Zündel in Mexico 2015, paying homage to Salvador Borrego; how Borrego woke up to the JQ in 1940; Margi’s translation

For almost 20 years, Margi translated important documents from German, French, and Spanish for me and the Barnes Review revisionist magazine.

.

…..The great Ernst Zündel in 2015

Ernst (I knew him and his wife Ingrid) did seven years in American, Canadian, and German jails 2003-10 for saying the truth about the Holofraud and the fake gas chambers.

I should add that the American and Canadian jails were by far the cruelest and most sadistic. In Toronto, Canada, Zündel was treated as a mega-terrorist…. given only a plastic “spork” to eat with and pencil stubs — three-inch  pencils — since he supposedly would turn anything else like a full-length pencil into a weapon!

He also was not allowed a table in his cell! Yes, he would have made a small table into a lethal weapon, too, which is ludicrous for anyone who knew the man…..

And the Canadian jewthorities fed him junk food, knowing he was a health-food and vitamin fan.

It is nice to see Ernst giving full credit for his political and racial awakening to Adrien Arcand, a French-Canadian who in 1961 deprogrammed the then 23-year-old Ernst about his own native Germany and the Third Reich era. Before Arcand, he had believed all the lies the puppet West German government had spoon-fed to him and all the other young West Germans.

Adrien spent five years in a Canadian prison for opposing WWII: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrien_Arcand

Ernst also honors the work of the late, great Robert Faurisson, a French professor and Sorbonne graduate, whom I knew, and publisher Willis Carto, for whom I worked for years myself.

Just two weeks after I met the professor, four jewish thugs set upon him in front of his own house in Vichy, France, kicking him in the head and ribs.

Willis Carto (orig. Carteau) was a huge figure in white nationalism and Holocaust revisionism for decades. A skilled businessman, he knew how to generate the income to pay salaries and fund important projects.

.

The grim personal background to Ernst, living after prison in Germany, being in Mexico in 2015 was that it was the only way he could see his wife Ingrid again, a  US citizen living in Tennessee in the United States,  in this third country of Mexico, after he had been abducted under color of law by US authorities in 2003 on a fake visa violation.

After Ernst did his five years in a German prison and was released in 2010, Ingrid was threatened with arrest for Holocaust denial if she came to Germany to see her husband — and he was banned from the USA as a criminal!

So, thanks to the jews, before that conference in Mexico in 2015, this married couple, Ernst and Ingrid, had not seen each other in 13 years!

.https://www.bitchute.com/video/sbMRWe7PTk2j/

Obviously, I have mixed feelings with regard to Fred Leuchter, whom Zündel mentions.

While his Leuchter Report did debunk the Auschwitz gas chambers, he was no saint, as Margi and I experienced painfully in 2019. Leuchter borrowed $20,000 from Margi under radically false pretenses, and he ignored all appeals to repay this as she battled the cancer that would take her life.

Had Leuchter repaid her, she would have been able to afford a private cancer clinic that used alternative cancer therapies, not the usual chemo and radiation — where the cancer is defeated yet soon comes back, just as it did with Margi.

 

Margi and I at the Mayo Clinic. While it is a wonderful place, with chemo and radiation the cancer often recurs. She died in September  2022 after four and a third years of my caring for her, which caused us both enormous pain, time, and expense, not to mention my grief when she died.

And Leuchter’s gas-chamber report, though it showed there was no cyanide at all on the walls of the supposed homicidal gas chamber, was flawed. Chemist Germar Rudolf, whom I hosted briefly at my home in 2022 when he was in trouble, had to redo everything and issue his own report. In point of fact, Leuchter had no engineering degree, or chemistry degree, but had majored in history in college and became an execution specialist only because he needed a job — and few wanted to specialize in such a macabre career as executions by poison gas or electrocution.

Ernst ends his speech, where he gives full credit to other great men in our Cause, on a noble note about how he was proud to have spread the truth –and that he never thought once of renouncing the truth despite all the persecutions, prosecutions, and seven years of hard prison time he endured.

The  conference in Mexico where Ernst spoke was in honor of the 100th birthday of Salvador Borrego.

Salvador Borrego Escalante (1915-2018), who died January 8, 2018, at age 103, was a Mexican historian and journalist most noted for his well-written, factual Revisionist books in which he repeatedly refuted, among other sacred cows, the criminal Jewish Holocaust swindle.

He wrote and published over fifty books on topics that include politics, economics, military history, medicine, sociology, religion, metaphysics, journalism, philosophy and more. Over the years he was editor of thirty-seven newspapers. He was considered an impeccable gentleman, and “Don Salvador” was revered by all who knew him.

Borrego started out as a serious Establishment journalist and worked for decades for the national daily Excelsior. He insisted that Adolf Hitler was defamed by a lying media using fake news stories. His most famous book is Derrota Mundial (“Worldwide Defeat”) published in 1953 with a foreword by the national luminary José Vasconcelos.

In Derrota Mundial Borrego claimed that World War II was provoked by a Jewish-controlled Soviet Union, which managed to drag the western Allies into its war against the NS Reich. With the defeat of the National Socialists the world fell into the clutches of Jewish “supercapitalists” – hence the title of the book.

Borrego’s masterpiece has become hugely popular among nationalists worldwide. It has been reprinted 48 times, and is one of the most widely read Revisionist books in the Spanish-speaking world. It is reportedly used in some conservative schools and colleges in Western Mexico.

Borrego always denied being an antisemite, arguing that he just criticized the Jewish leadership, and that criticizing the Jewish leadership is no more antisemitic than criticizing the Mexican government is “anti-Mexican.” He also denied being right-wing, claiming that “it is the bankers who are the real ‘right wing.’”

Borrego wrote books about other conspiracies as well, such as how the United States ruling class controls Mexico by sponsoring Freemasonry and Protestantism, how the supposedly “criminal” Waffen-SS, in fact, consisted of noble warriors and did not engage in any atrocities, how scientific medicine fights against real medicine, and, of course, how there are crypto-communists throughout all Western societies.

Fifteen years older than the Catalan Revisionist writer Joaquin Bochaca, with whom he had a cordial friendship, Borrego was considered the dean of Historical Revisionism in the Spanish-speaking world.

 

INTERVIEW WITH SALVADOR BORREGO

This article appeared in a 2018 issue of The Barnes Review.

This interview with the great Mexican Revisionist author Salvador Borrego has been translated by Margaret Huffstickler from a pdf version of his masterpiece Derrota Mundial on the Aaargh/VHO site: http://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres9/BORREGOdermund.pdf, where it appears as an appendix.

Margi and I in 2018, when she translated this

The link at the bottom of the article leads to the previous location of the Argentine nationalist website El Nacionalista which, we are informed, existed from 2005-2017 but has now been “baneado” – banned. The interview has appeared on several Internet sites, but with no clue as to the authorship. This is, to our knowledge, the interview’s first appearance in English.

Question: This book entitled Derroto Mundial (Worldwide Defeat) is very controversial, particularly controversial. To help us form an accurate judgment, what was your motive in writing it?

Salvador Borrego: Well, simply to provide a version different from the propaganda in vogue, because in all major conflicts, such as World War II, the two sides use propaganda as one of their most effective weapons. I wanted to give an account that wasn’t cloaked in propaganda.

Q: You consider that there was propaganda in favor of the Allied Powers? And of the Nazi-Fascist Axis? But how did you identify it?

SB– You see, I worked in the newspaper Ultimas noticias de Excelsior (Latest News from Excelsior)

***

[footnote1: Founded in 1917 and still going strong today, Excelsior, the parent newspaper of Ultimos Noticias, was the second most widely read newspaper in Mexico in 1940.],

***

which started circulating at three o’clock PM. At two o’clock in the afternoon, the closing time of the edition, it was nine o’clock in the evening in Europe. Because of this, almost all the information of the day was received by Ultimas noticias. For one reason or another I read a lot of messages – it was part of my work – both those that were published and those that there was no place for; so I had been following the course of events day by day since before the war began, and it was becoming increasingly evident that there were contradictions between the scenarios presented by the two sides. So the question arose: what is the truth? Or, what is the degree of truth in this version and in its opposite?

*** This was the top newspaper in Mexico!”

***

Q: Possibly you already had some opinion at the time that was leaning toward one or another version.

SB: Well, no. I was pretty much neutral. I could even say that President Roosevelt’s speeches and all that derived from them were more focused, more serene than those of Hitler or Goebbels. The messages that originated in Berlin sometimes spoke of a supposed understanding between the Bolshevism of the USSR and the plutocracies – as they called them – of the Allied Powers. And another thing: they said that this supposed understanding had as its final goal the domination of the world. That sounded like fantasy to me.

Q: So how did you come to develop the thesis that you outline in your book, which refers precisely to a plan to establish a world government?

SB: A series of details gave me, very gradually, the impression that the Allied powers were trying to hide something. It is quite natural that propaganda exalts its own virtues, just as it is done in marketing. But if it was about informing the public, and therefore so much emphasis was placed on objectivity and truth, so why the increasing pressure to hide facts?

Q: Are you talking about pressure on the media?

SB – Of course to enumerate all the details of this pressure would be long and tiring, but here’s an example:

Eight months after England and France declared war on Germany, during which time they had been gathering armies to start their offensive, Germany got the jump on them and attacked on May 10, 1940.

The Little Maginot line [footnote 2: The very expensive and sophisticated Maginot Line of military bunkers and fortifications was built by France from 1930-39 to slow any German advance into France.] was broken and the Anglo-French troop lines began to be overwhelmed. It happened then that in Mexico a group of advertisers led by Mr. Jacques Soustelle  was formed, which threatened to withdraw advertising from the Excelsior because, according to them, it was favoring the Nazis.

***

[footnote 3: Jacques Soustelle spent his life working to further the interests of the would-be rulers of the world. As an anthropologist he espoused the concept of moral relativism, according to which perspective Aztec sacrifice was just another culture. After his successful subversion of the Mexican press as co-chair of the Allied Information Bureau, and upon the fall of France, he became the representative of Charles de Gaulle’s Free French Movement in Mexico – his job being to prevent Petain’s government from forming diplomatic ties in the Americas.

In 1943 he was appointed head of the Free French secret service in France, furthering the illegal and murderous activities of the French Resistance. He helped bring de Gaulle to power in the early 1950s, and was one of his closest councillors, but in 1963, disagreeing with de Gaulle’s decision to accord freedom to Algeria, he joined the Organisation armée secrète (OAS), a terrorist group that sought to overthrow and even assassinate de Gaulle.

This group was supported by David Ben Gurion and Israeli intelligence, who also allegedly supported Soustelle in his resultant exile from France from 1963-68. After his return from exile in the 1968 general amnesty, the rest of his life was spent in similarly nefarious activities, though with more plausible deniability.]

 

***

The first blow was struck against Ultimas Noticias, because it was the paper that first published the events of Europe – since at two o’clock in the afternoon, as I explained before, we already had information about everything that had happened there up until nine o’clock at night (European time). The editor of the newspaper, Don Miguel Ordorica, invited Mr. Soustelle to go to the newsroom all morning so that he could see objectively how the newspaper was made. Mr. Soustelle accepted, and consequently he was shown the messages that came from the Associated Press with its headquarters in New York.

The Little Maginot line had just been breached in Sédan, France, and some positions in northern France were beginning to fall into the hands of the Germans. Mr. Ordorica said to Mr. Soustelle: “In your store, you display the merchandise that most attracts the attention of your buyers. We in the newspaper business do the same. The most important news is on the front page; if it merits it, it will even be spread over eight columns;” and he added, more or less: “The war will be won, not in Mexico, but in Europe.”

However, the group of advertisers began canceling their advertising in order to sink the newspaper. The editor, Mr. Ordorica, was forced to retire. The goal, in short, was to manipulate information so that the reader did not know, or only half knew, what was happening.

***

[footnote 4. Several recent books have confirmed from a scholarly perspective the subversion of the wartime Mexican press of which Borrego had a “worm’s eye view”.

The following passage is from Mexico in the 40s – Modernity, Politics and Corruption by Stephen R. Niblo (1999, Scholarly Resources, inc.):

The Inter-Allied Propaganda Committee in Mexico City quickly organized a campaign aimed at convincing sympathetic corporate advertisers to withdraw their business from unfriendly newspapers. US diplomats joined this Franco-British effort, and the Rockefeller committee produced its own blacklist, which excluded Excelsior. . . At a board meeting of Excelsior attended by Allied diplomats, Miguel Ordorica, the pro-German editor of Ultimas Noticias, was given an indefinite leave of absence. By May, Excelsior had shifted to the use of the Associated Press as its news service.

And, from a 1999 paper by Jose Luis Ortiz Garza entitled Mercenary Writers of British Propaganda in Mexico During the Second World War: “Thousands of news articles, editorials and features claiming to be written by Mexican journalists, political commentators or military specialists, were produced by writers in the pay of  British propaganda agencies during the Second World War in Mexico.”

Just how massive was the subversion of the wartime Mexican press? According to a graph in Mexico in the 40s, in just five days – from March 17-21, 1941 – the top eight papers in Mexico ran 12,639 articles placed by the Inter-Allied Propagand Committee.]

***

Q: Well, but that was just one case.

SB: Yes, but there were many who collaborated to ensure that only one version would be known of even the most relevant facts.

Another example: before the war began, Pope Pius XII believed that the butchery could still be avoided, and instructed his various nuncios to make inquiries in Berlin, Rome, Poland, Paris and London in pursuit of this goal.

Mussolini and Hitler replied that they were willing to negotiate at a summit meeting of the five countries. Paris said that the papal intervention was totally inappropriate; London and Warsaw refused as well.

This was minimized in the messages by the New York agencies. That is, both the Associated Press and the United Press continued to present a picture in which on one side were the good guys and on the other the villains.

***

[footnote 5: The refusal of Britain and France to listen to the Pope’s urgent appeal for peace on the eve of the German-Polish clash which triggered World War Two has been carefully covered up. While Leon Degrelle, Captain Archibald Ramsay, and other nationalists writers have discussed it, “mainstream” media do not mention it at all. TBR’s coverage of this important historical incident can be found in its 2006 issue in the form of a chapter entitled “Pius XII, the Pope of Peace”, from Joaquin Bochaca’s book Los Crimenes de los “buenos” (The Crimes of the “Good Guys”)] [translated by Margi].

***

Q: But did other, similar events occur in all the media?

SB: Yes, they did occurr. For example, when the Allied forces were defeated in Norway very early in the war, and were retreating to the sea to return to England, a newspaper was afraid to state it so clearly and broke the news in this way: the headline said, “The Allies are Advancing toward the Sea!”

And it is because the pressure of a group of advertisers, headed by foreigners, caused the newspapers to self-censor, so that in one way or another they concealed or distorted what was happening although the sun could not be completely hidden with the ten fingers of the hand.

Q: There was no television at that time; what happened with radio ?

SB: The same as with the newspapers, but even worse! The government sent an official to the X.E.W. radio station to censor the news. I saw it at close hand, since I wrote the texts for the news at 7:45 and 10:45 at night. 90% or 95% of the international news was required to consist of one side’s version, and the rest – and sometimes less – that of the opposing side. One bookshop was closed for selling hundreds of German books and magazines; in short, it was clear that no objectivity would be allowed in the news.

Whoever wanted to write an account of the Second World War would have thought back then that he would have to make his way through clouds of propaganda to approach the historical truth. Whoever was attempting to comment on the Second World War would have felt inclined to delve into masses of historical, sociological, racial, religious and economic data, etc., to better explain the major events that were happening.

Q: So with what you have told us, did you reach any conclusions?

SB– No. Not at all. In four or five questions and answers one cannot explain a whole process that took many years. I spent almost fifteen years collecting and classifying data and carrying out research in various disciplines from 1936 to 1951, a  period of 15 years; it then took me two years to write and rewrite the first edition of Derrota Mundial, which was published in December 1953.

Q: There is international talk of a revisionist current in history, and it is said that you were the first revisionist, or one of the first. Is that true?

SB: Well, I could go into many details and this talk would go on and on; in fact there have been many who have written about World War II from very different points of observation and have come to the same conclusions as I, without our knowing each other.

Q: Like who?

SB: Well, there is the English military historian B.H. Liddell Hart; the Spanish writer Joaquín Bochaca; Major General J.F.C.Fuller; David Irving; Father Julio Meinvielleof Argentina; Mauricio Carlavilla, a Spanish historian; the Belgian León Degrelle; Saint Paul of France

***

[footnote 6. Here Borrego is clearly referring to Paul Rassinier (1906-1967), who is considered the father of Holocaust Revisionism.  A Communist, and a member of the Resistance during World War II, he spent time in various German concentration camps and was thus well placed to refute the blatant propaganda he heard after the war which described the lagers as “death camps”. Broken in health by his wartime experiences, he dedicated the rest of his life to writing books exposing the lies.];

***

Doctor Dmitri Konstantinov, a Russian combatant, and many others whom I can not remember now but who are neither Nazis nor fascists.

Q: But the books of those authors are little known. They quickly disappear from the market.

SB: That’s right, and do you know why? Because there is a so-called Anti-Defamation League that is responsible for preventing all testimonies from circulating that are not favorable to the group that from Moscow, Washington and New York directed the Second World War.

Actually that war was one of many battles – huge, yes, but not the end of the fight. The struggle continues and the propaganda also continues.

It can be said that the war is now proceeding through other tactics such as that of neo-liberalism, that of disorienting the youth, that of dissolving the family, that of fragmenting the church, that of encouraging drugs, etc.

It is a war that has been going on for two thousand years. The Doctor of Theology Father Alfredo Sainz considers that history has a theological meaning and that this will become more evident in the coming years, but that is another topic . . .

Your questions about how Derrota Mundial was born are already answered, at least in a general way, so far as it can be done in a brief talk.

Q: One last question, Don Salvador. The prologue by José Vasconcelos, how did you manage get him to write it for Derrota Mundial?

SB– Well, when the first edition was published I hardly wanted to approach friends for a prologue because it was a very controversial subject and I did not want to compromise them, but one day at the Garcia Varseca publishing chain, where the lawyer José Vasconcelos

***

[footnote 7: José Vasconcelos Calderón (1882–1959) has been called the “cultural caudillo” of the Mexican revolution. He was an important Mexican writer, philosopher and politician, and one of the most influential and controversial personalities in the development of modern Mexico. His philosophy of the “cosmic race” – of a mixed, Latin American, “bronze” race, which he glorified – affected all aspects of Mexican sociocultural, political, and economic policies.]

***

was assisting them, they introduced me to him and he said: “Are you the one who wrote Derrota Mundial?” “Well, yes,” I told him, and then he praised the book and I took the opportunity to say to him, “As you can see, my book does not have a prologue. Could you do it for me?” and he said: “Yes, with pleasure.” And that was how the second edition was prefaced, let’s say, accidentally.

Q: Editions abroad: What countries?

SB: Well, there have been editions in Argentina; they tell me that six editions were printed, then one was published in Spain, but it seems that there were pressures and they were blocked from printing more editions there.

Q: Thank you very much, Don Salvador.

http://elnacionalista.mforos.com/680890/3142473-entrevista-a-salvador-borrego/