Accuse them all day long? I suggest you something better.
.
As Lanzadel Vasto wrote: It is by all means allowed to every honest man to have us beaten or throw to jail as much as possible in large numbers and all together. Criminal law is based on fear of punishment. It is equipped for the prosecution of people hiding and fleeing. Against those who rush to the front of thugs, jailers and executioners she is taken aback and confused. Full prisons will have to be opened… I have showed the way, but I remain alone, desperately alone, much like Horst Mahler in Germany and others elsewhere.
.
However, if tomorrow we were 300, 600 even 1,000 to openly defy each on our side the Gayssot law, if we went to each others’ trials in a compact group, not to play the justice game and defend ourselves, but to be there and take this opportunity to calmly pass out fliers that present revisionist arguments.
.
Do you believe that the case would go unnoticed? I am told that I am wrong. That people are not responsible for their misfortune, but that they are asleep and fooled by television. OK. Well, then let’s wake them up, undeceive them by a manly and courageous action. Let’s plan something with the help of social networks. Are you ready to attempt the adventure?
.
Then send me an email. When I get 300, we will plan something. Some will probably saythat it is foolish. I will oppose them the antisemitic Edouard Drumont, who in a book reminded us that the characteristic of the insurgent is to embark on the unknown, to violently force the hand of destiny, and by the mere fact of his will, by the extraordinary power given to him by the sacrifice he made in advance of his life, to compel Destiny to give birth.
.
The insurgent basically never knows what will happen as a result of what he does, but he knows that something will happen.
.
He has produced action and this action creates movements, currents, and changes circumstances and people, creating disorders which would have remained dormant without this shake-up.
.
Are you ready to attempt this adventure with me? I am waiting for you. Good night. Do you like our videos? then help us to continue. Give for the cause.
…..Donate for Vincent Reynouard
Just write me: “FOR VR” I promise that he will get your donation via channels.
I and Margi have known VR since February 2007 when he was in exile in Belgium and we spent three days with this hospitable and lovable comrade at his apartment, meeting his then wife and seeing him enjoy being a father to his eight children.
Azelée Reynouard; a photo I took
Margi collected his fabulous work “in defense of the Gestapo” and gave major radio interviews and article about it.
Saturday Afternoon: Conversation with Margaret Huffstickler about Lies and Those Who Tell Them
Feb. 15, 2015
Margaret Huffstickler joins me again to discuss the extent and nature of the LIES we loyal White have to deal with on a regular basis. Our topics ranged from Hollywood movies to Internet gossip on Facebook, and much in between.
- The latest big Hollywood propaganda film, The Monuments Men, is a distortion about Adolf Hitler planning to either own or destroy all the greatest art treasures in the world;
- Lies and misunderstanding about the Gestapo, and how/why it was created, are dispelled by Margaret in her article from Vincent Reynouard’s research in the Jan-Feb 2012 issue of The Barnes Review;
The Heretics’ Hour: Exposing Gestapo Legends
Feb. 24, 2014
Margaret Huffstickler guides us through more of the research by Vincent Reynouard, this time on the Gestapo in occupied France.
- Even the Nuremberg Tribunal in 1946 could not find any grounds to declare the Gestapo a “criminal organization” until Sept. 1939;
- In the German-occupied territories everything was blamed on the Gestapo, as if they were omnipotent, yet there were only 160 Gestapo personnel (of all types) in France;
- Reinhard Heydrich ordered that torture could not be used to obtain confessions, and only the more mild forms to gain vital, life-saving information;
- Not one single German order for torture has ever been produced;
- The war against Germany conducted by the Allies was a war of extermination from the beginning, and that was also the purpose of the “Unconditional Surrender” demand;
- The Gestapo behavior toward women and girls was always correct “ notwithstanding the pornographic books, comics and images flooding the marketplace, specialized in mostly by Jews.
- The Barnes Review revisionist magazine “half-price subscription” special: $23 for one year (6 issues), call 1-877-773-9077.
Category
Financial transaction certified by Stripe.com and SSL certificate. Pls donate $5 or more. Thank you!
[spt_paybutton text=”Donate Now” comment=”false” service=”false” amount=”5.00″ design=”40″ lightbox=”true”]
I KNOW A FANTASTIC PRO-DISSIDENT WEBMASTER & WEBHOST IF YOU NEED ONE AND CAN PAY A REASONABLE $100/MONTH — BACKUPS; ANTIVIRUS; FAST PAGE OPENING; SEARCH ENGINE RANKING; YOU NAME IT. Write me if interested.
This log is to confirm to those who send me useful items “cash, valuable coins, checks
, money orders, books or other gifts ” that I did receive them. (I formerly listed all donations by amount, but this has proven unwise for a number of reasons, and I changed my policy in March of 2015.)
If you sent a donation and I did not get it, please let me know at the email address john_denugent@yahoo.com, at thejohndenugent@gmail.com, or by calling me at (906) 884-6689, or writing me (see below) on Skype or Facebook!
John de Nugent
306 S. Steel Street
Ontanagon MI 49953
(906) 884-6689 
Facebook: John D. Nugent
Skype: John de Nugent (Ontonagon)
JOHN_DENUGENT@YAHOO.COM
THEJOHNDENUGENT@GMAIL.COM
Twitter at John de Nugent @johndenugentESA
….HEROES ACT WHEN MUSLIM KILLER PULLS OUT KALASHNIKOV
Muslim bastard with Kalashnikov tries to slaughter whites on French train; American airman and others heroically charge him:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3206426/U-S-Marines-armed-gunman-onboard-high-speed-train-Amsterdam-Paris.html [stupid link name; no Marines were involved]
Spencer Stone, who is part of the U.S. Air Force, spotted the 26-year-old Moroccan acting suspiciously and took him down with the help of two friends before he…
DAILYMAIL.CO.UK
Leave a Reply