(continued from: https://johndenugent.com/name-the-jew-or-hate-our-brothers-they-misled-the-french-revolution-was-jews-satanists-and-white-trash-not-the-true-french-nation/)
From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in motion; each more violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders.
In their turn, each of these “leaders,” actually a puppet only of the real powers behind the revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to join those of his victims of yesterday.
Philippe Égalité, the Duke of Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for the revolution; to protect with his name and influence the infancy of the revolutionary club; to popularize Freemasonry and the Palais Royal; and to sponsor such acts as the ”March of the Women to Versailles.”
The “women” on this occasion, by the way, were mostly men in disguise.
[NN: Here Captain Ramsay is making a merely passing reference to this critical event, assuming the reader may know all about this “March of the Women to Versailles.” I think it would be wise to back up and explain the key events of 1789 and also about the normal nature of the French people, whom I know well — and who are really not bloodthirsty at all.
In the year 1789, here in America, the various individual states of the United States were busy voting on ratifying the US Constitution, and establishing a stable government, one that had ensured both freedom and order, as intended by George Washington, who was the president of the convention which created the Constitution and then served as the first president of the United States.
He was aided by highly respected, very successsful men, not low-lifes and white trash, but gentlemen who were brilliant, idealistic, but also practical and level-headed, such as Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin.
But the French Revolution, which many Americans of good will hoped would cause France to peacefully evolve in the right direction, leading to a constitutional monarchy and a good constitution, was quickly taken over by violent mobs that were being stoked to extreme hatred and violence by evil masterminds lurking in the shadows.
Their real desire was to murder tens of thousands of people, and eventually they got to do just that during the so-called Terror, the guillotine phase, when tens of thousands of innocent people had their heads chopped off, just as ISIS does today.
For Captain Ramsay, this level of hatred and violent mob action in itself was an indicator that some foreign element, not French at all, but Jewish, was steering things.
As for me, my own distant ancestry is French, Norman French. I minored in French at Georgetown University, they graduated me there with high honors, and I speak the language fluently. My second marriage was, in fact, to a Frenchwoman, and I lived in France with her in 2004-05, and made many friends there.
(Btw, unlike Barack Obama, I AM willing to release MY college transcript. I have dotted the French courses – one B and 4 A’s.)
Lavender fields
By coincidence or fate, I was even born on the 14th of July, Bastille Day, the day the French Revolution began, the day which is now the national holiday of that country, with a huge military parade in Paris being held, right through the Arc de Triomphe and down the Champs Elysées Boulevard. I always thought it cool all of France was celebrating my birthday. 😉
Students of the French Special Military School of Saint Cyr march down the Champs-Elysées Avenue during the annual Bastille Day military parade on July 14, 2014, in Paris, France.
So I can say, as a result of all this, that I know the French, and basically they are not a bloodthirsty people at all, nor are they cowards. And the fact of being beaten in war twice by the Germans is not really a disgrace. The Germans are magnificent warriors who have beaten many people, including even the Roman Empire, 1,600 years ago. It was destroyed by the ancient ancestors of the Germans of today.
And the Germans beat the British too, in 1940, after previously crushing Poland, Holland, Belgium, Denmark and Norway, and then the British Army fled from Dunkirk back over to England with just the shirts on their back. This happened only because Hitler let them go — rather than massacre them on the beach, because he wanted peace with England and not a bloodbath.
So the French are neither cowards nor violent, just normal people.
In fact, French mobs never chopped peoples’ heads off before, especially not those of beautiful women 😉 or well-dressed, stylish men.
They hate vulgarity, drunkenness and peasant behavior. They hate mobs, sweat and garlic breath. Even fistfights are almost unheard of in French culture — and a sign that you are a dimwit and a moron.
The French love their children, but are strict with them too, because they want to enjoy parenting, they want to enjoy their life, and just as the stereotypes go, they make love, they laugh, and they dine well, with good wine and cheese, loyal friends, and they trying to be merry as much as possible. The French are not a nasty people, au contraire. 🙂
Here are three short anecdotes from my own experience showing what the French are like, and that is anything but heavy, or fanatic, and lacking a sense of humor. They also respect others, even their former enemies:
1) They are supposed to dislike the Germans, but ever since World War Two, to my astonishment, they eat sauerkraut and they drink beer! They love to buy German cars, and always say “German products are robuste.” Even Charles de Gaulle admitted in his memoirs that “in 1940, the armies of Germany swept us aside in six weeks — like a broom.”
Once I overheard a French friend scolding his teenage daughter for not cleaning her room up, and he concluded with “Now clean it up, and schnell!” I asked him: “Did you just say ‘schnell’? That’s the German word for ‘fast’!”
He replied: “Well, I could say the French word, vite, but she might ignore me. If I say schnell, she won’t!”
2) Another time, he, his wife and I went to the festive opening of a new business, a big wine-and-cheese party, and the local people were invited by flyers to attend and meet the owner. My friend already knew the owner but then did introductions. “Marcel, this is my wife, Sophie, and this, John de Nugent, is ‘er loverre!”
It was such an unexpected joke, and it came out with perfect timing.
You can see the French love to laugh and have a good time. They don’t nurse hatred, they don’t want to cut your throat off like ISIS, and the worst thing you can say to a Frenchman is “you are long-winded and boring.”
For example, if your story goes too long, a Frenchman will cock his head sideways, and scratch his fingers up his cheeks to see if, during your speech, he finds he needs to shave again!
I have a final anecdote, which is not from my own experience, but from the end of the French Revolution in 1792. Despite all the hatred injected by ”operatives” into the French people, an ire aggravated by seeing aristocrats sneer at them while going to the guillotine, the death of the humble and beautiful Madame du Barry totally broke the spell of hatred that had been cast over the people.
Her real name at birth was Jeanne Bécu. She was a beautiful, shapely girl and the daughter of a seamstress. Louis XV made her his official mistress, which meant, as with earlier French monarchs, having her own apartment and official rank.
Louis XV ruled from 1715-74, a reign of 59 years. Jeanne Bécu became his mistress when he was 58 and she was just 25.
Now, the French knew that royal marriages were arranged; they often were alliances between countries and dynasties, and royal marriages usually were not based on love or even very happy. (This was certainly the problem with England’s Prince Charles and Lady Diana, who in the best of times, at most, merely liked each other.)
The French knew their monarchs were human beings like anyone else, who needed real love and fun in their relationships, not just the duties of producing a royal heir.
They also did not want their kings being blackmailed via adultery scandals, or jumping from bed to bed with unknown women who could poison them, or make them talk about state secrets during ”pillow talk.” So the practical French (and also the Chinese and Japanese, btw) gave their kings for centuries an official, approved mistress.
So this Jeanne Bécu, later ennobled as the Countess du Barry, was the official mistress of the previous king of France, Louis XV, the one before the Louis XVI who was overthrown and executed during the French Revolution.
After King Louis XV died in 1774, Madame du Barry was no longer at the court and she had other lovers. The Duke de Brissac was one of them.
As Wikipedia relates,
“During the French Revolution, Brissac was captured while visiting Paris, and was slaughtered by a mob. Late one night, Jeanne heard the sound of a small drunken crowd approaching the Chateau, and into the opened window where she looked out someone threw a blood-stained cloth. To Jeanne’s horror, it contained Brissac’s head, at which sight she fainted.
Madame du Barry, whose only crime was having been the mistress of the previous king of France, is dragged from jail to be taken to the guillotine. She could not believe she had to die for that.
As Wikipedia relates:
In 1792, Madame du Barry was suspected of financially assisting émigrés who had fled the French Revolution, and in the following year she was finally arrested. When the Revolutionary Tribunal of Paris accused her of treason and condemned her to death, she vainly attempted to save herself by revealing the hiding places of some gems she had hidden.[31]
On 8 December 1793, Madame du Barry was beheaded by means of the guillotine on the Place de la Révolution (nowadays, Place de la Concorde).
On the way to the guillotine, she collapsed in the cart and cried “You are going to do something awful to me! Why?!” Terrified, she screamed for mercy and begged the crowd for help. Her last words to the executioner were: “One more moment, Mr. Executioner, I beg you!”
Well, the Terror had finally gone too far even for the mob, hearing the screams of a beautiful and completely innocent woman. In a few months, Robespierre, the main villain of the Revolution, would himself be guillotined and the Terror was over. Later, Napoleon Bonaparte would come in, end the chaotic republic, restore law and order and make himself emperor.
So the French Revolution, which did involve appalling viciousness, lies, defamation, hatred, violence, and cruelty, was out of character for the French, which implies someone else was guiding it, another people, a people who for millennia have been well known for these very traits of viciousness, lies, defamation, hatred, violence, and cruelty.
Maximilien Robespierre made France a land of executions
And the exact same thing applies to the Paris Commune of 1870, 81 years later. Somebody was pulling the strings and scientifically bringing out the worst in people.
And the Treaty of Versailles in 1920 was the same way. An observer said that the assistant of every minister of the Allied governments creating this cruel document was a Jew. It was designed to leave the Germans poor and defenseless for a hundred years — after they had surrendered in good faith, and gone home to Germany, unbeaten, and desiring only peace,
In sum, I would say that as long as the French are eating their long fresh sticks of bread, their baguettes, and making love three times a week and drinking their wine (which is cheap and very good over there, btw), they are among the nicest and funniest people on earth, and loyal friends who really care. They will invite you to a party even if you are broke, as long as you are polite, witty and interesting. And they stay friends even after a bad argument, and are there for you in your hour of need.
I would only say to my fellow Anglos — to stay on their good side, do try hard to speak French when in France, just as Frenchmen, when they come to us in England or America, speak our language and not theirs. A Frenchman would never walk into a Chevrolet dealership in the United States and expect to be waited on in French, nor would he point out that Chevrolet and Cadillac are both French names. Now, as for the Parisians, well…. they are rude even to other Frenchmen! Paris is like the New York of France.
Having said all that about the normal French character, which is not sinister at all, here are the suspicious details about the French Revolution from the get-go.
One, it starts when a huge and ugly mob suddenly forms on July 14 (that is, on my birthday) in 1789, and after months of huge and suspicious rises in food prices and mass hunger. This mob had already seized 29,000 muskets (ancient rifles) elsewhere in the city, but now they needed the gunpowder and bullets stored in the Bastille, a prison and armory with enormous walls, but containing, btw, just six prisoners.
This guy, with a big, hooked nose, calling himself Stanislas-Marie Maillard, 28, was a captain of the ”Bastille Volunteers.” As a national guardsman (they were revolutionary troops), he participated in the attack on the Bastille.
The warden, Bernard de Launay, used rifle and cannon fire attempting to disperse the mob, killing about 98 of them, and could have blown the whole fortress sky-high with the 39,000 pounds of gunpowder located inside, and the surrounding neighborhood as well, but he finally offered to surrender, though that was refused, and came out with his men peacefully around 5 pm.
But his peace gesture was ignored, he was bayonetted and shot, then his head was cut off. The same happened to four of his officers and men, and all their heads were stuck onto pikes.
Others were lynched and murdered around the city for opposing the mob. A unit of the Royal French Army with 5,000 men that was located near the Bastille, very bizarrely, just watched all this — and did absolutely nothing.
So the Revolution began with one side trying to be peaceful, trying to be reasonable and seeking to avoid bloodshed, but the mob was into betrayal and murder from Day One.
Later, the hook-nosed Maillard was involved in the outrageous “March of the Women” to the royal castle at Versailles, where Ramsay says many of the so-called women were actually men wearing women’s clothes. They invaded the bedroom of the queen….
…murdered two royal bodyguards, put their heads on pikes, a real obsession with those agitators, as with the Israeli-created ISIS right now, and forced the king, queen and their children to come with them to Paris.
The Marquis de Lafayette, who had been a hero in the American Revolution, helping George Washington and securing French help for the Americans, was then back in France and was the commander of the National Guard.
He was terrified to see agitators among his soldiers, telling them to kill him, Lafayette, if he did not lead them to the king’s castle at Versailles outside Paris and bring the king and queen back to the city to be put under the control of, quote, “the people.”
The people had been told the utter falsehood that Marie Antoinette, the queen, who was the blonde, blue-eyed, German-speaking daughter of the emperor of Austria, had been told that the people had no bread to eat and had merely responded, “then let them eat cake!”
This vicious lie is a classic example of seizing on a popular perception — in this case, that the queen supposedly did not care about the poor and the hungry — and strengthening it by inventing a rumor — a pure lie, in this case — which seemed to prove it, and this defamatory lie then fanned what had been a certain level of popular resentment into a fiery hatred.
The Marquis de Lafayette was shocked to hear his own soldiers calling the queen a “bitch” or a “whore” as he escorted the royal family back to Paris, and to see his own troops carrying the heads of two royal bodyguards on pikes.
Going back to the hook-nosed Maillard, Wikipedia reports:
While serving as president of the improvised tribunal at the Prison de l’Abbaye, Maillard released the Marquis Charles Franois de Virot de Sombreuil, who had been saved by his daughter Marie-Maurille, to whom legend confers the status of l’héroïne au verre de sang. [ = ”the heroine of the glass of blood”]
This name refers to the legend that, in order to spare her father’s life, she was compelled to drink a glass of blood. Jules Claretie, the man who was second-in-command at the tribunal, gave an eyewitness account of the now Judge Maillard: “Maillard was a young man of thirty, large, dark, with matted hair.“[4]
I can tell you from MY experience, speaking as John de Nugent, that the French hate filthy clothes, nasty hair, and disrespect toward girls or women.
They would never ask a girl to drink a glass of blood in order to save her father.
The cruelty and the filthy, unshampood, black, matted hair suggest to me just one thing: Maillard was really an Orthodox Jew.
***
The Duke of Orleans was under the impression that the King and Queen would be assassinated by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic king.
The real planners of the march, however, had other schemes in view. One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and instead under the power of the ”Commune,” or Paris County Council, in which the [radical] Jacobins were supreme.
They continued to make use of Égalité right up to the time of the vote on the King’s life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin. His masters thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very shortly followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all classes.
The Marquis de 
Mirabeau [painting] played a similar role to that of Égalité. He had intended that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis as a democratic monarch with himself as chief adviser. He had no desire to see violence done to the King.
On the contrary, in the last days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to get the King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still commanding his army.
He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the Jacobin club of Paris — that bloodthirsty focus of revolution which had materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and Illuminati. It was Mirabeau’s voice, loud and resonant, that kept in check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.
There was no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so industriously to unchain.
In his last attempt to save the royal family by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down all opposition in the Jacobin club. That very evening he died by a sudden and violent illness; and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace writes:
“Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned.”
Thus, like Philippe Égalité, and later Danton….
Georges Danton
….and Robespierre, Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played.
We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:
“We execute Masons in such ways that none save the brotherhood can even have a suspicion of it.”
And again :
“In this way we shall proceed with those goy Masons who know too much.”
As Mr. E. Scudder writes in his Life of Mirabeau:
“He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been checked.”
The figure of [the Marquis] de Lafayette occupies the stage on several important occasions during these first revolutionary stages.
Lafayette at the battle of Brandywine, Pennsylvania, fighting for the Americans, where he was wounded
With General Washington at Valley Forge
In full dress uniform
With George Washington at Mount Vernon, Virginia
As commander of the Paris National Guard
He was one of those simple Freemasons, who are borne they know not whither, in a ship they have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are totally ignorant.
Above the “Declaration of the Rights of Man” is of course an eye and the pyramid of Masonry
Left side of the back of the US one-dollar bill
While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary violence, notably in the “March of the Women to Versailles” [of October 1789], during ”the Attack on the Tuileries [palace],” and then at the Champs de Mars …..
NN: The Champs de Mars, the “field of Mars,” that is, the drill field of the god of war, was the place where troops drilled in Paris.
On July 17, 1991, Lafayette ordered his troops to fire on a wild crowd demanding the king abdicate; at least twelve were killed.
…and during the mob attack on the palace of the Tuileries [of August 10, 1792], when the mob seized the king and his family in Paris, thus ending the monarchy.
The standoff on the staircase that became a shootout; the Swiss Guard in red faced off for 45 minutes with the insurgents, but refused to surrender — and then someone opened fire.
In the end, 700 of the 1,000 Swiss Guards were killed — or murdered after surrendering by the mob.
The murder even of the female staff of the palace was only narrowly prevented. (I [JdN] can say that no Frenchman — in his right mind — would ever gun down a woman, especially not a good cook. 😉 )
The Marquis too desired the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no threat to the King even from Philippe Égalité, whom he treated with the utmost hostility during and after ”the March of the Women to Versailles,” believing on that occasion that Égalité intended the assassination of the King and the usurpation of his crown.
[NN: Every time I have revisited the French Revolution by reading, I am struck at how often some mob shows up and how it then stays fired up, it marches all over Paris, and it wants blood for hours on end. First of all, mobs tend to cool off, especially if the other side is compromising, and no one is hungry, starving or being hurt.
But with the French Revolution, one sort of gets used to reading about mobs arising, marching, attacking buildings, cutting peoples’ heads off and sticking them on pikes, and increasing their demands all the time, as if it were somehow normal for French people or for anyone to just run around in a lather all day. This is just not the case, and Ramsay is trying to say that professional instigators were behind this phenomenon.
The Marquis de Lafayette sensed this as well, and when he ordered his troops to fire on the mob, it was because he could see clearly in their faces and chants that this was now a wild beast and not something to be reasoned with.
And why? Because it was being incited to violence by professional agitators such as the hook-nosed Maillard and many, many others, who likely were being trained and paid to do so.
The Marquis had hoped the French Revolution would stay sane, as did the American Revolution which he had helped to succeed, and that revolution ended up in sensible reforms, not bloodbaths, massacres and the overthrowing of important traditions of the country.
But the storming of the Tuileries palace ended the moderate phase of the Revolution, or rather it meant that entirely different people eventually took over.
The monarchy was abolished, and so-called “committees of vigilance” formed and ordered mass arrests of nobles, priests and the middle class. All property of nobles was confiscated. Monasteries and all religious orders were closed. Opposition newspapers were shut down, and the most uneducated of the mob, the sans culottes, meaning “people without underwear,” began to rule.
The very next month, prisoners all over France were simply massacred in their jail cells in the “September [1792] Massacres” as “escape risks.”
Wikipedia reports:
The first instance of massacre occurred when 24 non-juring priests [NN: that is, priests who would not take an oath of loyalty to the anti-Christian government] were being transported to the prison of the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prés, which had become a national prison of the revolutionary government.
They were attacked by a mob that quickly killed them all as they were trying to escape into the prison, then mutilated the bodies, “with circumstances of barbarity too shocking to describe” according to the British diplomatic dispatch.
Of 284 prisoners, 135 were killed, 27 were transferred, 86 were set free, and 36 had uncertain fates.[14] In the afternoon of 2 September 150 priests in the convent of Carmelites were massacred, mostly by sans-culottes.
[NN: Here you can see a sinister force, which had to be Freemasons or Jews, because the working class in most countries back then was devoutly Christian. Some intellectuals were atheists or agnostics, or perhaps deists, but the working class was not. So clearly there was some new and sinister force changing society.]
On 3 and 4 September, groups broke into other Paris prisons, where they murdered the prisoners, who, some feared, were counter-revolutionaries who would aid the invading Prussians. From 2 to 7 September, summary trials took place in all Paris prisons. Almost 1,400 prisoners were condemned and executed […]. Among the victims were more than 200 priests, almost 100 Swiss guards, and many political prisoners and aristocrats,[15] including the queen’s friend, the Princesse de Lamballe. [painting]
Wikipedia tells us of this princess that she fled to England after ”the March of the Women to Versailles,” but returned out of her deep friendship for the queen, Marie Antoinette, after writing her will, fearing death.
And here we see again the vile influence of Freemasonry and Jewry, for we read in the Wikipedia article on the Princess de Lamballe:
[She] was by nature reserved, and there was never any gossip about her private life. However, in popular anti-monarchist propaganda of the time, she was regularly portrayed in pornographic pamphlets, showing her as the queen’s lesbian lover to undermine the public image of the monarchy.[2]
Death
On 19 August, she and the Marquise de Tourzel, governess to the royal children, were separated from the royal family and transferred to the La Force prison.[6] On 3 September, she was brought before a hastily assembled tribunal which demanded she “take an oath to love liberty and equality and to swear hatred to the King and the Queen and to the monarchy”.[7]Some reports allege that she was raped and that her breasts were cut off, in addition to other bodily mutilations,[10][11] and that her head was cut off and stuck on a pike.
Other reports say that it was brought to a nearby café where it was laid in front of the customers, who were asked to drink in celebration of her death.[10]
Other reports state that the head was taken to a barber in order to dress the hair to make it instantly recognizable,[11] though this has been contested.[9]
Following this, the head was replaced upon the pike and was paraded beneath Marie Antoinette’s window at the Temple.[12]
Those who were carrying it wished the queen to kiss the lips of her favourite, as it was a frequent slander that the two had been lovers. The head was not allowed to be brought into the building.[12]
In her historical biography, Marie Antoinette : The Journey, Antonia Fraser claims that the queen did not actually see the head of her long-time friend, but was aware of what was occurring, stating, “…the municipal officers had had the decency to close the shutters and the commissioners kept them away from the windows…one of these officers told the King ‘..they are trying to show you the head of Madame de Lamballe’…Mercifully, the Queen then fainted away”.[12]
[Back to the book.]
***
[Lafayette] evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did dash back to Paris in an effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war. Mirabeau’s death followed, and Louis’ fate was sealed.
The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robespierre, and the fanatics of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.
Charlotte [de] Corday [d’Armont] avenged the victims of the Terror by stabbing Marat to death in his bathtub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Corday
Being taken from her cell to the guillotine
In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible “September massacres”; eight thousand persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris alone, and many more over the country.
It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held till the time of the massacre in their prisons by one Manuel, Procureur [ = Prosecutor] of the Commune.
Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much concerning the influences which were at work behind the scenes. In his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:
“The demand of the Communauté de Paris, ( 4 ) now the Sanhedrin of the Jacobins, was, of course, for blood.”
Again, on page 56 Sir Walter Scott writes :
[33] “The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robespierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue.”
Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:
“The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners.”
Some of the names of these “foreigners” are worthy of note. There was Choderlos de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said to be of ‘‘Spanish origin.”
There was Manuel, the Procureur of the Commune, already mentioned. He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie Antoinette.
There was [Jacques-Louis] David the painter, a leading member of the Committee of Public Security, which “tried” the victims.
His voice was always raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this fiend used to preface his “bloody work of the day with the professional phrase, ”Let us grind enough of the Red’.”
Jacques-Louis David, ”Self-Portrait”
The fanatic republican David later hypocritically made tons of money painting the emperor Napoleon
Napoleon crossing the Great Saint Bernard (Pass in Switzerland)
David it was who inaugurated the ”Cult of the Supreme Being” ; and organized “the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted for every external sign of rational devotion.”
The Cult of the Supreme Being is celebrated in June of 1794 in the Tuileries Garden in Paris
([This is from] Sir Walter Scott, The Life of Napoleon Buonaparte, Emperor of the French. With a Preliminary View of the French Revolution. Edinburgh 1827, Vol.2.)
Sir Walter Scott of Edinburgh, Scotland was a bestselling author across Europe .
Sir Walter Scott’s mansion, Abbotsford
Interior hallway
There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five “Directors,” who, with a ”Council of Elders,” became the government after the fall of Robespierre, being known as the Directoire. The terms “Directors” and “Elders” are, of course, characteristically Jewish.
One other observation should be made here; it is that this important work by Sir Walter Scott, in nine volumes, revealing so much of the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his other works, and is almost unobtainable. [This was true in 1952.]
Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full significance of this fact; and the added importance it lends to Sir Walter Scott’s evidence regarding the powers behind the French Revolution.
[34] To return to the scene in Paris, Robespierre now remains alone, and apparently master of the scenes ; but this again was only appearance.
Let us turn to The Life of Robespierre, by one G. Renier, who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal.
Maximilien de Robespierre
He writes :
“From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robespierre) the Terror was at its height. It was never the dictatorship of a single man, least of all Robespierre. Some 20 men (the Committees of Public Safety and of General Security) shared the power.”
“On the 28th July, 1794,” to quote Mr. Renier again,
“Robespierre made a long speech before the Convention … a philippic against ultra-terrorists ” uttering vague general accusations.
‘I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively that among the authors of this plot are the agents of that system of corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the Republic; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is at its base’.”
Mr. Renier continues with all a Jew’s satisfaction:
“Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!”
In this smug sentence Mr. Renier unwittingly dots the i’s and crosses the t’s, which Robespierre had left uncompleted.
Robespierre’s allusion to the “corrupting and secret foreigners” was getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth would be out.
At 2 a.m. that night Robespierre was shot in the jaw, and early on the following day he was dragged to the guillotine.
Once again let us recall Protocol 15:
“In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much.”
[35] Note : In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew John Wilkes Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his Cabinet that he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt-free basis, similar to the debt-free money known as “Greenbacks” with which he had financed the American Civil War.
This is Weimar-Denmark entertainment lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG0_05Udm2U
That drawing of Stanislas-Marie Maillard reminds me a lot of a current-day evil Jew named Gene Simmons (real name Chaim Witz):
https://news.yahoo.com/kiss-gene-simmons-says-anyone-013123220.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Simmons
Alex Jones isn’t happy with Simmons:
https://blabbermouth.net/news/alex-jones-blasts-gene-simmons-over-anti-vaxxer-comments-are-you-stupid-or-are-you-consciously-evil