Weepy, hanky-out Ford testifies against Kavanaugh; George Washington fiercely against all factions and political parties

Watching this Dr Ford testify against Brett Kavanaugh over his supposed attempt to rape her….

As a survivor myself, and an expert on Republican pedophiles and rapists, I am the last one to dismiss her out of hand, even though 1) she offers no proof, 2) she is a committed Demoncrat, and 3) the Deep State is clearly using her to “get” Kavanaugh so as to stop or even impeach and remove Donald Trump from the presidency.

….However, my first reaction is that she really has her hanky out here, she is hyping it, she is overtly acting and playing for pity. Her voice as a professional woman with a PhD in her late 40s is just too quavery, too little-girly, too consciously pitiful, and putting on a poor-little-me demeanor that is over-the-top.

Is she telling the truth? Not sure.

I will also watch, as a former interrogator myself, Judge Brett Kavanaugh testify. (Update: I found him convincing.)
2
4
LIVE http://www.wfae.org/post/watch-live-kavanaugh-ford-testify-about-sexual-assault-allegation-0#stream/0

Watch Live: Kavanaugh, Ford Testify About Sexual Assault Allegation
www.wfae.org
1

PT Morelli
Exactly!!! She is appealing to emotions and the court of public opinion is catching on to that about her.
2

John De-Nugent to PT
PT, we are seeing how partisan politics, which led our main Founding Father, There are very good reasons for having proper procedure and rules of evidence, which were developed over centuries.

Otherwise, anyone can just cut some onions up, get all teary, go out on camera, and destroy anyone!, to repeatedly denounce the existence of any and all political parties, which he also called factions, as a threat to the nation, is splitting this country in two, rival, and warring camps, where we end up HATING and attacking EACH other (while the jew rubs his hands in glee).

*** (from Washington’s 1796 “Farewell Address”: https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=15&page=transcript

One of the expedients of party to acquire influence within particular districts is to misrepresent the opinions and aims of other districts. You cannot shield yourselves too much against the jealousies and heartburnings which spring from these misrepresentations; they tend to render alien to each other those who ought to be bound together by fraternal affection.

[…]

All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.

However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.

[…]

I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

[…]

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

[…]

A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

[…]

Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

***

The Demoncrats WANT to believe this Ford, the Republicraps WANT to believe Kavanaugh.

As a survivor, I am for the truth coming out about VIP rapists and pedophiles. But as a man, I fear for a country where a woman can pop up, get weepy, and destroy a man 36 years later with no proof.

With Harvey Weinstein and the vile, secretly white-hating Bill Cosby [photos] whom I never, ever liked, there were dozens of other women corroborating the story.

Almost all the cowardly monster Cosby’s rape-drug victims were white.

There are very good reasons for having proper procedure and rules of evidence, which were developed over centuries.

Otherwise, anyone can just cut some onions up, get all teary, go out on camera, and destroy anyone!

.

……When I abolished political parties

In the 24 March 1933 Law for the Protection of Folk and Reich, also called the Enabling Act (das Ermächtigungsgesetz),  the German people, through their votes for my political organization, the National Socialist German Workers, and through their parliament, voted me the emergency powers which I openly, frankly, and repeatedly requested in the course of hundreds of speeches in 1920-32 in order to save a dying country.

When I came to power, Germany had undergone four years of World War One, two million dead, millions more crippled in body and mind,

 

.

…and perpetual hunger and malnutrition for the old, and children, due to a total British naval blockade on food from 1914-1919, five years of hunger.

Then followed 13 years of absolute political chaos under a multi-party democracy, culminating in the Great Depression, in even worse starvation…

…. joblessness, bread and soup lines… 

.

…the collapse of the family and morality, a national wave of suicides (with women jumping with their children into rivers, men shooting themselves and stepping in front of trains and streetcars), and the terrifying rise of the Communist Party of Germany to the Number-Two position under Ernst Thälmann.

This was a psychopathic thug who took his orders from Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, who had already murdered, next door to Germany, 15 million people. 

  

It was because of the spiritual primitiveness of people, and their own egotistical squabbling, all exploited BY THE JEW, and not because dictatorship is desirable, that it was necessary to put an end to the squabbling that was destroying a great nation.

And the German people WANTED me to end the chaos of fake democracy!

It was by terminating these factions, these parties and the influence of the divide-and-conquer Jews who financed them, that I united my nation and thereby saved my country.

Does an ER physician, with a dying patient on the table, and his blood pressure dropping and the heartbeat fading, call, every 60 seconds, for a vote by the nurses, anesthesiologists and tirage nurses out in the lobby, and the janitors, on where I should cut next? 😉

Until the people are no longer spiritually primitive, and ruled by their ego — and healing this is now my paramount goal —  then a temporary dictatorship, voted for by the people themselves, just as in Ancient Rome — is a necessary evil when a nation, a society, a people are dying, and men, women and children by the millions are faced with misery, slavery and death.

.

.

As I said in 1932,

“German people, just give me four years time, and you will not recognize your country!”

.

.

.

…..See also

 

George Washington on black slaves