When “freedom” means the jews cause chaos, division and anarchy among us, leading to a full-on, jewish-run police state; spiritual reading

Spread the love

The German people, educated and united by national socialism, came to understand the mortal threat jewry posed to their survival and also to play as a united team. We are now in a merciless race war that will lead to either Aryan victory or to jewish bolshevism and white genocide — you decide. But in a war, you MUST give up certain precious and normally desirable freedoms, accepting that everyone must obey orders to win the war — or you will lose:

lose your entire country,

forfeit ALL your freedoms —

and finally they will lock you up and take your life. 

.

“Victory or bolshevism”

In March 1938, I met at the Reich Chancellery in Berlin with the former US president Herbert Hoover, a decent, though naive man: of German ancestry, a great engineer, and the person who,  after WWI, organized massive food shipments from America to avoid a famine for European civilians and later on, he did the same thing after WWII as well. For these great achievements, which saved millions of white lives, Herbert Hoover was nominated in 1964 for the Nobel Peace Prize, and he would have gotten it, had he not died that year.

President Hoover and I discussed Germany’s spectacular progress in getting out of the Great Depression, which had not only plunged millions of Germans and Americans into hunger and despair, but had also ruined his own presidency and thwarted his re-election.

But Hoover, a good and decent American, objected that the US Constitution and Bill of Rights precluded America from using my methods, which were effective but frankly, openly authoritarian without any subterfuge or apology. I said to the German people in 1932 and to the German parliament, the Reichstag, in 1933:

“Give me four years time” — to do as I wish, meaning with full emergency powers to carry out my plans, “and you will not recognize the country.”

From poverty we went to prosperity, from weakness to strength, and from misery and suicide to happiness and joy. Because the German people knowingly and deliberately gave me full emergency powers under the Ermächtigungsgesetz (Enabling Act) of 23 March 1933 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933), we became

THE ONLY HAPPY PEOPLE ON EARTH AND IN HISTORY

.

 

And what meaning does “freedom” REALLY have when you cannot walk down the street in your own town without being bullied, mocked, beaten, raped or murdered?

We ENDED street crime!

I am definitely not advocating a return to monarchy, merely relaying the sober, practical, hard-nosed reasoning behind it. ALL the germanic and keltic peoples had kings for three thousand years.

.

A comrade and donor who cherishes the old American Revolutionary ideal of freedom wrote me:

***

Happiness is having a good dictator/ruler?

In that case, I would rather not be happy, for I need to be free.

  • I fully understand. And we all want freedom to speak and do as we please.

    Anyone who has ever worked under a tyrannical boss, or lived with a tyrannical spouse (male or female), knows it can make you miserable, and even, as medical statistics show, take literally years off your life.

    (A large reason for bars is husbands fleeing nagging and disagreeable wives, though the wife may have her own complaints as well.)

    If you dread going to work every day, or coming home from the office or factory to a nasty spouse, and then seethe all day or night long under some mean and sarcastic boss or spouse, it will slowly weaken your heart, give you high blood pressure, and eventually kill you.

    Women in the workplace have faced for years as well the serious problem of bosses taking sexual advantage of them, knowing they absolutely need to keep their job to feed their children or to keep a career going that they worked very hard to build up.

    Harvey Weinstein, now doing 23 years in prison, in 1991 with Welsh actress Catherine Zeta-Jones

    And every time they see the bastard who forced them to submit to unwanted sex, the humiliation enrages them. It corrodes your soul and body to live for months or years in fear and anger.

    So a certain reasonable amount of freedom and respect is a natural human need and desire.

    And that need includes your boss speaking with respect to you, if you are a good worker, and treating you right, and not being a “toxic boss.”

    The true goal I have for the white race is a genuinely spiritual, genuinely educated people who can handle freedom.

    As for our freedom now, we have almost none. IF one is retired and on social security, and your kids have grown up and left, fine — you won’t starve.

    BUT if you are working, raising a family, and paying a mortgage, then just say one wrong word, Kendra, especially on a major platform, and you will be fired immediately, and your career will end, making you destitute.

    You are free to say the truth just one time.

    A Florida acquaintance/friend who worked for a major airline was fired for a private text message he sent a coworker while off-duty, and on the weekend.

    He had had a perfect work record for THIRTY-TWO YEARS.

    This text message, where he used the n-word in private to another coworker, was in response to a black co-worker who, hating Trump and therefore hating this co-worker as well, created and texted to HIM a nasty graphic of the white man’s dog being burned alive on a barbecue rotisserie, over an open fire.

    This was sick, scary and an act of mental terrorism. “This is me, yyour co-worker, burning your dog alive.”

    And who got fired? The white victim did!

    Dr Joseph Goebbels addressed the issue of freedom in his magisterial The Law of War. (See below.)

    He points out that, sure, we had all kinds of freedom, even anarchy, during the Weimar Republic years. You could lie, steal, loaf, live off others, break promises, squabble, infight, slander and defame everyone. And everyone in Germany was at everyone else’s throat.

    Given this chaos, Germany was an economic and military nothing. It was forced to sign the Versailles Treaty and had no military with which to say no to an Allied sentence of eternal poverty, impotence, division, feuding and anarchy.

    When Hitler came to power, Germany did indeed restrict certain political freedoms, because the Germans had squabbled for 13 years straight under Weimar, to the delight of their enemies, and in return for losing some political freedoms, Germany became incredibly unified, and then powerful again — economically, militarily, scientifically, culturally and politically. Germany became a great and happy nation again.

    Germany was FREE as a nation, externally, by its citizens giving up certain precious liberties INTERNALLY.

    But as long as the earthlings remain unspiritual and egoic, then they will continue to gouge each other’s eyes out.

    Do you know why the Romans gave up their republic? Fifty-six straight years of civil war, Romans idiotically killing other Romans!

    And thus what the Romanian rightist Codreanu said remains true:

    Democracy is not really freedom; it the jews using the media and political parties to divide and conquer us.

    It is white people being conquered.

    And we see this every day.

    I did a series of interviews this spring with revisionist Jim Rizoli and recounted my decades of sometimes appalling experiences with white nationalists and revisionists, and it was the same thing:  jealousy, envy, backstabbing, cooperating with the feds against another comrade  or to escape prison time, infighting, slander, defamation, outright lies, and hating each other.

….Lessons from “The Law of War”

An always generous German comrade sent me a copy of the very final book by Dr.  Joseph Goebbels, The Law of War.
It was essays he wrote in the final war year. Goebbels never saw the book itself. A bomb apparently hit the Franz Eher Verlag printing shop in April 1945 in Berlin.
It is about how war tests and matures a nation. Really great stuff….
“The Law of War. The never-published book by Dr Joseph Goebbels” 
 It seems so far worth translating. I am on page 73 out of 181. Goebbels also goes frankly into how democracy means, yes, freedom, including also freedom to harm others, spread rumors, waste time and sitr up trouble… thus causing disunity, infighting and defeat. NS means less freedom within, but yields unity and thus victory and the survival of the race and nation.
…a Germany powerful and therefore free to act out in the world — due to deciding after the terrible anarchy and weakness of the Weimar Republic to have less freedom at home….
And also he writes about how, in actual wartime, the bombastic people, the big talkers, can turn out to be utter cowards, and yet very quiet ones, the pluggers, sometimes surprise us and do the really heroic feats.
Still waters run deep.

This is a totally new edition from 2019 by a new German publishing house (“Der Schelm” = “The Rascal” — https://derschelm.com/) that specializes in classic NS books.

And they seem to not get overly hounded because the Jews and their goy lackeys understand with great relief that, except for one white man in a thousand, a Rockwell type, reading old books, or any books at all, however stunning their message, absolutely will not, by itself, lead to action.

I want to say some nice words now about Dr. Goebbels, the little doctor, as many called him. He was in fact a doctor of philosophy, a PhD.

He was also a little guy, dark, and vaguely Egyptian-looking, which maybe was due to the fact that the Roman Empire had once controlled the Rhineland part of Germany where he grew up, 2,000 years before, and it also ruled Egypt (think Antony and Cleopatra 😉 )….so maybe, maybe this feisty little guy had some Egyptian ancestors.

With me, others, and a winsome German actress at Bayreuth for Wagner music

But he sure was full of faith and courage. He marched right into communist-dominated, violent and dangerous Berlin for me and converted it to National Socialism. Imagine going into Boston or San Francisco and doing that! It was that unfriendly a terrain.

And while he WAS a womanizer, and an adulterer, for which I ripped him a new one in 1938, when the accurate rumors began causing a scandal, the truth is that his wife, Magda Goebbels, was in love with me, not him.

But since I felt in my bones that I had to be a full-time leader, given the gigantic, inevitable Jewish and Allied threat, and not slide into the time-devouring burdens of being a GOOD husband and GOOD father, Magda married Goebbels, really to be around me.

Goebbels was no angel, but he was a man of deep love for our race…. and wherever he is now, I give him (and Himmler, too) credit for magnificent work for our people.

What a speaker, too…..As I said, you cannot set others on fire unless you burn with passion yourself.

Highlights from his total war speech soon after Stalingrad:

Do You Want to Wage Total War?

Full, translated transcript of Joseph Goebbels’ “Do You Want to Wage  Total War?” speech, delivered in the Sports Palace in Berlin, Germany on February 18, 1943.

***

Only three weeks ago I stood in this place to read the Führer’s proclamation on the 10th anniversary of the seizure of power, and to speak to you and to the German people.

The crisis we now face on the Eastern Front was at its height. In the midst of the hard misfortunes the nation faced in the battle on the Volga, we gathered together in a mass meeting on the 30th of January to display our unity, our unanimity and our strong will to overcome the difficulties we faced in the fourth year of the war.

It was a moving experience for me, and probably also for all of you, to be bound by radio with the last heroic fighters in Stalingrad during our powerful meeting here in the Sport Palace. They radioed to us that they had heard the Führer’s proclamation, and perhaps for the last time in their lives joined us in raising their hands to sing the national anthems.
What an example German soldiers have set in this great age! And what an obligation it puts on us all, particularly the entire German homeland! Stalingrad was and is fate’s great alarm call to the German nation! A nation that has the strength to survive and overcome such a disaster, even to draw from it additional strength, is unbeatable. In my speech to you and the German people, I shall remember the heroes of Stalingrad, who put me and all of us under a deep obligation.

I do not know how many millions of people are listening to me over the radio tonight, at home and at the front. I want to speak to all of you from the depths of my heart to the depths of yours. I believe that the entire German people has a passionate interest in what I have to say tonight. I will therefore speak with holy seriousness and openness, as the hour demands.

The German people, raised, educated and disciplined by National Socialism, can bear the whole truth. It knows the gravity of the situation, and its leadership can therefore demand the necessary hard measures, yes even the hardest measures. We Germans are armed against weakness and uncertainty. The blows and misfortunes of the war only give us additional strength, firm resolve, and a spiritual and fighting will to overcome all difficulties and obstacles with revolutionary élan.

Now is not the time to ask how it all happened. That can wait until later, when the German people and the whole world will learn the full truth about the misfortune of the past weeks, and its deep and fateful significance. The heroic sacrifices of heroism of our soldiers in Stalingrad has had vast historical significance for the whole Eastern Front. It was not in vain. The future will make clear why.

When I jump over the past to look ahead, I do it intentionally. The time is short! There is no time for fruitless debates. We must act, immediately, thoroughly, and decisively, as has always been the National Socialist way.

The movement has from its beginning acted in that way to master the many crises it faced and overcame. The National Socialist state also acted decisively when faced by a threat. We are not like the ostrich that sticks its head in the sand so as not to see danger. We are brave enough to look danger in the face, to coolly and ruthlessly take its measure, then act decisively with our heads held high. Both as a movement and as a nation, we have always been at our best when we needed fanatic, determined wills to overcome and eliminate danger, or a strength of character sufficient to overcome every obstacle, or bitter determination to reach our goal, or an iron heart capable of withstanding every internal and external battle.

So it will be today. My task is to give you an unvarnished picture of the situation, and to draw the hard conclusions that will guide the actions of the German government, but also of the German people.

We face a serious military challenge in the East. The crisis is at the moment a broad one, similar but not identical in many ways to that of the previous winter. Later we will discuss the causes. Now, we must accept things as they are and discover and apply the ways and means to turn things again in our favor. There is no point in disputing the seriousness of the situation. I do not want to give you a false impression of the situation that could lead to false conclusions, perhaps giving the German people a false sense of security that is altogether inappropriate in the present situation.

The storm raging against our venerable continent from the steppes this winter overshadows all previous human and historical experience. The German army and its allies are the only possible defense. In his proclamation on January 30, the Führer asked in a grave and compelling way what would have become of Germany and Europe if, on January 30, 1933, a bourgeois or democratic government had taken power instead of the National Socialists!

What dangers would have followed, faster than we could then have suspected, and what powers of defense would we have had to meet them? Ten years of National Socialism have been enough to make plain to the German people the seriousness of the danger posed by Bolshevism from the East. Now one can understand why we spoke so often of the fight against Bolshevism at our Nuremberg party rallies. We raised our voices in warning to our German people and the world, hoping to awaken Western humanity from the paralysis of will and spirit into which it had fallen. We tried to open their eyes to the horrible danger from Eastern Bolshevism, which had subjected a nation of nearly 200 million people to the terror of the Jews and was preparing an aggressive war against Europe.

When the Führer ordered the army to attack the East on June 22, 1941, we all knew that this would be the decisive battle of this great struggle. We knew the dangers and difficulties. But we also knew that dangers and difficulties always grow over time; they never diminish.

It was two minutes before midnight. Waiting any longer could easily have led to the destruction of the Reich and a total Bolshevization of the European continent.

It is understandable that, as a result of broad concealment and misleading actions by the Bolshevist government, we did not properly evaluate the Soviet Union’s war potential. Only now do we see its true scale. That is why the battle our soldiers face in the East exceeds in its hardness, dangers and difficulties all human imagining. It demands our full national strength.
This is a threat to the Reich and to the European continent that casts all previous dangers into the shadows. If we fail, we will have failed our historic mission. Everything we have built and done in the past pales in the face of this gigantic task that the German army directly and the German people less directly face.

I speak first to the world, and proclaim three theses regarding our fight against the Bolshevist danger in the East.

This first thesis: Were the German army not in a position to break the danger from the East, the Reich would fall to Bolshevism, and all Europe shortly afterwards.

Second: The German army, the German people and their allies alone have the strength to save Europe from this threat.

Third: Danger faces us. We must act quickly and decisively, or it will be too late.

I turn to the first thesis. Bolshevism has always proclaimed its goal openly: to bring revolution not only to Europe, but to the entire world, and plunge it into Bolshevist chaos. This goal has been evident from the beginning of the Bolshevist Soviet Union, and has been the ideological and practical goal of the Kremlin’s policies. Clearly, the nearer Stalin and the other Soviet leaders believe they are to realizing their world-destroying objectives, the more they attempt to hide and conceal them. We cannot be fooled. We are not like those timid souls who wait like the hypnotized rabbit until the serpent devours them.

We prefer to recognize a danger in good time and take effective action.

We see through not only the ideology of Bolshevism, but also its practice, for we had great success with that in our domestic struggles. The Kremlin cannot deceive us. We had fourteen years of our struggle for power, and ten years thereafter, to unmask its intentions and its infamous deceptions.

The goal of Bolshevism is Jewish world revolution. They want to bring chaos to the Reich and Europe, using the resulting hopelessness and desperation to establish their international, Bolshevist-concealed capitalist tyranny.

I do not need to say what that would mean for the German people. A Bolshevization of the Reich would mean the liquidation of our entire intelligentsia and leadership, and the descent of our workers into Bolshevist-Jewish slavery. In Moscow, they find workers for forced labor battalions in the Siberian tundra, as the Führer said in his proclamation on 30 January. The revolt of the steppes is readying itself at the front, and the storm from the East that breaks against our lines daily in increasing strength is nothing other than a repetition of the historical devastation that has so often in the past endangered our part of the world.

That is a direct threat to the existence of every European power. No one should believe that Bolshevism would stop at the borders of the Reich, were it to be victorious. The goal of its aggressive policies and wars is the Bolshevization of every land and people in the world. In the face of such undeniable intentions, we are not impressed by paper declarations from the Kremlin or guarantees from London or Washington. We know that we are dealing in the East with an infernal political devilishness that does not recognize the norms governing relations between people and nations. When for example the English Lord Beaverbrook says that Europe must be given over to the Soviets or when the leading American Jewish journalist Brown cynically adds that a Bolshevization of Europe might solve all of the continent’s problems, we know what they have in mind. The European powers are facing the most critical question. The West is in danger. It makes no difference whether or not their governments and intellectuals realize it or not.

The German people, in any event, is unwilling to bow to this danger. Behind the oncoming Soviet divisions we see the Jewish liquidation commandos, and behind them terror, the specter of mass starvation and complete anarchy. International Jewry is the devilish ferment of decomposition that finds cynical satisfaction in plunging the world into the deepest chaos and destroying ancient cultures that it played no role in building.

We also know our historic responsibility. Two thousand years of Western civilization are in danger. One cannot overestimate the danger. It is indicative that when one names it as it is, International Jewry throughout the world protests loudly. Things have gone so far in Europe that one cannot call a danger a danger when it is caused by the Jews.

That does not stop us from drawing the necessary conclusions. That is what we did in our earlier domestic battles. The democratic Jewry of the “Berliner Tageblatt” and the “Vossische Zeitung” served communist Jewry by minimizing and downplaying a growing danger, and by lulling our threatened people to sleep and reducing their ability to resist. We could see, if the danger were not overcome, the specter of hunger, misery, and forced labor by millions of Germans. We could see our venerable part of the world collapse, and bury in its ruins the ancient inheritance of the West. That is the danger we face today.

My second thesis: Only the German Reich and its allies are in the position to resist this danger. The European nations, including England, believe that they are strong enough to resist effectively the Bolshevization of Europe, should it come to that. This belief is childish and not even worth refuting. If the strongest military force in the world is not able to break the threat of Bolshevism, who else could do it? The neutral European nations have neither the potential nor the military means nor the spiritual strength to provide even the least resistance to Bolshevism. Bolshevism’s robotic divisions would roll over them within a few days. In the capitals of the mid-sized and smaller European states, they console themselves with the idea that one must be spiritually armed against Bolshevism. That reminds us of the statements by bourgeois parties in 1932, who thought they could fight and win the battle against communism with spiritual weapons. That was too stupid even then to be worth refuting.

Eastern Bolshevism is not only a doctrine of terrorism, it is also the practice of terrorism. It strives for its goals with an infernal thoroughness, using every resource at its disposal, regardless of the welfare, prosperity or peace of the peoples it ruthlessly oppresses. What would England and America do if, in the worst case, Europe fell into Bolshevism’s arms? Will London perhaps persuade Bolshevism to stop at the English Channel? I have already said that Bolshevism has its foreign legions in the form of communist parties in every democratic nation. None of these states can think it is immune to domestic Bolshevism. In a recent by-election for the House of Commons, the independent, that is communist, candidate got 10,741 of the 22,371 votes cast. This was in a district that had formerly been a conservative stronghold. Within a short time, 10,000 voters, nearly half, had been lost to the communists.

That is proof that the Bolshevist danger exists in England too, and that it will not go away simply because it is ignored. We place no faith in any territorial promises that the Soviet Union may make. Bolshevism set ideological as well as military boundaries, which poses a danger to every nation. The world no longer has the choice between falling back into its old fragmentation or accepting a new order for Europe under Axis leadership. The only choice now is between living under Axis protection or in a Bolshevist Europe.

I am firmly convinced that the lamenting lords and archbishops in London have not the slightest intention of resisting the Bolshevist danger that would result were the Soviet army to enter Europe. Jewry has so deeply infected the Anglo-Saxon states both spiritually and politically that they are no longer have the ability to see the danger. It conceals itself as Bolshevism in the Soviet Union, and plutocratic-capitalism in the Anglo-Saxon states.

The Jewish race is an expert at mimicry. They put their host peoples to sleep, paralyzing their defensive abilities. Our insight into the matter led us to the early realization that cooperation between international plutocracy and international Bolshevism was not a contradiction, but rather a sign of deep commonalities. The hand of the pseudo-civilized Jewry of Western Europe shakes the hand of the Jewry of the Eastern ghettos over Germany. Europe is in deadly danger.

I do not flatter myself into believing that my remarks will influence public opinion in the neutral, much less the enemy, states. That is also not my goal or intention. I know that, given our problems on the Eastern Front, the English press tomorrow will furiously attack me with the accusation that I have made the first peace feelers. That is certainly not so. No one in Germany thinks any longer of a cowardly compromise. The entire people thinks only of a harsh war. As a spokesman for the leading nation of the continent, however, I claim the right to call a danger a danger if it threatens not threatens not only our own land, but our entire continent. We National Socialists have the duty to sound the alarm against International Jewry’s attempt to plunge the European continent into chaos, and to warn that Jewry has in Bolshevism a terroristic military power whose danger cannot be overestimated.

My third thesis is that the danger is immediate. The paralysis of the Western European democracies before their deadliest threat is frightening. International Jewry is doing all it can to encourage such paralysis. During our struggle for power in Germany, Jewish newspapers tried to conceal the danger, until National Socialism awakened the people. It is just the same today in other nations. Jewry once again reveals itself as the incarnation of evil, as the plastic demon of decay and the bearer of an international culture-destroying chaos.

This explains, by the way, our consistent Jewish policies. We see Jewry as a direct threat to every nation. We do not care what other peoples do about the danger. What we do to defend ourselves is our own business, however, and we will not tolerate objections from others. Jewry is a contagious infection. Enemy nations may raise hypocritical protests against our measures against Jewry and cry crocodile tears, but that will not stop us from doing that which is necessary. Germany, in any event, has no intention of bowing before this threat, but rather intends to take the most radical measures, if necessary, in good time

[The chants of the audience prevent the minister from going on for several minutes.]

The military challenges of the Reich in the East are at the center of everything. The war of mechanized robots against Germany and Europe has reached its high point. In resisting the grave and direct threat with its weapons, the German people and its Axis allies are fulfilling in the truest sense of the word a European mission. Our courageous and just battle against this world-wide plague will not be hindered by the worldwide outcry of International Jewry. It can and must end only with victory.

The tragic battle of Stalingrad is a symbol of heroic, manly resistance to the revolt of the steppes. It has not only a military, but also an intellectual and spiritual significance for the German people. Here for the first time our eyes have been opened to the true nature of the war. We want no more false hopes and illusions. We want bravely to look the facts in the face, however hard and dreadful they may be. The history of our party and our state has proven that a danger recognized is a danger defeated. Our coming hard battles in the East will be under the sign of this heroic resistance. It will require previously undreamed of efforts by our soldiers and our weapons. A merciless war is raging in the East. The Führer was right when he said that in the end there will not be winners and losers, but the living and the dead.

The German nation knows that. Its healthy instincts have led it through the daily confusion of intellectual and spiritual difficulties. We know today that the Blitzkrieg in Poland and the campaign in the West have only limited significance to the battle in the East. The German nation is fighting for everything it has. We know that the German people are defending their holiest possessions: their families, women and children, the beautiful and untouched countryside, their cities and villages, their two thousand year old culture, everything indeed that makes life worth living.

Bolshevism of course has not the slightest appreciation for our nation’s treasures, and would take no heed of them whatsoever if it came to that. It did not do so even for its own people. The Soviet Union over the last 25 years built up Bolshevism’s military potential to an unimaginable degree, and one we falsely evaluated. Terrorist Jewry had 200 million people to serve it in Russia. It cynically used its methods to create out of the stolid toughness of the Russian people a grave danger for the civilized nations of Europe. A whole nation in the East was driven to battle.

Men, women, and even children are employed not only in armaments factories, but in the war itself. 200 million live under the terror of the GPU, partially captives of a devilish viewpoint, partially of absolute stupidity. The masses of tanks we have faced on the Eastern Front are the result of 25 years of social misfortune and misery of the Bolshevist people. We have to respond with similar measures if we do not want to give up the game as lost.

“Victory oder bolshevism”

My firm conviction is that we cannot overcome the Bolshevist danger unless we use equivalent, though not identical, methods. The German people face the gravest demand of the war, namely of finding the determination to use all our resources to protect everything we have and everything we will need in the future.

Total war is therefore the demand of the hour. We must put an end to the bourgeois attitude that we have also seen in this war: Wash my back, but don’t get me wet!

The danger facing us is enormous. The efforts we take to meet it must be just as enormous. The time has come to remove the kid gloves and use our fists. We can no longer make only partial and careless use of the war potential at home and in the significant parts of Europe that we control. We must use our full resources, as quickly and thoroughly as it is organizationally and practically possible. Unnecessary concern is wholly out of place. The future of Europe hangs on our success in the East. We are ready to defend it. The German people are shedding their most valuable national blood in this battle. The rest of Europe should at least work to support us. There are many serious voices in Europe that have already realized this. Others still resist. That cannot influence us. If danger faced them alone, we could view their reluctance as literary nonsense of no significance. But the danger faces us all, and we must all do our share. Those who today do not understand that will thank us tomorrow on bended knees that we courageously and firmly took on the task.

It bothers us not in the least that our enemies abroad claim that our total war measures resemble those of Bolshevism. They claim hypocritically that that means there is no need to fight Bolshevism. The question here is not one of method, but of the goal, namely eliminating the danger.

The question is not whether the methods are good or bad, but whether they are successful. The National Socialist government is ready to use every means. We do not care if anyone objects. We are not willing to weaken Germany’s war potential by measures that maintain a high, almost peace-time standard of living for a certain class, thereby endangering our war effort. We are voluntarily giving up a significant part of our living standard to increase our war effort as quickly and completely as possible. This is not an end in itself, but rather a means to an end. Our social standard of living will be even higher after the war. We do not need to imitate Bolshevist methods, because we have better people and leaders, which gives us a great advantage. But things have shown that we must do much more than we have done so far to turn the war in the East decisively in our favor.

As countless letters from the homeland and the front have shown, by the way, the entire German people agrees. Everyone knows that if we lose, all will be destroyed. The people and leadership are determined to take the most radical measures. The broad working masses of our people are not unhappy because the government is too ruthless. If anything, they are unhappy because it is too considerate. Ask anyone in Germany, and he will say: The most radical is just radical enough, and the most total is just total enough to gain victory.

The total war effort has become a matter of the entire German people. No one has any excuse for ignoring its demands. A storm of applause greeted my call on January 30 for total war. I can therefore assure you that the leadership’s measures are in full agreement with the desires of the German people at home and at the front. The people are willing to bear any burden, even the heaviest, to make any sacrifice, if it leads to the great goal of victory.

This naturally assumes that the burdens are shared equally. We cannot tolerate a situation in which most people carry the burden of the war, while a small, passive portion attempts to escape its burdens and responsibilities.

***
Hmmm, how little things have changed today…..

***

The measures we have taken, and the ones we will yet take, will be characterized by the spirit of National Socialist justice. We pay no heed to class or standing. Rich and poor, high and low must share the burdens equally. Everyone must do his duty in this grave hour, whether by choice or otherwise. We know this has the full support of the people. We would rather do too much rather than too little to achieve victory. No war in history has ever been lost because of too many soldiers or weapons. Many, however, have been lost because the opposite was true.

It is time to get the slackers moving. They must be shaken out of their comfortable ease. We cannot wait until they come to their senses. That might be too late. The alarm must sound throughout the nation. Millions of hands must get to work throughout the country. The measures we have taken, and the ones we will now take, and which I shall discuss later in this speech, are critical for our whole public and private life. The individual may have to make great sacrifices, but they are tiny when compared to the sacrifices he would have to make if his refusal brought down on us the greatest national disaster. It is better to operate at the right time than to wait until the disease has taken root. One may not complain to the doctor or sue him for bodily injury. He cuts not to kill, but to save the patient’s life.

Again let me say that the heavier the sacrifices the German people must make, the more urgent it is that they be fairly shared. The people want it that way. No one resists even the heaviest burdens of war. But it angers people when a few always try to escape the burdens. The National Socialist government has both the moral and political duty to oppose such attempts, if necessary with draconian penalties. Leniency here would be completely out of place, leading in time to a confusion in the people’s emotions and attitudes that would be a grave danger to our public morale.

We are therefore compelled to adopt a series of measures that are not essential for the war effort in themselves, but seem necessary to maintain moral at home and at the front. The optics of the war, that is, how things outwardly appear, is of decisive importance in this fourth year of war.

In view of the superhuman sacrifices that the front makes each day, it has a basic right to expect that no one at home claims the right to ignore the war and its demands. And not only the front demands this, but the overwhelming part of the homeland. The industrious have a right to expect that if they work ten or twelve or fourteen hours a day, a lazy person does not stand next to them who thinks them foolish. The homeland must stay pure and intact in its entirety. Nothing may disturb the picture.

There are therefore a series of measures that take account of the war’s optics. We have ordered, for example, the closing of bars and nightclubs. I cannot imagine that people who are doing their duty for the war effort still have the energy to stay out late into the night in such places. I can only conclude that they are not taking their responsibilities seriously. We have closed these establishments because they began to offend us, and because they disturb the image of the war. We have nothing against amusements as such. After the war we will happily go by the rule “Live and let live.” But during a war, the slogan must be “Fight and let fight!”

We have also closed luxury restaurants that demand far more resources than is reasonable. It may be that an occasional person thinks that, even during war, his stomach is the most important thing. We cannot pay him any heed.
At the front everyone — from the simple soldier to the field marshal — eats from the field kitchen. I do not believe that it is asking too much to insist that we in the homeland pay heed to at least the basic laws of community thinking. We can become gourmets once again when the war is over. Right now, we have more important things to do than worry about our stomachs.

Countless luxury stores have also been closed. They often offended the buying public. There was generally nothing to buy, unless perhaps one paid here and there with butter or eggs instead of money. What good do shops do that no longer have anything to sell, but only use electricity, heating, and human labor that is lacking everywhere else, particularly in the armaments industry.

It is no excuse to say that keeping some of these shops open gives a lovely impression to foreigners. Foreigners will be impressed only by a German victory! Everyone will want to be our friend if we win the war.

But if we lose, we will be able to count our friends on the fingers of one hand. We have put an end to such illusions. We want to put these people standing in empty shops to useful work in the war economy. This process is already in motion, and will be completed by March 15. It is of course a major transformation in our entire economic life. We are following a plan. We do not want to accuse anyone unjustly or open them to complaints and accusations from every side. We are only doing what is necessary. But we are doing it quickly and thoroughly.

We would rather wear worn clothing for a few years than have our people wear rags for a few centuries. What good are fashion salons today? They only use light, heat and workers. They will reappear when the war is over. What good are beauty shops that encourage a cult of beauty and take enormous time and energy? In peace they are wonderful, but a waste of time during war. Our women and girls will be able to greet our victorious, returning soldiers without their peacetime finery.

Government offices will work faster and less bureaucratically. It does not leave a good impression when the office closes on the dot after eight hours. The people are not there for the offices, the offices are there for the people. One has to work until the work is done. That is a requirement of the war.

If the Führer can do that, so can his paid employees. If there is not enough work to fill the extended hours, 10 or 20 or 30 percent of the workers can be transferred to war production and replace other men for service at the front. That applies to all offices in the homeland. That by itself may make the work in some offices go more quickly and easily.
We must learn from the war to operate quickly, not only thoroughly. The soldier at the front does not have weeks to think things over, to pass his thoughts up the line or let them sit in dusty files. He must act immediately or lose his life. In the homeland we do not lose our lives if we work slowly, but we do endanger the life of our people.

Everyone must learn to pay heed to war morale, and pay attention to the just demands of working and fighting people. We are not spoil-sports, but neither will we tolerate those who hinder our efforts.

It is, for example, intolerable that certain men and women stay for weeks in spas and trade rumors, taking places away from soldiers on leave or from workers who are entitled to a vacation after a year of hard work. That is intolerable, and we have put an end to it.

The war is not a time for amusement. Until it is over, we take our deepest satisfaction in work and battle. Those who do not understand that by themselves must be taught to understand it, and forced if need be. The harshest measures may be needed.

It does not look good, for example, when we devote enormous propaganda to the theme: “Wheels must roll for victory!,” with the result that people avoid unnecessary travel only to see unemployed pleasure-seekers find more room for themselves in the trains. The railroad serves to transport war goods and travelers on war business. Only those who need a rest from hard work deserve a vacation.

The Führer has not had a day of vacation since the war began.

Since the first man of the country takes his duty so seriously and responsibly, it must be expected that every citizen will follow his example.

On the other hand, the government is doing all it can to give working people the relaxation they need in these trying times. Theaters, movie houses, and music halls remain in full operation. The radio is working to expand and improve its programming. We have no intention of inflicting a gray winter mood on our people. That which serves the people and keeps up its fighting and working strength is good and essential to the war effort. We want to eliminate the opposite.

To balance the measures I have already discussed, I have therefore ordered that cultural and spiritual establishments that serve the people not be decreased, but increased. As long as they aid rather than harm the war effort, they must be supported by the government. That applies to sports as well. Sports are not only for particular circles today, but a matter for the entire people. Military exemptions for athletes are out of place. The purpose of sports is to steel the body, certainly with the goal of using it appropriately in time of the people’s greatest need.

The front shares our desires. The entire German people agrees passionately. It is no longer willing to put up with efforts that only waste time and resources. It will not put up with complicated questionnaires on every possible issue. It does not want to worry about a thousand minor matters that may have been important in peace, but are entirely unimportant during war.

It also does not need to be constantly reminded of its duty by references to the great sacrifices of our soldiers at Stalingrad. It knows what it has to do. It wants everyone, high and low, rich and poor, to share a Spartan life style. The Führer gives us all an example, one that must be followed by everyone. He knows only work and care.

We do not want to leave it all to him, but rather we want to take that part of it from him which we are able to bear.

The present day has a remarkable resemblance for every genuine National Socialist to the period of struggle. We have always acted in the same way. We were with the people through thick and thin, and that is why the people followed us. We have always carried our burdens together with the people, and therefore they did not seem heavy to us, but rather light. The people want to be led. Never in history has the people failed a brave and determined leadership in the critical hour.

Let me say a few words in this regard about practical measures in our total war effort that we have already taken.

The problem is freeing soldiers for the front, and freeing workers for the armaments industry. These are the primary goals, even at the cost of our standard of social life. This does not mean a permanent decline in our standard of living. It is only a means to reaching an end, that of total war.

As part of this campaign, hundreds of thousands of military exemptions have been canceled. These exemptions were given because we did not have enough skilled labor to fill the positions that would have been left open by revoking them. The reason for our current measures is to mobilize the necessary workers. That is why we have appealed to men not working in the war economy, and to women who were not working at all. They will not, and cannot, ignore our call. The duty for women to work is broad. That does not however mean that only those included in the law have to work. Anyone is welcome. The more who join the war effort, the more soldiers we can free for the front.

Our enemies maintain that German women are not able to replace men in the war economy. That may be true for certain fields of heavy labor. But I am convinced that the German woman is determined to fill the spot left by the man leaving for the front, and to do so as soon as possible. We do not need to point out Bolshevism’s example. For years, millions of the best German women have been working successfully in war production, and they wait impatiently to be joined and assisted by others. All those who join in the work are only giving the proper thanks to those at the front. Hundreds of thousands have already joined, and hundreds of thousands more will join. We hope soon to free up armies of workers who will in turn free up armies of fighting front soldiers.

***

In point of fact, after this speech, German war production did boom and was far higher in 1943-44, despite constant bombing day and night, than in 1941.

***

I would think little of German women if I believed that they do not want to listen to my appeal. They will not seek to follow the letter of the law, or to slip through its loopholes.

They few who may try will not succeed. We will not accept a doctor’s excuse. Nor will we accept the alibi that one must help one’s husband or relative or good friend as a way of avoiding work. We will respond appropriately.

The few who may attempt it will only lose the respect of those around them. The people will despise them. No one expects a woman lacking the requisite physical strength to go to work in a tank factory. There are, however, numerous jobs in war production that do not demand great physical strength, and which a woman can do even if she comes from the “better circles.” No one is too good to work, and we all have the choice to give up what we have, or to lose everything.

It is also time to ask women with household help if they really need it. One can take care of the house and children oneself, freeing the servant for other tasks, or leave the house and children in care of the servant or the NSV [the party welfare organization], and go to work oneself.

Life may not be as pleasant as it is during peace. But we are not at peace; we are at war. We can be comfortable after we have won the war. Now we must sacrifice our comforts to gain victory.

Soldiers’ wives surely understand this. They know it is their duty to their husbands to support them by doing work that is important to the war effort. That is true above all in agriculture. The wives of farmers must set a good example. Both men and women must be sure that no one does less during war than they did in peace; more work must instead be done in every area.

One may not, by the way, make the mistake of leaving everything to the government. The government can only set the broad guidelines. To give life to those guidelines is the job of working people, under the inspiring leadership of the party. Fast action is essential.
.

.

One must go beyond the legal requirements. “Volunteer!” is the slogan. As Gauleiter of Berlin, I appeal here above all to my fellow Berliners. They have given enough good examples of noble behavior and bravery during the war such that they will not fail here. Their practical behavior and good cheer, even during war, have earned them a good name throughout the world. This good name must be maintained and strengthened!

If I appeal to my fellow Berliners to do some important work quickly, thoroughly, and without complaint, I know they will all obey. We do not want to complain about the difficulties of the day or grump to one another. Rather we want to behave not only like Berliners, but like Germans, by getting to work, acting, seizing the initiative and doing something, not leaving it to someone else.

What German woman would want to ignore my appeal on behalf of those fighting at the front? Who would want to put personal comfort above national duty? Who in view of the serious threat we face would want to consider his private needs instead of the requirements of the war?

I reject with contempt the enemy’s claim that we are imitating Bolshevism. We do not want to imitate Bolshevism; we want to defeat it, with whatever means are necessary. The German woman will best understand what I mean, for she has long known that the war our men are fighting today above all is a war to protect her children.

Her holiest possession is guarded by our people’s most valuable blood. The German woman must spontaneously proclaim her solidarity with her fighting men. She had better join the ranks of millions of workers in the homeland’s army, and do it tomorrow rather than the day after tomorrow. A river of readiness must flow through the German people. I expect that countless women and above all men who are not doing essential war work will report to the authorities. He who gives quickly gives twice as much.

Our general economy is consolidating. That particularly affects the insurance and banking systems, the tax system, newspapers and magazines that are not essential for the war effort, and non-essential party and government activities, and also requires a further simplification of our life style.

I know that many of our people are making great sacrifices. I understand their sacrifices, and the government is trying to keep them to the necessary minimum. But some must remain, and must be borne. When the war is over, we will build up that which we now are eliminating, more generously and more beautifully, and the state will lend its hand.

I energetically reject the charge that our measures will eliminate the middle class or result in a monopoly economy. The middle class will regain its economic and social position after the war. The current measures are necessary for the war effort. They aim not at a structural transformation of the economy, but merely at winning the war, and as quickly as possible.

I do not dispute the fact that these measures will cause worry in the coming weeks. They will give us breathing room. We are laying the groundwork for the coming summer, without paying heed to the threats and boasting of the enemy. I am happy to reveal this plan for victory to the German people. They not only accept these measures, they have demanded them, demanded them more strongly than ever before during the war. The people want action! It is time for it! We must use our time to prepare for coming surprises.

I turn now to the entire German people, and particularly to the Party, as the leader of the totalization of our domestic war effort. This is not the first major task you have faced. You will bring the usual revolutionary élan to bear on it. You will deal with the laziness and indolence that may occasionally show up. The government has issued general regulations, and will issue further ones in coming weeks. The minor issues not dealt with in these regulations must be taken care of by the people, under the Party’s leadership. One moral law stands above everything for each of us: to do nothing that harms the war effort, and to do everything that brings victory nearer.

In past years, we have often recalled the example of Frederick the Great in newspapers and on the radio. We did not have the right to do so. For a while during the Third Silesian War, Frederick II had five million Prussians, according to Schlieffen, standing against 90 million enemies. In the second of seven hellish years he suffered a defeat that shook Prussia’s foundations. He never had enough soldiers and weapons to fight without risking everything. His strategy was always one of improvisation.

But his principle was to attack the enemy whenever it was possible. He suffered defeats, but that was not decisive. What was decisive is that the Great King remained unbroken, that he was unshaken by the changing fortunes of war, that his strong heart overcame every danger.

At the end of seven years of war, he was 51 years old, he had no teeth, he suffered from gout, and was tortured by a thousand pains, but he stood above the devastated battlefield as the victor.

How does our situation compare with his?! Let us show the same will and decisiveness as he, and when the time comes do as he did, remaining unshakable through all the twists of fate, and like him win the battle even under the most unfavorable circumstances. Let us never doubt our great cause.

I am firmly convinced that the German people have been deeply moved by the blow of fate at Stalingrad.
.

.

It has looked into the face of hard and pitiless war. It knows now the awful truth, and is resolved to follow the Führer through thick and thin.

[The crowd rises and chants for several minutes, “Führer command, we follow! Heil our Führer!”]

The English and American press in recent days has been writing at length about the attitude of the German people during this crisis. The English seem to think that they know the German people much better than we do, its own leadership. They give hypocritical advice on what we should do and not do. They believe that the German people today is the same as the German people of November 1918 that fell victim to their persuasive wiles. I do not need to disprove their assertions. That will come from the fighting and working German people.

To make the truth plain, however, my German comrades, I want to ask you a series of questions. I want you to answer them to the best of your knowledge, according to your conscience.

When my audience cheered on 30 January, the English press reported the next day that it was all a propaganda show that did not represent the true opinion of the German people. I have invited to today’s meeting a cross-section of the German people in the best sense of the word.

In front of me are rows of wounded German soldiers from the Eastern Front, missing legs and arms, with wounded bodies, those who have lost their sight, those who have come with nurses, men in the pink of youth who stand with crutches.

Among them are 50 who bear the Knight’s Cross with Oak Leaves, shining examples of our fighting front.

Behind them are armaments workers from Berlin tank factories. Behind them are Party officials, soldiers from the fighting army, doctors, scientists, artists, engineers and architects, teachers, officials and employees from offices, proud representatives of every area of our intellectual life that even in the midst of war produce miracles of human genius. Throughout the Sportpalast I see thousands of German women. The youth is here, as are the aged. No class, no occupation, no age remained uninvited. I can rightly say that before me is gathered a representative sample of the German population, both from the homeland and the front. Is that true? Yes or no?

[The crowd jumps up and shouts JA! (YES)]

You, my hearers, at this moment represent the whole nation. I wish to ask you ten questions that you will answer for the German people throughout the world, but especially for our enemies, who are listening to us on the radio.

The English maintain that the German people has lost faith in victory. I ask you: Do you believe with the Führer and us in the final total victory of the German people? I ask you: Are you resolved to follow the Führer through thick and thin to victory, and are you willing to accept the heaviest personal burdens?

Second: The English say that the German people are tired of fighting. I ask you: Are you ready to follow the Führer as the phalanx of the homeland, standing behind the fighting army and to wage war with wild determination through all the turns of fate until victory is ours?

Third: The English maintain that the German people have no desire any longer to accept the government’s growing demands for war work. I ask you: Are you and the German people willing to work, if the Führer orders, 10, 12 and if necessary 14 hours a day and to give everything for victory?

Fourth: The English maintain that the German people is resisting the government’s total war measures. It does not want total war, but capitulation! I ask you: Do you want total war? If necessary, do you want a war more total and radical than anything that we can even imagine today?

Fifth: The English maintain that the German people have lost faith in the Führer. I ask you: Is your confidence in the Führer greater, more faithful and more unshakable than ever before? Are you absolutely and completely ready to follow him wherever he goes and do all that is necessary to bring the war to a victorious end?

Sixth: I ask you: Are you ready from now on to give your full strength to provide the Eastern Front with the men and munitions it needs to give Bolshevism the death blow?

Seventh: I ask you: Do you take a holy oath to the front that the homeland stands firm behind them, and that you will give them everything they need to win the victory?

Eighth: I ask you: Do you, especially you women, want the government to do all it can to encourage German women to put their full strength at work to support the war effort, and to release men for the front whenever possible, thereby helping the men at the front?

Ninth: I ask you: Do you approve, if necessary, the most radical measures against a small group of shirkers and black marketers who pretend there is peace in the middle of war, and use the needs of the nation for their own selfish purposes? Do you agree that those who harm the war effort should lose their heads?

Tenth and lastly: I ask you: Do you agree that above all in war, according to the National Socialist Party platform, the same rights and duties should apply to all, that the homeland should bear the heavy burdens of the war together, and that the burdens should be shared equally between high and low and rich and poor?

I have asked; you have given me your answers. You are part of the people, and your answers are those of the German people. You have told our enemies what they needed to hear — so that they will have no illusions or false ideas.

Now, just as in the first hours of our rule and through the ten years that followed, we are bound firmly in brotherhood with the German people. The most powerful ally on earth, the people itself, stands behind us and is determined to follow the Führer, come what may. They will accept the heaviest burdens to gain victory. What power on earth can hinder us from reaching our goal. Now we must and will succeed!

***
All this is bittersweet until you realize the fact, as proven by Operation Highjump, that becasue the Germasns fought on for two and a half years AFTER Stalingrad, the Third Reich’s ultra-elite soldiers and scientists, and nordic women, survived and escaped to the Andes and Antarctic. And due its incredible technology, the Reich, though just five million people, exists deep underground and in the skies today. If WWIII tragically annihilates America and Russia, the Reich will return, clean up the pieces, and rule what is left. And why? Because the Germans fought on after Stalingrad, givng the Disengagement Movement time to evacuate and set up elswewhere.

***

I stand before you not only as the spokesman of the government, but as the spokesman of the people. My old party friends are here around me, clothed with the high offices of the people and the government. Party comrade Speer sits next to me. The Führer has given him the great task of mobilizing the German armaments industry and supplying the front with all the weapons it needs. Party comrade Dr. Ley sits next to me. The Führer has charged him with the leadership of the German work force, with schooling and training them in untiring work for the war effort. We feel deeply indebted to our party comrade Sauckel, who has been charged by the Führer to bring hundreds of thousands of workers to the Reich to support our national economy, something the enemy cannot do. All the leaders of the party, the army, and government join with us as well.

We are all children of our people, forged together by this most critical hour of our national history. We promise you, we promise the front, we promise the Führer, that we will mold together the homeland into a force on which the Führer and his fighting soldiers can rely on absolutely and blindly. We pledge to do all in our life and work that is necessary for victory. We will fill our hearts with the political passion, with the ever-burning fire that blazed during the great struggles of the party and the state. Never during this war will we fall prey to the false and hypocritical objectivism that has brought the German nation so much misfortune over its history.

When the war began, we turned our eyes to the nation alone. That which serves its struggle for life is good and must be encouraged. What harms its struggle for life is bad and must be eliminated and cut out. With burning hearts and cool heads we will overcome the major problems of this phase of the war. We are on the way to final victory. That victory rests on our faith in the Führer.

This evening I once again remind the whole nation of its duty. The Führer expects us to do that which will throw all we have done in the past into the shadows. We do not want to fail him. As we are proud of him, he should be proud of us.

The great crises and upsets of national life show who the true men and women are. We have no right any longer to speak of the weaker sex, for both sexes are displaying the same determination and spiritual strength. The nation is ready for anything. The Führer has commanded, and we will follow him. In this hour of national reflection and contemplation, we believe firmly and unshakably in victory.

We see it before us, we need only reach for it. We must resolve to subordinate everything to it. That is the duty of the hour. Let the slogan be:

Now, people rise up! And storm — break loose!

[The minister’s final words were lost in unending storms of applause.]

.

.

…….The goal is to earn our freedom and then use it wisely

National socialism 2.0 will be is a religion to make us into adults, no longer squabbling, kicking, scratching, irrational children.

You can help me by donating to this essential cause.

.

….Spiritual reading for June 18

Move gently through your avenues of perception today and you will be rewarded with improved vision.

As we have mentioned, and as you know yourselves, there is so much that is not easily seen but utterly real. To be able to see the many layers of connection and interaction and influence that guide and determine the course of your life is to be empowered, to be freed in many regards, to have the opportunity to manifest potential of all sorts.

You will not enhance your ability to perceive with any kind of force, however. Extreme enthusiasm, desire or even powerful intent can cloud things. If you want to know what is really going on—beneath surface appearances—then the way to approach it is to sit quietly in your receptivity. The best means for seeing what lies under your animal perception is to open. Open and allow.

There is a veritable flood of information being made available to you. Each in your own way has come to see and know and intuit on
deeper and deeper levels. And yet there is much more that is still invisible.

You will see it if you let it enter your organs of perception. These would primarily be your heart and some aspects of your brain. Just be aware of your own processes today. As you use logic, or even intuition, to deduce what has happened, what might happen, what motivates or drives something or someone, as you engage that operation, watch how you take control of it.

Watch how you enjoy knowing. And then consider the possibility that you know nothing at all. And watch what happens then.

If you can let yourself be unknowing, it is possible that you will be able to see into previously unimaginable intricacies. It is possible that your understanding of what really is going on there will expand significantly.

But it is one of those paradoxical situations where, in order to know more, have more, one must know less
and have less.

The blank slate, the empty vessel.

So although your mind is likely to insist that it knows and to feel that it must know (and this is simply one of its characteristics), if you can slip under or around that penchant for control, you can open some new windows onto your life and the world around you.

We want to tell you that this is desired, that your ability to see more clearly and more deeply is very much wished for. In fact, much is being brought to you, on silver platters, as it were, and all you need do is open the door and receive the gifts.

Do what you can on this day to let go of your knowing so that you can know more. Observe yourself with care, and with an intent to do something new. It is more likely that you’ll hear the knock at the door if you are not having to know who is coming and what they are bringing before they even set out. And by all means, whatever you do see, treat your understanding with respect and gratitude, even that which you cannot make sense of in this moment.

We send you—as do many, many others—much love.

.

.

.

….To donate:

If in the US, you can use Cash App:

Simply link it to your debit or credit card!

To send a payment:
.
— Open the Cash App
— Enter the amount
— Tap “Pay”
— Enter an email address (john_denugent@yahoo.com), phone number (if I gave it to you personally), or “$Cashtag” ($JohndeNugent)
.
— Enter what the payment is for (education)

It works in seconds, and you get an email confirmation!

PLEASE SEND ME AN EMAIL TO john_denugent@yahoo.com after donating so I can thank you! (CashApp goes overboard on the confidentiality and does not provide any email address for the donor so I can contact and thank the person!)
.
If in Canada or overseas, set up a TransferWise account! Same basic idea.
.
Note on composing comments under my articles:
.
I am tired of editing mis-spelled words and uncapitalized names and proper nouns (the names of persons, cities, rivers and countries). I do know they no longer even teach cursive. The way people type today is literally how Deep South negroes and the mentally retarded spelled fifty years ago. 😉
.
Whites are a detail race, a race of careful craftsmen.
1. If you recommend a book, then send a link.
2. If in your mind you are „too busy“ to check your comment for flaws before hitting the „send“/“publish“ button, then please abstain. I cannot keep on editing your sloppy typing; I cannot approve comments that were dashed off by someone on a caffeine buzz who needed urgently to first go wee-wee. 😉 That sloppiness and lack of diligence I see in so-called Millennials actually is a kind of subtle disrespect both for you yourself and for all my readers. Be Aryan: strong and conscientious!
.

.

28 Comments

  1. Freedom is the ability to be true to your conscience.

    During the Enlightenment the notion was born that the ideal purpose of the State is to enable the freedom of the individual.

    That ideal was the foundation of our state, America.

    Enlightenment ideals arose in France and England, and never rooted eastwardly in Germany or Russia.

    The Jews latched on to this ideal and transformed it to mean Jewish emancipation (citizenship).

    Largely through this transformation of the Enlightenment ideal of Liberty the Jews have taken over America.

    Americans need to return to the original meaning of freedom, which is the ability to be true to one’s conscience and a State whose purpose is to enable this.

    • Actually, a German, a Prussian army officer, Baron von Steuben, was the key to the American victory.
      .
      And Germany had two popular democratic upheavals, one in 1848 and another in 1918.

      The problem is when psychopaths misuse the democratic system and gradually take it over completely, as we see now. And the zombie masses do nothing about it.

      Democracy thus remains practically unworkable, and in fact a dangerous myth, an “opium of the people.” By pretending it is “rule of the people” when it is really a brutal psychopathocracy, it discourages what is needed and justified, revolution.

  2. Nearly a century after the Nazis came to power the media have to attack and smear the Nazis, like in the film of the Hitler look-alike having his photo taken with tourists in Berlin.
    .
    Who wants their photo taken with a murdering jewish bolshevik?
    .
    Or with a New York Jewish financier of the Bolshevik revolution?
    .
    AJP Priestly gives an accurate account of the inter-war years.

  3. Things were much better under Monarchy.

    Here is a fascinating book wich traces the descendants of Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus, both being of members of the Royal Blood Line of Jacob Israel (Israel was always a people, never a land).

    https://www.amazon.com/Joseph-Arimathea-Jesus-Robert-Nelson/dp/1514226596/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=1BC2J0FJU9CVJ&keywords=joseph+of+arimathea+and+jesus&qid=1657216225&sprefix=joseph+of+arimatheia+an%2Caps%2C273&sr=8-1

    After they fled The Holy Land, one line went to Ireland and and became the Royal Family of Ireland whilst another line became the royal bloodline of the Holy Roman Empire. If you watch this video, you will see that the stones for Charlemagne’s Throne in Aachen were brought all the way from Jesus’ tomb in Jerusalem, openly showing a connection with the bloodline of Jesus.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q59m4nf8wlw

    The Vatican knew that they were the true bloodline, that’s why there was always an uneasey relationship between the Vatican and the Holy Roman Empire. The Vatican even murdered Dogabert in 639.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagobert_I

    And what was the result of WW1? The last three great Christian Monarchies, Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia, were all destroyed, turned into democracies or communist.

    When one understands the bloodline connection, it is much easier to understand why both Ireland and Germany were genocided.

    • The trouble with monarchies was they actually believed they were descendants of gods.
      .
      They act as if they are above the law and are indifferent to the sufferings of the lower classes.
      .
      Even today Britain’s Royal Family is corrupt. Prince Charles admitted to accepting suitcases stuffed with cash from the Saudis. Yet no action will be taken.
      .
      The Royals are weak and knew nothing about finance. That’s how the Rothschilds wormed their way into power and influenced the foreign policy of most world powers.

    • Ireland genocided? I don’t think so, Jake. Actual events may surprise you. Don’t believe Irish talking heads; they like being victims, just like zionists. The guilt trip always serves a purpose.

      • I have blogged in depth about the horrible saga of England vs Ireland after the Protestant Reformation (both peoples having been Roman Catholic before this)… then the insane Cromwell period…. and finally the horrible Great Famine, which reduced the Irish population drastically. This happened via both starvation and also the ensuing mass emigration of the Irish to America, Australia and Canada, including and especially to French-speaking Quebec.

        The incredible folly in all this was that these two great peoples, who once had gotten along, were fighting over which version of Saulianity was correct when neither was, gouging each other’s eyes out over “Gentle Jesus,” the “Prince of Peace”!

        Today, fewer and fewer sensible people attend the pedophilic, homo-ridden churches in England and Ireland. It is time for the two peoples, one keltic, the other kelto-romano-germanic (with a heavy Saxon and Viking admixture), recognize their one true enemy, the Eternal Jew, the many white traitors who serve him, and the Muslim hordes who pour into both countries, allied with the jews against the white man.

      • Ireland were indeed genocided, starved out while there was food all around. So, I do think so Carl.

        If you look at the flag of England, you will notice that it is the exact same as the flag of Genoa, the Templar Cross of St. George.
        If you also look at the coat of arms of the City of London and also of Genoa, very similar again.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genoa

        So, the Genoan and the Venetian Templars teamed up and moved north, first settling in the Netherlands and establishing the Dutch East India Company. The Pope was eventually able to shut that down but not before they had established themselves in London.

        The Genoans and the Venetians were the power behind Henry VIII (first Cestui Que Vie Act) and Elizabeth I. Catholics regained the Throne, then the Genoans backed Cromwell to take down the King and destroy Catholicism in England, destroying all of the beautiful abbeys and murdering many priests. Cromwell married a Pallavicini and had a child with her. If you don’t know who the Pallavcinis are, I suggest you seriously look into it. Protestantism was always a front for these people. The “English” Civil War, just like the “French” Revolution.

        Then Cromwell set his sights on Ireland If you want to contest that the Irish people weren’t genocided by the “British” (Jews) then you do not know what you’re talking about.

        The Irish people, and all Europeans for that matter, are being genocided up to this very moment. Actually, one could call it a democide as it’s being carried out by our own so-called governments.

        As for Monarchy, I would look into RH negative bloodlines if I were you. We’re not all the same. They have abilities that we do not. Monarchy for the most part was our form of government for as long as we’ve been on this planet, until our enemies replaced it with democracy. If you’ve got a better idea on how to govern, I’m all ears.

        • I think “genocide” is a word that is overused. Definition:

          “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group”

          Well, the Irish were hardly destroyed, or genocided, because today there are 40 million Irish-Americans. Did their ghosts have babies? 😉

          A genocided Irish family 😉

          Carl is a long-term activist, a bodyguard for Nick Griffin when he was the chairman of the BNP at its height, the single father of a teenage son, and a former British soldier who saw action in Northern Ireland and in the Middle East.

          IMO, he deserves your respect for his deeds, whatever facts you proffer, and they may be true.

          This is one of his articles: https://johndenugent.com/area-strategic-bombing-in-wwii-the-grim-truth/

        • Jake, the English authorities told the Irish people to diversify their crop and not rely on the potato as their main daily food.
          .
          The Irish have had many famines over the years. The had the “summer hunger” each year as they used the previous crop and waited for the next harvest.
          .
          The British people collected food and money for the starving Irish people. Because of Irish incompetence, the famine relief wasn’t distributed. The Irish were still using wheat and barley to make beer and alcohol rather than foodstuffs.
          .
          Over 400,000 Irish fled to Britain and never went back, including my own Irish ancestors.
          .
          It was a fungus that caused the potato blight, not the British.
          .
          Amazing how even today people think it was organised genocide, the same people who believe in shrunken heads and human-skin lampshades.

          • I think there were other factors, including, as I wrote above, an Irish population explosion and the British view of the Irish as a hostile enemy people, which from the time of Henry VIII on was to be expected, since the two peoples now had a very serious religious conflict. In the Middle Ages and early modern times, to be a heretic who perverted the truth about God and Christ was literally a capital offense. It meant you were wicked and a traitor.
            .
            Before this, the two peoples got along, and the English common folks are half-keltic themselves, King Arthur and all that, and you can see it in all their many gingers (redheads, such as even Prince Harry himself), in my own dear, late cousin Holly Hyde, a blue-eyed redhead killed by drink, and in the propensity to drink overmuch and, with men, to enjoy starting fistfights.;-)

            The Kelts can be very pugnacious, and one sees this also in the Scots. Irish joke, told me by an Irish-American:

            An Irishman passes by a bar where a fight has broken out, and everyone inside is swinging away. “Is this a private fight or can anyone join in?” 😉

            In the mostly excellent movie “1917,” the two British “tommies” represent the diversity of the UK gene pool, with the one, shorter, with the rounder face and brown eyes and hair, looking keltic/pre-Indo-European/Roman, and the other is tall, blond and Saxon.

            Interestingly, it is the keltic-looking one who gets himself killed by being kind, sentimental and soft-hearted (basically good keltic qualities, including the famous “sympathy for the underdog”), and the colder Saxon is the one who survives.

            When the Irish left the Emerald Isle by the millions for the British colonies/Dominions or for America, London was very quietly very happy to see them gone.

            Having both Irish and English blood, and I saw it in my native New England as well (the Irish being the biggest ethnicity in those six states), I see both sides…. and that the horrible past is over.

            Today, these two great peoples face the exact same enemies, the jew/muslim/negro migrant menace. I think both sides could use a good reading of Eckhart Tolle and his “The Power of NOW.” 🙂

            https://johndenugent.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Power-Of-Now-Eckhart-Tolle.pdf

            Rare but it happened: a British officer, a captain of infantry, is stricken by PTSD and sobs at the senseless slaughter:

            May this Aryan bravery be finally put to a good use — uniting to rid our world, our nations, once and for all of the Eternal Jew and his white lackeys who betray their own people:

  4. https://www.wordnik.com/words/genocide

    I stand by the use of the word genocide. It doesn’t mean that all of a people are killed during a genocide. But the Irish were systematically murdered. There are so many Irish in America because of the genocide of the Irish, they were forced to leave. The attempt to extermante a people, which certainly happened in Ireland, also falls under the definition.

    I never said I never respected him, but to suggest that a campaign of genocide in Ireland didn’t take place is just ludicrous.

    As for the “Royal” families that we have today, those people aren’t who they claim they are.

    My parents are German and survived the war before settling in South Africa. Most in my generation served in the Border War and saw heavy contact. In the end we were sold out. So, I didn’t appreciate being talked to as if I didn’t know what I was talking about. If I misinterpreted, my apologies.

    • Thanks for your comments, brother. I know a lot about white South Africa…..and remain shocked to this day that it actually turned power over to Stone Age and even communist blacks.

      Now what Julius Malema talks about, for me THAT is genocide.

      Genocide: genus + cide = killing a people. (I took four years of Latin.)

      In the Wordnik definition you provided:

      “The systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination of a national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.”

      What we are dealing with here are horrendous massacres, not genocide. The purpose was to drive as many Irish out of Ireland as possible, since its population was exploding, from two to nine million, and the Irish were viewed as a permanent national-security threat to England. And the Irish were, in fact, in a most understandable sympathy with Catholic Spain and later on with Germany.

      “Ireland shall ne’er be free unless set free by Germany” was an Irish song in the 1910s.

      Had the English, or the Germans, truly set out to genocide the Irish, or the jews, or the Boers, for that matter, there would be none left.

      A “systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination” is something the English or Germans, efficient germanic peoples as all would attest, COULD have done but they did not.

      So the atrocious concentration camps of Lord Kitchener for the Boers, where perhaps 20,000+ innocent civilians died, were not genocide. Nor was the French Revolution genocide, where perhaps 40,000 nobles and others were killed out of 28 million French.

      Nor were the Amerindians genocided, or the blacks by the translatlantic slave trade.

      I think words should be used precisely, racial comrade. Since your parents were German, Genauigkeit, precision, is one of the great attributes of Germany, and it is how I run this website. 🙂 Thank you again for your comments.

  5. Thwre was IMO no deliberate Irish genocide by the British Government.

    Their response was abysmal, however, just like the absentee landlords [heartless British owners of Irish land].

    The British authorities warned the Irish people to diversify their crop, but the Irish ignored them.
    .
    If you wanted to commit genocide, why warn people about a famine?
    .
    Anyone who says it was deliberate genocide will believe Anne Frank wrote her own diary with a ballpoint pen from the future, or he believes in the tooth fairy.
    .
    Over 30% of the British army then was Irish volunteers.
    .
    Thefact is that living conditions in Britain were almost as appalling as in Ireland [which the novels of Charles Dickens depicted].
    .
    The British working-class man didn’t get the vote until March 1918. They had about as much political representation as the Irish.
    .
    Funny how Irish people who don’t even live in Ireland call it genocide, while those who live in Ireland refer to it as “the hunger,” yet don’t blame the British for a mixture of events that were both natural and man-made.

    • Thanks. I cannot think of a better example of the jews doing a divide-and-conquer than the insane Protestant-versus-Catholic madness.
      .
      Might as well hate all Italians for the rape of Boadicea’s daughters.

      • Excellent rebuttal, JdN. As we speak, Dr Allan Shatter is destroying Ireland via uncontrolled black/brown and East European gimmegrants.

        Due to this zionist shyster, Muslims are now building mosques in Ireland — to dominate and oppress the future Irish!… whilst the indigenous Irish sleep in cars or tents. Irish children sleep in police stations as there’s no housing for them, all caused by the Left and Dr Allan Shatter.

        • Thanks. This one jew has indeed tranformed the demography of Eire.

          But let us never forget that the IRA today is a marxist, woke, open-borders organization…. They accepted military help from the Soviet Union decades ago and got brainwashed at the same time. Jerry Adams is no jew, but something even worse — far worse — a white traitor.

          For every Alan Shatter there are ten goy lackeys.

          • Jerry Adams is a known paedo protector.I feel sorry for the Irish people for the leaders they elect.so much for a Free Ireland, now run by the EU. EU law overrides all Irish laws past present and future.

  6. I listened to the Rizoli show you did with great interest.

    There is an area in Central Florida outside of Tampa and Orlando which at a certain angle is something between paradise and the America of at least 80s or before culturally and demographically. There are confederate flags everywhere, gadsden flags, and lots of “Joe and the Hoe got to go” stickers. It’s really all about freedom.

    As far as elections we are talking about the “solid red” 11th Congressional district of FL where the Republican candidate is all but guaranteed to go to the US House. Enter Laura Loomer. Miss Loomer has moved from Palm Beach where she won the nomination two years ago but could not beat the deep blue Democrat Congresswoman, to the deep rural 11th – in order to primary out the old man Webster who always wins. Loomer riles up the crowds with her “America First” talking points while gently squeezing her eyes to read the micro reactions of the audience to see what works and what doesn’t. It all sounds great until you do the research (that most voters won’t) and find that Loomer has said many things like “if you don’t support Israel god will punish you.”

    Now, drawing it back to Jared Taylor. Loomer is a guest speaker at AMREN. I am glad Loomer knows the election was stolen and speaks against Communism but this whole deal leaves me with a very deep uneasy feeling.

    • Thanks for this comment.

      Yes, distraction and diversion are the name of the jews’ game. Get them gayz/blax/trannies/hispanics/russkies…. not the jew behind it all.

      I do know Central Florida a bit, and it used to be the true Deep South, with southern accents and views.

  7. Eustace Mullins, in his New History of the Jews, states that Jewish society lacks individuality in a radical way.

    “,,,, the member of the Jewish community, like the member of the Mafia, has no personal rights or freedoms. He can only do as he is told, and if his superiors decide that he may be thinking of betraying them, he is killed at once,” writes Mullins.

    Mullins contrasts the radical lack of individualism in Jewish society, where the Jewish nation is what lives on indefinitely, with Christianity, where the individual has eternal life.

  8. I´m all for sensible freedom.

    Not for anarcho-tyrannical “freedom”!

    Fuck this pseudo-freedom! I can tell you some examples what this “freedom” means. A good example are the laws.

    If someone steals my money per fraud – as happened to me and relatives – it is nearly impossible to get it back via the court system.

    Heck, a relative even has a verdict in his favour because someone did not pay him for work he performed, a substantial amount, namely 5000 €.

    But how to get it? Nearly impossible. The fraudster just has no money in his own bank account, but it is in his wife’s’.

    If we all him what he is, a fraudster, online, he could sue us for libel (though a court found against him).-.

    It has already happened in other cases. You are not allowed to call a fraudster a fraudster because it “could harm his business”! Yes, this is going on under what they ceaselessly call “the rule of law.”

    This law is only used to put people in jail for sedition or give them hefty fines.

    They are cracking down on people who are – so they say – condoning violence. What crime did they do? They are saying they are on the side of the Russians in Ukraine. This might these days warrant a police raid!

    The law § 140 [about crooked or incompetent business partners] is the same garbage as § 130 [= “incitement to racial hatred,” the main law from the Allies by which patriots are nailed].

    What do these articles say? “Public peace”…yeah, the “public” – I had neighbours breaking into the property of other relatives, and the case was dismissed because of “no public interest”. It´s only of “public interest” when someone uses the words “ngrs” or “muzzies” as a racial slur. I on my part don´t give a rat´s ass about that.

    It also happens that people are prosecuted if they “insult” politicians. That too might warrant a police raid. A woman had that because she presumably insulted the mayor of Berlin. In another case someone got his home raided because he called the interior senator of Hamburg a “dick”(“Pimmel”) on Twatter.

    There is this ugly, war-mongering cunt Agnes Strack-Zimmermann from the FDP who wants more weapons for Jewkraine, also sending out lawsuits.

    Even the ultra-leftists don´t like her!

    https://taz.de/Die-Wahrheit/!5907641/

    On the other hand, ngrs and other migrants who commit murder get no serious prison sentences. In 2019 a Somalian pushed a kid in front of an arriving train in Frankfurt. Of course the court said he is not criminally responsible, therefore he will be kept in a mental asylum.

    More recently another ngr cut off the hand of a man in rage (he actually had no argument going on with the man!) and was also just sent to a mental asylum by the female judge.

    Mental asylums are a joke. Some rapist (not a foreigner) was released some years ago. What did he do first? Well, not rape, but murdering a pensionist in his garden until he got caught again.

    But the system said he was now harmless.

    Freedom? Yes, for the libtards, foreigners and other scum living off the system.

    I´m either for a real rule of law where fraud is nearly impossible, and if it does happen, then the fraudster gets a real sentence and has to pay up…or I would go for real freedom and a kind of anarchy where I could beat up the fraudster until he gives me my money back.

    And if not, at least I would have the satisfaction of inflicting real pain.

    They fear a system change.I propose this:

    Put these monsters in a well-guarded prison with all these judges, attorneys, cops and other system whores with some knives and no food, wait until they get hungry and horny. Get my hint? Watch the facility closely until this scum has eliminated itself!

    After that, clear the mess. Win-win situation for all concerned.

    My country needs to be free of all enemies, whether of foreign background and indigenous Germans. Even more so the latter!

    I´m not condoning bolshevism, but I can understand why they had their purges after their revolutions. In their view they did the right thing.

    • Thanks for this.

      With the dying-out of the war generation, which was imbued with national socialist values and did an amazing job rebuilding a shattered country, now we see raw hatred for the German people.

      • Yes, but the hatred is also stirred by the self-hating traitors of their own country!
        The main problem is the “March through the institutions”(“Marsch durch die Institutionen”) by the leftists.
        Their judges are everywhere.

        Also a little correction, the § 140 is not about fraud. It is “condoning criminal acts”.
        And as the crooked justice systems sees Russias fight as this, they crack down on people saying the “wrong” opinion. See here please:
        https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__140.html

        Fraud is more regulated in the BGB(Civil code of law). Which doesn´t make it better.
        They got a guy named Peter Niehenke in jail without verdict for 17 months!
        http://www.rechtundgerechtigkeit.de/4-schwerpunkt-reportagen/fall-niehenke/hintergrund-adressbuchbetrug/wie-konnte-das-geschehen.html

        While Niehenke is a left-leaning oddball, in some things he is right. They even convicted him wrongfully of child molestation to besmirch him.

        We also had a talk about GDR before, and you often mention the egoistic demons of people. Yes, that showed after the GDR area was overtaken by the brD!
        Insurance fraud was a big thing with the new law system. People bought a cheap west-german car, often nearly scrapworthy, then provoked a rear-end collision and cashed in on that. So much about the use of the presumably new freedom they gained…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*